Skinny-Fat Bulk or Cut? Pics Included - Help!

[quote]dt79 wrote:

[quote]zapata1 wrote:

[quote]T3hPwnisher wrote:

[quote]zapata1 wrote:
And I’ve always liked taking notes from geared people since they were usually the strongest, hardest working naturals for the most part. [/quote]

This has NOT been my experience. I have seen way more lazy and stupid people use gear than I have seen the hardest working naturals using it.
[/quote]

Maybe I am not looking hard enough for them then. [/quote]

That’s because you wouldn’t even suspect some of them are using.

Behold… “THE TREN LOOK”![/quote]

I would not conjugate with him. I just want to punch that guy in the face and I know nothing about him.

[quote]flipcollar wrote:

Well, your hub’s private, so I have no idea what you looked like. [/quote]
Huh. I didn’t know it was set to private. I’ll see if I can figure out how to set it to public.

EDIT: Ok. Changed it.

You didn’t read the explanation that went along with it?

What did your lift numbers look like in college?

How about these guys?

OMFG

Now we have pics of Flipcollar from the Basketball Diaries in all his awesomeness, SuperTightPanda and the clowns from Jersey Shore all on the same page!

OP, look what you’ve done!!!

Just for shits and giggles since Flip post a before he figured out what he was doing pic. This is 240lbs when I got fat about my fatest. Eating a ton of protein and basically NEVER going over 150g of carbs a day because I thought I didn’t tolerate them well.


This is at 205 when I learned I was stupid and making smaller much more trackable and reasonable adjustments were the way to go, NEVER ate more than 240g of protein just barely over my bw at 205lbs and only 200g on off days while also drastically increases my carbs to well over 300g literally over double what I ate before when I thought I was “intolerant” Still nothing impressive but, for a powerliftering redneck ill take it.

[quote]dt79 wrote:
OMFG

Now we have pics of Flipcollar from the Basketball Diaries in all his awesomeness, SuperTightPanda and the clowns from Jersey Shore all on the same page!

OP, look what you’ve done!!![/quote]

It is pretty amazing but the real question is:

Can the Jersey Shore guys deadlift 495??

Nice work, Reed. I don’t think you were very fat at all at 240, but of course you look much better at 205.

But can you really say with absolute certainty that bulking up to 240 didn’t help? I mean, just between you and Flip; he’s never allowed himself to get over 12%, and he’s 180ish at 5’10". You bulked to 240 and now you’re 205 at 5’7" with fewer training years than him.

Doesn’t that support my argument?

We know for a fact that as a trainee gets more time under the bar, the less protein he needs because he grows slower. In experienced lifters who are only going to put on around 10-15lbs of muscle in a year, .8-1.0g/lb is more than enough. But what about newbs who can reasonably expect to add 30+ lbs of lean weight to their frame for their first year? Every study I’ve found on the subject used experienced lifters, not novices.

Another thing that comes to mind is that you may have been carb intolerant at first, but by keeping carbs low and protein high for so long, you improved your insulin response and ability to handle all those carbs.

In your opinion, you may have bulked like an idiot, but if you ask me, it seems like you pretty well got it right.

[quote]flipcollar wrote:

[quote]JayPierce wrote:
I didn’t bring up steroids as the one and only reason he’s able to DL 600. I brought it up because my point of view is from a natural lifter who used to be in the same situation as the OP, where his view is from a geared lifter. I specifically stated that there’s nothing wrong with that, but comparing that to the OP’s situation is ludicrous.

I’m not so sure about the “unhealthy level of body fat” being unneccessary. 20% really isn’t that bad. I know there’s the whole “get hyooge without ever getting even a little bit fat” movement happening right now, but I’m pretty sure that’s going to peter out pretty quick. I got up to 235 on purpose, following advice of several very large and knowledgeable men, to achieve a particular effect. And it worked.

The advice was to take your goal weight, add 15%, and do whatever it takes to get there. Hold that exaggerated weight for a few months, and then back it down to your goal weight. The concept is to change your body weight set point, and it absolutely worked.

