Opinions of Chad Waterbury Programs?

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:
JonBlood wrote:
Here are the pictures that were requested because apparently im a troll…whatever that means.

Dude, you’re NOT a troll.

You are serious and dedicated and are simply asking for guidance. [/quote]

I don’t get the impression that he’s trolling either, but I gotta say, his biggest hurdle is getting in touch with his own physiology. 3 years in and this lost doesn’t mean he’s an idiot, but at some point you have to start thinking for yourself. I mean that sincerely and as no insult at all.

[quote]BrownTrout wrote:
You know, I’d sure like to see a pic of Waterbury’s physique. All the pictures I know of are pretty unrevealing. [/quote]

heres an article with quite a few pics of Chad, and here is a pic from his website.

Ok this thread is hilarious. The OP is not a troll, but is now probably confused as hell about what to do with himself.

The Troll analysis practically had me in tears and Nominal Prospect is killing me.

I’d say to the OP: up your calories (you can do so healthily, it’s really not that hard) and find a higher volume program to try for a while. They’re all over the place.

[quote]JonBlood wrote:
What do you mean man?!?!? Hes got a huge forehead![/quote]

No need to be a douche about it is there? The guy is bigger than you, and makes a living at training people. Wasn’t his fault you couldn’t get anything out of his program.

[quote]BrownTrout wrote:
You know, I’d sure like to see a pic of Waterbury’s physique. All the pictures I know of are pretty unrevealing. [/quote]

you forgot to say no homo

I was completely joking about the forehead comment!
I do completely understand that I have to up my cals but I’m still looking for an isolation routine! Advice, anyone?

Advice—nominal prospect, you are an idiot. You are an idiot on so many levels that I have problems comprehending the depth of your idiocy, and quite frankly have no time or desire to try and write the next great NOVEL that it would take to explain the numerous levels of your wrongness.

If Chad Waterbury is one extreme, you are the other Nominal Prospect. An all isolation program is STUPID. Do HSS-100 JonBlood. Do it and if you don’t gain muscle you aren’t eating enough. Do it and see the results, because there are only 2 ways you aren’t seeing results-- 1) you’re not training hard enough, or 2) you’re not eating enough. I would trust the word of Christian Thibaudeau of Prospects any day of the week and twice on Sunday.

[quote]Aragorn wrote:
Advice—nominal prospect, you are an idiot. You are an idiot on so many levels that I have problems comprehending the depth of your idiocy, and quite frankly have no time or desire to try and write the next great NOVEL that it would take to explain the numerous levels of your wrongness.

If Chad Waterbury is one extreme, you are the other Nominal Prospect. An all isolation program is STUPID. Do HSS-100 JonBlood. Do it and if you don’t gain muscle you aren’t eating enough. Do it and see the results, because there are only 2 ways you aren’t seeing results-- 1) you’re not training hard enough, or 2) you’re not eating enough. I would trust the word of Christian Thibaudeau of Prospects any day of the week and twice on Sunday.[/quote]

I fail to see how it could be considered any more “stupid” than an all-compound program, which many here would no doubt recommend without hesitation.

If it’s “okay” to tell athletes to rely on compounds, why is it bad to tell aspiring bodybuilders to rely on isolations?

There’s nothing bad about it. Such a program WOULD result in noticeable hypertrophy, particularly for someone coming off a compound-based routine.

Besides, I made the suggestion to challenge him to think along a different paradigm than what he is used to. I doubt he will actually go through with it. Most people are way too attached to their bench presses, squats, and other ego exercises (yes, that’s exactly what they are).

If you think I don’t know what I’m talking about, you probably assume (falsely) that I’m a one-track kind of guy who preaches machine isolation training to anyone who will listen. That’s incorrect. I only tout that particular modality to people who have aesthetic goals, since it is, by far, the best suited for that purpose.

If I were programming for athletic populations (and I do), my recommendations would probably seem familiar to you. They would be no different than any of the advice that is routinely dispensed on this site. Train movements, not muscles, develop the kinetic chain, build strength in basic exercises, and start with bodyweight before adding external resistance.

It IS possible to recommend opposing training methods to different populations. Why does everyone always try to shove their pet modality down everyone else’s throat? I am an aesthetics guy but I recognize that you simply don’t train athletes the way you train bodybuilders. Nearly everything that the one group does, the other does the opposite! And there’s nothing wrong with it.

