The Dead Bedroom Thread

This got an actual laugh out of me. I was worried it was too horrible to even post, but…you’re welcome!

Having been that woman with a husband who was not able to maintain his own stability, I have strong feelings about the need for safety, which to me means the ability to care for oneself and one’s children in all ways, including financially. I see a lot of other women in that position as well. Married and stuck with substance abusers or guys who make other terrible choices. My ex was a very good earner, but he had spending problems along with his infidelity and other self-control issues. I am astonished in retrospect, watching each of us as we’ve moved on, at the degree to which I stabilized us. Or else there’s something going on with him that is worsening over time. (“Watch your thoughts, they become your words; watch your words, they become your actions; watch your actions, they become your habits; watch your habits, they become your character; watch your character, it becomes your destiny.”― Lao Tzu)

Because I had a working mother who eventually left, I believed in a life like the one you advocate. My conservative father was all for this (my mom died when I was 21, so never weighed in). At 23 I chose a man for the qualities I thought most valuable: he had a degree in English literature, was well employed, went to college on an athletic scholarship (tennis), and had a dozen or so kickboxing trophies. I met him at the gym I worked in.

I didn’t notice, because I was young, that things he said often didn’t match. Like, one day saying people who spent all day watching football were idiots and another day professing to love it. Little things, but a lot of them, which represented integrity shortfalls. He was insecure, but I didn’t recognize that, either. A bully. A braggart. He was 8 years older than me and as the kids came and I got a little older, I began to outgrow him, by which I don’t mean “got bored” (I had 4 kids less than 5 years apart) but rather mature enough to see him clearly as reactive and dishonest.

Anyway, so I did exactly what you’ve done. I researched. I tried very hard to get us organized into a happy couple so we could be intimate (in all ways) and he wouldn’t call me names in front of our friends when I won at party games. In addition to all of the standard pop-psych books about relationships I read Laura Schlessinger’s Care and Keeping of Husbands, The Surrendered Wife, etc. Anti-feminist stuff. It didn’t work because topping from the bottom isn’t workable. I can’t actually make him stronger or me less strong.

So anyway! This is the basis of my take on things. Women Going Their Own Way makes more sense to me in light of women’s restricted history than MGTOW does in light of feminism.

I don’t fear women having less children because I know that if children are needed, there will be policy changes that encourage it, and attitudes will follow. Human beings are resourceful.

I wasn’t implying it. I stated it. And I question your “objective facts.”

And yet here we are debating whose fault it is that words you don’t like are being used so widely. Personally, IDGAF what people call their intimate companions or legal spouses. I can roll with DV or IPV, feeling that the violence itself is our greater shared problem.

Thank you, but I’m fine and more importantly, my kids are fine. Their father struggles, which impacts them, but they’re healthy, self-supporting, lovable good eggs. There were good things about my marriage, too, of course. He was a good father for the most part, and a hard worker at home and at his job. My kids have his work ethic and I’m glad. We were very active as a family, and I appreciate that. I’m just very glad that I didn’t have to grow old with him, and God forbid have to count on him if ever I’m very sick.

1 Like

What did your dad think of him?

My father liked him, but my dad was in Connecticut and we lived in Texas. He died before we moved east and things really collapsed.

I guess if I’m being honest, my father’s estate is what enabled me to set myself up (finish school) to be independent.

1 Like

Had you already left home when you started dating/met the guy? Was your dad ever around him for a significant amount of time?

I think a lot of lifestyles are completely valid and anyone in a happy relationship that isn’t hurting someone else is right by me. Most of my qualms come at the inauthentic desire for higher understanding without releasing one’s current perspective for open review. It’s an inherently backward process, and seems to be used preferentially more often when the subject matter is intrinsic to one’s sense of masculinity. Go figure. I don’t think I’m useful here not because I don’t think I have valuable perspective to share or haven’t studied exactly these questions for years, but because this isn’t a school and I think people’s aims here are more to find commonality first and then shared understanding, and I just don’t have that much in common with most, so I’d just be pulling people into a thought space they aren’t trying to have, lol. Im good in the study group but nobody likes that guy at the party.

1 Like

For those underestimating the magnitude of feminism power… even on a global scale.

For those taking about women in war.

Just the tip of the iceberg of feminist power. ^

3 Likes

It’s that those words are being forced upon us. Latinx is a term that the people who it’s used to describe don’t even like. And who is pushing it? American feminists who believe they can tell other countries how to change their language to make it more English. The word can be found on government forms. Birthing parent is now used by government agencies and schools. The humanity and soul is being sucked out of language in a way that reflects how it is being sucked out of society. A society that is degrading.

And you can try and color me as a crybaby or playing the victim but if you work for child protective services you know that young people today who are growing up in this climate, are more likely to have mental and emotional health issues than me and my age group. If they are more likely to suicide themselves than I am, then who exactly is the victim?

1 Like

Man, the Latinks love their new name.

Who is Whitey?

I think there’s a tendency among some to conflate the power of Feminism with the power of women. Like many Progressive ideas, it’s supposed beneficiaries don’t need to benefit from it for it to serve its purpose.

2 Likes

If only they could pronounce it.

Shhhhhh…. we’re trying to keep from AOC the fact she is white. POC was made up just to help maintain her delusion.

1 Like

I dont think you’re a crybaby, for the record.
@EmilyQ this is what I mean. I’ll never get around to the nuance that’s interesting to me from these starting points, so why sit around annoying people or making them feel angry?

1 Like

Meanwhile, there was a generation that went through the Great Depression and WW2 and whatever diseases that we didn’t have vaccines for yet.

@zecarlo Adding a separate subjective comparative stressor to a different cohort to assert a previous stance only reinforces your beliefs. It’s not compelling, causal, correlated, or significant in the slightest otherwise.

We’re talking about imposing English conventions on Spanish and other Romance languages and the people who are native speakers of those languages.

Yes, and the majority of people think it’s ridiculous and silly. A small group of angry, miserable, poorly educated (even with doctorates), low IQ feminists are pushing their agenda on everyone else.

These women want to tear down society as we know it, a society built primarily by men. What they can’t tell us is what they want in its place.

I would have found your use of English impressive if it had made a point.

Cont…

1 Like

My entire point is points can’t amicably be made with you when you think with emotions. Im describing your approach, for example, and why your presentation negates your assertions. Not attacking your worldview, which you’re entitled to. Im glad you find my English clear.

It has always been an elitist movement that cared more about those at the top of the socioeconomic scale. They are more concerned about the supposed wage gap and glass ceiling than about the issues facing women and girls in poverty who are more likely to be victims of abuse and things like sex trafficking.

I remember seeing some show and a feminist started arguing with Ayaan Hirsi Ali who was criticizing Islam. Ali is from Somalia, where female genital mutilation is the norm, and this feminist was attacking her for being Islamophobic.

2 Likes

Here’s the thing, you can try and portray yourself as erudite with your responses but there is this concept called “there are things we know to be true.” If you need some nationwide poll to prove to you that most Americans think birthing parent is not preferred over mother, then you need to touch grass (a term I learned on this forum).

Why would I need to prove this to be true? Feminists have an agenda. What does one do with an agenda? Pro lifers have an agenda. What exactly are they doing? Trying to make it the law of the land.

And I would add…it’s implemented in order to benefit the MEN at the very top of the heap.

4 Likes

Of course, because it limits the competition. Affirmative Action benefited white women more than any other demographic.

1 Like