So yes, I got fat. On purpose. And it worked exactly the way I wanted it to. I spent almost three years out of the gym, and my weight stayed pretty close to that new set point without losing much strength at all. Maybe it could be seen as extreme, but it works. Maybe it could be seen as “bullshit bro science”, but it works. [/quote]

However you want to phrase your argument, you used the fact that Reed used steroids as a reason he is at the level he’s at now, and that because he uses steroids now, his advice is not appropriate. What you seem to be missing is the fact that every steroid user on the planet has both a natural and a geared perspective, because we were all natural, most of us for a long time. I’ve spent less than a year unnatural, and a decade natural. So most of my opinions were derived from my natural training/dieting.

As for your own bodyfat, I guess I’ve simply assumed that you’re pretty far off on your 20% estimation, given the fact that you did not get all that strong, and you weighed so much. (again all this is relative…) I had surpassed all your lifts naturally, at a bodyweight in the 180s, at 10-12% bodyfat. If you doubled my bodyfat, you wouldn’t be anywhere close to your bodyweight. This makes me assume you were carrying much more fat than you think you were. I realize this is just an opinion, you’re free to disagree. This isn’t my main contention.

It’s fine that you met your goals, and that you made ‘get fat’ a goal. But for most of us (and I’m assuming the OP is in this camp based on everything he’s said), this is not a goal. If you’re going to justify getting fat to get strong by saying ‘hey it works’, then you’re opening the door for ME to say ‘never ever get above 12% bodyfat, because that also works, and I’m stronger than you so it actually works better’. I don’t think that’s really where you want to go with this.

Staying lean while gaining muscle is not a fad. I don’t know why you would think that. It’s addressing training and diet intelligently and efficiently. It’s an advancement. I’ve got a six pack and quite a bit of vascularity, and I seen no reason to change that. The best powerlifters in the world, aside from the SHW’s, are staying lean year round. Hell, even Lilliebridge is pretty damn lean at 300 lbs.[/quote]

great post, and yeah, you are awesome, Flip

[quote]JayPierce wrote:
Nice work, Reed. I don’t think you were very fat at all at 240, but of course you look much better at 205.

But can you really say with absolute certainty that bulking up to 240 didn’t help? I mean, just between you and Flip; he’s never allowed himself to get over 12%, and he’s 180ish at 5’10". You bulked to 240 and now you’re 205 at 5’7" with fewer training years than him.

Doesn’t that support my argument?
[/quote]

no, because your strength gains didn’t justify getting so fat. I’m not trying to be a dick and call you out, but you got fat. The all out mega bulk is fine if you are gaining the strength to justify it, but you didn’t.

I’m sorry I was rude to you earlier, but the point remains the same.

[quote]craze9 wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:
OMFG

Now we have pics of Flipcollar from the Basketball Diaries in all his awesomeness, SuperTightPanda and the clowns from Jersey Shore all on the same page!

OP, look what you’ve done!!![/quote]

It is pretty amazing but the real question is:

Can the Jersey Shore guys deadlift 495??[/quote]

I dunno. Are they carb tolerant?

jay pierce
one thing i have noticed over the years is how many big strong guys will say this is how i got big and strong but now that i smarter i should have done it this way
when you look at total picture most big strong guys got big and strong the same way eat alot lift alot

[quote]Yogi wrote:

[quote]JayPierce wrote:
Nice work, Reed. I don’t think you were very fat at all at 240, but of course you look much better at 205.

But can you really say with absolute certainty that bulking up to 240 didn’t help? I mean, just between you and Flip; he’s never allowed himself to get over 12%, and he’s 180ish at 5’10". You bulked to 240 and now you’re 205 at 5’7" with fewer training years than him.

Doesn’t that support my argument?
[/quote]

no, because your strength gains didn’t justify getting so fat. I’m not trying to be a dick and call you out, but you got fat. The all out mega bulk is fine if you are gaining the strength to justify it, but you didn’t.

