[quote]Montenegro wrote:
Overall calorie-wise, does this new protocol end up being significantly lower?
one thing I love about the current protocol is that I’m banging out like 1400 calories in that window… makes it much easier to hit calorie goals without spending the whole day going back in forth between the kitchen and dining room///[/quote]
It’s lower, but nothing against adding Surge Recovery on top of the new protocol if your goal is a jacked up caloric intake.
sounds good to me, thanks
Thibs-
I have been using the protocol you orginally came up with Surge instead of the Anaconda. Solid results, but I was wondering if you had some thoughts on these protocols used over an entire week considering I play a couple sports in conjunction with lifting.
My Week:
Monday - Tennis (1-2 hours)
Tuesday - Full-Body Workout
Wednesday - Tennis or Box
Thurday - Full-Body Workout
Friday - Off
Sat AM - Boxing (Spar / station to station drill work)
Sat PM - Lower Body Split
Sun - Upper Body Split
I know it is crazy, but I have always trained to support atheletics and the protocol helps a great deal on the lifting. Anyway I need to lose weight for boxing and was considering a low-carb approach for my meals and just focusing on getting my carbs from the workout protocols, but I was wondering what you thoughts are about adding a “protocol” to the non-lifting workouts. I can make it on no-carbs but doubt that that would be very muscle sparing. It seems like a finabar before would have a positive impact.
Thanks
Christian,
Are you still using this same protocal, or is it still evolving?
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.