Mike Matarazzo Passed Away

[quote]MissHarber wrote:
I know this is a bit off topic but since everyone’s discussing steroids…

I’ve often wondered how prevalent roid usage really is. I often google heavy leg workouts and run into pictures of females who look overly masuline (but have nice [huge] legs and asses) and I wonder if it’s roid usage.

Ever seen some of those South American ‘fitness’ models on instagram and facebook? Do you think some of those girls roid up? It’s hard to tell IMO because I don’t know what to look for. Like the other day I ran into a video of some South American fitness model chick squatting 4 plates. She did it with absolute ease, but her quad development looked nowhere near like she squats 4 plates.

I’m thinking they were either crossfit plates or something else was up. But she has a huge rear, so. I’m assuming either she has rear implants or she has killer levers for squats and her glutes fire harder than most with them, and that coupled with roid usage causes her to plump up in that ‘area.’ I really don’t know. But will steroids affect other muscles and cause them to grow even if you don’t work them?

Sorry, I realize how big of a noob I am. [/quote]

This the video?

Ah, if only he was a “smart” user and took his milk thistle and drank his cranberry juice and saw a doctor regularly to get blood checkups. Oh wait, he did go to doctors.

[quote]Spidey22 wrote:

This the video?[/quote]

lol, I had seen that before, but I forgot how thoroughly convincing it is. 5 plates per side, practically exploding with zero exertion on each of many many repetitions… good stuff.

S

[quote]MinotaurXXX wrote:

[quote]MissHarber wrote:

I’m thinking they were either crossfit plates or something else was up. But she has a huge rear, so. I’m assuming either she has rear implants or she has killer levers for squats and her glutes fire harder than most with them, and that coupled with roid usage causes her to plump up in that ‘area.’ I really don’t know. But will steroids affect other muscles and cause them to grow even if you don’t work them?

Sorry, I realize how big of a noob I am. [/quote]

The way the traditional squat was explained and taught to me, the glutes are and should be activated when coming out of the hole. They never really turn off, or at least they shouldn’t throughout the entire movement, positive and negative. Just their level of contribution changes. This is one of the reasons why Vince Gironda advocated the traditional squat for women’s glutes.

A good source for the type of steroid information you’re asking is the Shadow Pro thread in Steroids sub forum. He gave me really good insight on what the figure competitors take.
[/quote]

Credit to Bret Contreras (I can’t post link)

“Squats and deads don?t maximize glute activation, they don?t maximize hip extension torque, and they leave some room on the table in terms of glute development (more on this later). Moreover, squats and deads are better-suited for certain body types. Many lifters will never be good squatters. Some are forced to lean over considerably in the deadlift and also the squat due to their body structure, which places large amounts of loading on the spine. This incredible demand on the spine does indeed build core stability, but this comes at a price as it also increases the risks. Squats and deads do require skill; there are many exercises that are simpler and easier to master. Squats and deads have probably led to more injuries in the gym than any lifts in existence”

And also (Credit to Bret Contreras)

“Forth, when challenged to maintain anterior pelvic tilt, the glutes don?t fire as hard. This is the case with squats and deads. Don?t believe me? Arch your back as hard as possible and squeeze the glutes. Now get into a neutral spinal position and squeeze the glutes. Huge difference.”

I squatted for a year and got up to sets of 8 at 225. I couldn’t get past parallel because I would round (I have shitty levers for squats [long ass legs and the shortest torso imaginable]) and I busted ass forever trying to make my ass grow. I finally ditched squats and implemented barbell hip thrusts. My glutes burned like never before with any other lift and my hip measurement increased 4 inches. My hip measurement went from 34.5 to 38.5.

[quote]MissHarber wrote:

[quote]MinotaurXXX wrote:

[quote]MissHarber wrote:

I’m thinking they were either crossfit plates or something else was up. But she has a huge rear, so. I’m assuming either she has rear implants or she has killer levers for squats and her glutes fire harder than most with them, and that coupled with roid usage causes her to plump up in that ‘area.’ I really don’t know. But will steroids affect other muscles and cause them to grow even if you don’t work them?

