[quote]Professor X wrote:
trextacy wrote:
-
I am in this forum because I like the people, the advice and seeing people achieve their goals (or learning from failures). Generally, it’s a great resource w/ great people.
-
Generally, the lamenting that goes on is a waste of time and says more about the person posting than the subject about which they lament.
-
There needs to be more (a) posting about bodybuilding than (b) posting about posting about bodybuilding.
-
80% (warning: made up statistic) of the time this is a SEMANTIC discussion- IOW, it’s merely arguments about what is embraced/described by the word “bodybuilding”.
-
MY GRIPE w/ some people who are “hardcore” around here is the fact that EVERYTHING is skewed by the drug use that is rampant in the sport. The reality is that our perception about what constitutes big, well-conditioned, strong, etc. has been skewed to the point that people who make fantastic progress (e.g. 15 lbs of muscle in a year with little fat gain) are seen as pussies who aren’t eating enough. Adding 35 lean pounds of muscle over 5-7 years may not be that bad in terms of progress. I frequently read things like “come back when you’ve gained 20 lbs”-- well, that could be 2 years unless the person wants half their new weight to be fat, so that advice is shitty and creates the perception among impressionable newbs that they need to gain weight faster than they really need to.
Please don’t drill me on the numbers I’m using…I’m just using those examples to illustrate an overall point. For natural trainees, I do believe that different eating habits and training protocols may be more optimal. So, when Flex Wheeler or Branch Warren’s training routine/intensity are discussed, it needs to be taken with a grain of salt. At the same time, the tired old chestnut of “this shit has worked for pros for decades, why are you making it so complicated” IS NOT very helpful to most people.
So, to summarize- it’s the insistence that how the pros train, eat, recover, etc. is the end all, w/o at least acknowledging that their approach works particularly well due to drugs is to turn a blind eye to a key component of their overall approach and successs. I don’t think a natural trainee w/ something other than elite genetics should eat/train like a pro.
That doesn’t make me anti-bodybuilding. Niether does my belief that newbs are tending to pack on too much fat in their pursuit of mass than they need to be, and that’s a direct result of certain people preaching their gospel of weight gain. I realize newbs’ reading comprehension abilities are partially to blame.
Remember, size impresses, conditioning wins contests.
Fact:
Some people have the genetics for this.
Fact:
Some people do not have the genetics for this.
Fact:
People who do not have the genetics for this can potentially slow down the progress of those who do by claiming everything needs to be toned down for those who achieve least.
Fact:
This activity is not for those with the weakest genetic potential.
It is not unbelievable for someone to gain 20lbs of mostly muscle (if not all) in a year even after newbie gains have gone. “Kingbeef” on this site just proved that which means he has the genetics for this. If YOU alone do not, do not expect the rest of us to dull down our discussions for you. That is illogical.
The first year I started lifting, I put on over 20lbs in one semester with most of it being muscle mass (I say most because I did not get any measurements done aside from body weight but I did not get noticeably fatter). By the end of that year I was up nearly 40lbs hitting 190 for the first time with a little more body fat on me (I may have gained too quickly but I sure as hell wouldn’t go back and change it because it worked in the long run). If YOU can not do the same, then you need to adjust things for you but quit trying to claim our expectations are too high or that our views are skewed. Of course they are skewed to someone who does not have the same potential or the same goals because the chances of you doing similar may be less.[/quote]
I’m here because I rather argue with you that pro’s use steriods, then agree on the quilting forum that sweaters are warm in the winter. What can I say I’m just not interested in warm sweaters.
Don’t worry I also go into superhero forums also and can care less if I’ll ever be able to fly.
Now to the argument,
Can you tell me who these pros with the natural genetics to compete without steriods are?, because all i’ve heard from pro’s who competed and are willing to report back is that a) they all use (even old timers) or b) they don’t want to talk about it ( I guess that means it’s really sensative topic to not use steriods in bodybuilding).