[quote]dollarbill44 wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]buffalokilla wrote:
[quote]HynesKetchup wrote:
If he was trying to get that point across then he wasn’t very successful. If he was talking about diet control and how it applies to exercise then why would he not be giving sample meal plans designed to support weight loss? Instead he states such fallacies as “Turning fat into muscle.” Laughable
[/quote]
TIME is the pop media here; the actual work behind it was decent if not of the “no shit” variety. I do agree, though, that he’s not the best writer for laymen.
You’d mentioned doctors before; that’s whom I was applying the malice for stupidity thing to. Pharmaceutical companies are evil by and large, I agree, at the administrative level anyway.
The OP should try hitting her.
[/quote]
If most people were as evil as pharma companies we would live in a better world.
Oooohhhh, they develop drugs against diseases for, gasp, money!
The audacity to turn diseases that were death sentences mere decades into nothing but a mild inconvience!
Bastards.
[/quote]
While I don’t subscribe to the theory that big pharma is inherently evil, it is a bit naive to think that profit margins and organic growth are not significant drivers of where capital is allocated, moreso than idea of saving the human race from disease. Granted, they often intersect but big pharma devotes a LOT of money to finding new ways to extend patents to avoid a drug going generic, which has no inherent benefit to humanity.
DB[/quote]
If they plough the money back into their company it has.
Now I do agree that pharma compoanies are very politically active companies but they work in a very politized envuironment.
I think it is a bit unfair to make the whole field muddy and then blame the players if their hands get dirty.