What Naturals are Truly Capable of...

[quote]JoabSonOfZeruiah wrote:
I wonder when these thread max out?[/quote]
when 46 emerges

[quote]spar4tee wrote:

[quote]JoabSonOfZeruiah wrote:
I wonder when these thread max out?[/quote]
when 46 emerges[/quote]
The end is nigh

Relatively new to reading the forums but read this entire thread today at work and felt compelled to say this in the least offensive way:

Great reading at first, learned some good stuff from guys like Stu. Then PX chimes in with loads of shit about 30 inch legs, being the top dog medical expert, being more advanced than Pros etc.

From all the neutrals out there wanting to learn bits from others:

PX fuck off.

[quote]hawkins14 wrote:
Relatively new to reading the forums but read this entire thread today at work and felt compelled to say this in the least offensive way:

Great reading at first, learned some good stuff from guys like Stu. Then PX chimes in with loads of shit about 30 inch legs, being the top dog medical expert, being more advanced than Pros etc.

From all the neutrals out there wanting to learn bits from others:

PX fuck off.

[/quote]
You are new here but you will find that your assessment of this thread is easily transposed to every other thread on BLS. But it is not PX’s fault it is everyone else as he rarely posts here

[quote]SteelyD wrote:

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

[quote]SteelyD wrote:

[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
If I was just looking to get as big as possible, I would listen to X. However, that would most likely end up with me carrying much more fat than I’d like. [/quote]

So at the risk of being a “PX Nuthugger”, I’ll say this:

PX never said “go get fat”. (That I’m aware of).

The good doctor, while comfortable in his own level of fatness, has to my knowledge never said “go get fat”.

This is what I, as a newb, took from his earlier posts/threads. I always understood it as ‘take it to where you feel comfortable’, the ‘put the brakes on’. I think, IIRC, he said ‘damage control’. No? I mean, if your goal is BB comp or physique oriented and you are not worried about 1RM liftsand you just keep getting fat, then really you’re not really listening to the message. If you want to put on weight fast and you understand that you’re going to smooth out, then the message is eat for the goal.

It’s one way of doing it. Certainly not “The Only” way. Maybe not the best way, or even a good way (for everyone). Just ‘one’ way.

I know I am somewhat retarded and probably one of the least knowledgeable people on these boards, but I swear I’ve never read “Go get fat” from the “Works of PX”.

Now, can we fucking move on now? I really want to talk about biceps or something else besides this damned fat vs lean bullshit.[/quote]

Your post is sensible and I think you know I think good of you.

However, although X of course never said “get fat” --who would actually say this?–his advice will and has lead quite a few people to get fat.
[/quote]

Brick - I love you too, brother. <3

Let me ask you this: If someone goes to “bulk”, and they eat, and they get fat, beyond their comfort zone, is that really anyone’s fault but their own?

I’ve been looking back through “T-Cell Alpha” threads (remember that cobwebby place?) and I remember a couple people (JFit maybe? and someone else) tried to ‘bulk up’. Honestly, they failed. Was that really anyone’s fault but their own?

Maybe they ate too much junk (never condoned). Maybe they didn’t work as hard as they think they did (never condoned). Maybe they justified flabby fat and ignored their progress (never condoned).

Ok, let’s talk about me, me, me now :wink:

I’m not lean for sure. However, I’m not ‘flabby’. I know I’ve justified a pizza (or fifty), but for several years, in my late 30’s early 40’s I’ve set some aggressive goals and pretty much hit them knowing I wouldn’t be seeing my abs soon.

I’ve finally just about hit my ‘comfort zone’ and have started taking steps to come down a bit. I’ve used an amalgam (HA!! Dental word) of advice from a lot of different folks-- PX, MauraduerMeat (I miss that guy tremendously), Stu, Coach Thibs, and some others (I could think of worse composite lifters), but I would NEVER blame them for anything I’ve done wrong, although I’d probably credit them for the good their methods provided.

It really does boil down to responsibility. That’s in life AND lifting.

Just my 0.02 centavos.

[/quote]

Best post.

Thanks.

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:

[quote]SteelyD wrote:

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:

[quote]jskrabac wrote:
I can vouch for that. I bought into the whole “gotta hold a heavy weight so my body gets used to moving around at that weight” mentality. In the end, I needed to diet for 10 whole months to get stage ready, and I actually had alot of medical issues at the heavy bodyweight. [/quote]

There are many ppl from tnation that had this exact thing happen only to diet the fat off and see the results of getting strong and eating s ton did not yield extra muscle. Now they stay lean and grow look better all the time yet make consistent progress[/quote]

That’s awesome that some can do that.

Is that the only way everyone should approach growing and making progress?[/quote]

I think we can all agree that there’s no single way to do things, but while you’ve got a lot of posters who will offer thoughts on their approaches and results, most don’t try to turn everything thread into a support post for why they’ve exceeded everyone else’s progress, and give the impression that all of the best developed people followed a similar path.

By this point, we all know what X’s approach to training was and we all know his opinion on matters such as how well the top competitive natural bodybuilders have done and it’s lack of relevance to everyone else.[/quote]

How do you know its relevance to everyone else? You seem to think you speak for the majority.

