Many are, but there are ones who spill the most.
Ones who are more violent and cruel.
Many are, but there are ones who spill the most.
Ones who are more violent and cruel.
Disagree. People are innately attracted to those they find attractive. White women may be “over represented” for beauty on the world stage (considering white people are a minority in the world as a whole) but it’s because people find them attractive, so it sells. Not the other way around. Like the men’s World Cup drawing a crowd significantly large and with more inherent value than women’s soccer. They’re better athletes overall and more fun to watch, which is simply more marketable than the alternative. As a whole. Some female stars may may be better than male 3rd string players, or whatever they call them in soccer, but in general.
There are attractive black women too, though, and everybody knows it when they see it. And Asians, Latinas et cetera.
I disagree.
That’s because you want to. If attraction exists because of group think then there wouldn’t be variance in preferences, even among white women (blonde vs brunette, skinny vs thick, tan vs pale et cetera). There would be one singular look that everyone preferred and this isn’t the case. But you do you if it makes you feel good.
Of course, I believe I am right and I will not change my mind.
Yes in archaic societies leading up to modernism. It’s called survival of the fittest and is basic representation in the animal kingdom. It’s what makes a species stronger until the advent of social services. Strong dominating the weak whether it be by body, mind, and/or will.
I’m not sure you understand Castle Doctrine.
This not an extreme take on my logic but a take that ignores my logic. You are describing people who are the victims of crime.
This is silly. You believe George Washington beat Martha? When was wife beating socially acceptable in the US? If men were beating and abusing their wives in significant numbers, women would not have had the courage to speak up against slavery, there were women abolitionists, or have a suffrage movement. Ask yourself why you don’t see a suffrage movement in parts of the Middle East.
Combat support maybe.
This post is all sorts of fucked up.
You are right. Who has been selling the image of what ideal beauty is? That’s why Miles Davis would put black women on his album covers.
Historically speaking, fair skin (white or not) was seen as beautiful because it was associated with wealth
The same goes with some other strange historical beauty standards like foot binding and those weird puffed Elizabethan collars
Seen by those who write history.
Interpretation definitely varies by state.
Isn’t crime subjective to law? Subjugation via abuse was legal, now it’s not. Was it ok then because it was legal? You’re dodging logic. Your own logic. Follow the bouncing ball.
I’m not sure if you’re serious or not, but having women pick switches for “being out of line” was fairly common practice, and at the least…… not illegal. Problematic despite law or not?
Regarding the Middle East, would you agree that beatings and beheadings/stonings are a little different?
So yes?
Below is a fun link for you. I included a quick screenshot for cliff notes too. Can you answer the question as it was asked now? FTR, im not saying it’s right or wrong, but again, follow the bouncing ball of the context of the question itself.
No. Your whole premise is pointless. I don’t think how women were treated is remotely comparable to victims of crime. If you were paying attention you would have noticed I did make an exception for slavery but that also included men. Your comparison is as silly as American women crying about rape culture.
Maybe your inbred ancestors did that but I would need to see proof before I believed that was commonplace.
Saying women can serve in combat roles is not the same as women actually serving in those roles.
I would add: men who are unfit to be fathers should not procreate with women they’re unwilling to become parents with.
You’re completely twisting and dodging now. Have a good night.
Good point. We should strive to ensure as much responsibility as humanly possible is put on the men of society. That will surely help even out the playing field.
I don’t disagree with your point here, I’m just saying that constantly putting the responsibility on men - for everything (even things of which women have 100% autonomy, like pregnancy/termination) - has its flaws.
I’ve got the first of our six kids coming tomorrow to bake cookies with six people for Christmas day and twelve for a feast and “2nd Christmas” on Tuesday. IT’S KILLING ME not to respond, but I can’t debate this now. Let me just say that you’re all* wrong, wrong, wrong and I’ll explain why very well later.
*Except @Njord, which is blowing my mind. I’m allied with that guy? Weird. But okay! Nice job, Njord!
Merry Christmas and enjoy all the festivities and people and stuff. ![]()