The Bodybuilding Bible

[quote]Hazzyhazz24 wrote:
Brick, you deserve an award for this thread. although the concepts you outline are straight forward and not exciting or sexy. This is how its done. If this was the only thing beginners could read online, the world would have a lot more young jacked bastards. This is deff true and any one with any logic would observe this at my college gym. All the big heavy dudes are doing the same shit.

Monday-chest and tris, tuesday- back and bis, wednesday-shoulders and tris, thursday- legs take two days off then repeat mofos. Coincidently the guys that are not making progress and weigh a 150 are the ones that come in everyday swearing theyve unlocked the secret training and supplements to become jacked before spring break. Dude im doing rippetoes, DC, Max OT, GVT, Westside for Stupid Bastards, while the big guys shake theyre heads and keep it moving like yead dude your still a fuckin buck 50. sorry for the rant it just seemed extremely relative. and maybe you could outline a sample diet too. like when a jacked dude is supposed to be eating p+c or p+f. sample breakfast, lunch or whatever for the aspiring meathead.

seriously dude thank you [/quote]

Where did you get your screen name? There used to be a graffiti writer in New York with the name Hazzy Haz.

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:
This was my chest routine when I was into bodybuilding:

Incline dumbbell flys (pre-exhaust)
Incline dumbbell bench press
Pec-deck flys (pre-exhaust)
Dumbbell bench press

I write this know that might get a bunch of people saying shit like, “Bro, why do flys first? They’re not a major exercise. You can’t make huge gains on them. And pre-exhaust is stupid.”

Yeah, sure - tell Dorian Yates that pre-exhaust is bullshit, considering he used it liberally during his competitive years to bring up a lagging muscle group or to reduce the load in a compound lift because he didn’t want to risk injury as his poundages kept increasing through the years.

My calves and chest have always sucked, but that routine I outlined above did a lot for my chest. Pre-exhaust did a whole lot for my back and chest. I’m arms-dominant. The added intramuscular pressure created by pre-exhaust really allows one to recruit the targeted muscle during a compound lift, which is far more beneficial than just TRYING to use the “mind-muscle connection”. [/quote]

I’m going to be the stupid one here - why pre fatigue/exhaust instead of doing the “isolation” exercise afterwards? Surely would that not be just as effective except without interfering with the compound lift (if that’s not your goal)? I’ve often wondered this…

Oh, and what was your favourite split that got you big? Just for the sake of an example lol

Great thread by the way!

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:

[quote]Hazzyhazz24 wrote:
Brick, you deserve an award for this thread. although the concepts you outline are straight forward and not exciting or sexy. This is how its done. If this was the only thing beginners could read online, the world would have a lot more young jacked bastards. This is deff true and any one with any logic would observe this at my college gym. All the big heavy dudes are doing the same shit. Monday-chest and tris, tuesday- back and bis, wednesday-shoulders and tris, thursday- legs take two days off then repeat mofos. Coincidently the guys that are not making progress and weigh a 150 are the ones that come in everyday swearing theyve unlocked the secret training and supplements to become jacked before spring break. Dude im doing rippetoes, DC, Max OT, GVT, Westside for Stupid Bastards, while the big guys shake theyre heads and keep it moving like yead dude your still a fuckin buck 50. sorry for the rant it just seemed extremely relative. and maybe you could outline a sample diet too. like when a jacked dude is supposed to be eating p+c or p+f. sample breakfast, lunch or whatever for the aspiring meathead. seriously dude thank you [/quote]

Thank you very much.

Right - the guidelines I wrote are what all successful bodybuilders do. The only program that you mentioned that actually follows the guidelines is Max-OT.

Why Max-OT is treated as something novel is really completely fucking beyond me. It’s not a bad program, but I never understood why there’s a name attached to it and treated like something special. It has the same shit everyone else does:

  1. Work up to 2 all-out blast sets of 6 to 8 reps in each exercise. [/quote] Actually, it’s 4-6 reps for almost all exercises, and the sets are anything from 1-3 at the same weight I believe… One of my gripes with the program is the reliance on the 4-6 range even for exercises where that kind of thing can really hurt you in the wrong places (as it’s always 4-6 to failure). Easily fixed, of course, so it’s not much of a problem unless the trainee is an idiot. [quote]

  2. Body spread out over 4 to 5 workouts.

  3. 2 to 4 exercises per muscle group.

Perhaps I’ve missed some things, but that’s what I remember of it.
[/quote] You pretty much got it right.
I don’t understand why people treat it like something special either. It’s almost exactly the same as a regular modern bb routine… Just a bit lower in the rep range.[quote]

Westside for Skinny Bastards is a decent program - FOR GUYS THAT WANT TO STAY IN SHAPE or are training for a sport. As I wrote in the first page of this thread, Defranco wrote that it’s NOT a program for guys that want to get as jacked as possible, either for the sake of being jacked or for getting ready for a bodybuilding show!

I don’t know about Rippetoe’s program. [/quote] Well. It’s mostly for beginners, and just about any routine that isn’t completely and utterly retarded (and even those sometimes) is going to produce results in beginners… I don’t find the average results impressive at all, particularly the upper body gains, though the squat gains are usually close to maximal (well, it is sort of a squat spec program, no matter how people twist and turn it).

