[quote]BrickHead wrote:
[quote]IamMarqaos wrote:
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
When I look back on my obese permabulking days, I look back with both regret and nostalgia. Permabulking gave me some problems, but I also liked some aspects of it.
Perhaps we can share our permabulking stories. Here is a serious of questions.
-
What did your permabulking diet look like?
-
What was one of your permabulking regular meals?
-
What did you like about permabulking?
-
What didn’t you like?
-
Why did you permabulk?[/quote]
-
Sample day:
Breakfast: 1 lbs of ground beef (30% fat) with spaghetti noodles and meat sauce
Snack and lunch: 20 slices of bread with ham/cheese/lettuce (1 loaf a day was the goal)
Dinner: regular meat and potatoes with veggies plus protein shake and dessert
After training: 1/2 gallon milk, yoghurt, cheese and a carb source like mashed potatoes with carrots (Dutch dish, has lots of grass fed butter in it!)
Before bed: Cottage cheese with sour cream
-
See snack and lunch: this was during college (in Holland) and during my first years in the States…
-
I like the just massive amount of work I could do on all these calories. I could easily do 20 sets of really hard work per muscle group on this diet. Felt strong and pumped all day long and actually slept really well, if I remember correctly…
-
what I didn’t like is that it ruined my physique.
Although it got me up to 290lbs (no steroids) I have completely ruined my proportions. I started out exceptionally skinny weighing only 116 lbs at 6 ft. By the time I hit a ripped 176 lbs I still only saw that really skinny kid in the mirror. Didn’t matter that I was offered modeling gigs and that I got compliments on a daily basis. I kept pushing the envelope and worked my way up to 216 then 235 followed by 269 and finally 290. All on a bone structure of a Frank Zane.
Yes I was large, and very impressive looking (in clothes) and I was incredibly strong but I did NOT look like a bodybuilder and my 26 inch waist was gone. I also was not in proportion with a super thick back and quads yet arms (extremities really) that did not match.
The other thing I do not like is that as a result I am ravenously hungry almost all the time. Not easy for me to lose fat whereas before it was no issue.
- why I started? I was 116 lbs at 6". I think virtually all of you can imagine the mental and emotional state that caused me to be in. I was also relentlessly bullied. Aside from being terribly skinny I had reddish hear, very, very pale skin with freckles as well as a stutter and you can see why I wanted to get to a size where no one messed with me.
Things is, I achieved that at 176-180 lbs and even more so at 216-225 lbs. There was never a reason to go all the way to 290 lbs.
Would not advice anyone to do this for more than 1-2 years. And only if they are under 150 lbs and tall, like I was. To anyone under 5’10" weighing more than 135 lbs when they start out, I’d say do not do this and aim for 2-3 lbs of mass gain a month for the first two years. Now, if that takes 6,000 calories a day…than go for it
I realize that it will not be linear and that some months you gain 1 and others you gain 5 lbs but gaining more than 20 lbs will likely lead to too much fat gain.[/quote]
That menu is insane! 20 slices of bread in a meal?! [/quote]
I was living in Holland at the time (I was born there) and it is the custom there to eat bread at breakfast and dinner. Even the smaller people probably eat 4-10 slices divided over those two meals. Very different bread than what you get here, by the way.
My view, at the time of course, was to simply eat twice what other people were eating so I would get twice as big, twice as fast.
Youth is wasted on the young… 
Lets not forget that I was exceptionally skinny with a blazing metabolism. 116 lbs at 16 years of age at 6 feet. I weighed 32 lbs less than the next lightest guy in my class 