[quote]Sexxxton wrote:
I adhere to what Dorian said, which was a little English is ok, but you should be able to hold the weight at the top of the positive motion – a static hold. Otherwise you didn’t ‘muscle’ the weight up, you just used momentum. If you use momentum, you’re not working the muscle – it’s in your joints.
That chick was awesome. However, she couldn’t hold that weight to her hip. NO way. Just like the OP. He needs to drop to at least 80.
Depends if you’re ego lifting, or lifting for gains.[/quote]
80lbs??? How is he going to make gains doing super slow ‘perfect form’ reps with 80 fucking lbs, when he can row 125 without too much issue.
I’m pretty sure I started out being able to DB row 80lbs with pretty decent form when I weighed 145lbs.
And by the way, Dorian was using very heavy weights when he was talking about a slight hold, he didn’t get to that size by fucking around with 80lb DB’s.[/quote]
Thing is, with the first video, chances are his back is not even lifting 80lbs because of all that momentum thats used… I would kinda agree with sexxton on that
personally i think the 3-5 rep range should never be used. [/quote]
Alright, I have had quite enough of this shit.
You are a 160lbs beginner, stop handing out fucking advice.
Had you not talked shit to Jax in the other thread I would have not responded to you, but you are starting to get irritating.
[/quote]
Sorry i dont update my tmuscle profile quite often and i have put on 30 pounds of lean muscle mass since i have joined. I dont post pics because i work at a bank and have had bad experience with co workers on this site printing my pictures out and bringing them to work. and sorry but maybe you should get CT’s cock out of your throat for a second because you and i both know CT did not build his substantial amount of muscle mass doing anything in the 3-5 rep range and their are books on why this rep range is not ideal for maximum muscle size or strength. Hence why their is Max effort training 1-3 reps, dynamic effort 1-3 explosive reps, and repetition method training. Read a real fucking book and stop riding e gurus cocks. I would be more then glad to PM you pics of myself to prove that Im no 160lb fucking beginner but your such an arrogant prick that you would probably post em. and by the way by the looks of your physique you shouldnt be giving out advice either.
Sorry i dont update my tmuscle profile quite often and i have put on 30 pounds of lean muscle mass since i have joined. [/quote]
Bullshit.
Bullshit
LOL, you ASSume so much it really is funny. I haven’t read a single thing from CT other than the few times he has posting in this forum…
Lol.
There you go ASSuming again. I don’t give a fuck about you, other than to point out you need to stop handing out advice.
hmmm. Every pic in my profile is like 6 months old… Except my arm pic. HHHMMMMM…
But keep putting me down without any pictures of yourself up, makes you look like a real champ. Do you make comments on youtube video’s in your spare time?
personally i think the 3-5 rep range should never be used. [/quote]
Alright, I have had quite enough of this shit.
You are a 160lbs beginner, stop handing out fucking advice.
Had you not talked shit to Jax in the other thread I would have not responded to you, but you are starting to get irritating.
[/quote]
Sorry i dont update my tmuscle profile quite often and i have put on 30 pounds of lean muscle mass since i have joined. I dont post pics because i work at a bank and have had bad experience with co workers on this site printing my pictures out and bringing them to work. and sorry but maybe you should get CT’s cock out of your throat for a second because you and i both know CT did not build his substantial amount of muscle mass doing anything in the 3-5 rep range and their are books on why this rep range is not ideal for maximum muscle size or strength. Hence why their is Max effort training 1-3 reps, dynamic effort 1-3 explosive reps, and repetition method training. Read a real fucking book and stop riding e gurus cocks. I would be more then glad to PM you pics of myself to prove that Im no 160lb fucking beginner but your such an arrogant prick that you would probably post em. and by the way by the looks of your physique you shouldnt be giving out advice either. [/quote]
You can PM me those pics and I can tell everyone whether or not you should be handing out advice. I promise I won’t post them for everyone to see.
[quote]pumped340 wrote:
What a retarded statement, you think if someone goes from repping 50lb for 3-5 to repping 150lb for 3-5 they’re not going to be bigger or stronger?[/quote]
Not as big as if they had focused on a higher rep range…are we really going to argue this?
personally i think the 3-5 rep range should never be used. [/quote]
Alright, I have had quite enough of this shit.
You are a 160lbs beginner, stop handing out fucking advice.
Had you not talked shit to Jax in the other thread I would have not responded to you, but you are starting to get irritating.
[/quote]
Sorry i dont update my tmuscle profile quite often and i have put on 30 pounds of lean muscle mass since i have joined. I dont post pics because i work at a bank and have had bad experience with co workers on this site printing my pictures out and bringing them to work. and sorry but maybe you should get CT’s cock out of your throat for a second because you and i both know CT did not build his substantial amount of muscle mass doing anything in the 3-5 rep range and their are books on why this rep range is not ideal for maximum muscle size or strength. Hence why their is Max effort training 1-3 reps, dynamic effort 1-3 explosive reps, and repetition method training. Read a real fucking book and stop riding e gurus cocks. I would be more then glad to PM you pics of myself to prove that Im no 160lb fucking beginner but your such an arrogant prick that you would probably post em. and by the way by the looks of your physique you shouldnt be giving out advice either. [/quote]
You can PM me those pics and I can tell everyone whether or not you should be handing out advice. I promise I won’t post them for everyone to see.
[/quote]
Lanky, I PM’d you the pics. One of me bulking and one cutting. Im closer to the cutting picture right now but working my way back up a little more cautious this time. I would really appreciate if you kept your word.
