[quote]big martin wrote:
tricep work–pressing 3 times a week is pleanty of tricep work for a athletes…and 3-4-5 board presses wich are in the exersice pool are the best tricpe strength builders there are…
waves- what we do is usually go by instinct…but say a athlete benches 225 and he wants to do close grip inclines i assume 70-75% wich would eb around 185…so we would wave like this barx10-95x5x2sets-135x3x2sets-155x3x2sets-185x3***90% set
typical westside program- the reason i feel the tiers is better than normal westside is becuase…i think most athletes are not advanced enough where westside will help…there needs to be a base built…is a athlete really going to get much out of speed work when his bench is 185 and he is going to use 95 pounds?..or he squats 255 is doing speed work with 135 going to help??..from my experence NO the athlete needs ot get a lot stronger…and a weaker athlete can spend more time under failry heavy weights with out it effecting his cns to much…rb[/quote]
Correct BM. Good to see you are still hammering away. You’re correct in saying that a weaker athlete can withstand more higher end work. This is discussed in Supertraining, I believe. It does assume that the athlete has a decent GPP base, but since the athlete really doesn’t have an optimal CNS for power output, he/she never really comes close to using their true potential.
So, a 175lb Wide Receiver who squats 235 may actually be able to squat 400 once he trains his CNS and brings up lagging muscles. Therefore, doing sets of 85% of 235 isn’t so bad.
Now, that being said, less experienced lifters may struggle with other aspects during lifting which may tax their CNS to a slightly higher degree then an experienced lifter. Propriopercetion is one of these factors. A kid who is in his second year of squatting still probably hasn’t grooved his squat, so he actually struggles a touch to maintain form. Someone like Dave Tate has his squat grooved, so he can concentrate more on staying tight to transfer power.
Modern day personal trainers would have you believe that you must spend $1000 on Perform Better gear to teach an athlete to stabilize and maximize proprioperceptive ability. This isn’t true at all, but it sells crap. The novice and early developmental stage athlete (first couple years of solid lifting) has enough trouble learning to bench and squat on perfectly stable surfaces. A Bosu ball isn’t what is needed at this point (or possible ever). I have seen far too many Baby-Boomer type ladies on stability balls doing press work, who are actually training to stabilize incorrectly. Instead of recruiting stabilizer muscles, they must call upon many stronger skeletal muscles to help. This is due to the fact that the kid who is training her just got back from the latest conference and saw so-and-so do a ‘functional training’ demonstration.
Stuns me. OK, I will get off the soapbox now.
BM, good to see you are still handing out experienced advice here. Right on point as usual.
BTW, did you ever get your place all set up on the Southside? let me know.
Coach JR, CSCS
“Jumanji”