Actually, Irish are a fairly recent addition to the “white race”. An early to mid 19th century American or Brit would have been horrified how the term “white Irishmen” is liberally used around here.
Yesterday’s subhumans, today’s master race.
1 Like
- Ireland matters, as it refutes your argument.
- “innovation and security” not sure if you have looked at a map before, but who were the non whites on the verge of attacking the Irish? Ever?
- “white people willing to share advancements with other white people” hmm you’re talking out of your backside again here.
This is also, ironically, a highly racist viewpoint - that white people are some kind of monolith and act in “white interests.”
You have repeatedly denied there are “white interests” and that races do not act in their own interests, rather that all people are individuals.
You are tying yourself in knots with this stuff.
There is no relevance between this post and what is being discussed. None.
Double negative won’t help you there. 150 years ago the Irish weren’t considered white by Americans and the Brits.
Also if the white Irishmen were members of an inherently superior white race, how did that superiority manifest itself only in the last 40 years corresponding with market reforms and a liberal fiscal policy?
What about two millennia before that?
For the last time, Irish isn’t a race. Caucasian is the race. I never said historically each country was winning against non whites. Merely that, looking through history, whites win a lot more than non whites, whenever white people are a side in a fight.
Right. When the modern world discovered something, it never left country lines. I forgot.
I said if those things exist. Reading comprehension is your friend.
Using my definition of white interests, not yours
- It isn’t a double negative. It is a separate sentence.
- I honestly don’t know what you are on about with the rest of this post. It bears no relation to what has been discussed in this thread.
- If you wish to make a separate post or thread outlining some form of argument, feel free.
It’s been in conflict and has not been considered white 150 years ago. Please do explain the immutable characteristics of the “white race” if the criteria changed so much in 150 years or so.
You seem to equate “looking through history” to amount to about 250 years.
“looking through history, whites win a lot more than non whites, whenever white people are a side in a fight.”
Why do you think that is?
Going back 1-2k years won’t change anything. But give it a shot?
Regional advantages leading to military advancements.
- Ireland has not been in conflict with large areas of the world.
- Genetic science is a very recent phenomenon. The ‘criteria’ has not changed, as genetics haven’t changed over the brief time span you discuss. Political thought has changed to accurately reflect genetic reality.
What “regional advantages” did the incoming whites have vs the natives in north America
What is “Ireland”? Irishmen in Royal Irish Rifles fought in Afghanistan, South Africa and Tibet.
Republic of Ireland exists for less than 80 years.
Lol. Classic.
A minuscule proportion of Irish people are in the fucking ‘Royal Irish Rifles’ in Afghanistan. This is the bottom of the barrel scraping you types have to refer to. Lol.
“What is Ireland?”
No different from the Left’s current dehumanising of whites.
“What is whiteness?”
“What is ‘white culture’?”
“What are ‘white interests’?”
Over a thousand years of regional advantages back home, leading to military, social, and economic advancement.
Guns are sick
Surely the “regional advantages” the natives had in being there for a thousand years in advance, should have negated this?
After all you posit that “regional advantages” are the NUMBER ONE reason white were able to dominate so much of the world?
No genius, I was talking to the historical Royal Irish Rifles and other regiments. You see, there’s wasn’t much career opportunities for Irishmen and the King’s shilling was often the only option for eating three square meals a day. Please do google how many Irishmen wore red coats, bled and died in all corners of the globe.
Answer the question. What is Ireland? The island in the North Sea? Or an ethnic group? Ireland was part of the British Empire and as a consequence Irishmen fought in or invaded over 100 modern day countries, not to mention their struggle against the British, which pretty much negates your argument
Uhhhhhhh…
Are you under the impression that every region of the planet provides the same value to the locals?
Didn’t @twojarslave go like 20 posts back and forth about dropping people in New Guinea? Did I have a stroke?
Uhhhhhh…
I’ma bow out now. You’re terrifyingly stupid
Lol, again.
“Please do Google…” perhaps you should Google this stuff yourself. Another one digging a hole ever deeper.
A minuscule amount of Irish people have been soldiers working for the British army. Feel free to “Google” as much of that as you want. And yet you are claiming this means that the Irish should now accept African immigrants (as that is the discussion you have bolted all of your points onto)?
As for your “what is Ireland” spiel. The British also controlled India for a period. Yet you would never claim those people were ever British. They remained Indians, controlled by the British. You’d never ask “what is India?”
I also strongly fucking doubt you would suggest India accepts infinity African immigrants due to once being part of the Empire or having men fight for it.
Ireland is the land in the North Sea and Irish people are those with majority bloodlines linked to that land for 1,000+ years.
It would appear you may indeed have had a stroke.
Reverting to ad hominem, well done.
You seem to be under the impression that whites have progressed so disproportionally to others owing to plain luck.
Yet then have the temerity to use phrases such as “terrifyingly stupid.” Terrifying, indeed.
Oh dear. Ireland was an integral part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and sent MPs to Westminster while the Indian subjects of the British Raj and princely states haven’t enjoyed that privileges, nor have other colonies.
No, these tangential points are your rabid masturbatory fantasies. I’m merely pointing out the changing definition of the “white race” throughout centuries, as the example of the Irish shows.
That would exclude all loyalists in Northern Ireland then, not having bloodlines linked to that land for 1000+ years.
By that logic the US hasn’t fought the Spanish-American War because only a minuscule number of Americans served.
The Irish fought in over 100 modern day countries so the basic premise of Ireland never having fought a war does not stand.