I dont think I even want to hear that interview now. It sucks that these guys should make up contracts to prevent certain subject matter from being questioned
Yah, such a lose-lose situation. If he says no, people assume he’s lying. If he says yes, he’s a cheater. Douche interviewer.
I think it’s outright rude to ask someone if they are using illegal drugs on camera like that. Could you imagine a TV interview with an actor/actress who had never been in trouble with the law and them being asked about using cocaine?
[quote]Scott M wrote:
I think it’s outright rude to ask someone if they are using illegal drugs on camera like that. Could you imagine a TV interview with an actor/actress who had never been in trouble with the law and them being asked about using cocaine?[/quote]
For some reason, that would be more acceptable. Sheeple think:
Cocaine: illegal, dangerous
Steroids: illegal, dangerous, MAKE YOU A FUCKING CHEATER!!!
I think he handled it as well as you can handle that kind of question. I’m gonna go start “The ‘I Hate That Interviewer Even More’ Thread”
Oh yeah, he should just shave his head. Problem solved.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
My back minus lovehandles.
I will obviously take more pics when I drop back down…but I personally love being this size with this level of strength.
Sorry about the lighting, but that is with the window open and the sun about to go down…and apparently none of you can wait.
[/quote]
For a natural bodybuilder, to have a back that big is ridiculous, hell, to weigh near 300lbs is ridiculous, nice work X. But seriously fuck u, that back is awesome and i want ur ‘back’ babies, so i can just eat them and hope they come out proportionately. well done sir.
and secondly, i reckon u could hang with rockel, lean. rockel’s shit. def not top 6. \
and no, im not ball hanging, so dont say it fuckers ![]()
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
I dont think I even want to hear that interview now. It sucks that these guys should make up contracts to prevent certain subject matter from being questioned[/quote]
The interviewer sucked so you aren’t missing much. I think he was trying to be “edgy” with that shit and yeah, it is bad that anyone would have to deal with that on camera.
I will say this, Jay Cutler fails as far as presenting himself on film…I mean REALLY fails…but it is clear he knows what he is doing and why and can easily explain it.
The problem is, unless you are a die hard meat-head and fan of bodybuilding, you won’t care what he says because of HOW he says it.
I don’t smile all of the time either, but you can bet I would make an effort on fucking television.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
I don’t smile all of the time either, but you can bet I would make an effort on fucking television.[/quote]
Agreed especially because he’s trying to get into hollywood. I think he should have went with the huge blonde villain approach not John America or whatever role he’s doing. People love the Dolf Lundgren “Drago” type role.

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
I don’t smile all of the time either, but you can bet I would make an effort on fucking television.[/quote]
Agreed especially because he’s trying to get into hollywood. I think he should have went with the huge blonde villain approach not John America or whatever role he’s doing. People love the Dolf Lundgren “Drago” type role. [/quote]
I vill break you.
Does anyone remember that Danish short film called “Dennis”? It’s the one about the bodybuilder who lives with his mum. I think Jay could manage that kind of role, but this action film sounds pretty dire.
[quote]pro-a-ggression wrote:
and secondly, i reckon u could hang with rockel, lean. rockel’s shit. def not top 6. \
and no, im not ball hanging, so dont say it fuckers ;)[/quote]
I’m not surprised you think Rockel is shit, it must be hard to get a good look when you’re trapped under X’s nutsack.
[quote]Rational Gaze wrote:
Does anyone remember that Danish short film called “Dennis”? It’s the one about the bodybuilder who lives with his mum. I think Jay could manage that kind of role, but this action film sounds pretty dire.[/quote]
Yea that was pretty disturbing.
So much for Cutler, he has a concussion and won’t be able to compete for a few weeks. This thread was a good idea. He was overrated anyway.
Knocked out by a CB, jeez…
[quote]Humbert wrote:
So much for Cutler, he has a concussion and won’t be able to compete for a few weeks. This thread was a good idea. He was overrated anyway.
Knocked out by a CB, jeez…[/quote]
Huh? He was knocked out by what?
I haven’t been following football much but I am assuming this is a Jay Cutler joke as in the QB.
[quote]Rational Gaze wrote:
[quote]pro-a-ggression wrote:
and secondly, i reckon u could hang with rockel, lean. rockel’s shit. def not top 6. \
and no, im not ball hanging, so dont say it fuckers ;)[/quote]
I’m not surprised you think Rockel is shit, it must be hard to get a good look when you’re trapped under X’s nutsack.[/quote]
Hahahahaha zing!

Jay 2 weeks out
[quote]Scott M wrote:
Jay 2 weeks out[/quote]
He looks incredible. In fact, if he hits the stage at next years O looking like that I think it’ll be another win.
but his waist is so thick and his hair looks funny, plus he’s white. He doesn’t deserve the win!
[quote]waylanderxx wrote:
but his waist is so thick and his hair looks funny, plus he’s white. He doesn’t deserve the win![/quote]
Agreed. I don’t see a V, just a giant box.

[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]waylanderxx wrote:
but his waist is so thick and his hair looks funny, plus he’s white. He doesn’t deserve the win![/quote]
Agreed. I don’t see a V, just a giant box.[/quote]
Mate, do you think he was being serious?