[quote]TheDudeAbides wrote:
zephead4747 wrote:
TheDudeAbides wrote:
don’t think too long
ok, so I did box squats for the first time today. Used a normal flat bench as the box. Are you familiar with depth on a bench - as in is it too high, just right, blah blah
I will say that I really felt it in my quads. Immediately. Usually I’m not sore until the next day. This was different.
How high is your bench? I use a ~13-14" box when I box squat. This is exactly competition depth for me, and the lowest setting on my box. I would probably say your bench is too high, however some people (BFS) use a high box once a week in their training.
However since working the top end with more weight than you probably should have on your back could lead to injury, and you’ll lose strength out of the hole. I don’t know about you, but most raw lifters are MUCH weaker out of the hole then out of the top.
I end up with DOMS in my glutes and to a lesser extent hammys from box squats. building a box is pretty simple. I’d just make one with 12"x14"xwhatever for dimensions. THat way you c an use the 12 and 14 inch sides.
I probably went off farther then you’re interested in, but I’m a huge proponent of boxsquats. I feel that from doing boxsquats for so long gave me the pchain strength to deadlift the weights I currently do.
no its all good; you brought up points that I was suspecting. I struggle getting depth, and doing a higher then depth box squat will do me now good. Any thoughts on using a smith machine (dont gasp) to get better ROM? Or maybe just in warm-up?[/quote]
IMO the squat is a much more dynamic lift as far as how many joints move and how far in their plane of motion than the presses and such you normally see on a smith. If you’re squatting on a smith you’re feet should be a bit out in front of you, and you just drop down.
I don’t see why one would even want to though, it seems like a spine loaded leg press to me. I would rather just leg press. I’m loving the smith but I wouldn’t want to do legs in one. But many people much larger than I would disagree.