The bottom line, as I have stated before, is that the aesthetics crowd “understands” performance, but the performance crowd simply does not grasp aesthetics. They are used to having aesthetics as a by-product of training, rather than it’s direct goal. Hence the faulty logic employed in statements such as, “Anyone who can bench 400 lbs. is bound to be big and muscular, therefore you should bench heavy for mass.”

The deficiency is on your end, not mine.

You care about your numbers so much that you can’t put it aside for even a second to consider how you would train if you didn’t give a shit how much you lifted but only wanted to look as good as possible.

YOUR problem sir, not mine. Any massive IFBB pro would laugh at your juvenile mentality. You see, they stopped caring how much they lifted long ago. Hardly anyone over 21 gives a shit how much they bench. But some people never grow up.

I understand you totally, pal. But you just don’t get me.

I feel really bad for you man. You came here looking for help, with a legitimate post, and all you get is a bunch of douche bags who spend more time putting you and other people down instead of using all the time into actually helping you and others reach their goals. Which is essentially what we are all here for. It’s a reminder of why I stay away from forums. If you don’t like the post, or topic, if you think it’s stupid, or belongs some where else, let a moderator take care of it and just scroll over. Wasting your time to rack up your post count or to put down others, or to just simply say use the search, is kind of pathetic.

Anyways, I was visiting the site, saw the topic and it’s something I could relate to cuz I been there. Waterbury is very convincing and I like his ideas and concept. I think the reality is, is he has tapped into a market and collected a fan base and is just capitalizing on it. It’s no different than someone selling low fat or low calorie diets. Stupid shit that people will pay money to read about.

Now don’t get me wrong Waterbury’s programs are good, but a custom program is always going to be better. It would take too much time for me to give you the plethora of knowledge I have learned, but let me help you where I can. I’ll give you some base with examples I have experienced, and you can take it for what it’s worth. I’ve turned into a somewhat poliquin fanboy, but his methods have really worked for me. And well, his career and reputation speak for themselves.

Diet is obviously the most important. Look up the 20 pounds in 20 weeks. I keep a big ass pot of the chili recipe in my fridge at all times. I eat it for breakfast as all i have to do is microwave it and I get a big solid meal. I eat the egg one pre bed as it takes the most cooking and prep work. Also add sour cream and cheese to chili and other meals as much as u want to get extra cals in. In between each meal I make a liquid shake of a shot of olive oil, protein powder, mixed nuts, and lactose free milk. usually around 700 cals, 3 a day = 2100 cals alone. For the chicken I poach about 10-20 pounds of chicken breasts at one time, I shred it up. I freeze the stock and put it in my chili, the rest of the chicken I make a large batch of berardis creamy chicken and freeze the rest. I took out the broth as it made it too watery for me, took out the squash too cuz it did the same, and added lots of cheese as it helped make it taste better and made it more creamy. I also hate the taste of yogurt but don’t notice with the cheese in the dish. For vegetables i use mushrooms, spinach and brocolli instead. These 3 veges are probably the most helpful in building muscle out of all the vegetables. So why not put the 3 together. This topic is obviously a matter of an opinion, but from my research the 3 veges add a huge punch.

I buy cheese in 1.5 pound blocks at sams, the CABOT brand is really good. I shred all my cheese at once and then freeze it. I buy bags of non roasted mix nuts at sams too, you get mac, pecans, almonds, walnuts, maybe one or two others im forgetting for 10$. A pretty good deal. In the chili I take out the v8 and just use a big ass can on canned tomatoes. 108oz can costs 1.50$ I buy bulk chili powder from the thespicehouse.com it’s off the chain and all their spices makes a huge difference if you’re big on eating tasty food.

I take 1 NOW HCL tab with every meal. This has helped a TON with increasing my appetite and weight gain. This one of Poliquin’s top sups and I def love it. I also like GABA pre bed I take about 2 tbsp, it’s helped quite a bit. T-Nation sups have always been too expensive for me so for protein I make my own mix. I’ve found post work out a scoop of maltodextrin, a scoop of waixymaize, 2 scoops of whey, a glass of juice, I rotate from a berry blend, apple, and cranberry. I finish this all off with 3 grams of taurine. I then eat as much brown rice and chicken I can stomach shortly after. This is the only carbs in my diet, besides the occasional cheat meal. I found once I got under 10% body fat, I can cheat pretty often though without it affecting my mood or body fat. Obviously fish oil and multi-vitamin are important. I constantly try other sups but haven’t really liked anything that much other than what I have mentioned. I take that back, ZMA is nice.

