I feel like I’m a genetic freak mainly because of my recovery ability which I think I inherrited from my dad going to west point and being in the army and my mom being in ROTC and in the army.
Also, some of my relatives (great great grandmother and father) were poor in Lithuania so had to survive off very little until they could make it to the USA. I’ve noticed my ability to recover during hockey tournaments where we play 5-6 games in 3 days, and athletic camps where I’m still at 100% after 5 whole days of skating and everything.
Who else?[/quote]
If you are speculating that you’re a freak because your ancestors were ABLE to perform superhuman feats, you might be on to something. If you’re reasoning is predicated simply on them having done so, you might be ON something.
The notion that experiences reconfigure genes is an example of Lamarckism, a discredited view of biological evolution.
If you think the preceding was nitpicking, hold on to your hat. A person’s biological makeup is comprised of more than their genes, i.e., is more than genetic. For example, identical twins, who are genetically the same, often differ on such traits as sexual orientation*, fingerprint patterns, height, weight, and so on. So, people can differ biologically even when they don’t differ genetically.
(*Interestingly enough, when one male twin is gay, the other more often than not isn’t. Gayness is probably biological, but not genetic in particular.)
I do, however, share your dismay that the unearned biological side of success is often understated. To say that genes and other biological factors matter is not to endorse defeatism, negativity, or whatever buzzword certain people apply to realism.