[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]pumped340 wrote:
[quote]waylanderxx wrote:
[quote]BiP wrote:
The question is: Waylander, why the hell do you care?
Does something about X annoy you so much that you have to devote hundreds of post just to expressing that?
I think it’s been established pretty well that you don’t like X. Why not leave it at that?
“CT looks fucking awesome, he can do what he wants.” Well, that includes inviting X to train with him in Colorado.
B.[/quote]
X has me on ignore I rarely post anything about him anymore. However, everything I said in my third post in this thread is true. In the main, I’m disappointed that he has been too proud to post or even take pictures of himself for critique which has allowed such glaring weak points to go unfixed for 20 years. If he had been a little more humble and done that he could have the physique of a competitive BBer.
Sorry, when you crown yourself king of a BBing forum and think you know everything I better be fucking impressed with how you look. The advanced guys will understand what I’m talking about upon viewing X in action, the noobs will nut ride harder.
[/quote]
[quote]eeu743 wrote:
Seems like there are things that definitely need work. I hope that you do start addressing your weak points/changing up your training to balance your physique better, only because you are clearly capable of doing it and doing it well.
It seems like you are out there to learn and improve yourself. Hopefully that’s true, and hopefully you’ll stick with it when you leave and get even better.
Personally, I was surprised to see some of the weak points that have been mentioned. But I like Professor X a lot more after watching the videos, and I find myself actually “rooting” for him. I’m all for constructive criticism, and I hope he takes it to heart, from CT and/or some of the bigger guys on here who are helpful. Waylander makes good points, they’re just lost in the bitterness.[/quote]
That’s basically my thought on the subject. Not in an asshole way, just that there are obvious weak points. I can definitely understand Waylander’s posts. PX’s form seems off on some basic exercises and is somewhat masked by CT but at the same time I agree there’s somewhat of a “rooting for PX” in my mind and my criticisms only come from the same place they come from seeing any lifter, right away I look for what could be brought up because that’s how it gets after you’ve seen hundreds of physiques.
I thought it was interesting today though that CT said he himself would have to drop 25lb to be in contest condition even though he’s so damn lean now. I mentioned to PX a little while ago that I would bet he’d have to be 225 to be really lean and he said he doubted it but now I’m thinking for contest condition he’d be around 205 or so. Like CT said, people really underestimate how much has to be lost for that. I mean look at Stu, he was a lean 210 and he competes around 175
by the way Modok, has X even said he’s natural? I’ve never seen that said by him and even if he said it, who knows. I have no idea, and that goes for most people…you generally almost never know.[/quote]
Look, guys, I am all for constructive criticism, but what Waylander is doing ain’t that. Waylander’s glaring weak points are his chest and quads…so for him to come on here like I wasted the past decade by being so out of proportion is ridiculous.
[/quote]
Obviously I’m on ignore, but my criticism was pretty constructive…Yah, I have weak points and I know I have weak points because I’ve posted pictures and people have pointed them out to me and I continue to work on them until the pictures no longer show them as weak points. However, because I’m open to showing my physique and tracking progress through myself and what others see they sure as hell won’t be weak points when I’ve reached 20 years of training time.
When someone is adamant about not taking pictures of their physique for whatever reason and spends 20 years training and still has glaring weaknesses, yah…that’s wasted time. I don’t see how you can justify that any other way.