Don’t count cals, calories is a concept that has never really been proven. Only thing that really matters is sugar and food allergens, those are the two things that mostly make you add fat. Taking high carbs post workout is the only time its safe, and encouraged if you’re trying to make progress and gain muscle mass. Keeping a constant supply of aminos and fats for your body to use is the best way to add muscle mass. There is actually a study I’m looking into and thinking about trying where eating only once every 4-6 hours is better for gaining mass. The concept is after a short fast the body is hypersensitive to amino acids so rotating this with constant feedings so you keep body fat low could be an even better way to add extra mass. I’m getting way too off track into geeky science stuff… But, also it’s often smart to take out certain protein sources for 6 weeks and then reintroduce them. Variety is key, but eating the same foods over and over, you can build up food in tolerances that will make you store fat.

For the most part though, just focus on eating as much as you can as cleanly as you can until you get your body fat to single digits, then focus on staying there. If you desire to get leaner, adjust the little things like rotating protein sources out and making sure to use as large a variety of sources as possible. I try and avoid gluten, and lactose as much as I can. Once you get down to single digits though, you’re optimizing your hormone levels as best you can naturally. You can gain muscle and lose body fat at the same time by following the diet plan above.

For workout, I have found that 2-3 months of a 5 day schedule isolation followed with a one month full body plan has worked best for me. I start with doing high rep work for 6 workouts and then follow it up with 6 weeks of low rep work. High reps make your muscle bigger, so it allows you to hold a larger load when doing low rep work. Low rep increases your strength, which then allows you to do larger loads on your high rep work which makes your muscles bigger. A full body plan every now and again helps throw variety at your body and ensures you keep making progress.

Read the five elements by poliquin. When I first was getting into body building, that article is what made me determine poliquin was a nut job. I then got frustrated cuz like you, i been doing Waterbury type shit for almost a year and barely made any progress. I then determined I was a wood type, starting lowering my volume by 20% every workout, and BAM i was making progress.

More take home points. coax don’t force your muscles into adaption. I have 2 pairs of 5/8, 5/4 & 8/4 plate mates. I also have 1/4lb collars. I make sure I only increase my load 1-2% and it has ensured that I constantly make progress in the gym. And if you aren’t making progress, you are wasting your time. I have found slow tempo has helped improve my form, increased strength, and muscle size. I don’t care how much science Waterbury gives me. I’m a chem major, so I really get into all the geeky science stuff, but the results speak.

As i learned more, I understand why though. Poliquin’s structural balance is another great article. I didn’t bench for nearly 18 months because of constant shoulder pain. When I first really got into lifting, I used my arms instead of my back for pulling exercises, and centered everything around the bench. 9 months later I couldn’t bench anymore and really discouraged me from lifting. for 18 months i lifted on and off constantly getting discouraged, when my shoulder would start hurting i would stop lifting. My back is super strong and has always been my strongest point, add in no bench for 18 months, my strong point only became stronger. I could do external rotations with 30lb dumbbells for 5 reps but couldn’t bench 135 for more than week pain free. I tested out my strength ratios and discovered my military presses were extremely weak. I substituted all bench and chest work for shoulder work, caught them up, and magically all my shoulder pain went away. I check my maxes every one - two months, and if something starts to fall behind, I center my workouts around that.

Anyways, i know this is a lot of info. Probably a lot of rambling, I tried to just give you the main points, and what I have picked up. If you are curious about anything do your own research. For example, look into white button mushrooms. Poliquins 5 day plan i awesome. You get 6 workouts for each body part in just a month. Add in 2 a day training to this… with an awesome diet, the results are unreal. My squat went up 20 pounds a month for 5 months when i switched from Waterbury to poliquin. It’s still my weak point, and I’m still honing in on it, but it has definately helped sculp my body.

tinman

i completely agree with nearly every single word you just said. i know how frustrating it can be working your ass off and not seeing the results you are expecting. some are not as genetically gifted as others and some dont pick up on this stuff as quickly as others. this game is a lot of trial and error and unfortunately for many, it takes a whole lot of fucking up to realize what we need to fix. with all of the contradicting information all over the place, it is extremely difficult to know what to believe and what to disregard. some want it so bad that they believe everything they read and it just creates a vicious cycle. ive been there and still go through it at times when i read a bind boggling article.

point is: OP, i feel where youre coming from and it sucks when you really feel like youre at a complete stop. i hate to repeat what many others have said, but the best thing you can do is read read read as much you as you can. id shit my pants if i knew how many hours ive spent reading about this shit and i still feel like i have much much more to learn. try the split. although everyone is different, i am like tinman… my body responds incredibly when i hit my body with a split for a few months, then hit it hard with TBT for 4-6 weeks. and you have to eat eat eat to ensure youre not wasting your efforts. also, do lifts that you fucking hate doing. for me, i HATED leg work because i basically had to start over with me having to basically relearn to walk. but i love leg work now, even though my legs are still little and very weak. but if you keep pushing only particular mucles, your body only lets you get so assymetrical and the more lean muscle mass you have, the better youre going to shed fat.

ill stop there because i know im starting to fuckin rant and will probably catch shit from someone on something i said.