Sorry, I realize how big of a noob I am. [/quote]

The way the traditional squat was explained and taught to me, the glutes are and should be activated when coming out of the hole. They never really turn off, or at least they shouldn’t throughout the entire movement, positive and negative. Just their level of contribution changes. This is one of the reasons why Vince Gironda advocated the traditional squat for women’s glutes.

A good source for the type of steroid information you’re asking is the Shadow Pro thread in Steroids sub forum. He gave me really good insight on what the figure competitors take.
[/quote]

Credit to Bret Contreras (I can’t post link)

“Squats and deads don?t maximize glute activation, they don?t maximize hip extension torque, and they leave some room on the table in terms of glute development (more on this later). Moreover, squats and deads are better-suited for certain body types. Many lifters will never be good squatters. Some are forced to lean over considerably in the deadlift and also the squat due to their body structure, which places large amounts of loading on the spine. This incredible demand on the spine does indeed build core stability, but this comes at a price as it also increases the risks. Squats and deads do require skill; there are many exercises that are simpler and easier to master. Squats and deads have probably led to more injuries in the gym than any lifts in existence”

And also (Credit to Bret Contreras)

“Forth, when challenged to maintain anterior pelvic tilt, the glutes don?t fire as hard. This is the case with squats and deads. Don?t believe me? Arch your back as hard as possible and squeeze the glutes. Now get into a neutral spinal position and squeeze the glutes. Huge difference.”

I squatted for a year and got up to sets of 8 at 225. I couldn’t get past parallel because I would round (I have shitty levers for squats [long ass legs and the shortest torso imaginable]) and I busted ass forever trying to make my ass grow. I finally ditched squats and implemented barbell hip thrusts. My glutes burned like never before with any other lift and my hip measurement increased 4 inches. My hip measurement went from 34.5 to 38.5.[/quote]

I’m going back to how it was explained to me so hope this makes sense. I’m more or less paraphrasing what I was told.

The glutes DO activate or SHOULD activate in a squat. This does NOT mean that everyone will get all the glute work they need from squatting alone. In fact, many people who have a poor ability to engage the glutes are setting themselves up for injury. This is why many of the supplemental exercises are important.

In fact, my Coach had me perform certain exercises to make sure my glutes (and everything else) were firing properly BEFORE he taught me to squat properly.

You said yourself you have less than ideal levers for squatting. If that’s the case, then things like hip thrusts will be a better choice for you with putting less stress on the lower back. And the hip thrust places the quads and hamstrings in a WEAKENED position so the glutes have to fire.

Brett’s right in that squats and deads are very technical and should be approached with caution. This doesn’t mean that they should be avoided (unless the person has some injury in the equation).

The way my training has progressed with my Coach (going on 8th month now), we do the following:

  1. address imbalances

  2. integrate movements such as squat variations

  3. constantly evaluate my progress, mix and match different money movements with accessories so I stay injury free

I have scoliosis. And years of mountain biking gave me questionable knees. Going about this the right way, I can squat and dead with nothing more than DOMS the next day or two.

Brett makes some good points and he is known for being the glute guy. And people who don’t want to stress the spine or can’t otherwise squat should use the hip thrust. Even my Coach uses it for some of his clients. I’ve seen him use it with the typical office worker who sits on her fanny all day.

Yet the strongest and most athletic people I’ve seen know how to properly engage the glutes in a squat pattern. The hip thrust, for them, are either an accessory movement or something they don’t bother with.

I can tell you love the hip thrust and, hey, as long as it’s working for you, great. Not everyone needs it, though.

Sorry to hijack from the squat debate, but…

A thread about Matarazzo is incomplete without mentioning his calves.

^^^I should be the one apologizing. This thread is about Mike, after all. Those are some epic calves (and everything else).

Yeah sorry for switching the thread topic. Epic calves though.

I get the sense a lot of people on this forum are in favor of steroids. Does this story change your opinion?