[quote]pumped340 wrote:
What a retarded statement, you think if someone goes from repping 50lb for 3-5 to repping 150lb for 3-5 they’re not going to be bigger or stronger?[/quote]
well obviously their going to be stronger since they went from rowing 50lbs to 150lb you idiot. but the size gains would be minimal compared to someone who focused on a traditional bodybuilding rep range. again. my advice to you is the same advice i gave to beans. read a real book.
[quote]pumped340 wrote:
What a retarded statement, you think if someone goes from repping 50lb for 3-5 to repping 150lb for 3-5 they’re not going to be bigger or stronger?[/quote]
well obviously their going to be stronger since they went from rowing 50lbs to 150lb you idiot. but the size gains would be minimal compared to someone who focused on a traditional bodybuilding rep range. again. my advice to you is the same advice i gave to beans. read a real book. [/quote]
This argument is old. All rep ranges can be part of a well written program. As for which is better in general, that will totally depend on the individual. And btw Hazz, please don’t call someone an idiot right after you misspell “they’re.”
[quote]pumped340 wrote:
What a retarded statement, you think if someone goes from repping 50lb for 3-5 to repping 150lb for 3-5 they’re not going to be bigger or stronger?[/quote]
well obviously their going to be stronger since they went from rowing 50lbs to 150lb you idiot. but the size gains would be minimal compared to someone who focused on a traditional bodybuilding rep range. again. my advice to you is the same advice i gave to beans. read a real book. [/quote]
This argument is old. All rep ranges can be part of a well written program. As for which is better in general, that will totally depend on the individual. And btw Hazz, please don’t call someone an idiot right after you misspell “they’re.”[/quote]
ok dude i dont really care what rep ranges any of you use.
This argument is old. All rep ranges can be part of a well written program. As for which is better in general, that will totally depend on the individual. And btw Hazz, please don’t call someone an idiot right after you misspell “they’re.”[/quote]
ok dude i dont really care what rep ranges any of you use.
[/quote]
I didn’t say anything about my personal preference. You are weird
This argument is old. All rep ranges can be part of a well written program. As for which is better in general, that will totally depend on the individual. And btw Hazz, please don’t call someone an idiot right after you misspell “they’re.”[/quote]
ok dude i dont really care what rep ranges any of you use.
[/quote]
I didn’t say anything about my personal preference. You are weird[/quote]
Dude, seriously Im not trying to be an asshole but that argument is not old like you said. Substantial hypertrophy gains are made in the 6-12 rep range. and their is a big difference in 3 sets x 6-12 reps vs 10 sets x 3 reps, hence why Pro bodybuilders do one and not the other. Im not trying to flame anyone here or call out any programs. I just stated that personally, I feel that the 3-6 rep range should not be used if the goal is pure hypertrophy which it should be since were in a bodybuilding forum. Im done arguing and this has gotten way out of hand. I fucking had to email Lanky my photos to prove I am not a newb just to say that a bodybuilder shouldn’t be doing triples.
I was skeptical but I have to admit, hazzyhazz is not a beginner. He still has a long way to go (who doesn’t though, right?) but he looks pretty good at 195 pounds.
[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
I was skeptical but I have to admit, hazzyhazz is not a beginner. He still has a long way to go (who doesn’t though, right?) but he looks pretty good at 195 pounds.[/quote]
Fair enough. Good work on the progress, and I retract my diskish statements regarding it.
BUT
You still have your head up your ass about low reps, and you’re a dick for shitting on Jax without your own face public.
[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
I was skeptical but I have to admit, hazzyhazz is not a beginner. He still has a long way to go (who doesn’t though, right?) but he looks pretty good at 195 pounds.[/quote]
Fair enough. Good work on the progress, and I retract my diskish statements regarding it.
BUT
You still have your head up your ass about low reps, and you’re a dick for shitting on Jax without your own face public.[/quote]
alright the jax thing was a joke and I do apologize. But I don’t think I have my head up my ass about low reps. I just think more hypertrophy gains can be made with a higher rep range and better strength gains with a much lower rep range. This isn’t anything new. So maybe you should get your head out of your ass I’m done. This website has gone batshit crazy that people get called out for stating common fucking sense.
“Remember there isnt a magically rep range per se…its what you feel comfortable in doing by and large…its gaining 50-200lbs in that same rep range progressively over months and months of time thats going to do the magic”
-DT
That being said I personally agree with Hazz, but do whatever works for you. I do think if you use low reps you should use more exercise variation and/or cycle intensity on a regular basis.
[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
I was skeptical but I have to admit, hazzyhazz is not a beginner. He still has a long way to go (who doesn’t though, right?) but he looks pretty good at 195 pounds.[/quote]
Fair enough. Good work on the progress, and I retract my diskish statements regarding it.
BUT
You still have your head up your ass about low reps, and you’re a dick for shitting on Jax without your own face public.[/quote]
alright the jax thing was a joke and I do apologize. But I don’t think I have my head up my ass about low reps. I just think more hypertrophy gains can be made with a higher rep range and better strength gains with a much lower rep range. This isn’t anything new. So maybe you should get your head out of your ass I’m done. This website has gone batshit crazy that people get called out for stating common fucking sense.[/quote]
The point is, all rep ranges are beneficial and can be used
You had used the term never, someone would be a total fool to throw a tool out of their toolbox for no real reason. If you notice I gave you a hard time with the use of the word never. I didn’t say only do low reps, i said don’t fucking tell people to NEVER do low reps.