Who would win: prime Ali vs prime Tyson

[quote]Aussie Davo wrote:
It bothers me when people talk about Tyson as if he was only a puncher. That’s true of his post prison career sure, and its probably the part that people remember the most sadly.

In his youth the dude was a nearly PERFECT fighter. I do not think I am exaggerating. Deep seated issues aside, he is technically perfect in his youth. He had a ramrod, accurate jab, excellent technique and leverage, his footwork is vastly underrated (show me how many fighters can go from standing in front of you to being right at your fucking side, in position to take your head off before you can even blink), he had phenomenal speed, I would go as far as saying he was faster than Ali, and he always threw punches in bunches.

He had great defense, maybe some of the best ever exhibited in the heavyweight division. It is completely demoralizing to be in there with someone who can not only hit you like a truck, but you can’t hit him back. Everytime you throw, you miss and he makes you pay.

As to talk of tyson being only a frontrunner, honestly what examples are there of this. The bonecrusher smith fight showed tyson was more than willing to adapt to an opponent who was going to try to survive to the late rounds, and he thoroughly outboxed smith with simple combinations for the rest of the night when he saw what kind of fight it was going to be. Mitch green held up for 10 rounds too, Tyson showed no signs of fatigue, and adjusted his pace accordingly. IT’s not like he was a dumb fighter. To the contrary, a true student of the game.

I wouldn’t give much credence to examples from tyson’s post prison career since it was widely known he was well on his way to becoming a full blown alcoholic, had a cocaine habit and was reportedly seen partying just mere days before some fights. Its no more use using these fights as examples if we’re talking about “primes” than it using examples of Ali’s late career of how he would be a punching bag, you follow?

As to Ali vs Tyson, I don’t know. Some people say foreman was a bigger puncher than tyson, but thats just the thing, young tyson never threw just one punch. It was furious and most importantly, accurate combinations.

I dont want to say decisively who takes it, because i believe it could go either way. But people act like it’s impossible Ali could get knocked out or even down. He was downed multiple times by frazier, and frazier is not as big, not as fast and not as accurate as Tyson was. Late rounds, decision Ali. Troubled waters early, KO tyson.
[/quote]

Agree with this. I watched a couple of Tyson’s last amateur fights and then all his professional fights up until he became champion. The guy had amazing head movement. He also went to the body a lot. But he got quite a few knockouts, and around the time he became champion he got lazy. He started head hunting, not going to the body as much. He also stopped moving his head as much to slip his opponents punches. I wonder if Cus would have kept him in line, or whether he was destined to get lazy because he was the champion. Would have been interesting if Cus lived a few years longer.

Aussie Davo,

I am using the term front runner because I really do think it describes Tyson at his best. I mean it like I have heard “front runner” used by guys who bet horses. Basically, the prime Tyson took an early lead and did his best to keep it. This almost always broke the other guy. The examples of Smith and Green are examples of guys reconciling themselves to hanging on. Tyson won those fights, but he was always ahead. That isn’t a criticism of his performance. Gaining and keeping advantage is a good thing.

I simply do not take it on faith that if the prime Tyson would have solved the kind of problems Ali would have given him, similar to what an old Lewis gave an old Tyson. I was a huge Tyson fan, but I can’t manufacture evidence of him hanging on or battling back from adversity. He didn’t show that ability in Japan against Douglas, Tyson was ill prepared and an angel was on Douglas’s shoulder so that might be a poor example. He didn’t show it against Holyfield, older and post prison Tyson but he was facing a pumped up cruiser weight(ok, a cruiser who could foul like nobody’s business). He sure as shit didn’t show resolve in his rematch with Holifield. Lewis, who is under rated but not Ali by any stretch, wrecked Tyson.

I am fine with the contention that none of Tyson’s losses happened to the “prime” or best Mike. I agree with that. His head wasn’t in it for very long after he lost Cus. When Rooney and Tyson parted ways it was the death spiral. I didn’t see it at the time.

