[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Oh good lord. Marx was a self hating Jew that slacked on hygiene and pissed through his father’s money before his own postulating about utopian dreams that are at odds with nature’s unrelenting reality.
He was the occupy movement, doing what would be the equivalent of our times of blogging about the ills of the market and the evil of the western world and capitalism from his MacBook Pro while sipping his $5 latte from Starbucks, wearing a $200 pair of jeans his daddy bough for him…
[/quote]
I’m not defending Marx but this reads like some conservative undergrad blogger’s attempt at wit. [/quote]
lol. Again. People can’t argue the point, so let’s bash who said it.
Sure fire stance. [/quote]
Argue what point? You attacked Marx in a very sophomoric way.
Dude, you don’t respond to anything people say, [/quote]
Utterly false. Just because you don’t like what I have to say, doesn’t make this statement true.
Funny coming from you, who insults the intelligence of every poster he disagrees with, lmao.
Yeah, and he did. Other wise please explain how abolishing something isn’t a reform of its current state. (Don’t make me pull post dictionary definitions of “reform” now.)
Which is utterly and completely at odds with nature. Not only the natural world around mankind, but mankind’s nature itself. It is some utopian dream land of fairy tales and purple horses.
Okay?
Hasn’t worked out yet… Maybe some more people can be starved out in an attempt to try some variation of this bullocks again.
Put it this way, if Key’s thinks you are wrong… You’re pretty wrong.
Dude, you don’t respond to anything people say, [/quote]
Utterly false. Just because you don’t like what I have to say, doesn’t make this statement true.
Funny coming from you, who insults the intelligence of every poster he disagrees with, lmao.
Yeah, and he did. Other wise please explain how abolishing something isn’t a reform of its current state. (Don’t make me pull post dictionary definitions of “reform” now.)
Which is utterly and completely at odds with nature. Not only the natural world around mankind, but mankind’s nature itself. It is some utopian dream land of fairy tales and purple horses.
Okay?
Hasn’t worked out yet… Maybe some more people can be starved out in an attempt to try some variation of this bullocks again.
Put it this way, if Key’s thinks you are wrong… You’re pretty wrong.
Ever wondered why the term reform or revolution came about? Refrm is working within to fix a preexisting institution, Abolishing it is to do away with said institution.
Or is the english language, everyone who has ever used the two words wrong and you are right.
Let me guess, another post is coming by you that does not address this or says something like unrelenting reality haha. This is the most unintentional comedy from one person since Rob ford said he had enough pussy to eat at home.
So…back to Iran and “WMDs”, speaking of which…
“Weapons of Mass Destruction” is politically constructed terminology that needs to die. Unconventional weapons are more accurately described as Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear weapons, or CBRNs.
WMDs is a term that is far too emotive for fields that should be characterized by cold, calculating analysis. By using it, a normative judgement has been made regarding their morality and effectiveness both on the strategic and tactical levels, one that does not always find credence in positive reality.
[quote]Bismark wrote:
So…back to Iran and “WMDs”, speaking of which…
“Weapons of Mass Destruction” is politically constructed terminology that needs to die. Unconventional weapons are more accurately described as Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear weapons, or CBRNs.
WMDs is a term that is far too emotive for fields that should be characterized by cold, calculating analysis. By using it, a normative judgement has been made regarding their morality and effectiveness both on the strategic and tactical levels, one that does not always find credence in positive reality. [/quote]
Again, sorry for the hijack.
But I never understood why people were generally okay with a government slaughtering its people with bullets and your run-of-the-mill bombs (starvation even in some cases), but as soon as a “chemical weapon” gets used, everyone is up in arms. I mean, dead innocents are dead innocents, why do people start to lose their mind dependent upon the weapon.
Maybe he is maybe he isn’t. The body of water between Dover and Calais is known to us living in England as the English Channel…the French prefer to call it something else.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]shorty_blitz wrote:
Both chess and polo are thought of as Persian games by Iranians and Indian by Indians. [/quote]
You don’t to believe anything they say and my advice to you is not to lol
But they will get a nuclear bomb if they like, it’s their intentions for having one that you are afraid of and this is all down to politics not some means to blowing up the Joos or the world.
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]shorty_blitz wrote:
Those of you who think the Iranian government aren’t rational actors have completely underestimated them. These guys are some of the smartest political motherfuckers around. They didn’t come into power by accident, they played the Iranian population and will play with you as well.
The U.S.government along with its intelligence services know how smart these people are even if you don’t. They won’t make the same stupid mistakes Saddam or Gadaffi or any of the other despotic tyrants made.
@sexmachine that stuff you copy paste from the writings of Khomeini is ridiculed by the majority of the Iranian population, most of his books have been pulled off the shelves because they’re so full of shit.
When I tell you they are rational players, I don’t mean they are nice people and they want to lick your butt, I mean that they will not let you find a reason to stop them from doing what they want to achieve.[/quote]
So then, why should we believe anything that these wily “smart political motherfuckers” say about their effort to get nuclear weapons?[/quote]
[quote]shorty_blitz wrote:
Maybe he is maybe he isn’t. The body of water between Dover and Calais is known to us living in England as the English Channel…the French prefer to call it something else.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]shorty_blitz wrote:
Both chess and polo are thought of as Persian games by Iranians and Indian by Indians. [/quote]
[quote]Bismark wrote:
So…back to Iran and “WMDs”, speaking of which…
“Weapons of Mass Destruction” is politically constructed terminology that needs to die. Unconventional weapons are more accurately described as Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear weapons, or CBRNs.
WMDs is a term that is far too emotive for fields that should be characterized by cold, calculating analysis. By using it, a normative judgement has been made regarding their morality and effectiveness both on the strategic and tactical levels, one that does not always find credence in positive reality. [/quote]
Again, sorry for the hijack.
But I never understood why people were generally okay with a government slaughtering its people with bullets and your run-of-the-mill bombs (starvation even in some cases), but as soon as a “chemical weapon” gets used, everyone is up in arms. I mean, dead innocents are dead innocents, why do people start to lose their mind dependent upon the weapon. [/quote]
No worries. You were engaged with a particularly formidable breed of imbecile.
Indeed. When initially used weapons of Mass Destruction was a term meant to scare the listener or reader. It’s a shame that it has entered into our everyday lexicons. In reality, chemical weapons are both relatively ineffective and inefficient. We shouldn’t be losing sleep over them.
If my mother was a democrat am I therefore a democrat?
[/quote]
No
Again no. If your mother is a Jew, you are a Jew whether you are also an atheist is neither here nor there.
“Who is a Jew?
A Jew is any person whose mother was a Jew or any person who has gone through the formal process of conversion to Judaism…”
No. In fact Marx spent all his inheritance and then lived off Engels’ money in a London apartment.
Again no. Lenin himself is famously complained that Marx never provided any useful real world economics in his work. That is why the millions of people starved to death in the first decades of the Soviet Union.
So you’re even more of an idiot than we first thought?
[quote]shorty_blitz wrote:
Maybe he is maybe he isn’t. The body of water between Dover and Calais is known to us living in England as the English Channel…the French prefer to call it something else.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]shorty_blitz wrote:
Both chess and polo are thought of as Persian games by Iranians and Indian by Indians. [/quote]