[quote]WS4JB wrote:
BrownTrout wrote:
You know, I’d sure like to see a pic of Waterbury’s physique. All the pictures I know of are pretty unrevealing.

heres an article with quite a few pics of Chad, and here is a pic from his website.[/quote]

BEHOLD! THE MAN WITH NO DELTOIDS!

Ironically, it looks like Chad Waterbury needs some lateral raises in his life.

I can’t imagine what other lagging bodyparts he might have following his own training philosophy.

What? Am I supposed to be soft and understanding with somebody that is clearly blaming his lack of results on trainers and programs rather than his lack of efforts?? IF he would have started the thread stating that he was a beginner even though he’s being messing around with weights here and there for 3 years and need some info/help, then maybe the responses he would have received from most guys here would have been a bit different. IF he’s truly serious about getting big, hopefully he will take this as a kick in the pants and actually DO what he is supposed to be doing, whether he chooses a split routine OR any of the other programs offered in this website.

Now, as far as the tone of my post, it was not to portrait any “hardcore” persona or whatever, it’s just me being dead honest, I didn’t know I had to be soft and nurturing in a website called T-Nation.

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:]Misfit is truly hardcore; I mean it’s truly hardcore and called for and respectable to talk derisively and dismissively and disrespectfully a kid trying to get his shit together!

Pussy![/quote]

Dumbass!

[quote]JonBlood wrote:
wfifer wrote:
I do Waterbury-type stuff with my clients who are looking for “general conditioning”. They come to me looking to lose fat and get a bit stronger with limited time to do so. TBT is also appropriate for most beginners, IMO.

I would suggest that your lack of hypertrophy has more to do with your diet than your training. This is not to say you’re not ready for a split, but don’t expect anything different if you’re not eating enough to grow. What are your lifts like?

I have been lifting for three and a half years now. I started with chest/bis monday, back/tris wednesday and shoulders on friday. That’s is how I initially gained size until my progress started to slow and eventually stop. So, I looked elsewhere for advice. I came upon T-Nation and started to read all of the benefits of total body training.

Like I said, I have been doing tbt for about eight months now and I really do feel like I get more out of the workout because of the increased intensity, but I have not grown much. I am currently on his TBT workout which really does kick my ass. I eat over 2400 calories each day and train hard. So frustrating!
[/quote]

Now THIS is quality trolling. Not obvious (too much) in the thread starter, then a nice lead in with the ‘over 2400 calories’. Kudos!! Can’t wait to read the rest of the thread!

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I just got back from the store. I bought 20 t-bones about an inch thick. I eat at least two of those a day at a pound each on average along with everything else. [/quote]

Cholesterol, much?

[quote]LiveFromThe781 wrote:
Free2Be wrote:
When Charles Poliquin says that his athletes are all on splits and that no one he knows who is both big and strong has done TBT for the bulk of their training, that is saying something.

No body builder does it, no one huge today does it. If you want to be big, do splits, plain and simple.

when Poloquin says he gained 20 pounds from eating grapefruit THATS saying something[/quote]

Very true. You have to separate his grandstanding from his seriousness.

eat big, lift big, get big.

it ain’t black magic.

Just takes a while

[quote]LiveFromThe781 wrote:
Clifford wrote:
a PX vs Waterbury debate article about split training vs total body training for hypertrophy would no doubt be one of the most controversial “in your face” articles ever. and probably get more discussion then any article i have ever read.

heres the article…

PX: eat food, use a split, stop being a pussy, if you get too fat add cardio or drop some cals

CW: lots of scientific words, studies, Biotest plug, hopscotch with a weighted vest[/quote]

Couldn’t agree more

And that’s the exact reason why knowledgeable, big, real world guys cant write articles.

what you just described is exactly what they’d all say. And that don’t sell supplements to dumb ass newbies and it doesn’t make interesting reading (even though its all true)

People don’t want the truth, they just want their own dumb ass opinions fed back to them so they can justify what they do all day long.

[quote]tinman15 wrote:
I feel really bad for you man. You came here looking for help, with a legitimate post, and all you get is a bunch of douche bags who spend more time putting you and other people down instead of using all the time into actually helping you and others reach their goals. Which is essentially what we are all here for. It’s a reminder of why I stay away from forums.[/quote]

I would think some of the misconceptions you write in this novel you posted would be a better reason to stop posting in the forums…

[quote]
It would take too much time for me to give you the plethora of knowledge I have learned[/quote]

Like…

[quote].

Don’t count cals, calories is a concept that has never really been proven. Only thing that really matters is sugar and food allergens, those are the two things that mostly make you add fat.[/quote]

That is very interesting…apparently calories haven’t been proven yet. What year is this?

[quote]

Taking high carbs post workout is the only time its safe, and encouraged if you’re trying to make progress and gain muscle mass. [/quote]

Is someone here dieting for a contest? What if they have a very fast metabolism? Everyone sees better progress from low carbs?

[quote]
Keeping a constant supply of aminos and fats for your body to use is the best way to add muscle mass. There is actually a study I’m looking into and thinking about trying where eating only once every 4-6 hours is better for gaining mass. The concept is after a short fast the body is hypersensitive to amino acids so rotating this with constant feedings so you keep body fat low could be an even better way to add extra mass. I’m getting way too off track into geeky science stuff… [/quote]

If you think 4-6 hours alone constitutes a “fast” I would suggest holding off on that “study” you plan to put together until after you earn a degree. In fact, most studies are showing no difference in overall results from regular feedings 6 times a day and someone who can get the same caloric intake in from lesser frequency feedings. Obviously this doesn’t help the guy who needs over 5,000 cals a day just to gain weight as it would be damned hard to eat that much in only two or three meals without starving the rest of the day.

[quote]
But, also it’s often smart to take out certain protein sources for 6 weeks and then reintroduce them. [/quote]

How is this “smart”?

I’m sorry, but WHAT? Where are you getting this info from? Most bodybuilders eat the same shit for decades on end when preparing for contests with very little changes and they don’t “build up food tolerances” that somehow lead to magic fat gain.

Are we back to believing calories haven’t been proven again?

[quote]

For the most part though, just focus on eating as much as you can as cleanly as you can until you get your body fat to single digits, then focus on staying there. [/quote]

Uh,. what if he gains muscle faster at 12% body fat? What if he finds he gains muscle faster at “13%”? Why do you think everyone needs to stay under 10% body fat? Most competitive bodybuilders don’t even stay that lean year round and it doesn’t take into account those who see more progress at higher body fat percentages. Are you saying people like that don’t exist?

[quote]
If you desire to get leaner, adjust the little things like rotating protein sources out and making sure to use as large a variety of sources as possible. [/quote]

WHY?

Wait, so you have scientific proof that “hormones” are universally optimized simply because someone is “10%” instead of 14%?

Do you really believe this shit?

I’m not even reading the rest of that, but my guess is, 18" arms aren’t something you are sporting. I am also recommending you take more advanced courses in biology…and then take a little time to realize that some of the people on this board aren’t exactly uneducated.

I can see why you avoid the forums…

“Stay under 10% body fat” and “hormones are optimized at 10%” isn’t a plethora of knowledge. You simply read some articles. You don’t get a degree in random personal trainer article reading.

Just to answer the original question, i did Chad Waterbury’s TBT. I gained alot of strength doing this program which i am happy with. However, from trying all of these things i have now stumbled across the fact that for pure hypertrophy split training with quite a high volume with heavy weights seems to be working.

[quote]Clifford wrote:
LiveFromThe781 wrote:
Clifford wrote:
a PX vs Waterbury debate article about split training vs total body training for hypertrophy would no doubt be one of the most controversial “in your face” articles ever. and probably get more discussion then any article i have ever read.

heres the article…

PX: eat food, use a split, stop being a pussy, if you get too fat add cardio or drop some cals

CW: lots of scientific words, studies, Biotest plug, hopscotch with a weighted vest

so your saying you wouldn’t read the article? i find that a little hard to believe. i guarantee neither of them will convince the other their wrong but people would read it just to watch them bash each other.i get the hunch from reading some of their past posts this wouldn’t be your friendly neighborhood debate. humans love drama and that’s why i think it would be a fun article to read. do you disagree? [/quote]

LOL. The last time we had a “debate” or argument (about 3 years ago), CW had the entire thread deleted and removed. I seriously doubt, given that response, that he wants to go down that route again.