This guy is an anti vaxxer known for spreading misinformation in order to make a quick buck.
His claims are not compatible with the massive breadth of data available surrounding cholesterol and can be easily debunked.
I understand some people believe they are renegade free thinkers (and in some cases they actually are) but when vehemently pressing against a heavily engrained scientific construct please take a hard look at the literature available
Biology/physiology isnāt malleable like āsocial sciencesā aka bullshit⦠Itās hard to bullshit biology, anatomy and physiology.
Itās like how the people against covid vaccines often donāt actually understand how the vaccines work (which is fair enough as vaccine are somewhat complicated, mRNA vaccines even more so)
But I wish people would learn about what they tend to push against before forming hard and fast conclusions.
If someone (not you) doesnāt have the time to learn (learning about cholesterol shouldnāt take longer than a few hours)⦠They shouldnāt claim an opinion as fact. Iām happy to debate you on this subject.
If I have a hunch Iāll say "I have a suspicion raised LDL might be benignāā
And Iāll say āpeople with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia usually die before the age of 25 due to dyslipidemia aloneā.
Cholesterol matters.
I will cite my references in apa7 format. Give me your side of the story, try change my mind. Iāve heard what Asseem Malhotra has to say⦠And I believe he is disingenuous
As a matter of fact I believe he is getting sued by a colleague of his for willfully promoting medical misinformation that cannot be supported by ANY metric of validate literature beyond pseudoscience and while a normal person can promote pseudoscience, when a doctor does so on a large scale it amounts to medical malpractice.
Legal trouble for medical malpractice seriously tarnishes the career of a doctor if the case is serious enough to be made public
Note some doctors make fairly outlandish claims, particularly in the world of orthopaedics where experimental procedures pop up fairly often. Subacromial decompression, thermal capsullorsphy used to be standard procedure in the world of shoulder surgery⦠Now subacromial decompression is coined (SAD) due to poor outcomes and thermal capsullorsphy has largely been made obsolete as itās not that effective at tightening the shoulder joint and often led to capsular necrosis
Alternative techniques have been developed with higher success rates
However there was a body of evidence looking at these procedures at one point in time suggesting they may be effective. If a doctor were to suggest thermal capsullorsphy over say⦠A capsular shift today and the patient had a bad outcome one could credibly consider it to be malpractice.