[quote]Scott M wrote:
The other thread is closed down so I had to put this picture somewhere.
[/quote]
I wish I could switch bodies with him Captain Ginyu style.
He can have my height challenged skeleton of a body. I don’t mind.
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
Adding:
When I was a teen, I’d obsessively draw bodybuilders. Over and over again I’d try to exaggerate the features to the point where it didn’t seem possible that a man could actually get that way.
[/quote]
You remind me of the fat guy from Superbad when he was a child 
[quote]waylanderxx wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
Adding:
When I was a teen, I’d obsessively draw bodybuilders. Over and over again I’d try to exaggerate the features to the point where it didn’t seem possible that a man could actually get that way.
[/quote]
You remind me of the fat guy from Superbad when he was a child :)[/quote]
I never saw Superbad.
I never was a child.
Okay, I WAS a child, but not a FAT one.
lol
[quote]enrac wrote:
I’m curious, do the judges ever make their decisions and criteria public? Are there any interviews with the judges of bodybuilding shows?[/quote]
I’ve never seen an IFBB judge interviewed, but I did see somewhere else online a copy of the judges’ scoring sheets for the Olympia as well as the 2020 Olympia. Probably not that difficult to find if you actually care to see the actual breakdowns.
S
[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:
[quote]enrac wrote:
I’m curious, do the judges ever make their decisions and criteria public? Are there any interviews with the judges of bodybuilding shows?[/quote]
I’ve never seen an IFBB judge interviewed, but I did see somewhere else online a copy of the judges’ scoring sheets for the Olympia as well as the 2020 Olympia. Probably not that difficult to find if you actually care to see the actual breakdowns.
S[/quote]
SEE!! They already have the 2020 Mr Olympia picked! The judges are bought!
lol
I just had to do this.
I know Ronnie’s completely relaxed, but one can still see that Phil is even better than Ronnie.
Vascularity means nothing where shape, size, proportion, separation and definition are concerned.
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
I just had to do this.
I know Ronnie’s completely relaxed, but one can still see that Phil is even better than Ronnie.
Vascularity means nothing where shape, size, proportion, separation and definition are concerned.[/quote]
BLASPHEMY!
At least get a pic of ronnie with his lats flared and arms turned towards the front, wtf is this.
That’s almost as bad as X saying he has a better back than Ronny Rockel.
[quote]waylanderxx wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
I just had to do this.
I know Ronnie’s completely relaxed, but one can still see that Phil is even better than Ronnie.
Vascularity means nothing where shape, size, proportion, separation and definition are concerned.[/quote]
BLASPHEMY!
At least get a pic of ronnie with his lats flared and arms turned towards the front, wtf is this.
That’s almost as bad as X saying he has a better back than Ronny Rockel.[/quote]
Haha I laughed at the last part.
Phil looks incredible but some of these guys lose a little appeal when standing next to their competitors. Phil is one of the best but side by side with Ronnie at his best he’d be crushed.
[quote]waylanderxx wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
I just had to do this.
I know Ronnie’s completely relaxed, but one can still see that Phil is even better than Ronnie.
Vascularity means nothing where shape, size, proportion, separation and definition are concerned.[/quote]
BLASPHEMY!
At least get a pic of ronnie with his lats flared and arms turned towards the front, wtf is this.
That’s almost as bad as X saying he has a better back than Ronny Rockel.[/quote]
I already stated in advance that Ronnie’s completely relaxed.
Whatever.
Ronnie’s waist is wide and he looks sloppy compared to Phil.
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]waylanderxx wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
I just had to do this.
I know Ronnie’s completely relaxed, but one can still see that Phil is even better than Ronnie.
Vascularity means nothing where shape, size, proportion, separation and definition are concerned.[/quote]
BLASPHEMY!
At least get a pic of ronnie with his lats flared and arms turned towards the front, wtf is this.
That’s almost as bad as X saying he has a better back than Ronny Rockel.[/quote]
I already stated in advance that Ronnie’s completely relaxed.
Whatever.
Ronnie’s waist is wide and he looks sloppy compared to Phil.
[/quote]
Have you seen pics of “early” Ronnie?
That’s ronnies final win. He was roughly 40lbs heavier than phil in that pic. Phil would get smoked standing next to Ronnie.
Seriously though. Phil is hitting his prime right now. Id say this is the first year of his “prime”. Take a picture of Ronnie from 99,'00,'02 and compare that. The “unbelievable” years.
Phil is awesome and all but this is getting out of hand. Saying he’s better than Ronnie Coleman.
edited
At least put up a comparable picture of Ronnie. His physique wasn’t as insane the last few years but between 98-2004 he was nearly untouchable.
Phil Ronnie
[quote]waylanderxx wrote:
BLASPHEMY!
At least get a pic of ronnie with his lats flared and arms turned towards the front, wtf is this.
That’s almost as bad as X saying he has a better back than Ronny Rockel.[/quote]
lol, I didn’t think anyone was gonna go there even though they were probably thinking it too.
Wow people like waylander who are hopping on Jay Cutler’s you know what need to slow it down with the love…one can handle only so much bromance in a thread.
[quote]waylanderxx wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
I just had to do this.
I know Ronnie’s completely relaxed, but one can still see that Phil is even better than Ronnie.
Vascularity means nothing where shape, size, proportion, separation and definition are concerned.[/quote]
BLASPHEMY!
At least get a pic of ronnie with his lats flared and arms turned towards the front, wtf is this.
That’s almost as bad as X saying he has a better back than Ronny Rockel.[/quote]
I didn’t even say that so why lie? I said I HOPE my back is about that big now. That sounds like, “my back is better than his”?
I am not sure why that even caused you to take notice. I am 5’10" and weigh about 285lbs right now. You thought I had a small back?
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]waylanderxx wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
I just had to do this.
I know Ronnie’s completely relaxed, but one can still see that Phil is even better than Ronnie.
Vascularity means nothing where shape, size, proportion, separation and definition are concerned.[/quote]
BLASPHEMY!
At least get a pic of ronnie with his lats flared and arms turned towards the front, wtf is this.
That’s almost as bad as X saying he has a better back than Ronny Rockel.[/quote]
I didn’t even say that so why lie? I said I HOPE my back is about that big now. That sounds like, “my back is better than his”?[/quote]
Yes. And I speak for everyone barring any objections.
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]waylanderxx wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
I just had to do this.
I know Ronnie’s completely relaxed, but one can still see that Phil is even better than Ronnie.
Vascularity means nothing where shape, size, proportion, separation and definition are concerned.[/quote]
BLASPHEMY!
At least get a pic of ronnie with his lats flared and arms turned towards the front, wtf is this.
That’s almost as bad as X saying he has a better back than Ronny Rockel.[/quote]
I didn’t even say that so why lie? I said I HOPE my back is about that big now. That sounds like, “my back is better than his”?[/quote]
Yes. And I speak for everyone barring any objections. [/quote]
Well then, that isn’t what I meant and isn’t what I wrote so maybe you should take the words as written from now on.
Lol that’s not how the english language works. Everthing is interpreted based on the context.