[quote]pumped340 wrote:
At what point would you decide it’s time to switch out an exercise? I’m cutting now and have low incline DB presses one day and flat DB presses another day. When I added these in I made some good progress for the first 2 months or so but now I feel like I’m not really going anywhere, and lost a rep on a set today.
I know I can’t expect the same strength gains while cutting but still, at what point would you think it would be more beneficial to switch…to say a higher incline BB bench press (not doing any direct shoulder pressing at the moment so I was thinking about using that)
[/quote]
From an article I’m working on…
''Many coaches recommend changing your exercises around every four weeks or so. I don’t agree with that. Yes you can change program and loading methods, but I would keep the same basic exercises for longer than four weeks in most cases. Remember, it is only once the neural gains have stopped that you begin to build a significant amount of muscle tissue. So you have to stick with your exercises for a certain time to reap the full benefits.
Changing exercises often is a cool trick to give the illusion of progress. If you change all your exercises every 4 weeks you rarely hit a plateau because you stop doing a movement before the quick neural gains stop. When they are about to stop you change movements and bam: quick ‘‘progress’’ again (initial adaptations to the new movement).
But in reality you are not doing yourself a favour by changing exercises too often because you rotate them out before they can stimulate actual muscle growth.
I’ll play the Devil’s advocate by saying that more advanced individuals with a super efficient nervous system might need more frequent changes because they start to build muscle right from the start because they are so well adapted neurally already. But most would do well to do more work on fewer exercises if optimal progress is desired.
Yes, many top coaches suggest otherwise. But I’m still trying to understand why the same coaches will often use Olympic lifters and old-school legends as examples to follow; yet those guys relied only on a few basic exercises, never using a lot of variation.
Muscle growth will begin to rise significantly when neural adaptations begin to stagnate. And from an evolutionary perspective it makes perfect sense; the body wants to adapt to its environment while spending as little resources as possible and by requiring the least amount of expense. Building new muscle tissue as an adaptation to increased muscular demands is a costly process. Not only does building muscle tissue requires a lot of energy and nutrients, simply maintaining the added tissue increases the daily energy and nutrients requirement too.
On the other hand, neural changes require very little ‘‘investment’’ and don’t cost much to maintain. So as long as neural changes are available as an adaptation option, the body will choose that option over the more costly muscle building one.
Now, depending on your level of development and current neural efficiency, it can take anywhere from 4 to 20 weeks for neural adaptations to a stimulus to taper off. For most strength athletes and bodybuilders we’re talking 4-8 weeks depending on training experience.‘’