[quote]DiddlySquat wrote:
I get the sense a lot of people on this forum are in favor of steroids. Does this story change your opinion?[/quote]
Not really, I’m pretty sure there were many factors that came into play that caused his downfall in health than just steroids alone. Unfortunately, We will probably never know. You can do things the smart way or do things the 'I want to be Mr. Olympia way for a couple of decades. I highly doubt he was the only one at the time doing copious amounts of drugs and most of them seem to be pretty healthy even today.

[quote]AzCats wrote:

[quote]DiddlySquat wrote:
I get the sense a lot of people on this forum are in favor of steroids. Does this story change your opinion?[/quote]
Not really, I’m pretty sure there were many factors that came into play that caused his downfall in health than just steroids alone. Unfortunately, We will probably never know. You can do things the smart way or do things the 'I want to be Mr. Olympia way for a couple of decades. I highly doubt he was the only one at the time doing copious amounts of drugs and most of them seem to be pretty healthy even today.[/quote]

Like what factors?

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

[quote]AzCats wrote:

[quote]DiddlySquat wrote:
I get the sense a lot of people on this forum are in favor of steroids. Does this story change your opinion?[/quote]
Not really, I’m pretty sure there were many factors that came into play that caused his downfall in health than just steroids alone. Unfortunately, We will probably never know. You can do things the smart way or do things the 'I want to be Mr. Olympia way for a couple of decades. I highly doubt he was the only one at the time doing copious amounts of drugs and most of them seem to be pretty healthy even today.[/quote]

Like what factors?[/quote]
Factors such as:

Massive amounts of Anti/estos,HGH,Ephedrine,Bodyweight,Sress,High Blood Pressure. Unknown recreational drugs, or just plain crappy genetics. Who knows! I have no idea what he was taking but still find it hard to believe that it was steroids alone considering most of his peers did not end with major heart problems or death. These are all speculation as I have no idea what he was taking.

[quote]AzCats wrote:

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

[quote]AzCats wrote:

[quote]DiddlySquat wrote:
I get the sense a lot of people on this forum are in favor of steroids. Does this story change your opinion?[/quote]
Not really, I’m pretty sure there were many factors that came into play that caused his downfall in health than just steroids alone. Unfortunately, We will probably never know. You can do things the smart way or do things the 'I want to be Mr. Olympia way for a couple of decades. I highly doubt he was the only one at the time doing copious amounts of drugs and most of them seem to be pretty healthy even today.[/quote]

Like what factors?[/quote]
Factors such as:

Massive amounts of Anti/estos,HGH,Ephedrine,Bodyweight,Sress,High Blood Pressure. Unknown recreational drugs, or just plain crappy genetics. Who knows! I have no idea what he was taking but still find it hard to believe that it was steroids alone considering most of his peers did not end with major heart problems or death. These are all speculation as I have no idea what he was taking.[/quote]

Don’t think anyone has said his death/health problems were caused solely by steroids, just that they were a (maybe the) major contributing factor. I’m sure quite a few of his peers have problems we don’t know about, and quite a few do and/or have died as a result. Playing with your body’s physiology is dicey, and there’s a couple dude’s on this very site who, despite being in their mid 20’s look ROUGH due to their steroid abuse. That shit clearly takes a toll on one’s body, we just collectively don’t know to what degree. I’m sure genetics -like in everything else - play a major role. There’s people who’ve smoked a pack a day and chased it with a bottle of bourbon for half a century and make it to 90. Their genetics won that battle. Most of us aren’t that lucky. Matarazzo wasn’t.

Uh, HELLO!

No major heart or other organ problems? No hypertension amongst probably ALL of these men?

Art Atwood: dead (from heart attack)
Brad Hollibaugh: kidney failure requiring dialysis
Flex Wheeler: kidney failure
Anthony D’Arrezo (spelling): dead (not sure from what)
Nasser el Sonbaty: dead (I don’t know the cause of death)
Derek Anthony: dead (from a bunch of goddamn things, end stage renal disease being one of them)
Don Youngblood: dead (from heart attack)
Frank Hillebrand: dead (from heart attack)
Ed Kawak: dead (from heart attack)
Doug Young: dead (was 61, not a spring chicken, but died from heart attack)
Ed Van Amsterdam: dead (heart attack, at 41!)
Scott Klein: dead (kidney failure, at 30!!!)
Curtis Leffler: dead (from heart attack)
Daniel Seccarecci: dead (from heart attack)
John Riggins: dead (had liver and renal failure, and I believe died from a heart attack at age 33!)

