Test/Primo/Mast P90X and Doggcrapp Training!

[quote]Stronghold wrote:

[quote]t-minotaur wrote:
Ehemm, try not to laugh when you read the subject line.

Now, let’s begin. Starting soon I will be taking:

200mg/week, week 1-10 Test Cyp
400mg/week, week 1-10 Primo
2 caps/day, week 1-4 Epi (Shredded Mass)
6 caps/day, week 5-8 AndroHard
100mg/E3D, week 9-12 Mast

Obviously, I am trying to get ripped to get to single digit bodyfat. I finished the V-Diet about 2 months ago and I am down to 13% bodyfat.

I started P90X five weeks ago and am following the Phase 1 diet, along with some extra calories on the weekend. However, it seems I have plateaued in fat burning.

I also feel like P90X has taken all my muscle glycogen and thrown it in the dumpster for a homeless man to laugh at!

I haven’t really lost much weight and I find the Velocity Diet more effective. However, I shoud not and will not do a shake diet while on-cycle.

Here are my goals:

  1. I want to burn fat to a single digit (or close as I can)
  2. Build a few pounds of muscle.

Its the age-old paradigm of bodybuilding. The cycle I have planned it is great for cutting (as long as I don’t eat my lungs out) and building muscle.

I’m in the middle of P90X and I really want to finish it because everyone I know never does. It’s only 3 months out my life, it’s not a life long commitment.

I figure if I do the P90X in the morning 6x/week and throw in 3x/week heavy lifting (Doggcrapp training, anyone?) at night, I should be able to accomplish the fat burning and muscle building, in theory.

However, I may just be overtraining myself even with the juice, but I won’t know until I try. I just wish I could find someone whose done something like this before and tell me their experience or advice. [/quote]

seriously.[/quote]

lol that episode was on last night

[quote]Darkangel wrote:
if you didnt have anything major from the eq or the test previously then the primo should be fine for you.

either way have fun and let us know how it goes.[/quote]

Check out the update on the cycle.

[quote]Stronghold wrote:
seriously.[/quote]

Seriously, do you have anything intelligent to add to the discussion?

We are not here to watch clips from family guy or whatever boring shit you do in your spare time.

We are here to talk about the intelligent and relentless pursuit of muscle. If you would have read the whole blog, you would have realized that I didnt go through with the P90X and Doggcrapp training because it would have been counterproductive. Sometimes we all have dumb ideas and it’s nice to have someone explain to you why you should take another route. That’s the point of this discussion.

[quote]t-minotaur wrote:

[quote]Stronghold wrote:
seriously.[/quote]

Seriously, do you have anything intelligent to add to the discussion?

We are not here to watch clips from family guy or whatever boring shit you do in your spare time.

We are here to talk about the intelligent and relentless pursuit of muscle. If you would have read the whole blog, you would have realized that I didnt go through with the P90X and Doggcrapp training because it would have been counterproductive. Sometimes we all have dumb ideas and it’s nice to have someone explain to you why you should take another route. That’s the point of this discussion.[/quote]

Do I really have to add anything intelligent to this? You’re 170 lbs of beginner and posting in the steroid forum about smashing two diametrically opposed training methodologies together along with an overly complicated (specifically so for your given experience level- you shouldn’t be using shit right now to begin with) cycle that includes a shitty designer steroid and a bullshit DHEA product. That’s not “a few dumb ideas”, that’s a big ol’ bowl of “what stickies?”. Really, Family Guy videos are probably a little ABOVE the level of discourse in this thread.

Don’t feed me that “intelligent and relentless pursuit of muscle” crock. If that’s what you were after you 1) wouldn’t have been doing p90x in the first place and 2) would maybe commit a few years to working on that whole “lifting weights” thing before jumping into drug use. “Relentless” as in “Oh my god I want muscles so bad right noww I’ll do annyyythinnngg” might be accurate, but “intelligent”…Please.

I dont believe I missed this.

Thats a comical cocktail of drugs for someone who looks the way you do. I lol’d

Oh and you definitely dont have enough mass to get super lean. Simply dont have the genetics for that. Some people can be extremely lean at low LBM levels. They tend to have great metabolisms. You dont have that, based on your pictures. You also have zero abdominal hypertrophy, it will be difficult to achieve the look youre after without that.

Cutting at this point is a mistake unless you dont mind winding up at 155lbs with a CHANCE of having abs. (if you are in fact 170lbs)

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
(if you are in fact 170lbs) [/quote]

Just looked up his training log. OP is 160 lbs now at 5’9" and low teens BF. Perfect candidate for steroid usage…

…if you’re a woman.

