UFC 84: BJ Penn vs. Sean Sherk

Agreed. Sherk tried for a single leg early on, but soon realized that due to BJ’s flexibility/grappling ability, that he needed to tire BJ out a bit before trying to take it to the ground.

Like I said before, Penn’s jab was working so well because Sherk just stood right where BJ wanted him. A good striker who has a height/reach advantage will almost always pick you apart if you do that.

I’d disagree though that you “need” a right hand counter for a jab. Yeah, obviously that’s one option, but far from the only one. The best defense would have been to not stand in Penn’s line of fire, or at the range that he wanted. Then lead off, rather than trying to counter punch. As the old saying goes, “the best defense is a good offense”.

Tons of credit to BJ, he looked awesome in that fight. But to suggest that Sherk’s game plan/strategy wasn’t also a lot to blame for his loss simply isn’t true IMO.

Completely agree. His corner obviously had no idea how to tell him how to adjust his game plan. And once again, to be honest, it didn’t seem to me like he had learned any effective strategies for fighting a taller opponent (which seems odd since his training camp must have known that BJ had the height/reach advantage).

[quote]Sentoguy wrote:

otoko wrote:
I don’t think that was it. Sherk needed to establish his striking so he could set up a takedown. BJ is hard to take down and shooting in from outside without any offense would make it even harder.

Agreed. Sherk tried for a single leg early on, but soon realized that due to BJ’s flexibility/grappling ability, that he needed to tire BJ out a bit before trying to take it to the ground.

BJ’s jab was just working too well. You need a right hand counter for a jab. But BJ has such a straight right hand that he would beat Sherk to the punch. Which would make a right hand counter by Sherk ineffective. Sherk just could not pull the trigger.

Like I said before, Penn’s jab was working so well because Sherk just stood right where BJ wanted him. A good striker who has a height/reach advantage will almost always pick you apart if you do that.

I’d disagree though that you “need” a right hand counter for a jab. Yeah, obviously that’s one option, but far from the only one. The best defense would have been to not stand in Penn’s line of fire, or at the range that he wanted. Then lead off, rather than trying to counter punch. As the old saying goes, “the best defense is a good offense”.

I don’t think there is any shame for Sherk. BJ was just perfect. The credit goes to BJ for just shutting Sherk down. Everybody can say why Sherk didn’t do so and so but BJ made it that way.

Tons of credit to BJ, he looked awesome in that fight. But to suggest that Sherk’s game plan/strategy wasn’t also a lot to blame for his loss simply isn’t true IMO.

danew wrote:
I think Sherk is a guy who is smart in the cage and knows the game well. Because of that he knew that this matchup was difficult for him. It was a quandry to decide where to take the fight. Like you occasionally see with a wrestler, they have the ability to put the fight where they want, but not necessarily the ability to do anything there.

I think Sherk knew that BJ would put him in bad positions on the ground early (a la his fights with Hughes), so he thought he’d wear him down first and then overwhelm him (a la Hughes II). I agree that he should have def changed up the game much earlier because he was losing, but if you get in the cage you’ll know that its so hard sometimes to see what’s happening as its happening. That’s where you need your corner to be honest with you and give good advice. Fighters have to be very confident folks, and I think Sherk truly believed he was getting the better of it standing and his corner wasn’t telling him different. Tough spot.

Completely agree. His corner obviously had no idea how to tell him how to adjust his game plan. And once again, to be honest, it didn’t seem to me like he had learned any effective strategies for fighting a taller opponent (which seems odd since his training camp must have known that BJ had the height/reach advantage).[/quote]

I agree with alot of what you wrote. I think you are right about the “need” for a right hand counter. I just thought it was such a basic thing that it would have been thrown out there.

Sherk was pumping his jab to penetrate to get inside it seemed. That is one good way to get inside but you have to have alot of upperbody movement to get that done. Which as you said Sherk stood in Penn’s line of fire. So Sherk just ended up getting stuffed. Though even with alot of upperbody movement a taller guy with an excellent jab is going to make you eat some punches. I guess they didn’t have a way to adapt to that. Like shoulder roll and leaning down your right so the jab can’t hit you. To do that though you would have to counter more. Some really talented guys can pull out stuff like that in a fight when stuff isn’t working, like a Hopkins or young Toney for example. Some guys just fight one way all the time regardless if they are winning or losing like Trinidad.

So I agree that the game plan had flaws but I think they had a plan based on what tools Sherk has. With Penn executing I think that for this fight at least Sherk did the best he could and the gameplan was not the deciding factor, rather the bigger factor influencing the fight was Penn’s excellence. That is just my opinion.

[quote]matarael wrote:
and, to borrow Joe Rogan�??s word of the year, explosive.
[/quote]

Joe Rogan’s word of the that night was “elusive.” I think he said it about 20 times with regard to Machida.