[quote]

I have nothing but negative things to say about GVT and believe it shouldn’t be followed by anyone interested in PURE bodybuilding. (I don’t like to use the word “pure”, but the definition of bodybuilding is becoming more and more blurred.) [/quote] Agreed. It can, at most, be done for a short period of time, and beginners and intermediates have no business with this short-term crap. Hell, I don’t see any reason for someone truly advanced to do it either, but what do I know…[quote]

I think anyone interested in eating P + F and P + C meals should refer to John Berardi’s books and articles. That’s what I do, in addition to using the skills and knowledge I have as a nutrition professional, a dietitian. Read Lonnie Lowery’s and Lyle McDonald’s stuff too. After that, one doesn’t need much more nutrition education, except in the case of contest prep.

(Please–although I don’t like to keep repeating this–keep in mind I’m NOT an expert, don’t train like a bodybuilder anymore, and there are guys on here that are far more into it at this point than I am. Perhaps I’ll return to all-out hardcore bodybuilding, but I don’t see that happening soon.)

If you are one of the guys that follows the Berardi/Lowery food-combining guidelines, a breakfast might be something like:

Omelet (egg whites, added yolks, cheese, and veggies)
Fruit
Yogurt

If it’s a high carb meal it might be something like:
Egg-white omelet with veggies
Oatmeal
Fruit
Skim milk or fat-free yogurt

As always, there are some people that might come on this thread and start saying, “Do you really believe that food-combining shit? Lyle McDonald said he’s not fond of it.”, or “Do you really think newbies should be concerned with this shit?”

If you don’t like the food-combining thing, don’t do it! I do it because I believe in the concept behind it and it has worked for me and others.

Although I like Lyle McDonald’s work, he, and all the other gurus and experts, are NOT gods and I (or we) don’t have to grab onto ONE’S jock forever. [/quote]

The food combination stuff is a relatively easy-to-implement way to improve the dietary aspect of your journey, so I like it…

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:

Then we’ll have some geniuses who post pics of powerlifters–like the well-known one of Matt Kroc with his bloated buddies and then say, “Oh yeah? These dudes do only the big compound lifts, train really heavy, and they’re fucking huge!” Uh, no fucking shit they’re huge! But all of them, with the exception of Kroc, is anywhere near in shape to win a bodybuilding contest. Huge bellies, near-nonexistent calves, flat pecs, and an utter lack of aesthetic symmetry necessary to win bodybuilding shows doesn’t make you ready for–drum roll again, please–bodybuilding shows!

[/quote]

Just adding that Matt K and his pals all train their arms and shoulders… Not just with “big compound movements” either (hell, especially Matt who does practically no dedicated compound work for his arms or delts, except the occasional military press), not that it matters.

Matt didn’t do any/much arm work for a while, that was the time during which he took his DB rows from peanuts to 250+ for 20 or whatever, yet he said in his log that his arms practically hadn’t grown in ages…

Ended up going back to doing dedicated arm work (though he has tendonitis issues preventing him from going all too crazy on it I believe… Anyway, he does practically all iso work for high reps and still managed to bring his arms up 1-2 inches or so).

Also mentioned at some point that Skullcrushers built his tris, but he can’t do them anymore due to his tendonitis (well, crappy exercise choice here in terms of injury prevention, but still, tells you that he does in fact use iso exercises quite a bit, even as main exercises for some muscle-groups).

I hate the compound vs. isolation thing anyway. Completely unnecessary layer of classification.

A barbell curl or standing DB curl or whatever is only an isolation exercise in the world of textbook theory… In reality, more than 1 joint usually moves. But apart from that, we all know that

  1. CGP’s are an arm exercise. So are Pullover+Extensions. So are regular extensions.
    You just do whatever fits the situation best…

If I just did a lot of pressing for the chest/delts, then doing free-weight close-grip presses or dips is kind of stupid if I like my shoulders healthy and want to get the most out of my tricep work… My shoulder and chest fatigue are going to limit me here big time, and I may want to give the long head of the tris some love…
So bring on the dead stop extensions or pullover+extensions… Or SWRGBs…

The first is theoretically an isolation exercise, but works fucking great for the tris… The second is theoretically acompound move and also works great… The third is theoretically a compound move but also hits mostly the tris and allows you to keep the shoulders and chest out of the movement just like the other two so that fatigued delts and chest won’t limit you or get injured…

Here we go, they all work extremely well in this situation, regardless of what type of exercise they are, and they’re all classified as tricep exercises anyway.

Fuck that compound vs. isolation crap.
Use whatever works best in the situation, and totally murdering your shoulder joints over time just because you only want to do pressing exercises for your entire pushing musculature (and usually ending up with weak tris or shoulders due to the overlap) does not make you any more “hardcore” or whatever.

/edited, damn quote function again :slight_smile:

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:

Then we’ll have some geniuses who post pics of powerlifters–like the well-known one of Matt Kroc with his bloated buddies and then say, “Oh yeah? These dudes do only the big compound lifts, train really heavy, and they’re fucking huge!” Uh, no fucking shit they’re huge! But all of them, with the exception of Kroc, is anywhere near in shape to win a bodybuilding contest. Huge bellies, near-nonexistent calves, flat pecs, and an utter lack of aesthetic symmetry necessary to win bodybuilding shows doesn’t make you ready for–drum roll again, please–bodybuilding shows!