I’m sorry I was rude to you earlier, but the point remains the same.[/quote]
No problem. I don’t have thin skin, so rudeness doesn’t bother me much.

But now if you’ll forgive me for being rude; my seven-year-old daughter has better reading comprehension than you. I was comparing Reed’s results to Flipcollar’s. That post didn’t have anything to do with my own results.

Besides that, if you had been paying attention you would have realized that neither Flip nor Reed got much stronger than I did (both were stronger, but not by much at all) as naturals. But once again, Reed achieved that level of strength much faster.

[quote]JayPierce wrote:

What did your lift numbers look like in college?
[/quote]

I remember one summer I put 315 on my back and did MAYBE a half squat with it. Probably didn’t even go halfway down with it. A legit squat max for me at the time probably didn’t exceed 200 lbs at my best. I think my best bench press was around 225, although I never brought the bar all the way down, so this is also difficult to gauge. Deadlift might have been around 300?

I was not exactly a good lifter in college. All those numbers are substantially better than what I started at, but they’re not exactly good. All I wanted back then was to look a little better. I had no idea what I was doing. And I remember when I got back into the gym post-college, a 135 bench wasn’t happening. It’s only been in the last few years that I’ve really done quite a bit of leg work.

[quote]dt79 wrote:

[quote]craze9 wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:
OMFG

Now we have pics of Flipcollar from the Basketball Diaries in all his awesomeness, SuperTightPanda and the clowns from Jersey Shore all on the same page!

OP, look what you’ve done!!![/quote]

It is pretty amazing but the real question is:

Can the Jersey Shore guys deadlift 495??[/quote]

I dunno. Are they carb tolerant?[/quote]

They’re Italian, they have to be. Nothing but pasta, marinera, and garlic bread. Till it be the day when we discuss the misuse of steriods and not bring boo boo into the conversation lol.

[quote]cavemansam wrote:
jay pierce
one thing i have noticed over the years is how many big strong guys will say this is how i got big and strong but now that i smarter i should have done it this way
when you look at total picture most big strong guys got big and strong the same way eat alot lift alot[/quote]
Very true. I also see tons of guys who never reach their goals because they refuse to lose sight of their abs.

Hell, talk to a pediatric doc about fat stores and human growth! That’ll open your eyes for sure. They’ll tell you in a heartbeat that without sufficient fat stores, the human body doesn’t grow nearly as fast. Or to look at it from another angle; the quickest way to stunt a kid’s growth is to keep them skinny. Period.

Well, when we’re new to lifting, the same rule seems to apply. Want to stay weak? Stay skinny. Sure, you’ll grow, but you won’t grow nearly as fast as the guy who eats to get strong.

20x bodyweight in calories with a 40-40-20 macro split will get the job done almost every damned time. I’m training a 17yo right now who started lifting two years ago. After six months, his dad asked me to help him because he wasn’t showing any progress. I put him on this same diet, and I’ve been coaching his lifts. He just hit a 265 bench press, 340 squat, and 385 DL. He’s also gone from 120lbs to 160 without any discernable fat gain.

[quote]JayPierce wrote:
Besides that, if you had been paying attention you would have realized that neither Flip nor Reed got much stronger than I did (both were stronger, but not by much at all) as naturals. But once again, Reed achieved that level of strength much faster.[/quote]

sigh

and Reed admitted he didn’t need to get as fat as he did, and Flip did it staying lean…

[quote]JayPierce wrote:
Very true. I also see tons of guys who never reach their goals because they refuse to lose sight of their abs.
[/quote]

lol, that’s what fat guys always say

I’m going to bow out of this conversation as we’re going around in circles.

JayPierce, I checked your hub and yes, you were fat as fuck (20%? lols!) and your bulking didn’t give you anywhere near the strength to justify looking so shit. I wish you luck in your training endeavours, but you are the classic case of bulking gone wrong, no matter how you want to rationalise it. Soup’s on, fat boy.

dt79, Aliens is the second best action film ever made.

And I’m out.

I think today’s article is pretty on point for this thread.