[quote]Hyena wrote:
You guys are saying Kai’s back looks bad? Look at Jay’s. I’m sure I’ll catch a metric ton of shit for this, cuz most of you hate me already, and you like Jay, but just look at his lat insertions! That is NOT symmetry, and to me, that is why Jay should never have won anything. Don’t get me wrong, the guy is a fucking freak, but when the symmetry doesn’t exist, you shouldn’t be winning.
I don’t know if he tore it, or if that’s the way he was born, but call me a purist, that’s just tough shit. It’s not even close to symmetrical, which, IMO, is why he should never have won anything. You may be huge, but there are other aspects of bodybuilding than just mass (though it helps).[/quote]
Man your fucking retarded. Every body has flaws, Jay Cutler has always had probs with symmetry in his legs from an injury, a weak link, can make the whole thing come down. A weak leg, means weakness on that side, slight tweaking of form translating into slight weakness in erectors, back etc.
In addition, the side your most dominant in will tend to look more defined, thus appearing bigger. There’s so many factors. And if your talking about golden bb days, where symmetry was everything, even arnie, columbo etc. to coleman, yates, all had some form of unsymmetrical aspect to their physiques, calves, lats especially. The back as a whole is made up of so many muscles that a slight lean while performing an exercises, i weak side, a tight side, all will have an influence on growth in your muscles.
I realise it BB and symmetry, up and down, side to side, legs to arms, back to fron matter, but currently as a whole cutler dominates, or at least did in the years he one. Just stop posting retarded shit and ppl might end up like u. Your training partner is the real deal, your not.