[/quote]

Just adding that Matt K and his pals all train their arms and shoulders… Not just with “big compound movements” either (hell, especially Matt who does practically no dedicated compound work for his arms or delts, except the occasional military press), not that it matters.

Matt didn’t do any/much arm work for a while, that was the time during which he took his DB rows from peanuts to 250+ for 20 or whatever, yet he said in his log that his arms practically hadn’t grown in ages…
Ended up going back to doing dedicated arm work (though he has tendonitis issues preventing him from going all too crazy on it I believe… Anyway, he does practically all iso work for high reps and still managed to bring his arms up 1-2 inches or so).
Also mentioned at some point that Skullcrushers built his tris, but he can’t do them anymore due to his tendonitis (well, crappy exercise choice here in terms of injury prevention, but still, tells you that he does in fact use iso exercises quite a bit, even as main exercises for some muscle-groups).

I hate the compound vs. isolation thing anyway. Completely unnecessary layer of classification.

A barbell curl or standing DB curl or whatever is only an isolation exercise in the world of textbook theory… In reality, more than 1 joint usually moves. But apart from that, we all know that

  1. CGP’s are an arm exercise. So are Pullover+Extensions. So are regular extensions.
    You just do whatever fits the situation best…

If I just did a lot of pressing for the chest/delts, then doing free-weight close-grip presses or dips is kind of stupid if I like my shoulders healthy and want to get the most out of my tricep work… My shoulder and chest fatigue are going to limit me here big time, and I may want to give the long head of the tris some love…
So bring on the dead stop extensions or pullover+extensions… Or SWRGBs…
The first is theoretically an isolation exercise, but works fucking great for the tris… The second is theoretically acompound move and also works great… The third is theoretically a compound move but also hits mostly the tris and allows you to keep the shoulders and chest out of the movement just like the other two so that fatigued delts and chest won’t limit you or get injured…

Here we go, they all work extremely well in this situation, regardless of what type of exercise they are, and they’re all classified as tricep exercises anyway.

Fuck that compound vs. isolation crap.
Use whatever works best in the situation, and totally murdering your shoulder joints over time just because you only want to do pressing exercises for your entire pushing musculature (and usually ending up with weak tris or shoulders due to the overlap) does not make you any more “hardcore” or whatever.

/edited, damn quote function again :)[/quote]

I know that Matt Kroc and his buddies use isolation exercises. (I know there are no true isolation exercises, but I believe that nearly everyone here knows what I’m talking about.) The problem is that I’ve seen people pull up that well-known pic of him and his buddies and a few kiddies in defense of guys who use MOSTLY compound exercises and don’t train like bodybuilders, all while mistakenly coming to the conclusion that training like a powerlifter is so great for bodybuilding.

They’ll say shit like, “Look at deez guys! You gonna tell me or dem dat training hawdcaw like a powerlifta ain’t gon git you big? Why don’t ya tell dat ta der face!”

Meanwhile, while those guys are pretty thick and strong dudes who I wouldn’t want to mess with, they’re NOT bodybuilders, don’t train like bodybuilders, and with the exception of MK, are not even CLOSE to being ready for a bodybuilding show. One of them looks like he sports 50-inch waist. And they all lack the aesthetic symmetry necessary for bodybuilding. I’m sure they do their share of triceps extensions, pushdowns, and variations of lateral raises, but I highly doubt they spend a considerable amount of their training time on leg extensions, pullovers, leg curls, flys, and various machine exercises.

These guys are GREAT at what they do, but a photo of them shouldn’t be used to defend NON-bodybuilding training for bodybuilding. That’s one of the huge problems on this site - gurus writing articles for bodybuilding with NON-bodybuilding methods, all while saying that there way is better than traditional bodybuilding methods, and that they’re going to solve newjacks’ problems.

[quote]its_just_me wrote:

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:
This was my chest routine when I was into bodybuilding:

Incline dumbbell flys (pre-exhaust)
Incline dumbbell bench press
Pec-deck flys (pre-exhaust)
Dumbbell bench press

I write this know that might get a bunch of people saying shit like, “Bro, why do flys first? They’re not a major exercise. You can’t make huge gains on them. And pre-exhaust is stupid.”

Yeah, sure - tell Dorian Yates that pre-exhaust is bullshit, considering he used it liberally during his competitive years to bring up a lagging muscle group or to reduce the load in a compound lift because he didn’t want to risk injury as his poundages kept increasing through the years.

My calves and chest have always sucked, but that routine I outlined above did a lot for my chest. Pre-exhaust did a whole lot for my back and chest. I’m arms-dominant. The added intramuscular pressure created by pre-exhaust really allows one to recruit the targeted muscle during a compound lift, which is far more beneficial than just TRYING to use the “mind-muscle connection”. [/quote]

I’m going to be the stupid one here - why pre fatigue/exhaust instead of doing the “isolation” exercise afterwards? Surely would that not be just as effective except without interfering with the compound lift (if that’s not your goal)? I’ve often wondered this…

Oh, and what was your favourite split that got you big? Just for the sake of an example lol

Great thread by the way![/quote]

I used the split that Dorian used. Yeah, I’m sort of a Dorian jock-grabber. He’s the one who influenced me the most. I DON’T agree with all his advice (for most people; obviously all his shit worked for him), but I believe he was the best bodybuilder to ever live and was also the most articulate, intelligent, and methodical. Most successful bodybuilders have almost ZERO ability to articulate how they train and why they do so, in print and in speech. Dorian actually has the ability to discuss a SYSTEM - not shit like: “I switch it up every time I go to da gym. I’m doin’ ma delts ta-day; I start off wit undahand faward lateral raisez just ta get da blood flowin’,” while wearing a panzy Flex Wheeler, multi-color striped singlet in a training video!

