[quote]Big_Boss wrote:
[quote]FirestormWarrior wrote:
[quote]Big_Boss wrote:
[quote]666Rich wrote:
Muay Thai and Tkd go very very well together. I can throw thai style roundhouses quite easily and the mechanics are not that different, but hitting with the shin is a much noticeable difference and is a must for leg kicks. The chambering from TKD helps your knee strikes in Thai…
[/quote]
How is your punching game? Also…the biggest thing I have with guys from TKD is their stance and reaching for kicks. They have the hardest time adjusting to be able to throw sound thai-style kicks…and of course,their hands are shit. I guess some of that is dependent on what federation/style of TKD they come from…???[/quote]
As for the kicks… sorry, no native speaker… what do you mean by “reaching for kicks”? Also, “the stance” is confusing me. I’ve seen like 100 stances with 100 fighters ;). You really need to stop thinking styles and rather think fighters. Between you and me, a good fighter can be successfull with TKD, Karate, Boxing, Judo or Muay Thai or just any other thing… for a fighter who’s lacking heart, focus and maybe some of what you’d call “killer instinct”, the most complete, most sophisticated style will propably be useless.
As for the hands… yeah, it depends. As I said, ITF uses everything you might find in kickboxing when it comes to hand techniques, plus (spinning) backfists, knive hand (yes, it’s actually used and can be devastating) and hammer hand techniques… all of which is forbidden, of course, in WTF (olympic style) sparring (to be thrown to the head. Body-shots are ok).[/quote]
Well…“styles” do influence the fighter and their habits…just more so than the next guy sometimes. Which falls into my observation of a lot of TKD guys(in my experiences) getting more “sideways” in their stance. Something that is not optimal for aspects of Muay Thai.
As for “reaching” it’s just a term used when a guy doesn’t truly commit to his kicks and/or not being in best range for whatever kick they are executing. i.e. the few TKD guys we have that made the switch to Muay Thai tend to pull their hips short of turning over. Almost as if they are trying to “tap” their opponent with their foot/instep instead of going through them with their shin.
Almost in a point-karate way. IDK…that best I can explain it over the internet. Maybe it’s just a matter of them adjusting to getting in range to make contact with shin instead of instep…?? I’m not saying any of the above is universal for TKD guys…just observations of my particular experience with them. And if it’s worth anything I came from TSD/Hapkido background before Muay Thai. [/quote]
I see what you’re getting at. Can’t even agree with you, of course styles influence fighters. Especial,y rules do. Think SAID. Practicing point fighting only will make you a superb point fighter but might just take power from your technique by adapting to the demands of pointfighting. As you said, that’s where “reaching” comes in play.
Also, I agree that the sideway stance is not particularly great for Muay Thai. But that’s pretty much a WTF thing. In ITF (or open style, my personal favourite
) where you’re allowed to punch to the head, just like in kickboxing, the stance “straightens up” a bit. Still, more sideways than Muay Thai, but then that stance (particularly the “L” position the feet are in) isn’t all that great, either, in my opinion.
When talking about “not commiting oneself”… comes down to the fighter and the situation I say. Ever watched Muay Thai as done in Thailand? Those sideway knees from the clinch? Lots of points-only tapping there. Which brings us back to rules and scoring systems. As soon as there is any, fighters will take advantage of / adapt to it. That’s not a bad thing, mind you, that’s the way it should be.
Just sometimes, it’s annoying the audience (think soccer players who whine because they were touched … that’s part of the game, albeit a shite one).