Simply put, most people don’t give a flying piss in the wind about ever competing
so even using that as the only standard is where you lose relevance.

Wow. If that is the case, you blame those people doing that. I post on this site in my spare time. If that has literally changed this forum and threatened so many
should I be ashamed or proud? I personally think it is crazy if anyone is supporting those who act like that
like you seem to be.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

Wow. If that is the case, you blame those people doing that. I post on this site in my spare time. If that has literally changed this forum and threatened so many
should I be ashamed or proud? I personally think it is crazy if anyone is supporting those who act like that
like you seem to be.[/quote]

Meh, it’s the tone.

Maybe it’s aggressiveness, maybe it’s defensiveness, I don’t know and I’m not going to sit here and do the armchair psychology thing
 but it’s not a very friendly and helpful tone. You’ve definitely been helpful to many; that’s not the issue.

But because your tone is so abrasive, reading your posts brings up strong emotional responses with a lot of people. And, as has been noted many times in these threads, it’s not a particularly good kind of response. But it does make you memorable to even the casual reader of these forums.

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

Wow. If that is the case, you blame those people doing that. I post on this site in my spare time. If that has literally changed this forum and threatened so many
should I be ashamed or proud? I personally think it is crazy if anyone is supporting those who act like that
like you seem to be.[/quote]

Meh, it’s the tone.

Maybe it’s aggressiveness, maybe it’s defensiveness, I don’t know and I’m not going to sit here and do the armchair psychology thing
 but it’s not a very friendly and helpful tone. You’ve definitely been helpful to many; that’s not the issue.

But because your tone is so abrasive, reading your posts brings up strong emotional responses with a lot of people. And, as has been noted many times in these threads, it’s not a particularly good kind of response. But it does make you memorable to even the casual reader of these forums.[/quote]


which means people are upset because what I write meets an audience.

They used to call that jealousy. If what I was writing was so useless and hurtful, no one would be reading and no one would be getting upset.

You don’t blame me because someone else gets emotional about what I write when I am not insulting anyone on a personal level
yet every attack on me is nothing but personal.

You blame the person whose emotions are that wrapped up in an internet forum.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

Wow. If that is the case, you blame those people doing that. I post on this site in my spare time. If that has literally changed this forum and threatened so many
should I be ashamed or proud? I personally think it is crazy if anyone is supporting those who act like that
like you seem to be.[/quote]

Meh, it’s the tone.

Maybe it’s aggressiveness, maybe it’s defensiveness, I don’t know and I’m not going to sit here and do the armchair psychology thing
 but it’s not a very friendly and helpful tone. You’ve definitely been helpful to many; that’s not the issue.

But because your tone is so abrasive, reading your posts brings up strong emotional responses with a lot of people. And, as has been noted many times in these threads, it’s not a particularly good kind of response. But it does make you memorable to even the casual reader of these forums.[/quote]


which means people are upset because what I write meets an audience.

They used to call that jealousy. If what I was writing was so useless and hurtful, no one would be reading and no one would be getting upset.

You don’t blame me because someone else gets emotional about what I write when I am not insulting anyone on a personal level
yet every attack on me is nothing but personal.

You blame the person whose emotions are that wrapped up in an internet forum.[/quote]

Pleas re read that last statement to yourself and if you can’t find it ironic how you were the one who typed it
I just don’t know what to say

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
Pleas re read that last statement to yourself and if you can’t find it ironic how you were the one who typed it
I just don’t know what to say[/quote]

That’s the point
you shouldn’t have shit to say. Why would you or anyone else feel it is your duty to make sure I never think too highly of myself?

That points to more of a problem with you
not me. I make no argument against me being arrogant at times. I can be an asshole at times.

I can also spend my free time giving advice on an internet forum for ten years writing out what I can charge a patient anywhere from 50-200 bucks to say out loud.

I don’t apologize for not being perfect. I am everything that God and my life have made me to be. If you have that much of an issue with that, keep it to yourself.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
Pleas re read that last statement to yourself and if you can’t find it ironic how you were the one who typed it
I just don’t know what to say[/quote]

That’s the point
you shouldn’t have shit to say. Why would you or anyone else feel it is your duty to make sure I never think too highly of myself?

That points to more of a problem with you
not me. I make no argument against me being arrogant at times. I can be an asshole at times.

I can also spend my free time giving advice on an internet forum for ten years writing out what I can charge a patient anywhere from 50-200 bucks to say out loud.

I don’t apologize for not being perfect. I am everything that God and my life have made me to be. If you have that much of an issue with that, keep it to yourself.[/quote]

What more is there to say? If you thought highly of yourself and achieved nothing, then people might have a legitimate beef. The fact you’ve achieved enough for people to actually seek out your advice kinda points to the fact you’ve achieved plenty and have earned the right for your advice to count for something.

People seem to think that the fact they’ve never made a bulk work for themselves means you’re full of shit and know nothing, and that this gives them the right to ram it down your throat at every opportunity they get. “I bulked once and it didn’t work for me” shouldn’t automatically become “bulking doesn’t work at all”. If people were more eager to maybe learn a bit more and perhaps question where they went wrong rather than jump to the polar opposite end of the spectrum then they might make more progress.