By the way, with the exception of one man from this list, these men were all in their thirties, forties, and fifties when they croaked, not senior citizens. I find it hard to believe that bodybuilding so coincidentally attracts men with a genetic predisposition to pass away when not old.

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

Uh, HELLO!

No major heart or other organ problems? No hypertension amongst probably ALL of these men?

Art Atwood: dead (from heart attack)
Brad Hollibaugh: kidney failure requiring dialysis
Flex Wheeler: kidney failure
Anthony D’Arrezo (spelling): dead (not sure from what)
Nasser el Sonbaty: dead (I don’t know the cause of death)
Derek Anthony: dead (from a bunch of goddamn things, end stage renal disease being one of them)
Don Youngblood: dead (from heart attack)
Frank Hillebrand: dead (from heart attack)
Ed Kawak: dead (from heart attack)
Doug Young: dead (was 61, not a spring chicken, but died from heart attack)
Ed Van Amsterdam: dead (heart attack, at 41!)
Scott Klein: dead (kidney failure, at 30!!!)
Curtis Leffler: dead (from heart attack)
Daniel Seccarecci: dead (from heart attack)

By the way, with the exception of one man from this list, these men were all in their thirties, forties, and fifties when they croaked, not senior citizens. I find it hard to believe that bodybuilding so coincidentally attracts men with a genetic predisposition to pass away when not old.
[/quote]

QFT

Never ceases to amaze me the human ability to rationalize and delude oneself with the belief “it only happens to others.”

Yeah, I added another very good NPC bodybuilder to the list, John Riggins, who was from around my way, though I never met him.

Let’s also add, Vince Comeford, who passed away. Though I don’t know the cause, he did say he had heart problems.

[quote]BrickHead wrote:
Yeah, I added another very good NPC bodybuilder to the list, John Riggins, who was from around my way, though I never met him.

Let’s also add, Vince Comeford, who passed away. Though I don’t know the cause, he did say he had heart problems. [/quote]

Don’t forget Greg Kovacs. Dead at 44 due to, if I recall correctly, heart failure.

I think a lot of it is just due to the sheer size these dudes are. Human hearts just aren’t meant to cope with whale sized humans.

[quote]DiddlySquat wrote:
I get the sense a lot of people on this forum are in favor of steroids. Does this story change your opinion?[/quote]

When I was 16, me and a few friends had bought some extacy tablets. They were green and triangular. The same day we bought them, on the front page of most of the newspapers was a picture of a girl about our age who had died taking one of these pills. She was all fucked up, bleeding from her eyes and all sorts.

We were stood in a circle all holding our pills and looking at this picture. After a while I said “Well, I’m still taking mine” and all my mates agreed.

My point is, you just have to be comfortable with the risks. My moderate recreational drug habit in my younger days coud’ve fucked me up, just like my moderate steroid habit I have these days could potentially fuck me up. We have guys posting on this very forum that have caused irreperable damage to their endocrine system by using steroids, and while they are in the minority, it is something you need to be aware could happen.

There will always be the unlucky ones who get irreversible side effects from their first steroid cycle, just like there’ll always be the occasional unlucky teenager who has a bad reaction to whatever fancy new drug the hipsters are into. The chances of it happening are so small, however, that I have no problem with it. Other people will disagree. It’s a very individual thing.

Also remember that these guys are using MASSIVE amounts of steroids compared to the average user.

[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:

[quote]BrickHead wrote:
Yeah, I added another very good NPC bodybuilder to the list, John Riggins, who was from around my way, though I never met him.

Let’s also add, Vince Comeford, who passed away. Though I don’t know the cause, he did say he had heart problems. [/quote]

Don’t forget Greg Kovacs. Dead at 44 due to, if I recall correctly, heart failure.[/quote]

Yup! I also forgot Don Long, who is still alive but had kidney failure.