It’ll be exciting to see who White puts him up against next. I want to see Machida fight Silva - and I don’t mean Wanderlei. Of course, Anderson would have to come up a weight class, or Machida would have to drop a weight class. But damn, that would be an incredible fight. Anyone who can beat Anderson Silva right now is the man. Pound for pound, Silva is the best fighter in the UFC.

[quote]Chad Waterbury wrote:
matarael wrote:
and, to borrow Joe Rogan�??s word of the year, explosive.

Joe Rogan’s word of the that night was “elusive.” I think he said it about 20 times with regard to Machida.

It’ll be exciting to see who White puts him up against next. I want to see Machida fight Silva - and I don’t mean Wanderlei. Of course, Anderson would have to come up a weight class, or Machida would have to drop a weight class. But damn, that would be an incredible fight. Anyone who can beat Anderson Silva right now is the man. Pound for pound, Silva is the best fighter in the UFC. [/quote]

I think they train together at Black House or whatever new name they came up with.

I agree that it would be a good fight though.

To Sherk’s credit, let’s remember that he has been a very active fighter, and just came off almost a year of forced inactivity. That certainly didn’t help his cause. Sherk will be back. If Penn goes up in weight, which considering how fucking crazy he is seems likely, Sherk will be 155 champ again.

[quote]Ruggerlife wrote:
KBCThird wrote:
slimjim wrote:
If he and Chuck were to fight, I’d bet they’d stand there looking at each other for 3 rounds straight.

This phrase gets overused a lot on the internet, but I did laugh out loud at the thought of machida and chuck each waiting for hte other to do soemthing that they could counter

Actually, a Chuck/ machida fight happened, you’d see the first time opponents backed into each other![/quote]

I LOL’ed.

I think if Sherk wants to stand against a taller opponent, he better get tapes of a young Mike Tyson when Tyson used his upperbody movement combined with his jab to get inside.

[quote]otoko wrote:

I agree with alot of what you wrote. I think you are right about the “need” for a right hand counter. I just thought it was such a basic thing that it would have been thrown out there.
[/quote]

Yes, I agree, it is a basic counter for a jab. But then again, I would have thought that a good straight right was such a basic thing that you would have seen Sherk throw some to attempt to counter BJ’s jabs. Heck, I would think you’d see more fighters in general throw straight rights, but there seem to be few who do. Overhand rights seem much more common.

Well, like I said, Sherk’s biggest problem in that fight wasn’t so much the techniques that he was throwing (jabs,hooks, and overhand rights are all effective tools), it was how he was throwing them. Or more specifically where and when he was throwing them.

Like you said, you can’t stand right in a taller person’s line of fire, not weaken their position at all, and try to step right in and hit them in the face with a jab. They’re either gonna tag you on the way in, or snap back, make you miss and then counter you (unless you’ve got a decided speed advantage on them and can also clear very quickly).

Sherk’s problem was that he always tried to attack BJ when BJ was in a strong position (“set”). It wouldn’t have mattered what Sherk was throwing from that starting point, BJ would have made him eat quite a few punches (which obviously is what happened). And even if he was dead set on doing this (which once again I don’t understand why he would have been) trying to go straight for the taller person’s head is a recipe for disaster. The head is just too elusive a target and the taller fighter is usually quite good at snapping back out of range and returning fire (which BJ did quite a few times).

[quote]
So I agree that the game plan had flaws but I think they had a plan based on what tools Sherk has. With Penn executing I think that for this fight at least Sherk did the best he could and the gameplan was not the deciding factor, rather the bigger factor influencing the fight was Penn’s excellence. That is just my opinion.[/quote]

Well, in my opinion a game plan has less to do with what tools you have than it does to do with how to use those tools to neutralize your opponent’s advantages. Whoever got Sherk ready for this fight from a striking perspective obviously spent very little time teaching him how to neutralize a taller person’s reach advantage. Maybe they just don’t know how to do that, or to teach someone to do that. If that’s the case, then maybe Sherk should go find someone who does.

But I agree that Penn’s excellence in this fight obviously contributed a lot to his win.

[quote]Donut62 wrote:
To Sherk’s credit, let’s remember that he has been a very active fighter, and just came off almost a year of forced inactivity. That certainly didn’t help his cause. Sherk will be back. If Penn goes up in weight, which considering how fucking crazy he is seems likely, Sherk will be 155 champ again.[/quote]

Yes, good point as well. He looked quite off in his fight with GSP as well, which also came at the end of a long lay off from fighting.

Like I’ve said before though, I think he looked fairly on (in terms of his speed, explosiveness, crispness of his techniques) in this fight. I just think his game plan sucked.

Personally, I’d love to see what Sherk could do if he went and trained with Joe Lewis. I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that Lewis could take Sherk’s striking game (or almost anyone’s for that matter) to a whole different level. I gauranfuckingtee you that he would have done much better in that fight from a striking perspective if Lewis had been the one preparing him to fight Penn. And he might have even got the better of Penn on the feet.