Anything under 100mg ed, 700mg/wk of primo is a fuckin waist. You should shoot for 700-1000mg/wk, and run it 15-20wks. And who the hell thought that was a good idea to ramp it up or down… stupid. Please go read

wtf…

btw, primo is the one aas that has been known/thought to have nearly zero negative sides

[quote]DaJa wrote:
Anything under 100mg ed, 700mg/wk of primo is a fuckin waist. You should shoot for 700-1000mg/wk, and run it 15-20wks. And who the hell thought that was a good idea to ramp it up or down… stupid. Please go read

wtf…

btw, primo is the one aas that has been known/thought to have nearly zero negative sides[/quote]

Are you talking about oral primobolan or primobolan depot? The oral isn’t 17-alpha alakylated and therefore has absolutely horrid bioavailability so high dosages are required. I know people personally who have had good results on as low as 200-400mg primobolan depot/week stacked with low dose (250mg/wk) test. It’s my understanding that primo’s effectiveness is largely underestimated since it is 1) somewhat expensive and often underdosed and 2) low on androgenic effects, so it doesn’t carry the instant water weight gain, etc of other drugs.

Not looking for an argument, just questioning your 700mg/wk number since I know people who do well on much lower than that.

[quote]Stronghold wrote:
Are you talking about oral primobolan or primobolan depot? The oral isn’t 17-alpha alakylated and therefore has absolutely horrid bioavailability so high dosages are required. I know people personally who have had good results on as low as 200-400mg primobolan depot/week stacked with low dose (250mg/wk) test. It’s my understanding that primo’s effectiveness is largely underestimated since it is 1) somewhat expensive and often underdosed and 2) low on androgenic effects, so it doesn’t carry the instant water weight gain, etc of other drugs.

Not looking for an argument, just questioning your 700mg/wk number since I know people who do well on much lower than that.[/quote]

I am taking neither the primo oral or the depot. Technically its Menthenolone Enanthate (Primobol 100). It’s the long ester in injectable form (obviously). I’ve done a crapload of research on Primobolan and thats precisely why I chose it–>it has the least sides and reacts most safely/favorably with test. I am very sensitive to test, that is why I am doing a low does of test.

I am only doing 400mg of primo because thats all I can afford. Primo’s average dose is 200mg - 400mg so that should be suitable. I know you can do a lot more primo, but after 400mg or 600mg I believe your just throwing money down the tubes and should probably just do some tren instead. I love tren. Im just scared as hell to do it with test because Im afraid the sides will blow up.

I know that I look a little small in my pics, but you must understand that pic was taken after the V-Diet and Pulse Fast where I had gone down from 170 lb to 157 lb. It was the leanest Ive ever been, but I still wasnt single digit body fat. I am trying to see my abs, but as Bones said earlier, I do not have any abdominal hypertrophy. I though you had to get to single digit body fat to see abs. Thats what I was told. Maybe I was misinformed.

Anyway, I’ve been lifting weights for about 8 years. I’ve done a four cycles before this one, so here is my history of use:

1st Cycle
Time: 3.5 years ago
Substance: Trenbolone Acetate (Finaplix)
Dose: 1ml/100mg every three days
Length: 5 weeks

Side Effects: NONE (libido was throught the roof!)

Gains: 6 lb. pure muscle, I looked jacked! It was the shortest, sweetest, best cycle to date!

PCT: 2 large bottles Vitirx


2nd Cycle
Time: 2.5 years ago
Substance: Trenbolone Enanthate, Winstrol (Oral & Injectable)
Dose: 200mg tren weekly, 50mg Winstrol (Rotated between oral and injectable)
Length: 10 weeks

Side Effects: My balls had shrunk about 50%, but my libido was throught the roof!

Gains: Very good, but my ketogenic diet limited me

PCT: Clomid 50mg a day for 30 days, 1 large bottle Vitrix


3rd Cycle
Time: 1.5 year ago
Substance: Test Prop, Tren Acetate, Dbol
Dose: Done incorrectly. I started with the test prop 100mg EOD. A week later I added the tren acetate 100mg EOD and the dbol at 30mg/day. Each substance was used for about four weeks but they were staggered. The last week I was on tren only (bad idea!)
Length: 6 weeks

Side Effects: Fucked up! I started using Nolva 10 - 20 mg ED on cycle. I developed gyno by week three in my left nipple. I increased the nolva dose to 40mg. It made it worse probably because of the test/tren combo. I couldn’t get letro until week 5. I tapered off the nolva and got on the letro. I did the letro for two months to rid the gyno.

I also had no libido starting week 3 of the cycle. First time and it was the worst thing ever! My prostate blew up too, and I went on Flomax for a month. Libido was almost normal in 6 weeks.

Gains: Huge weight gains (20 lb.), but not dry lean muscle that I like.

PCT: Clomid 50mg ED for 30 days (my balls had shrunk about 50%), Letro 2.5mg ED for 2 months, Animal stack (2 bottles), Andactrim gel on my chest for gyno (it was freaking me out; I had a small lump under my left nipple and the areola was enlarged.) Gyno went away and I actually had some sex drive while using the letro. Everything normal by month 3 thank God!


I didn’t properly dose the test last cycle and it test now scares the shit out of me due to the side effects. Apparently, I am sensitive to test an dbol (basically any substance that aromatizes.) The test made me extremely aggressive and somewhat crazy while I was on it. So, for my next cycle I decided to use Equipoise because it is considered something “like” a weaker form of test.

4th Cycle
Date: September 2010
Substance: Epistane, Equipoise
Dose: 3 - 4 capsules for 6 weeks Epi and afterward 400mg - 600mg a week Eq
Length: 6 weeks Epi then 12 weeks Eq

Side Effects: The Epi shrunk my small gyno lump; the Eq aggrivated the gyno a little, but I countered it with Arimidex which seemed to work well at .5mg EOD - ED.

Gains: 12 lb., but it didn’t appear as quality gains that you would get from Trenbolone. The muscle seemed softer and not as dense as Eq is supposed to provide. My strength went up considerably and I trained harder than I ever have (10 hours a week). My squat was the highest it’s ever been. However, I did not get the quality gains I thought I would make (thats why I kept the cycle so long).

PCT: Clomid 300/100/50mg doses for three weeks (my balls shrank about 30%), HCGenerate (1 bottle) and then after that Animal Stack (1 bottle).


I am taking my second run on this cycle with Test, but this time I am doing it safely with Primo, Mast, and Adex; all of which cut back on the negative sides of Test and amplify the positive.

The epi and DHEA are not complete bullshit. They are only oral “bonuses” that also cut back on the negative sides of test. This particular DHEA by Primordial Performance is claimed to a be a substitute for Masteron. Why shouldnt I throw them in there? Theyll probably just synergize with the Test and Primo.

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
Oh and you definitely dont have enough mass to get super lean. Simply dont have the genetics for that. Some people can be extremely lean at low LBM levels. They tend to have great metabolisms. You dont have that, based on your pictures. You also have zero abdominal hypertrophy, it will be difficult to achieve the look youre after without that.

Cutting at this point is a mistake unless you dont mind winding up at 155lbs with a CHANCE of having abs. (if you are in fact 170lbs) [/quote]

You’re right I do not have the metabolism to be lean at low lean body mass levels. I have no abdominal hypertrophy either (that I can see). I thought you had to be at single digit body fat to see abs? I cant seem to get below 12-13% bodyfat no matter what I try.

So are you saying I need to bulk up and then shred down? I feel like thats what I did when I did the EQ cycle followed by the V-Diet.

I do not want to gain any more fat, period. I am eating very clean at about 2500/cal day with 300g protien, 150g carbs and 50g fat. I know I am capable of eating a lot more. It is extremely hard for me to eat this little. Whenever I eat more, I tend to put on pounds. Pounds of fat!

I could easily eat about 3500/cal a day with no problem. I did that when I was on the Eq cycle and ended up gaining a few pounds of fat, but also a lot of muscle.

I figured if I did a Test/Primo cycle and ate just enough to fuel the house, I should gain lean muscle with no fat. Maybe even lose a little fat.

So, what are your suggestions to attain about 5-10 lbs more muscle and 5-10 lbs less fat? That is my long term goal. I am extremely disciplined and can accomplish any diet and training regimine I put my mind to. I guess no one has put me on the right course thus far.

[quote]Stronghold wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
(if you are in fact 170lbs) [/quote]

Just looked up his training log. OP is 160 lbs now at 5’9" and low teens BF. Perfect candidate for steroid usage…

…if you’re a woman.[/quote]

Ok, since everyone seems to know so much goddamn more than me on steroid usage, what makes someone a good candidate to use?

[quote]Stronghold wrote:

[quote]t-minotaur wrote:

[quote]Stronghold wrote:
seriously.[/quote]

Seriously, do you have anything intelligent to add to the discussion?

We are not here to watch clips from family guy or whatever boring shit you do in your spare time.

We are here to talk about the intelligent and relentless pursuit of muscle. If you would have read the whole blog, you would have realized that I didnt go through with the P90X and Doggcrapp training because it would have been counterproductive. Sometimes we all have dumb ideas and it’s nice to have someone explain to you why you should take another route. That’s the point of this discussion.[/quote]

Do I really have to add anything intelligent to this? You’re 170 lbs of beginner and posting in the steroid forum about smashing two diametrically opposed training methodologies together along with an overly complicated (specifically so for your given experience level- you shouldn’t be using shit right now to begin with) cycle that includes a shitty designer steroid and a bullshit DHEA product. That’s not “a few dumb ideas”, that’s a big ol’ bowl of “what stickies?”. Really, Family Guy videos are probably a little ABOVE the level of discourse in this thread.

