Hey guys just wondering. If I pull 495 but only squat 455 does that imply I lack muscular development somewhere or is this just a result of my body structure?
Having a 40lb difference between the two lifts isn’t abnormal …
I hope not, because I’m truly crippling imbalanced with a 485 deadlift and 342 squat.
being at the level your at now, I’d assume you would have noticed that the majority of people can pull anywhere from a bit more to a lot more then they squat. It isn’t always the case but it is very, very normal.
.
[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
.[/quote]
[quote]jake_j_m wrote:
I hope not, because I’m truly crippling imbalanced with a 485 deadlift and 342 squat.
being at the level your at now, I’d assume you would have noticed that the majority of people can pull anywhere from a bit more to a lot more then they squat. It isn’t always the case but it is very, very normal.[/quote]
Im in this boat.
200 deadlift and a 140 squat. Thats 130# difference.
40lb isn’t anything.
Deadlift (RAW): 230kg
Low-Bar Powerlifting Squat (RAW): 187.5kg
A2G High-Bar Olympic Squat (RAW): 165kg
…at a bodyweight of @95kg.
[quote]sexyxe wrote:
[quote]jake_j_m wrote:
I hope not, because I’m truly crippling imbalanced with a 485 deadlift and 342 squat.
being at the level your at now, I’d assume you would have noticed that the majority of people can pull anywhere from a bit more to a lot more then they squat. It isn’t always the case but it is very, very normal.[/quote]
Im in this boat.
200 deadlift and a 140 squat. Thats 130# difference.
40lb isn’t anything. [/quote]
wait…are you serious? thats a 60 pound difference.
Sadly yes I am. Im an Aussie. We use metric, so 200kg, and 140kg is 60kg, or 135#.
[quote]austin-reese wrote:
[quote]sexyxe wrote:
[quote]jake_j_m wrote:
I hope not, because I’m truly crippling imbalanced with a 485 deadlift and 342 squat.
being at the level your at now, I’d assume you would have noticed that the majority of people can pull anywhere from a bit more to a lot more then they squat. It isn’t always the case but it is very, very normal.[/quote]
Im in this boat.
200 deadlift and a 140 squat. Thats 130# difference.
40lb isn’t anything. [/quote]
wait…are you serious? thats a 60 pound difference.[/quote]
lol
[quote]austin-reese wrote:
[quote]sexyxe wrote:
[quote]jake_j_m wrote:
I hope not, because I’m truly crippling imbalanced with a 485 deadlift and 342 squat.
being at the level your at now, I’d assume you would have noticed that the majority of people can pull anywhere from a bit more to a lot more then they squat. It isn’t always the case but it is very, very normal.[/quote]
Im in this boat.
200 deadlift and a 140 squat. Thats 130# difference.
40lb isn’t anything. [/quote]
wait…are you serious? thats a 60 pound difference.[/quote]
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]sexyxe wrote:
Sadly yes I am. Im an Aussie. We use metric, so 200kg, and 140kg is 60kg, or 135#.[/quote]
Why in the blue blazes would you mix your units of measurement in the same post without saying so?[/quote]
I agree, probably not the ‘right’ thing to do. A learning point for all of us!
But, I still think it would be obvious enough that it was a combination of both.
If you squat to parallel it is a longer range of motion than a deadlift so I would think it would be normal to have a bigger dead.