[quote]DoveofWar08 wrote:
[quote]RealPC wrote:
That’s why when someone was saying the 315 strict was so easy it made me laugh. Everyone I know that talks about putting that kind of weight overhead it’s almost always a push press or a push jerk. And yeah, lots of guys can do 315 in that fashion. That doesn’t really impress me. A 315 STRICT standing overhead is pretty rare.
Instead of trying to drop weight later just get in shape and start the chins now. Again, the whole point of all the numbers is to produce something that is in awesome shape and strong as hell. Striving for all the numbers at once is really the big picture because it forces you into uncomfortable places.
Critique wise, the squats looked high to me. But I’m kind of an asshole about squat depth. The top of your thigh doesn’t look like it breaks below your hip or even gets parallel. Maybe a side view next time.
Obviously no hitching on the dead. You noted that.
Your video also has a lot to do with why I would never include rows in this. Everyone has their idea of what a row is. That’s not mine.
Your base is good on the squat, dead, bench, and overhead of course. I would start in some conditioning work after you lift and work the hell out of the chins now instead of later. [/quote]
Thanks for this. I will see if I can get a better video for the squats next time then and work on my depth. No worries on calling it high. If it looks high, then its high, its just something to work on.
Fair enough on the rows, as it does seem like everybody does rows a little differently.
Having never done the strict standing overhead press, I was rather supprised at its difficulty. Easy is not the word I would use for getting 315 strict on this, after having actually done them.[/quote]
I have never seen, much less heard of, dumbbells that heavy. Two and a half more weeks until I can start tackling this challenge. Can’t wait.