[quote]magick wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote]
These were men who were not strangers to violence, giving and receiving it. They had been in prison, usually directly because of violence. Maybe it’s a guy thing but I would size them up. If I had to fight them the way people here are describing fights I would lose. If I had to choose between that and running I would run. If I could use BJJ then I would feel like I had a better than good chance of winning. Again, if I couldn’t use BJJ then I would need to get away or go down fighting, but go down I would.[/quote]
BJJ is fine if you’re fighting 1v1. In fact, it is probably preferable because it gives you control while boxing doesn’t have that aspect. Moreso against folks who haven’t practiced in grappling techniques. It is incredibly, if not virtually impossible, for people who don’t have experience in grappling to deal with an experienced grappler. Royce Gracie showed that in the first several UFCs. While you cannot make a clear cut example between Roye Gracie’s performance and actual fighting, I seriously doubt anyone would be able to strike Royce Gracie in any particular body part while he is working on you.
But the assumption most people writing on this thread here have is that you cannot assume that a fight will remain 1v1. It’s stupid to assume otherwise. How in the world do you know that no one will butt in? Maybe some outsider will try to pull you off your opponent. Maybe he has a friend somewhere who wasn’t nearby when the fight started but now rushes to help him? You don’t know, and you simply cannot ever assume things when your health is on the line.
[quote]zecarlo wrote]
What I’m getting at is that I rarely read in the grappling vs striking debate, from the strikers, is situations dictating tactics. It is always the same scenario: a bar, a face to face confrontation, friends, etc. How about you are in your bed with your wife and your kids are in their rooms and you hear someone in your kitchen? How about you are a woman on a date and the guy is on top of you and won’t stop? How about you are a cop in an apartment and someone is trying to take your gun away?
What if you are tackled from behind? Trayvon vs Zimmerman took place on the ground, in a suburban neighborhood, not in a bar. Striking did not “help” Zimmerman but a gun did. Had he known BJJ maybe his life isn’t in a shambles right now.
BJJ is not the answer to every question but that does not mean those questions will not get asked.[/quote]
Are you being serious? How in the world is BJJ a genuine factor in any of those situations?
A home invasion? I would grab the biggest fucking thing I can either throw or swing at the guy. I’d do my best to scare him away, not roll on the ground and try to submit him.
As for your second example- how did the guy even get on top of you in the first place? And you know what’s really fun about a mount pulled by someone who is NOT a brown/black belt and actually has you pinned down properly? Their fucking balls are exposed. Do something about that.
If someone’s trying to take your gun away, then they must be really close and either bent over to some degree or their knees are not locked. Maybe not. I don’t know, too many assumptions must be made here. In any case, why not go for their groin? If I was somehow magically in that situation, I’d just throw him and try to regain control over my gun. I would not use ground based grappling techniques against someone like that.
Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman began their “fight” when George Zimmerman approached him. Not on the ground. Maybe if Martin knew BJJ then he wouldn’t have died? Who fucking knows. What I do know is that you’re making a lot of baseless assumptions in an effort to squeeze grappling into a framework in which it is not necessary.
Grappling has its places. None of the examples you gave above seem to be one of those places to me.
You seem to have done BJJ a lot. Did you never notice how exposed you are when you’re on the ground? Just how much of a tunnel vision occurs when you’re trying your best to get in a complicated technique? Rolling exposes you to a lot of dangers that are absolutely irrelevant when you’re rolling on the mat or in a class. However, you must be absolutely aware of these dangers if you ever intend to use your skills outside of class.
That is about the only reason why I don’t know why people think that using ground-based grappling techniques would be effective. There are suddenly a LOT of factors that you must consider, and your options are far more limited. If you find yourself in a position where you’re on the ground, then strike them immediately in their exposed body parts instead of trying to get a dominant position over them. Then get up and use all your advantages over them.
Fighting IRL is fighting IRL. Styles and techniques do not matter. You use whatever you can to deal with the situation as best as you can. If you find yourself in a situation where you have to restrain an individual for a long time, then a good grappling hold could do that trick. But, beyond that, why?[/quote]
I agree with everything you said, except that techniques do not matter. Techniques absolutely matter. That is the reason for training. If somebody attacks you and you don’t know what technique to use for a defense then what do you do? I think you might have been trying to say something else but I am not sure.