Don’t feed me that “intelligent and relentless pursuit of muscle” crock. If that’s what you were after you 1) wouldn’t have been doing p90x in the first place and 2) would maybe commit a few years to working on that whole “lifting weights” thing before jumping into drug use. “Relentless” as in “Oh my god I want muscles so bad right noww I’ll do annyyythinnngg” might be accurate, but “intelligent”…Please.[/quote]

Well, since you know nothing of my past history and just assume I am some sort of newbee…you are sadly mistaken. However, by the topic of this forum, I can understand why this has lead you to beleive this. That’s my fault. Moving on…

I have been heavy weight training for many years. I have been up to 180 lbs before but it was a lot of fat. Anyway, the only reason I did P90x was becuase I wanted to try something different. I did the V-Diet to get lean. I couldnt lose any more fat. So, I tried P90x. When I realized it was a waste of time after about 2 months, I stopped. Enuff said.

Now I am back to heavy lifting and I feel like I’m back to my old self. I literally feel like a new person, which tells me to always lift heavy :wink:

[quote]t-minotaur wrote:

Ok, since everyone seems to know so much goddamn more than me on steroid usage, what makes someone a good candidate to use?[/quote]

Not you.

Obviously, you don’t care to listen, but you should FORGET ABOUT GEAR until you build some muscle. That’s pretty much the long and short of it. You have the potential to build mass naturally at this point. So you should do that.

[quote]SkyNett wrote:

[quote]t-minotaur wrote:

Ok, since everyone seems to know so much goddamn more than me on steroid usage, what makes someone a good candidate to use?[/quote]

Not you.

Obviously, you don’t care to listen, but you should FORGET ABOUT GEAR until you build some muscle. That’s pretty much the long and short of it. You have the potential to build mass naturally at this point. So you should do that. [/quote]

I’m at 12% bodyfat at 5’9" tall with 16" arms. I think that qualifies as muscle. I just got through a 4 month shredding phase with a lot of hard work. Now Im rewarding myself with a low dose of test/primo. I qualify for use because I know what I am doing.

[quote]t-minotaur wrote:

[quote]SkyNett wrote:

[quote]t-minotaur wrote:

Ok, since everyone seems to know so much goddamn more than me on steroid usage, what makes someone a good candidate to use?[/quote]

Not you.

Obviously, you don’t care to listen, but you should FORGET ABOUT GEAR until you build some muscle. That’s pretty much the long and short of it. You have the potential to build mass naturally at this point. So you should do that. [/quote]

I’m at 12% bodyfat at 5’9" tall with 16" arms. I think that qualifies as muscle. I just got through a 4 month shredding phase with a lot of hard work. Now Im rewarding myself with a low dose of test/primo. I qualify for use because I know what I am doing.[/quote]

Good luck then.

[quote]t-minotaur wrote:

I’m at 12% bodyfat at 5’9" tall with 16" arms. I think that qualifies as muscle. I just got through a 4 month shredding phase with a lot of hard work. Now Im rewarding myself with a low dose of test/primo. I qualify for use because I know what I am doing.[/quote]

You’re the only one. 160 lbs and 16 inch arms at your height and bodyfat qualifies you as a little more than a beginner. If it required many years to accomplish, then that’s just more evidence that you shouldn’t be using steroids right now.

Also, stop referring to dieting as “shredding”.

lol@ P90X AND gear…

[quote]t-minotaur wrote:

[quote]SkyNett wrote:

[quote]t-minotaur wrote:

Ok, since everyone seems to know so much goddamn more than me on steroid usage, what makes someone a good candidate to use?[/quote]

Not you.

Obviously, you don’t care to listen, but you should FORGET ABOUT GEAR until you build some muscle. That’s pretty much the long and short of it. You have the potential to build mass naturally at this point. So you should do that. [/quote]

I’m at 12% bodyfat at 5’9" tall with 16" arms. I think that qualifies as muscle. .[/quote]

Dude. Those stats would be fine for a relatively new lifter. The fact is that youre about to do your FIFTH cycle. Those are horrendous stats for someone with 4 cycles done.

And you say you workd hard to get to 12% bodyfat? Is that a joke.

You simply have no idea what it takes to diet properly. Thats the fact of the matter. Take it as an insult if you want, it isnt one though. Its just how it is.

You have 141 pounds of LBM on a 5’9 frame. AFTER FOUR CYCLES.

If you were a first timer coming here to post people would be 1. Laughing at you. 2. Telling you to gain 30 more pounds.

The fact that you arent a first timer is just sad.

If youre not going to be honest with yourself that’s fine. No one here is going to lose sleep. But you also shouldnt be surprised if no one takes you seriously.

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
You have 141 pounds of LBM on a 5’9 frame. AFTER FOUR CYCLES.

[/quote]

I didn’t even see that. Fucking seriously - 4 cycles, and that’s what you’ve got?!!

Unreal…