I absolutely agree with you about the technical skill and physical attributes of the young Mike Tyson. Even things conventionally thought to be disadvantages, like his height, were made into advantages. He used masterful timing and footwork to get close enough. He smothered guys just enough so he was in range, but they felt stuffed. He turned being short into an advantage and drove guys back (fucking David “I’ll just leap from the outside” Tua should have took notes). What he never showed was the ability to overcome real trouble. He never had to. He took the lead. He kept the lead. The other guy either fell away broken, or tried to spin hanging on as a “moral victory” like Green did.

Front runner isn’t damning criticism. It isn’t even intended to be damning with faint praise.

Regards,

Robert A

sugar ray robinson and roberto duran in their prime were both better than ali in his prime…

[quote]spk wrote:
sugar ray robinson and roberto duran in their prime were both better than ali in his prime…[/quote]
I don’t know if you have noticed or not but everyone is just ignoring your attempts to troll lol

just giving my opinion… not trolling… heres bert sugars. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/1203/boxing-greatest-pound-for-pound/content.13.html

Ali is without a doubt the most overrated boxer of all time. He wasn’t technically good, he took ALOT of damage (boxing is about hitting without getting hit right?). Tyson had the greatest defense and footwork speed combination in the h/w division ever, and i guarantee that Tyson would hit a fucking tonne harder than any of the guys Ali fought, also Ali was actually scared of Tyson so mentally he was already beaten.

Tyson always had a lot of trouble with guys taller than him, and Ali is a hell of a lot taller than Tyson. I’d give Ali the advantage. Tyson has a hell of a punch, no denying it, but Ali in his prime was nearly untouchable. Quicker feet, a sharper tongue and a nearly 10" reach advantage tells me that this would be Ali’s fight to lose.

[quote]Charged wrote:
Ali is without a doubt the most overrated boxer of all time. He wasn’t technically good, he took ALOT of damage (boxing is about hitting without getting hit right?). Tyson had the greatest defense and footwork speed combination in the h/w division ever, and i guarantee that Tyson would hit a fucking tonne harder than any of the guys Ali fought, also Ali was actually scared of Tyson so mentally he was already beaten.[/quote]

haha haven’t seen you in a while.

THIS, my friends, is what a troll is… he has a long and storied histoy in the combat forum…

[quote]Charged wrote:
Ali is without a doubt the most overrated boxer of all time. He wasn’t technically good, he took ALOT of damage (boxing is about hitting without getting hit right?). Tyson had the greatest defense and footwork speed combination in the h/w division ever, and i guarantee that Tyson would hit a fucking tonne harder than any of the guys Ali fought, also Ali was actually scared of Tyson so mentally he was already beaten.[/quote]

Can’t be serious.

  1. You do realize that we never even saw a “Prime” Ali? This is when is title was stripped before he fought Frazier. We never saw him fight a top guy at his PEAK.

  2. Look who Ali fought. Everyone. And he was never KO’d. Fought the biggest hitters of all time. Had a long career. Was never even HURT bad.

  3. Look who Tyson fought when he got spanked (like a stepchild) by Buster. A bunch of HOFer, right? Match that against Ali’s list. Now he fought some guys after he got locked up, and he got… Spanked again!! Lennox owned him. Holyfield broke him down, so no, no, no.

Ali would be in Mike’s head like one of his pigeons. Mike would not listen to his corner, or follow any game plan. NO. Mike would try to KILL Ali for all the Epic shit that he would talk about him. He would question his sexuality, blackness, everything. Mike would be in a fury. He would come right at Ali. Jabbing while slipping. Then he would drop inside and hammer with hooks to the body and try to go up the middle with uppercuts.

The problem is Ali’s guys would demand a big ring. Ali would be turning Mike all night. He comes forward, Ali jabs then check hooks as mike try’s to dig inside with his hook to the body. Ali would just touch and disrupt his rhythm and movement. And when his turns him, he will start to turn him into those long, hard right hands.

Late to the party, as always.

My own view is that this is one of the few matchups that is almost impossible to know. Both Tyson and Ali were inactive during their respective peak years. I also think you have to approach the issue on the basis of what would happen if they fought 10 times. Any fighter can win one fight. Both Tyson and Ali had the necessary tools to beat each other. You only have to look at Frazier vs Ali to see that a fighter like Tyson could do serious damage to Ali (and probably go further and get the stoppage). You can also see that a fighter as smart as Ali could find a way to win and stay in the fight.