Here it is:

Day 1: chest, biceps
Day 2: quads, hams, calves
Day 3: off
Day 4: shoulders, tris
Day 5: off
Day 6: back, abs

You’re not being stupid, but you just wrote what I anticipated people to write: “Why do pre-exhaust? Isn’t that going to make the compound lift suffer?”

Get this people - bodybuilding is about training to gain muscle, not training to increase my incline dumbbell bench press. If I use incline dumbbell bench press to get a bigger chest, then of course I have to TRY to increase the poundage with that exercise. And that’s exactly what you do, no matter where a compound exercise is assigned in a program.

If you use pre-exhaust, you don’t just let the weight in the compound exercise stay the same. You try to go for a PR in the isolation exercise first. Then you try to go for PR in the compound exercise second.

I used the flys first because of priority first. If my chest is weak, I want to prioritize by using an exercise that targets the pecs THE MOST, FIRST in the workout when freshest.

Second–as I wrote–the isolation exercise done first creates intramuscular pressure in the target muscle. So when you go onto the compound exercise, you’re going to innervate (god, I used that word) the target muscle more than if you started with the compound exercise. When you go back to normal training ((compound exercise first) after some time–perhaps months or years down the road–you’ll engage the target muscle more than before you used pre-exhaust.

It’s sort of like using glute-activation and mobility drills. Granted, you might squat and deadlift less after performing these for 10 to 15 minutes because of fatigue–jumping around like a hyena and humping the air can get you out of breath and sweating–but if you have weak glutes that aren’t firing during major lifts and are suffering from inflexibility, then doing these before a workout will help you in the long-term - when you can reduce your time doing them.

One thing I kind of confused myself with about pre exhaust…

It makes sense to me but lets say you’re looking to target the chest more. Doing flyes before presses makes sense because you will fatigue the chest more but I’ve also heard of doing, for example if you were tricep dominant, a tricep isolation exercise first instead which supposedly would make them weaker on the presses, allowing your chest to do more of the work. I guess in theory that makes sense too but I would imagine it would just limit your strength and become the weak link. BUT I guess that would be the point because now you would temporarily be chest dominant during the press. :\

I believe Mighty Stu might have mentioned using that 2nd method but I can’t be completely sure

Also Bricknyce, I like your outlook on bodybuilding training but do you think beginners and even intermediates should wait before implementing things like pre-exhaust? I mean I would imagine they would still want strength increases in the right rep ranges as quickly as possible and 1 guy benching 315 for reps would likely have a bigger chest than his twin who can only bench 250 for reps but does pre exhaust followed by 225 or something.

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:
How do we sticky stuff? I don’t know how to. [/quote]

Porn?

On a more serious note, this is a great thread, and should be posted atop of the beginners section as well. I think it would help curb the “I don’t really have any goals, what should I do in the gymt?” threads.

I also like your reasoning behind pre-exhaust, I think I am going to test drive 'em in the next month or two. I also use the DY split, the dude is a beast so why not copy?

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:

[quote]its_just_me wrote:

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:
This was my chest routine when I was into bodybuilding:

Incline dumbbell flys (pre-exhaust)
Incline dumbbell bench press
Pec-deck flys (pre-exhaust)
Dumbbell bench press

I write this know that might get a bunch of people saying shit like, “Bro, why do flys first? They’re not a major exercise. You can’t make huge gains on them. And pre-exhaust is stupid.”

Yeah, sure - tell Dorian Yates that pre-exhaust is bullshit, considering he used it liberally during his competitive years to bring up a lagging muscle group or to reduce the load in a compound lift because he didn’t want to risk injury as his poundages kept increasing through the years.

My calves and chest have always sucked, but that routine I outlined above did a lot for my chest. Pre-exhaust did a whole lot for my back and chest. I’m arms-dominant. The added intramuscular pressure created by pre-exhaust really allows one to recruit the targeted muscle during a compound lift, which is far more beneficial than just TRYING to use the “mind-muscle connection”. [/quote]

I’m going to be the stupid one here - why pre fatigue/exhaust instead of doing the “isolation” exercise afterwards? Surely would that not be just as effective except without interfering with the compound lift (if that’s not your goal)? I’ve often wondered this…

Oh, and what was your favourite split that got you big? Just for the sake of an example lol

Great thread by the way![/quote]

I used the split that Dorian used. Yeah, I’m sort of a Dorian jock-grabber. He’s the one who influenced me the most. I DON’T agree with all his advice (for most people; obviously all his shit worked for him), but I believe he was the best bodybuilder to ever live and was also the most articulate, intelligent, and methodical. Most successful bodybuilders have almost ZERO ability to articulate how they train and why they do so, in print and in speech. Dorian actually has the ability to discuss a SYSTEM - not shit like: “I switch it up every time I go to da gym. I’m doin’ ma delts ta-day; I start off wit undahand faward lateral raisez just ta get da blood flowin’,” while wearing a panzy Flex Wheeler, multi-color striped singlet in a training video!

Here it is:

Day 1: chest, biceps
Day 2: quads, hams, calves
Day 3: off
Day 4: shoulders, tris
Day 5: off
Day 6: back, abs

You’re not being stupid, but you just wrote what I anticipated people to write: “Why do pre-exhaust? Isn’t that going to make the compound lift suffer?”

Get this people - bodybuilding is about training to gain muscle, not training to increase my incline dumbbell bench press. If I use incline dumbbell bench press to get a bigger chest, then of course I have to TRY to increase the poundage with that exercise. And that’s exactly what you do, no matter where a compound exercise is assigned in a program.

If you use pre-exhaust, you don’t just let the weight in the compound exercise stay the same. You try to go for a PR in the isolation exercise first. Then you try to go for PR in the compound exercise second.

I used the flys first because of priority first. If my chest is weak, I want to prioritize by using an exercise that targets the pecs THE MOST, FIRST in the workout when freshest.

Second–as I wrote–the isolation exercise done first creates intramuscular pressure in the target muscle. So when you go onto the compound exercise, you’re going to innervate (god, I used that word) the target muscle more than if you started with the compound exercise. When you go back to normal training ((compound exercise first) after some time–perhaps months or years down the road–you’ll engage the target muscle more than before you used pre-exhaust.

It’s sort of like using glute-activation and mobility drills. Granted, you might squat and deadlift less after performing these for 10 to 15 minutes because of fatigue–jumping around like a hyena and humping the air can get you out of breath and sweating–but if you have weak glutes that aren’t firing during major lifts and are suffering from inflexibility, then doing these before a workout will help you in the long-term - when you can reduce your time doing them.

[/quote]

Thanks! That clears it up quite a bit. What lead you to directly “hitting” muscle groups once per week instead of twice (or near enough)? Also, many contemporary coaches are advocating not going to failure, what’s your take on this? I presume you used to take at least one last set to failure (like I think Dorian did…a kind of HIT)…

I hate it how I was always conditioned to believe that splits etc from the big guys only worked because of steroids…that’s why I never looked up to these ones, or followed their advice. I think it stems from the crazy high volume, split routines that used to float around in the mags from the 90’s - the naturals would say - “yeah, anything works if your on drugs”…

[quote]WestCoast7 wrote:

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:
How do we sticky stuff? I don’t know how to. [/quote]

Porn?[/quote]

That’s funny shit, dude!

Its:

I trained each muscle group once per week because it works. As CT wrote in a near argument (what’s called a roundtable on here) with CW and Alwyn Cosgrove (a ridiculous conversation considering one is jacked and the other two train people for sports or to be “in shape” and were never jacked as a bodybuilder), if you provide enough damage to a muscle, you will NEED 5 to 7 days of rest before hitting it again.

I chose to spread out the whole body over four sessions. Seometimes, I’d do a “rolling cycle” (not obeying the days of the week) of two on, one off. I didn’t like doing that because having a schedule that doesn’t obey the days of the week drives me nuts.

And remember, I never aimed for what was ideal because my livelihood is NEVER going to depend on training, and although I sometimes thought of competing, and at times strongly desired it, something in the back of my head always told me that I probably wouldn’t! And I didn’t. So you have to choose what you want in the context of life. That’s why lifestyle should be addressed more when talking of bodybuilding programs - which I’ll do later.

On training to failure. I never trained to failure in the sense of doing a set to the point where form breaks down. I trained to failure by going through a set until I knew that a next rep would be in bad form. There’s nothing wrong with that. And I only did it for one or two sets at the same weight. I ramped up to one or two all-out blast sets. Ramp-up sets, although not maximal sets, DO have an effect on the body - as said on here several times.

I like to ramp up by ABOUT 10 percent of the max weight. I gave an example before, but I’ll do it again.

Max set calls for 120 pound dumbbells in the flat dumbbell bench press. Dumbbbells don’t go up in 12-pound increments. So I do this:

Ramp-up sets
90s
100s
110s

Max set
120s x 10

For a 1- to 3-rep max effort used in WSB programs with 300 lbs, it looks like this:
Bar
75
105
135
165
195
225
255
285
300

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:

[quote]Hazzyhazz24 wrote:
Brick, you deserve an award for this thread. although the concepts you outline are straight forward and not exciting or sexy. This is how its done. If this was the only thing beginners could read online, the world would have a lot more young jacked bastards. This is deff true and any one with any logic would observe this at my college gym. All the big heavy dudes are doing the same shit.

Monday-chest and tris, tuesday- back and bis, wednesday-shoulders and tris, thursday- legs take two days off then repeat mofos. Coincidently the guys that are not making progress and weigh a 150 are the ones that come in everyday swearing theyve unlocked the secret training and supplements to become jacked before spring break. Dude im doing rippetoes, DC, Max OT, GVT, Westside for Stupid Bastards, while the big guys shake theyre heads and keep it moving like yead dude your still a fuckin buck 50. sorry for the rant it just seemed extremely relative. and maybe you could outline a sample diet too. like when a jacked dude is supposed to be eating p+c or p+f. sample breakfast, lunch or whatever for the aspiring meathead.

seriously dude thank you [/quote]

Where did you get your screen name? There used to be a graffiti writer in New York with the name Hazzy Haz. [/quote]

Well my real name’s Hassan. And my friends always called me Hazz or Hazzy when I was young and then while watching an episode of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air when I was like 10 or 11 I thought of DJ Jazzy Jeff and got the idea of HazzyHazz lol.

