[quote]Jim Wendler wrote:
This is a good question and one that I have no idea how to answer. I wish I did because I think it would be very interesting. But since I don’t know, I will admit it and not try to blow smoke up your ass. Having said that, I really think that any program can work well if it is well thought out with focus, and adheres to the philosophy that I talk about in the book.
As for single ply (or even double ply lifters) - the best advice I can give you is to put your equipment on AFTER the main lift of the day and work into it. I’m not a big believer in getting in your gear too often; this takes away valuable training time that you can use to get stronger.
I have had people use their gear every 3rd week and work up to a certain % of their best geared squat/bench press. The whole gear issue is really just a large clusterfuck and training to use it is so random and individual. I never put my squat suit on until 2 weeks or so before the meet. Others SWEAR that you have to put it on all the time.
I really think that how a person successfully trains with his gear is totally dependant on what he wants to believe is effective. I hated putting the stuff on and thus…didn’t need to put it on.
[/quote]
Thanks for the reply Jim… Might be an idea to try and assemble the data going forward, would give you a nice little back up to the effectiveness of the program in quantifiable terms!!
As for the equipment debate…I totally agree. I need a 10-12 weeks in my shirt (mainly because it’s 2-3 inches under chest size!!), but I normally put that on after doing some ME work and before doing some boards.
I typically only need 3-4 weeks in my suit, and 1 or 2 in wraps.
What’s the scope for modifying 5/3/1 for equipped lifting like anyway… using box squats, rack pulls board presses as assistance exercises after the main lifts? I’d be thinking a sensible enough approach to them, like multiple sets of 5-6 would be ok?
Also, the 4-6 or so of my 5/3/1 life will probably be done while dieting, I assume using 90% of your max as the basis for the program percentages will still be safe enough?