[quote]fnf wrote:
I think if Sherk wants to stand against a taller opponent, he better get tapes of a young Mike Tyson when Tyson used his upperbody movement combined with his jab to get inside.
[/quote]

The problem with that in MMA is it leaves the knee wide open. Sherk always has a habit of putting his head down, and takes a lot of big knees for it already.

Greetings Chad,
any clue when your Hammerdown: Mobility article is coming?
from Germany
Ken

[quote]Donut62 wrote:
Ruggerlife wrote:
KBCThird wrote:
slimjim wrote:
If he and Chuck were to fight, I’d bet they’d stand there looking at each other for 3 rounds straight.

This phrase gets overused a lot on the internet, but I did laugh out loud at the thought of machida and chuck each waiting for hte other to do soemthing that they could counter

Actually, a Chuck/ machida fight happened, you’d see the first time opponents backed into each other!

I LOL’ed. [/quote]

Am I the only one who enjoys Machida’s style?

[quote]otoko wrote:

I think they train together at Black House or whatever new name they came up with.

I agree that it would be a good fight though. [/quote]

Yep, they train together at Black House. But Liddell and Ortiz used to be training partners, and we all know how that ended up.

I doubt we’ll ever see Machida vs. Anderson anytime soon, but I would like to see Machida fight the top guy in the world to see how he fares. I guess the other Silva is likely to be Machida’s next opponent.

[quote]Kensei wrote:
Donut62 wrote:
Ruggerlife wrote:
KBCThird wrote:
slimjim wrote:
If he and Chuck were to fight, I’d bet they’d stand there looking at each other for 3 rounds straight.

This phrase gets overused a lot on the internet, but I did laugh out loud at the thought of machida and chuck each waiting for hte other to do soemthing that they could counter

Actually, a Chuck/ machida fight happened, you’d see the first time opponents backed into each other!

I LOL’ed.

Am I the only one who enjoys Machida’s style?[/quote]

Yes.

I think he is a really good, intelligent fighter, but for exciting fight he does not make. More than half of his victories have come from decisions. I think he needs to look to engage a lot more.

[quote]Kensei wrote:

Am I the only one who enjoys Machida’s style?[/quote]

No. Though it’s more for karate fanboyism than fight appreciation, I have enjoyed most of his fights.

[quote]Donut62 wrote:
fnf wrote:
I think if Sherk wants to stand against a taller opponent, he better get tapes of a young Mike Tyson when Tyson used his upperbody movement combined with his jab to get inside.

The problem with that in MMA is it leaves the knee wide open. Sherk always has a habit of putting his head down, and takes a lot of big knees for it already.[/quote]

Yep. Hermes Franca caught Sherk with a couple of knees back in their '07 bout. They weren’t as flush as the one BJ landed, but they did connect.

[quote]Kensei wrote:
Donut62 wrote:
Ruggerlife wrote:
KBCThird wrote:
slimjim wrote:
If he and Chuck were to fight, I’d bet they’d stand there looking at each other for 3 rounds straight.

This phrase gets overused a lot on the internet, but I did laugh out loud at the thought of machida and chuck each waiting for hte other to do soemthing that they could counter

Actually, a Chuck/ machida fight happened, you’d see the first time opponents backed into each other!

I LOL’ed.

Am I the only one who enjoys Machida’s style?[/quote]

Hell no, I’ve been a Machida nut rider for years. I love his style. Like I said, he’s the Pernell Whitaker of MMA. I’ve never seen him hit flush, and in the first round of their fight I saw Tito landed 0-18 punches. Pulling that off is rediculous and amazing to watch in and of itself.

[quote]Donut62 wrote:
Kensei wrote:
Donut62 wrote:
Ruggerlife wrote:
KBCThird wrote:
slimjim wrote:
If he and Chuck were to fight, I’d bet they’d stand there looking at each other for 3 rounds straight.

This phrase gets overused a lot on the internet, but I did laugh out loud at the thought of machida and chuck each waiting for hte other to do soemthing that they could counter

Actually, a Chuck/ machida fight happened, you’d see the first time opponents backed into each other!

I LOL’ed.

Am I the only one who enjoys Machida’s style?

Hell no, I’ve been a Machida nut rider for years. I love his style. Like I said, he’s the Pernell Whitaker of MMA. I’ve never seen him hit flush, and in the first round of their fight I saw Tito landed 0-18 punches. Pulling that off is rediculous and amazing to watch in and of itself.[/quote]

Agreed. His mobility is what really impresses me. This fight specifically, he really bitchmade Tito’s takedown attempts.

I just watched UFC 84 (was out of town for the weekend and had taped it). I was jumping off the couch cheering when Wanderlei knocked Jardine the fuck out. It was SO good to see him win again, in grand fashion. :slight_smile: