[quote]hardgnr wrote:
buffd_samurai wrote:
elusive wrote:
My point is that someone with great proportions but 230lbs, shouldn’t beat someone with good proportions and 30lbs heavier. Especially if their conditioning was the same or the heavier guy had better conditioning (Branch).
The way I see it is that bodybuilding is a triangle: one side is size, one side is shape, and one side is conditioning/density/separation.
Every year the criteria for the triangle changes…one year the long side of the triangle is for size, the next shape, etc. What most people really want is an equilateral triangle…and I think the equilateral triangle was reached with Coleman in 2001-2003. Kai is close to that when he is ON, but he wasn’t this time.
Lacking anyone who meets the equilateral triangle, judgement must be made on a whole bunch of scalene triangles (no equal sides).
[/quote]
Um…that’s what I meant by the equilateral triangle. I probably didn’t explain my thoughts very well…I’ve been in a very “reflective” moment following this Olympia…lots of interesting topics will come out of this one; at the top will be the discussions of shape versus condition when it used to be sheer mass versus shape.
Not sure what you meant here. In no way can one confidently say Branch has the “shape” side of the triangle balanced with the mass and condition side. I would say Branch is definitely a scalene triangle…the mass and condition sides are way longer than the shape side.
So if I understand you right, you would judge a contest based mostly on improvement versus great combo of mass, shape, and condition even if it was the same as the year before. I disagree with you…especially your comment regarding Dex slid. What? He was just as big as last year but more conditioned.
It is obvious we both value very different things in a physique, because when Dexter poses, he wows me.
[quote]
I don’t think Dex was ever going to win this one. If Kai and Phil came in better, then I would not be surprised if they both beat him also.[/quote]
You may be right…but these 3 are what I would consider the closest thing we have today to possible equilateral triangles provided Kai and Phil attain the condition they are known to be able to obtain but still maintain the mass they have now. I agree with the poster who indicated when all things are equal…mass/shape/condition…for one’s height, the bigger ones should win. In this case, both Phil and Kai are larger than Dex, and therefore they should beat Dex provided they are in the same condition and because they have that same element of shape.
Just me 2 cents.