How do you adjust the nutrition and training when you want to “cut” some body fat?

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:
Its:

I trained each muscle group once per week because it works. As CT wrote in a near argument (what’s called a roundtable on here) with CW and Alwyn Cosgrove (a ridiculous conversation considering one is jacked and the other two train people for sports or to be “in shape” and were never jacked as a bodybuilder), if you provide enough damage to a muscle, you will NEED 5 to 7 days of rest before hitting it again.

I chose to spread out the whole body over four sessions. Seometimes, I’d do a “rolling cycle” (not obeying the days of the week) of two on, one off. I didn’t like doing that because having a schedule that doesn’t obey the days of the week drives me nuts.

And remember, I never aimed for what was ideal because my livelihood is NEVER going to depend on training, and although I sometimes thought of competing, and at times strongly desired it, something in the back of my head always told me that I probably wouldn’t! And I didn’t. So you have to choose what you want in the context of life. That’s why lifestyle should be addressed more when talking of bodybuilding programs - which I’ll do later.

On training to failure. I never trained to failure in the sense of doing a set to the point where form breaks down. I trained to failure by going through a set until I knew that a next rep would be in bad form. There’s nothing wrong with that. And I only did it for one or two sets at the same weight. I ramped up to one or two all-out blast sets. Ramp-up sets, although not maximal sets, DO have an effect on the body - as said on here several times.

I like to ramp up by ABOUT 10 percent of the max weight. I gave an example before, but I’ll do it again.

Max set calls for 120 pound dumbbells in the flat dumbbell bench press. Dumbbbells don’t go up in 12-pound increments. So I do this:

Ramp-up sets
90s
100s
110s

Max set
120s x 10

For a 1- to 3-rep max effort used in WSB programs with 300 lbs, it looks like this:
Bar
75
105
135
165
195
225
255
285
300
[/quote]

I think Dorian also had a split where he spread the body over 3 workouts as well:

Day 1: chest, bi’s, tri’s
Day 2: legs, abs
Day 3: off
Day 4: shoulders, back
Day 5: off
Day 6: repeat

That one ^^^, I think that’s the pattern?

So on that one you’d be training muscle groups twice every 6 days (the lower end of the recovery period), whereas the one you quoted:

Day 1: chest, bi’s
Day 2: legs
Day 3: off
Day 4: shoulders, tri’s
Day 5: off
Day 6: back, abs
Day 7: off
Day 8: repeat

…would have you training muscle groups twice every 8 days - what’s with the difference?

As regards ramping, I guess the lesser the exercises, and the more ramping is done (e.g. going up in small 5% 1RM steps), this would be more strength oriented. Whereas going up in bigger jumps (e.g. 10% as you stated) would be better suited for bodybuilding? That seems to be the major difference I’ve noticed…

[quote]its_just_me wrote:

I think Dorian also had a split where he spread the body over 3 workouts as well:

Day 1: chest, bi’s, tri’s
Day 2: legs, abs
Day 3: off
Day 4: shoulders, back
Day 5: off
Day 6: repeat

That one ^^^, I think that’s the pattern?
[/quote]

He eventually out grew that because his weights and intensity became so high he needed more recovery. This is why beginners can train full body 3x a week and go “all out” but try and put an advanced guy on a program like that and he will be in the hospital come Thursday.

The more advanced you are the more recovery you will need. Dorian trained at his personal recovery level and paid attention to over training, was/is a smart guy.

its_just_me, the second split is his olympia routine, the 3-way was used before that one but done 2 on, 1 off, 2 on, 2 off I think.

I took that split and altered the amount of off-days, which resulted in the one you posted. Depending on how much you do per session, you can just train whenever you want though.

(we’ve been over these splits before though, haven’t we?)

Btw, I’d like to add to the 1/week/musclegroup type training: I think that you can give your progress a real boost by training some muscle-group (or combination thereof, like delts+traps or back+bis or whatever) twice per week… That type of specialization is sustainable for a very long time compared to thee day variant most authors here seem to favor, and not as hard on the joints/tendons.

More of a long-term thing (think half a year or a year or so per muscle-group, maybe even more for advanced guys).

Professor X is sort of the poster-child for that type of routine on here…

So for example, if you wanted to specialize in delts+traps you could do:

Day 1 Delts+Traps
-Seated High Incline Shoulder Presses from Pins set at mouth/chin height or so(or whatever press you like, I would not use standing military personally…) or Hammerstrength overhead press or whatever… Push Presses in the power squat machine or in the v-squat also work very well and are easy to progress on.
-Lateral Raise Machine or Cable Laterals
-Reverse Pec Deck or Face Pulls in the Lat Pulldown station
-DB or BB or HS machine shrugs

Day 2 Legs+Bis
-Sumo Deadlift
-EZ Bar Curls with a slight pause on the thighs, really explode it up (initiate with the bis, not the low back, though you can swing some once the lift has been initiated) but always start with somewhat bent arms.
-Hack Machine Squats (knee sleeves…) or some such
-Hammer Curls with both arms simultaneously… Or Pinwheels alternating…
-Leg Curls or Reverse Hyper or so…
-Leg Extensions if you feel the need.

Day 3 Chest+Tris+Abs
-Hammerstrength Inclines
-Flat DB Presses
-JM Presses on the Hammer incline (not the wide incline) for the tris
-Pullover+Extensions with bench setup (PJR’s)
(+ light face pulls or reverse pec deck if you want, just to make the shoulders feel good)
(+ maybe some weighted ab exercise)
-Ab Wheel or EZ roll-outs.

Day 4 off

Day 5 Delts + Traps
Same as the other day, or you can start with only the press and laterals and slowly add stuff over time…

Day 6 Back (+ abs again if you want)
-HS High Row
-T-Bar Rows
-HS Pulldown
-HS Low Row
(+ abs… Maybe just roll-outs)

Day 7 off

Just an example.
It’s not a bad idea for a beginner to start out specializing in back (or back+bis or whatever, which for me would probably then be just 2 exercises for each per session) for a few months at least so that you have a nice base for when you want to specialize in any of the pressing muscles.

[quote]its_just_me wrote:

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:
Its:

I trained each muscle group once per week because it works. As CT wrote in a near argument (what’s called a roundtable on here) with CW and Alwyn Cosgrove (a ridiculous conversation considering one is jacked and the other two train people for sports or to be “in shape” and were never jacked as a bodybuilder), if you provide enough damage to a muscle, you will NEED 5 to 7 days of rest before hitting it again.

I chose to spread out the whole body over four sessions. Seometimes, I’d do a “rolling cycle” (not obeying the days of the week) of two on, one off. I didn’t like doing that because having a schedule that doesn’t obey the days of the week drives me nuts.

And remember, I never aimed for what was ideal because my livelihood is NEVER going to depend on training, and although I sometimes thought of competing, and at times strongly desired it, something in the back of my head always told me that I probably wouldn’t! And I didn’t. So you have to choose what you want in the context of life. That’s why lifestyle should be addressed more when talking of bodybuilding programs - which I’ll do later.

On training to failure. I never trained to failure in the sense of doing a set to the point where form breaks down. I trained to failure by going through a set until I knew that a next rep would be in bad form. There’s nothing wrong with that. And I only did it for one or two sets at the same weight. I ramped up to one or two all-out blast sets. Ramp-up sets, although not maximal sets, DO have an effect on the body - as said on here several times.

I like to ramp up by ABOUT 10 percent of the max weight. I gave an example before, but I’ll do it again.

Max set calls for 120 pound dumbbells in the flat dumbbell bench press. Dumbbbells don’t go up in 12-pound increments. So I do this:

Ramp-up sets
90s
100s
110s

Max set
120s x 10

For a 1- to 3-rep max effort used in WSB programs with 300 lbs, it looks like this:
Bar
75
105
135
165
195
225
255
285
300
[/quote]

I think Dorian also had a split where he spread the body over 3 workouts as well:

Day 1: chest, bi’s, tri’s
Day 2: legs, abs
Day 3: off
Day 4: shoulders, back
Day 5: off
Day 6: repeat

That one ^^^, I think that’s the pattern?

So on that one you’d be training muscle groups twice every 6 days (the lower end of the recovery period), whereas the one you quoted:

Day 1: chest, bi’s
Day 2: legs
Day 3: off
Day 4: shoulders, tri’s
Day 5: off
Day 6: back, abs
Day 7: off
Day 8: repeat

…would have you training muscle groups twice every 8 days - what’s with the difference?

As regards ramping, I guess the lesser the exercises, and the more ramping is done (e.g. going up in small 5% 1RM steps), this would be more strength oriented. Whereas going up in bigger jumps (e.g. 10% as you stated) would be better suited for bodybuilding? That seems to be the major difference I’ve noticed…[/quote]

He followed that 3-way split from 1985 to 1990 (I think; it might have been '91, but I’m not going through my library right now). Before that, from '83 to somewhere in '85, he followed an A-B split done three times per week - like this:

Week 1
Monday - A Day: chest, back, shoulders, abs
Wednesday - B Day: quads, hams, calves, bis, tris
Friday - A Day

Week 2
Monday: B Day
Wednesday: A Day
Friday: B Day

The difference is that the more you split the body up, the more you specialize for each muscle group (more exercises per muscle group).

I wouldn’t do the 3-way split because a) even though I like Dorian’s writings, I didn’t have to follow what he says (same goes for any guru’s/trainer’s/bodybuilder’s/powerlifter’s writings), and b) I’m not following a rolling cycle that doesn’t obey the days of the week - never have, never will - ESPECIALLY with life now.

And this leads me to the lifestyle issue I’ve been wanting to get at…

I believe rolling cycles are impractical for most people. Say you have a cycle that obeys the days of the week. You can schedule a part-time job or time with a dodgeball league every Wednesday night. You can schedule time with your girlfriend/wife/fuck-buddy every Friday night. If you don’t like doing those things or aren’t obligated by anything else other than paying bills (working) and training, then go ahead - follow a rolling cycle.