But then again, if someone won’t accept something, its pointless telling them over and over. If they want to limit themselves then by all means they can.

Ans since everyone loves examples and pictures. Please post some examples of these people that bulked up to a decent weight for their height and did it staying at 8% bodyfat. I know only one person that fits this description, but I’ve been told by almost everyone that he doesn’t exist, which is hilariously ironic.

[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
Ans since everyone loves examples and pictures. Please post some examples of these people that bulked up to a decent weight for their height and did it staying at 8% bodyfat. I know only one person that fits this description, but I’ve been told by almost everyone that he doesn’t exist, which is hilariously ironic.[/quote]

Dude, I am still waiting on pics of guys who got as big as the big guys who did bulk up before.

I haven’t seen it yet. All I get is posts about how “deluded” I am about how much muscle I have.

My “delusion” seems to get a lot of attention in a tank top.

[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
Ans since everyone loves examples and pictures. Please post some examples of these people that bulked up to a decent weight for their height and did it staying at 8% bodyfat. I know only one person that fits this description, but I’ve been told by almost everyone that he doesn’t exist, which is hilariously ironic.[/quote]

https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/935323_543484985704311_1971780988_n.png

http://distilleryimage0.s3.amazonaws.com/5fbfb7609be411e290b722000a9f0a3d_6.jpg

i can keep going.

[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
Ans since everyone loves examples and pictures. Please post some examples of these people that bulked up to a decent weight for their height and did it staying at 8% bodyfat. I know only one person that fits this description, but I’ve been told by almost everyone that he doesn’t exist, which is hilariously ironic.[/quote]

Defixon on some other forums got quite big staying lean. Kingbeef has as well on here. There’s others I’ve seen on others forums. And I feel I read Bob Paris never bulked up either, staying sub-10% Bf (could be wrong there). And the drug use of these guys ranges from natty to using good amounts (not assuming anything for Defixon and KB said he was natty in a current thread)

It gets difficult though because you’re never going to be as big as you are when carrying more bodyfat then when you’re lean. So the BW’s of these guys may not be ‘big’ enough for the standards of some no matter what.

[quote]TheDon12 wrote:

[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
Ans since everyone loves examples and pictures. Please post some examples of these people that bulked up to a decent weight for their height and did it staying at 8% bodyfat. I know only one person that fits this description, but I’ve been told by almost everyone that he doesn’t exist, which is hilariously ironic.[/quote]

https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/935323_543484985704311_1971780988_n.png

http://distilleryimage0.s3.amazonaws.com/5fbfb7609be411e290b722000a9f0a3d_6.jpg

i can keep going.[/quote]


and they weigh how much for their height? (since that is what massiveguns wrote).

The people you posted have great progress. I think you are missing what is being stated.

[quote]Spidey22 wrote:

[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
Ans since everyone loves examples and pictures. Please post some examples of these people that bulked up to a decent weight for their height and did it staying at 8% bodyfat. I know only one person that fits this description, but I’ve been told by almost everyone that he doesn’t exist, which is hilariously ironic.[/quote]

Defixon on some other forums got quite big staying lean. Kingbeef has as well on here. There’s others I’ve seen on others forums. And I feel I read Bob Paris never bulked up either, staying sub-10% Bf (could be wrong there). And the drug use of these guys ranges from natty to using good amounts (not assuming anything for Defixon and KB said he was natty in a current thread)

It gets difficult though because you’re never going to be as big as you are when carrying more bodyfat then when you’re lean. So the BW’s of these guys may not be ‘big’ enough for the standards of some no matter what.[/quote]

While kingbeef has remained very lean while gaining, stating that he was sub-10% the whole time is just wrong.

When did this topic turn into staying sub 8% year round while gaining?
That is near contest condition lol
Come on guys.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]TheDon12 wrote:

[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
Ans since everyone loves examples and pictures. Please post some examples of these people that bulked up to a decent weight for their height and did it staying at 8% bodyfat. I know only one person that fits this description, but I’ve been told by almost everyone that he doesn’t exist, which is hilariously ironic.[/quote]

https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/935323_543484985704311_1971780988_n.png

http://distilleryimage0.s3.amazonaws.com/5fbfb7609be411e290b722000a9f0a3d_6.jpg

i can keep going.[/quote]


and they weigh how much for their height? (since that is what massiveguns wrote).

The people you posted have great progress. I think you are missing what is being stated.[/quote]

the first and last guy are both around 5,5 in height. weghing around 164-166 at contest shape. been working out for 5 years . a lot of the pros that work 3dmj bulked like this as well.

lets face it. even if you did manage to gain some more muscle by dirty bulking , you still have to put a lot of time on cutting off the fat and even more if you do it in a smart way if you want to keep most of your gains. that time could have been spent bulking even more.

[quote]Smashingweights wrote:
When did this topic turn into staying sub 8% year round while gaining?
That is near contest condition lol
Come on guys.[/quote]

\


wasn’t Brick posting picture after picture of guys near that as pros?

What were all of the pictures for?