Tyson really was technically perfect. All the talk of him being just a puncher is laughable. Watch his tapes - his foot placement is consistently perfect and his body movement is judged to perfection, he creates angles without ever jeopardising balance or strategic position, his defense is extraordinary and immaculate, Tyson in his prime does not leave himself open- ever. He didn’t just hit hard (with both hands), he was able to land relatively unorthodox punches (rear hooks!), and strin them together into well timed, and precise combinations - always ending on a punch that kept him out of harms way.

By contrast, Ali was fairly unremarkable from a technical point of view. He was a smart fighter, with supreme physical gifts (but no better than Tyson). He was excellent at frustrating other fighters, and supremely inventive. He relied heavily on his ability to make things work for him that don’t work for most fighters. For example, Ali did have a tendency to pull his head back to avoid punches, which any fighter will tell you is a bad move. He made it work for him, but never against a fighter as explosive, and relentless as Tyson.

I think if they boxed 10 times, Tyson would probably win 6/7 of them. He was so busy, supremely conditioned, evasive, explosive, and fearsome (as an aside, I believe Ali would have been more intimidated by Tyson than the other way round). Ali simply wasn’t busy enough (it wasn’t his style, and styles make fights) to keep a fighter like Tyson at bay.

Amen brother

This is exactly how I feel. These hypothetical situations are so annoying because at the end of the day it is all just speculation. Both great fighters and it would have been an amazing fight to watch or maybe not so amazing.

[quote]Aussie Davo wrote:
It bothers me when people talk about Tyson as if he was only a puncher. That’s true of his post prison career sure, and its probably the part that people remember the most sadly.

In his youth the dude was a nearly PERFECT fighter. I do not think I am exaggerating. Deep seated issues aside, he is technically perfect in his youth. He had a ramrod, accurate jab, excellent technique and leverage, his footwork is vastly underrated (show me how many fighters can go from standing in front of you to being right at your fucking side, in position to take your head off before you can even blink), he had phenomenal speed, I would go as far as saying he was faster than Ali, and he always threw punches in bunches.

He had great defense, maybe some of the best ever exhibited in the heavyweight division. It is completely demoralizing to be in there with someone who can not only hit you like a truck, but you can’t hit him back. Everytime you throw, you miss and he makes you pay.

As to talk of tyson being only a frontrunner, honestly what examples are there of this. The bonecrusher smith fight showed tyson was more than willing to adapt to an opponent who was going to try to survive to the late rounds, and he thoroughly outboxed smith with simple combinations for the rest of the night when he saw what kind of fight it was going to be. Mitch green held up for 10 rounds too, Tyson showed no signs of fatigue, and adjusted his pace accordingly. IT’s not like he was a dumb fighter. To the contrary, a true student of the game.

I wouldn’t give much credence to examples from tyson’s post prison career since it was widely known he was well on his way to becoming a full blown alcoholic, had a cocaine habit and was reportedly seen partying just mere days before some fights. Its no more use using these fights as examples if we’re talking about “primes” than it using examples of Ali’s late career of how he would be a punching bag, you follow?

As to Ali vs Tyson, I don’t know. Some people say foreman was a bigger puncher than tyson, but thats just the thing, young tyson never threw just one punch. It was furious and most importantly, accurate combinations.

I dont want to say decisively who takes it, because i believe it could go either way. But people act like it’s impossible Ali could get knocked out or even down. He was downed multiple times by frazier, and frazier is not as big, not as fast and not as accurate as Tyson was. Late rounds, decision Ali. Troubled waters early, KO tyson.
[/quote]

[quote]LondonBoxer123 wrote:
Late to the party, as always.

My own view is that this is one of the few matchups that is almost impossible to know. Both Tyson and Ali were inactive during their respective peak years. I also think you have to approach the issue on the basis of what would happen if they fought 10 times. Any fighter can win one fight. Both Tyson and Ali had the necessary tools to beat each other. You only have to look at Frazier vs Ali to see that a fighter like Tyson could do serious damage to Ali (and probably go further and get the stoppage). You can also see that a fighter as smart as Ali could find a way to win and stay in the fight.

Tyson really was technically perfect. All the talk of him being just a puncher is laughable. Watch his tapes - his foot placement is consistently perfect and his body movement is judged to perfection, he creates angles without ever jeopardising balance or strategic position, his defense is extraordinary and immaculate, Tyson in his prime does not leave himself open- ever. He didn’t just hit hard (with both hands), he was able to land relatively unorthodox punches (rear hooks!), and strin them together into well timed, and precise combinations - always ending on a punch that kept him out of harms way.

By contrast, Ali was fairly unremarkable from a technical point of view. He was a smart fighter, with supreme physical gifts (but no better than Tyson). He was excellent at frustrating other fighters, and supremely inventive. He relied heavily on his ability to make things work for him that don’t work for most fighters. For example, Ali did have a tendency to pull his head back to avoid punches, which any fighter will tell you is a bad move. He made it work for him, but never against a fighter as explosive, and relentless as Tyson.

I think if they boxed 10 times, Tyson would probably win 6/7 of them. He was so busy, supremely conditioned, evasive, explosive, and fearsome (as an aside, I believe Ali would have been more intimidated by Tyson than the other way round). Ali simply wasn’t busy enough (it wasn’t his style, and styles make fights) to keep a fighter like Tyson at bay.

[/quote]

Perfectly put, Tyson was a student of the game, easy way to be someone who is stupid enough to move their head backwards is right straights to get them freezing then an overhand, ali really isnt all hes cracked up to be, go watch his actual full fights, and tell me how impressive he is.

you guys are forgetting the mental aspect of the game.

  1. Ali was the best. The greatest there ever was in this regard.

  2. Tyson was the weakest.

Advantage to whom?

And would said advantage play a role? Yes, it would play a MAJOR role.

This wouldn’t be two guys sparring in a guy with no audience. This would be a 9 month build-up with 24/7 media coverage that Iron-Mike would not be able to escape from. And when it came down from them to “box”, Ali’s clowning in the ring would disrupt and make Tyson foul him repeatedly. Tyson could catch him of course ( if he does, it has to be early- Mike can’t go into the deep waters), but if they fought 10 times, I like Ali 7/10.

I mean, you guy that are picking Tyson:

  1. Do you know/follow boxing?

  2. Did you see what Lennox did to poor Mike?

Now LL is longer than Ali, but that will show you what someone with a long jab and a hard right hand will do that that 5’10" Peek-a-Boo style.

physically gifted Tyson would win any computer simulated model.

Ali would win any match.
I’ve never seen a match that didn’t have a build up, and by time Ali got done with Tyson. Tyson might knock himself out.

I’ve never seen Tyson win using any other style when he was in his prime, and if Ali could frustrate him I think Tyson would’ve been even more shocked and go down.

Actual boxing matches Ali would win 10 out of 10.

Nobody knows each other walks into a gym and start fighting Tyson would win 9 out of 10. The one is for the one time he doesn’t knock Ali out in the first three rounds.

I think there is that ^^^^.

Ali was loooved by the media and if there is one person who could not stand a 6 months taunt fest it is undoubtedly Tyson.

For me you have to have Prime Ali, which is before his 3+year suspension VS prime Tyson, which for me would be pre Robin Givens.

I’ve seen prime Ali in black and white, two things jumped out: fast and precise jab and quickness of feet, which allowed him to evade punches in a way which were not textbook. When I remember watching every single Tyson fight when he came up, I remember his awesome right hand body shot-upper cut combination, head movement, power and speed.

I believe Ali’s long, fast jab would give Tyson a hard time. If I recall correctly, an old Holmes before he was KO’d, was having success using it against Tyson. And yes it’s post Givens, but Douglass sadly dominated Tyson using his jab to set up his combinations.

Foreman does not have the combinations of Tyson, but Foreman hit an old Ali for 6+ rounds in the body. I do think Foreman’s single shot was just as strong as Tyson’s, and Ali took those round after round.

I give it to Ali by decision.

Alot of you guys are switching the question, saying that prime ali would win because we never saw him because he was in jail but he would’ve been amazing. Thats like saying giving mike tyson another 3-5 years fighting with cus.

And whats with this tyson cant go all the way bullshit, he has : 1Ko in round 10 and 2 Ko’s in round 7. Mike’s stamina was just fine, hes been the distance a few times, hes just smart and finishes early.

He also knocked out 11 guys that were 6’3 or taller before he lost.

Any1 who actually understands the science of boxing and know what they are on about will go with tyson, if they are being honest, too many people are full of shit.

[quote]Charged wrote:
Alot of you guys are switching the question, saying that prime ali would win because we never saw him because he was in jail but he would’ve been amazing. Thats like saying giving mike tyson another 3-5 years fighting with cus.

And whats with this tyson cant go all the way bullshit, he has : 1Ko in round 10 and 2 Ko’s in round 7. Mike’s stamina was just fine, hes been the distance a few times, hes just smart and finishes early.

He also knocked out 11 guys that were 6’3 or taller before he lost.

Any1 who actually understands the science of boxing and know what they are on about will go with tyson, if they are being honest, too many people are full of shit. [/quote]

LOL. Superb troll job douchebag.

Really, well done.

[quote]fnf wrote:
For me you have to have Prime Ali, which is before his 3+year suspension VS prime Tyson, which for me would be pre Robin Givens.

I’ve seen prime Ali in black and white, two things jumped out: fast and precise jab and quickness of feet, which allowed him to evade punches in a way which were not textbook. When I remember watching every single Tyson fight when he came up, I remember his awesome right hand body shot-upper cut combination, head movement, power and speed.

I believe Ali’s long, fast jab would give Tyson a hard time. If I recall correctly, an old Holmes before he was KO’d, was having success using it against Tyson. And yes it’s post Givens, but Douglass sadly dominated Tyson using his jab to set up his combinations.

Foreman does not have the combinations of Tyson, but Foreman hit an old Ali for 6+ rounds in the body. I do think Foreman’s single shot was just as strong as Tyson’s, and Ali took those round after round.

I give it to Ali by decision.

[/quote]

Like I said, everyone is looking at the wrong fights as an example of Ali’s “prime.”

THIS was his prime. THIS was how he’d fight against Tyson’s peekaboo style, and that jab is exactly what he would use to keep Tyson from even getting near him for the first four rounds.

Seriously, if you haven’t watched this, watch it. Ali’s jab splits Patterson’s peekaboo in half constantly, and it’s so fast, and so accurate, and his reach is so much longer… Tyson would have had a real problem coming in against him.

Muhammad Ali is not an aging Larry Holmes. He’s not Trevor Berbick. He would not fight like they did.

Seriously, watch old-ass, out-of-shape Larry Holmes the first few rounds against Tyson. Look at the first round, and how much trouble Tyson has with a guy who’s taller and has a longer reach. And note also that in the first, Tyson couldn’t get near him, and Holmes only threw 10 punches.

The second round isn’t much different… just Holmes wobbling around with his left hand out - and Tyson doesn’t have an answer for it. The only time he starts coming in is when he knows that Holmes isn’t going to pull the trigger.

Now insert Ali from the Floyd Patterson fight into the above clip. On his toes the whole time, circling, jabbing, jabbing, splitting the guard, hitting Mike in the eye and forehead, and controlling that range utterly and completely. Any time Tyson would come in, he’d do just what Holmes did - tie him up, then cuff the back of his head and start leaning down on him like he did to Foreman - before breaking quickly and getting back on the bike.

Keep in mind that Ali was the same height (6’3") as Holmes, and his reach was just one inch shorter at 80 inches.

Tyson’s reach? 71 inches. Big fuckin difference.

Also, I believe Ali would quickly realize that Tyson slips to the inside any time he jabs, and he’d be young enough and fast enough to pull the trigger and fire that right hand behind the jab and catch him slipping right into it.