One of the reasons I gave up extremely hardcore was because of the situations I speak of. Do you know how fucking irritating it was for a woman to invite me to spend the night, only for me to reply with something like: “Look, I got this bodybuilding thing. Do you have eggs, oatmeal, and fruit around so I can have a breakfast here?” Or “Alright, fine. But we’re getting up at 10 AM tomorrow to go to IHOP or the diner” and then have to wake up her up when she wanted to spend more time in bed with me on a fucking SUNDAY morning/early afternoon. It was instances like that, that made me re-evaluate my fitness goals.

But hey, if you want to take this to the limit, as I did, then go for it. Do whatever you have to do to get big.

I believe in the phrase “If it’s important to you, then it’s important!” So if getting jacked as possible is important to you, don’t let anyone dismiss it to the point where you’re actually brainwashed into thinking that you might be fucked up for making it a priority.

I personally was finding that consuming 5,000+ calories per day and training 4 to 5 nights or weekend mornings or afternoons was getting in the way of things that either needed to catch up on or wanted to do or have.

It could very well be that I can’t juggle a zillion things at once. If you’re one of the people that can somehow have a FLEXIBLE social and romantic life, family time, school stuff, AND (or) HARDCORE bodybuilding at the same time, then hats off to you! Seriously! I mean that I have nothing but respect for Professor X, a highly intelligent and competent professional who could train and eat like a maniac while attending some serious training and school for a profession. If I recall correctly, he’s a dentist.

I know that I couldn’t and clearly can’t juggle some of those things together. It led to some major irritation and, dare I say, LONELINESS and imbalance in life. There came a point where, YEAH, I wanted to go to a mall with a friend or a chic or a family member and not have to worry about bringing a cooler with rice and chicken in it. I wanted to fuck a girls brains out and not have to worry about a bedtime meal and what I’d be eating for breakfast or that I’ll miss a few meals over the weekend. I didn’t want to be invited to Jones Beach on a Saturday morning only to reply with, “Nope - not going; I got a workout planned.” or have to meet people at the beach later on (with cooler in hand of course) and be DESTROYED by the end of the day.

I say this NOT to discourage anyone! I say this to make it clear that in order to get very, VERY big, it’s a royal pain in the ass and you better know how to set up your life to do it - and not wonder why you’re staying a buck-eighty, all the while not making some serious sacrifices!

Yeah, now I’m a guy who “gets a work out in”. That’s why I DON’T put down people who just “want to look naked” or that follow routines by AC and Joe Defranco. Someone in another thread said something like, “People who train 2 to 3 times a week aren’t serious.” I ask, “Oh yeah? What if they’re serious about… training 2 to 3 times per week? What if they have other obligations and priorities and values that make it that they just want keep in shape and dedicate that little time to working hard in a gym? What if they enjoy a volleyball, softball, or dodgeball league several nights/days per week? These people don’t clearly value being physically fit? And what’s wrong with that?!”

I started this thread to share the information on getting jacked that’s still in my head and personal library - AND to put an end to the misinformation mess that’s been created on here.

Hm. Juggling this stuff actually got easier for me over time… Having a girl who trains too definitely helps, but it’s not even the main thing…

For the reasons you mentioned above (and others), I liked to ignore fixed rotations and just train whenever I could/felt like it with a 3 or 4-way. My volume has never been very high, so I could go 6 days a week, or just 3 days… Whatever I had time for that week… And it was not much of an issue to do sessions back to back if necessary due to the smaller amount of fatigue/volume-related overlap.
And my sessions also rarely took all that long (45 mins mostly, sometimes less… Especially now I may be in and out in 30 minutes).

These days, unless I’m posting here or helping some locals with their training, I’m not thinking about training at all and it doesn’t affect my daily life much… Food prep is done on sundays mostly (though I don’t have much to prepare and I’m somewhat flexible when it comes to meal choices… Sure I usually rely on the same few “filler” foods to get the cals/macros in, but I have several “blueprints” for my p+c/p+f meals so things don’t get boring/for when I’m out of some particular food… And I have no trouble eating out… I usually have several containers with a protein/carb/fiber mix in my car, just add water and there you go… And a small freezer if need be (brought that along back when my girlfriend and me weren’t yet living together).

That approach is of course less rigid than Yates’ (who after all was competing at Olympia level without the boon of super-duper genetics like Wheeler or Dillet), but it works well for me without disrupting my daily life… Only thing that is still difficult at times is getting in the sheer amount of food needed to, say, go from 250 to 300 for the first time. Took me several tries… Now I’m back down to 270 and staying between that and 260, getting my strength up and leaning out some… My body is used to being at that weight, so I can maintain it with a much smaller calorie intake while still gaining strength.

(DC training was a different story though, as accumulating a lot of general/overall fatigue is unavoidable there so a few weeks prior to each cruise I’d end up feeling like a zombie outside of the gym… It was fairly high maintenance and I would not want to do it while having a physically or mentally extremely demanding job, but it was totally worth it from a bbing and especially strength perspective)

/off topic, but how are you doing these days, Brick?

I’m still waiting for you to become a millionaire and send all your friends (me, me, and me as well) money as thanks for all the support “they” have given you here :slight_smile: