[quote]bushidobadboy wrote:
If it were down to me, I would likely impose huge muthafuggin taxes on:
Any food producer that adds sugar, fat, salt, artificial anything to their products.
Cigarette/tobacco producers/vendors.
Alcohol producers/vendors.
Basically, anyone who contributes to the general decline in the nations health… This includes bastard car manufacturers, and all those corporations who insist on raping the planet, just so they can churn out the latest shiny piece of worthless, unessential shit, to be lusted over by the average, dull-eyed, slackjawed, materialistic twat.
The revenue generated would be used to educate the populace towards healthy living etc, whilst also giving the health service the short-term boost it needs to do the massive task it faces, dealing with all those who are dieing from ‘lifestyle’ and/or ‘environmental’ diseases like obesity and cancer etc.
Farmers and food-producers would be offered huge incentives to start producing sustainable, healthy products, that works in harmony with our bodies, and the environment.
Refined and artificial - OUT. Natural, and sustainable - IN.
In the long term, the health of the nation would be improved through the consumption of organic, healthy foods and dramatically improved activity levels etc.
Then doctors wouldn’t be the ‘all knowing, omnipotent demi-gods’ that the average member of the public sees them as. Consequently, I’m sure that the numbers of med-school applicants would drop, leaving those that are into it for the genuine health and caring of their fellow man, and not for the perceived status…
I’m a bit of an idealist perhaps, lol.
bushy
Christ, that was a bit of a rant![/quote]
Nice rant bushy! The only way to make this happen is for you to be our benevolent dictator. As long as you are going to rule the world for the benefit of mankind, make sure that gear is not taxed. ;}
Incompetent doctors, those producing alcohol, tobacco, processed food, automobiles and worthless junk can all quit their jobs and report for work at the tofu factories. Now available with Soyant Green - the perfect blend of sustainability and recycling.
Market forces run the game now and the consumer drives the whole system. Marketing, ignorance and deception influences the consumer, as well as peer pressure. So it would seem that a better informed consumer would be the key to change.
Situation A and situation B can be evaluated and one can strive for a change from A–>B. But the economic disruption of the changes can lead to unemployment and skills displacement. The change process can kill the strengths of A and B and the outcome can be unattractive to all. Drastic changes might be by definition lead only to failure. Evolutionary change would seem to provide a model for successful change.
The one thing that we can do is to try to keep the idiots out of public office. But the consumer is also an imperfect voter.