I have a 60 degree curve in the thoracic spine, where as the normal person is 30±degrees. I’m squatting now with 140lb for reps, and it the back that’s definitely holding me back. And I really don’t even have perfect form (rounding in the thoracic region), I can barely arch my back perfectly WITHOUT weight up there.
Does squatting heavy require the back to be perfectly arched at all times?
Will I be able to squat heavy in the future?
You should ask a doctor.
If you feel your back is holding you back with 140 on there, imagine what it will feel like with twice that. Any bad elements in form will be magnified with heavier weight.
[quote]Carnak wrote:
You should ask a doctor.
If you feel your back is holding you back with 140 on there, imagine what it will feel like with twice that. Any bad elements in form will be magnified with heavier weight.[/quote]
But is it absolutely necessary to have an absolute perfect arch in the spine? or will I gain strength to keep my “almost perfect arch” from falling forward?
Tried hack squats?
see a doctor, im 19 and had grade 5 spondeoloptosis and scoliosis. sugery fixed me up. not suggesting that. but a doctors opinion to see if its safe is a smart way to go. im sure someone will offer different advice , but when i had my back before surgery. id do leg press machines and stayed realy light with deadlifts and whatever else.no matter what, learn form then get heavier
[quote]crazyman wrote:
Carnak wrote:
You should ask a doctor.
If you feel your back is holding you back with 140 on there, imagine what it will feel like with twice that. Any bad elements in form will be magnified with heavier weight.
But is it absolutely necessary to have an absolute perfect arch in the spine? or will I gain strength to keep my “almost perfect arch” from falling forward?[/quote]
A good arch is essential to squatting heavy, yes. Otherwise, you’re putting too much pressure on the spine and that’s when injuries happen. Gotta have good form on anything, but especially exercises where heavy weight will be involved.
What about front squats? That may be a viable alternative.
I agree with Carnak, though. Ask a doctor.
Look up belt squats also.
[quote]Brant_Drake wrote:
Look up belt squats also.[/quote]
I was just about to suggest this. It would take off the spinal loading that squatting is famous for. You would be a tad more limited in the weight you would be able to load on your squat but, at least you can still squat.