Olympic Lifting Programs

So i want to add O-lifts in my program. A question is:

  1. Will it help me with my other lifts?
  2. Since I’m into MMA stuff, will this make me more explosive?
  3. Is it more beneficial to just get stronger overall before incorporating o-lifts into a program? As in a good solid yaer of training before engaging into them?

dl-

I’m no strength coach, but my two cents would be the following.

1- yes
2- yes
3- um depends on your current level of conditioning etc, it’s hard to pass a judgement like that without knowing your numbers and how much you’ve trained before and your overall tolerance for high workloads.

but I’d go ahead and say yes.

Xen-I have followed the deepsquatter program. You can dump the 5th day (I did), as it is more of an add-on–meaning no O-lifting, just supportive exercises.

The volume isn’t really bad at all, just adjust for the insane number of reps on the leg strengthening exercises done at the end of the program. 5x20 on Goodmornings is a bit ridiculous in my opinion. Just keep in mind that the program is designed for someone with NO lifting experience, so the weights will be very (relatively) light, thus the higher reps.

The good thing is that it is a one core lift per day approach, so it give plenty of opportunity to improve your lifts without worrying about increasing the weight too much and sacrificing technique. Nearly perfect for beginners. I followed it for about six weeks before ditching it for a more conventional program involving both Snatch and Clean and Jerk in the same day (working up to a heavy single in each) followed by a push or pull and finally a leg strengthener. If you give it a shot you may be pleasantly surprised.

I’ll look at it in a different light then thanks for the clarification

There are some great recommendations here. I would add the book and video tape by former U.S. weightlifting coach Jim Schmitz. He has put together an excellent no nonsense book and videotape to take novice lifters through the intermediate level. There is no b.s. in his programs and he had the busy American lifter in mind when he created them.

I had the good fortune to work under his tutelage at his gym The Sports Palace in the early 90’s. His programs may not dazzle you on paper (they’re nuts and bolts) but they will give you dazzling results.

You can buy the book and/or video through IronMind.

Hrastnik, nice going finding that program. I couldn’t find it either even though I ran a search on the entire site.

Xen - You cannot go wrong with Mike Burgener’s OL WOD. I based my recommendations on the fact that you wanted some size gains, which is why I didn’t recommend Mike’s WOD - I don’t think it will result in a lot of hypertrophy but it may lead to some. As strength-based program for OL, you’d be hard pressed to find something better.

Bodybuildings Best Kept Secret by Don Alessi

http://www.t-nation.com/readTopic.do?id=459811

[quote]jackdaniels wrote:
Bodybuildings Best Kept Secret by Don Alessi

http://www.t-nation.com/readTopic.do?id=459811

[/quote]

I’m no expert on program design but I’m going to take a wild guess and say that an Olympic lifting program should actually involve some Olympic lifting. Doing things with a “snatch grip” does not an Olympic lifting program make.

Good call, well said.

[quote]jackdaniels wrote:
Bodybuildings Best Kept Secret by Don Alessi

http://www.t-nation.com/readTopic.do?id=459811

[/quote]

The guy demonstrating the clean pull and overhead squat isn’t really showing good form.

Ok, this is what I decided on.

QWA website has a program I really like. But I feel like I need to get in shape for it almost :-p

Using the knowledge I have from the other programs posted on this thread (HTT article was very informative) and my previous experiences with how my body reacts to certain rep ranges, etc.

I’m going to have a prepatory/ accumulation phase before beginning the QWA year long program. And yes. I"m going to do this program for at least 7-9 months.

The Program::

www.qwa.org/articles/yearprogram.asp

Depending on how I feel I may add in some Unilateral leg work, or weighted chins/dips things like that. I always leave some room for change. But for the most part I’m sticking to this new program.

Below is my prepatory program, it’s designed to improve my weakpoints and condition me to the workload [oh press, leg endurance]. It will be a 3-4 week phase with one week in which I’ll deload. Probably just bench do dips and unilateral leg work for 4 days, nothing serious…i’m just going to wing it.

Accumlation/Prepatory Phase::

– sets represent work weight, not prior warmup (1-2sets)–

Day 1::

Dead stop Front Squat 10x5
Power Clean 5x2
Triple Menace Press (3r)
Seated Dbell Press (5x10)
Bent row 5x10
Hanging Pikes (3x8)

Day 2::

GM 5x5
OH Squat 5x5
Strict Military Press (5x5)
Snatch Grip behind neck press (3x6)
Strict Reverse Military Press (3x12)
Strict Chinup (3x8)
Dragon Pikes 5x2

Day 3::

1 1/2 Back Squat 10x5
Snatch 5x2
Seated barbell OH press (10x1)
OH Support (5x10-15seconds)
Snatch Pull 5x5
W. Situps 5x10

Kind of a bit… but i’m 19, if i get a decent nights sleep this doesn’t even phase me. If I get enough protien I wont even be sore :-p

Great thread! Any thoughts on integrating olypmic lifts into Westside as outline by tate in his “Eight Keys” series?

My first thought would be to add them in on the Dynamic Effort days, as they are clearly speed oriented exercises. Any ideas on what to replace in the workout as to not jack the volume to high?

westside conjugate system was originally designed for olympic lifters in russia…so why wouldn’t it work?

This is what louie would do if he were an O-lifting coach which is the best you can get an idea on how to integrate it.

what if i were an olympic coach
louie simmons
17 July 2005
What If I were an Olympic Coach
by, Louie Simmons

In 1968 Jan Talts of the USSR said his training consisted of 90% power work and 10% actual competitive lifts. By doing this, he became one of the greatest lifters of all time. I recall him moving up to 110 kg. (actual weight roughly 100 kg.) and soundly defeating Bob Bednarski at the 1970 World Championships in Columbus, Ohio. If this system worked for him, why not me? Thus by using the training of the Soviets and modifying the special exercises to fit into powerlifting, I have developed the strongest power club in the world. In the United States, Olympic lifters have the Olympic Training Center, a national coach, and money in their budget. In fact, the Olympic lifter has everything that a powerlifter does not, yet the United States powerlifters rule the world, while our Olympic lifter brothers drag up the rear at international meets. I ask you, how can this be? Olympic lifters have a lot of excuses, none valid. This brings me to the title “What if” I trained Olympic Lifters?

If I were an Olympic lifting coach, I would first teach how one should train. A major mistake is doing the two lifts too often. Good training requires variety. I have said before that everything works, but nothing works forever.

The dynamic method with submaximal weight should be employed. This method is very effective with the correct percentages. I would recommend using weights between 60 and 80% of max to start with. A lifter who can clean 400 would start with 240 for the first week of training. The lifter would perform 12 cleans with short rest periods between sets (45 seconds to start with) and then 12 power snatches with the same percent and the same rest time between sets. If a lifter’s best snatch is 330, the weight is 198.

Jump 5% a week, and repeat 12 cleans and snatches at 65%. At 70% and 75% reduce the lifts to nine each. When you reach 80%, I recommend eight lifts each, for a total of 16. You are now employing the dynamic method with submaximal weight. You have also established a rest period. When using relatively light weights, short rest intervals are crucial. One should never let the body recuperate. If this happens, the athlete is doing nothing. Naturally, the lifter must use maximum force and always try to accelerate the bar.

The lifts should only be done once time per week. Lifters in the United States spend too much time on the quick lifts. The reasons is twofold. First, the bar speed is too quick, for the most part. A weight can move too fast to develop max force. The weight selection is critical. As regards the velocity-force curve (a concept you should be familiar with), the bar should have a sufficient amount of weight to achieve the force factor and a certain amount of speed to supply the velocity. If you understand this, you may begin to see the problem. The olympic lifter may move the bar so fast that force is neglected.

Remember what I said about weight selection. Let me illustrate by talking about throwing an object with a certain arm speed. Arm movement represents your absolute strength. If I throw a whiffle ball, it won’t go very far because it’s too light for max force to exist. Now if I throw a shot put, it doesn’t go very far either because it’s too heavy; thus no velocity is developed. However, if I throw a baseball, it will go a great distance because I have found a balance between force and velocity. This balance is found by doing velocity work with the Olympic lifts, and force work with special exercises in a controlled method known as the conjugate method. Foreign lifters have said the U.S. lifters lack strength, and I see the same thing. But no one seems to have an answer. I do. To suceed at weight lifting, a number of things are required. First you must be very strong.

This is where special exercises come in. If you think you must clean, for example, to be good at the clean, you are wrong, at least partly. I have seen a strong man clean 250 the first time he tried. How did he make that initial clean with no formal training? It was done through other physical activity. If he only concentrated on the clean, it is doubtful that he would ever double his effort to 500. However, if he used special exercises to develop the correct pulling muscles, he would have a much better chance.

It is known that to become a better miler, one has to increase his ability to sprint as well as increase stamina to the point of performing more and more work by doing multiple sets of runs at specific distances. At the same time, the rest periods between runs must be shortened. Also special exercises must be done to advance his progress. This is true in weightlifting as well.

The second reason why too much time on the quick lifts is that if a lifter cleans and snatches all the time, it can lead to overdevelopment in some major muscle groups, while neglecting others. I’m sure that if you line up five weightlifters in a row, you will find that some have better traps, while lacking erector size, and some may have huge glutes, while others have hardly any glute development. This is because they have different structures. Special exercises can counteract this.

When using the conjugate method, you must work your weaknesses first. If your traps are the weak link, work them first with pulls from boxes, snatch grip deadlift shrugs, or one-arm snatches. You will develop max force through heavy weights lifted at a slow tempo. If your pulls, good mornings, back raises, squats, etc., go up, your clean and jerk and snatch will go up as well.

We have a junior (22 year old) 275 pounder who is the only junior to hold the open world record in the bench press at 728.5 pounds. He actually exceeded the 308 world record, the only man to do this. He trains the bench press with 365 for eight to ten sets of triples, barely 50% of his max. How is this possible? This is accomplished through special exercises for the bench press. The triples are done in a very explosive manner, followed by triceps, delt, and lat work. The second workout consists of rack work, floor press, or board press for a max single. We don’t care how slow or hard the lifts are on this day. This is the max effort method. We don’t even care if a lift is missed, because at least he is putting forth maximum effort. He will do a certain major exercise for two or three weeks and then switch. By doing this, he maintains velocity on one day and max effort on the other day 52 weeks a year.

What’s my point? You can do the same, by doing the multiple sets with submaximal weights and building explosive strength, and build amazing brute strength throughout the year with pulls off at least four different height boxes. Pick a certain box and max out for two or three weeks. Then switch to a different box and repeat. The pulls should be followed by some type of good morning. There should be a wide variety of exercises to choose from, and the number of exercises should be limited to four or five per workout. Don’t do what you like to do; rather do what you need to do.

I am amazed to hear that the squat is overrated as far as developing the Olympic lifts. Remember Paul Anderson? He was an unreal squatter. Paul was light-years ahead of everyone in the squat, and at the same time he catapulted himself ahead of everyone on the Olympic platform. The increase in his squat paralleled his success in the Olympic lifts. After Paul visited the USSR and astounded them, they began to build squat racks. They soon realized the benefits of the squat. I hear all the time that one only has to squat with 10% more than their best clean and jerk (C&J). But why then do we hear of monster squats by the European SHWs (900 pounds and more)? Well, if my math is correct, they are doing a lot more than 10% over their C&J. The same holds true for D. Aranda of Cuba, a junior world record holder in the C&J with 402. He squats a deep 617. The 175 pound difference is well over 10%!

The squat can be the equalizer for the U.S. lifters. I recall that Kurlovich said the squat had no correlation to the C&J. That may be true for him because of his particular body structure. He quite possibly is built in a way that the legs and low back work heavily in all exercises. But not everyone is in this category. It is true that the squat could increase to the point where it would not help the C&J and snatch, but remember Kurlovich? He claimed a 400 kg. squat. The ability to do 881 could have been the reserve he needed to do those massive snatches and C&J’s."

The U.S. lifters need to increase their squat poundages for the main purpose of increasing their absolute strength in the hips, low back, and legs. The squat should be a mojor part of training. Most of the training should be between 50 and 70%. I have a 165 pound lifter that trains with 8 to 12 sets of two reps. Short rest periods are a must (45 to 60 seconds) between sets. He trains with 405-435 and his best contest squat is 722. As you can see, he never uses more than 60%. The same is true for my 220. He never handles a weight over 500, yet made an easy 843 at the Worlds. That is also 60% for his sets of two reps. I have many examples of the 60% rule. Everyone at Westside squats one time a week, followed by a variety of low back and ab work. This is our dynamic method.

We also have a maximum effort day. We manage these great poundages through a high volume of training, coupled with roughly 40 special exercises, using only two or three at a time and rotating them every two or three weeks; this is called conjugate training. If your snatch grip deadlift goes up 50 pounds along with an increase in your high pulls off boxes, your calf-ham-glute and back raises, and your squats, then your snatch is increased. You must set records in many special exercises. Pick a group of exercises that work well for you and rotate them every two or three weeks.

My methods are the reverse of everyone else’s. For example, if my lifter does a C&J with 402 and we are trying to compete with a lifter who is capable of 462, my training goal is to bring up the strength to that of our competitor by working towards being equal to his high pulls, squats, back raises, good mornings, etc. When we become equal to him in the special exercises, we will be equal to his 462. The U.S. lifters have the techinal skills but lack a high level of special strength, which can only be developed through special exercises. Progress in a lift does not stall; rather, a particular muscle group stalls. If our bench press stalls, we simply do more special work on the triceps, delts, upper back or lats. That is what is holding back the bench press, not the bench press itself.

I would use the same systrem for the Olympic lifts. Only a few have a perfect balance of muscle groups. Everyone else needs to do a higher volume of work for certain muscle groups. I am certain you have seen lifters with tremendous traps with mediocre erectors or just the opposite. Just look at the photo in MILO, Vol. 3, No. 2, page 31, of Pisarenko doing snatch pulls off a bench. Note first his balanced physical development. Certainly some of it comes from special pulls, such as thoses in the photo. Why do some Russian lifters do snatch pulls while standing in knee-high water? These special exercises
enable them to kick out butt. There is no excuse for a U.S. lifter not to be on page 31 of that issue of MILO.

With a high volume of reverse hypers, belt squats, kneeling squats, and special work with chains for pulling, learning how and why box squatting should be incorporated into training, knowing what percentage and how much volume to use, doing some eccentric, isokinetic, static, and dynamic work and many special exercises, we could move up considerably in the world of weightlifting. If we are to have a chance at the world level, we must learn how to train. If there is an excuse to fall back on, it is not knowing how to train. I would like to say something about Gary Taylor. Here is an unbelievably strong man. Did you notice that he is strong in just about everything he does? I would guess that one exercise contributed to the progress of the next exercise. This is exactly what I am talking about. One needs a widee array of exercises. I am quite sure Gary could still do well in weightlifting and take his fair share of powerlifting trophies as well. Is he a throwback to lifters like Ernie Pickett, Fred Lowe, and Russell Knipp, or is he what should be the future of weightlifting? Mixing an assortment of special exercises to excel in cleaning ability and his unreal push jerk, I think he exemplifies the latter.

Powerlifters sometimes will use the Olympic lifts to help their speed. It would be wise to do special exercises in slow tempo to develop max force in the Olympic lifts. Special exercises will not destroy form, but will in fact bring good form together by reinforcing the weak links. We know that there are six phases in the snatch. I find it hard to believe that each phase is equally developed in most lifters. Find the weak phase and strengthen it through special means. I find a similar problem in the squat. Most lifters base the amount of their squat poundages off their C&J. But American lifters’ C&J are so weak that it holds the squat back. Push the squats along with the pulls. Don’t do it the other way around. It’s not the C&J that should dictate the squats and pulls, but vice versa. The number of training workouts should be between four and a maximum of eight. For now, over eight would lead to overtraining. Once the work capacities are raised, then and only then would more workouts be added. I would raise workloads by reverse hypers and belt squats. Both have rehabilitation qualities and strength building potential. Exercises like walking barbell or dumbbell lunges and static squats against a wall would also be used to raise work capacity. Hip flexor work with either hanging or lying leg raises, one-leg swings, or spread eagle sit-ups would be done. Overhead support work must be done from the front, back, and seated. Different grips would be used. Lots of work for the torso, glutes and hamstrings is needed.

We need to view training tapes of the best lifters between major meets to see what made them strong. We must learn to max out on special exercises to test our strength gains. Learn the difference between a training max and a contest max. I have found success by changing routines and exercises to fit the individual lifter. The body is always changing and so must the training for constant progress."

Bump so I can get some opinions on my program :-p

I just checked out the QWA program. You just can’t beat having all the brainwork laid out for you, know what I mean? I like it a lot. I’m not sure you will really need your own prep phase to “get into shape” for it though. It sounds like you have been training, and given your age, you should be able to adjust quickly.

Just a thought on the percentages they are dicatating in the beginning. Unless you have been practicing O Lifting already, you probably won’t have a true indication of what your 1RM’s on the lifts are. They are so technique oriented that until your form gets to be second nature, you probably shouldn’t bother with trying to figure your 1RM’s. Take the first 4-5 weeks and concentrate on form work. Almost go lighter than you think you could/should. Work on balance and bar speed. After this initial period, try for a true 1RM. From there on out you can train according to the percentages they are prescribing. Good luck.

Why seated dumbell press?

Sounds good Xen, give it a shot.

Also, I was wondering what a clean or snatch pull is? Is that the same as a high pull?

Close. Clean or snatch pull is basically the first half of the movement. Usually pulling to triple extension with or without a shrug and returning to the floor. The main difference being that the arms remain in a (mostly) straight position, not pulling to armpit height.

just wanted to bump this, good info ,keep it coming

[quote]deadgame wrote:
I just checked out the QWA program. You just can’t beat having all the brainwork laid out for you, know what I mean? I like it a lot. I’m not sure you will really need your own prep phase to “get into shape” for it though. It sounds like you have been training, and given your age, you should be able to adjust quickly.

Just a thought on the percentages they are dicatating in the beginning. Unless you have been practicing O Lifting already, you probably won’t have a true indication of what your 1RM’s on the lifts are. They are so technique oriented that until your form gets to be second nature, you probably shouldn’t bother with trying to figure your 1RM’s. Take the first 4-5 weeks and concentrate on form work. Almost go lighter than you think you could/should. Work on balance and bar speed. After this initial period, try for a true 1RM. From there on out you can train according to the percentages they are prescribing. Good luck.[/quote]

Will Do.

I know my maxes for the variations but not the full versions. So I’ll give it time to adjust.

I"m only using this prepatory phase to get in some high rep ranges into my system. I rarely use high reps so it’ll be a nice switch up… might have a good effect when I switch over.

Did the last day of the workout I prescribed above… Not bad, fucking fun actually I’ll definitely LOVE doing the QWA program.