Rugby

[quote]Will Heffernan wrote:
supermick wrote:
And im English. Less of this “brits” thing.

Sorry mate…you guys are always confusing us…like when Andy Murray wins he’s British and when he loses he’s from Scotland…shall I go on??? I have quite a lot of ‘British’ winners and Scotish, Welsh and Northern Ireland ‘losers’…you English seem to have a selective view of Britishness and Englishness…I always laugh everytime I see you drag those flags out…can’t wait to see the Commonwealth Games coverage…I am sure their will be plenty of British winners and Scots, Welsh and Northern Irish that fail to cut the mustard.

[/quote]

Commonwealth games is when Britian is divided into each seperate country you divvy.
Im English first brit after but true to form instead of actually reading the posts above where a KIWI labelled English, brits u jumped in on an anti english parade yeah yeah we hate you blah blah see the chip on my shoulder and im not having it.
Bollocks mate.

[quote]supermick wrote:
Commonwealth games is when Britian is divided into each seperate country you divvy.
Im English first brit after but true to form instead of actually reading the posts above where a KIWI labelled English, brits u jumped in on an anti english parade yeah yeah we hate you blah blah see the chip on my shoulder and im not having it.
Bollocks mate.
[/quote]
Sorry my attempt at being a little high brow, a bit subtle with my humour was probably not pitched at the right level for my intended audience…I should of chucked some fart jokes in.
I do understand the Commonwealth Games concept…I’m an Aussie so I know all about cake and eating etc we lay claim to Crowded House and Russell Crowe…oh and don’t forget Sam Neil…ah what am I on about…anything good from NZ we’ll pretend it’s actually ours.
I can tell by your tone that maybe I struck a nerve with the whole British vs English thing?? Maybe a little bit…don’t you feel a little grubby inside when you find yourself cheering some Scot, Welsh or Nth Ireland athlete at the Olympics? You obviously know what I was getting at if you feel so agreived.
You really need to take a bit of a pill and have a little lay down…you obviously have a persecution complex? I can only speak for myself but I am definitely not anti English or British for that matter.

Supermick, i’m not anti english, british whatever you want to call it. I lived there for 3 years and loved it (played rugby there too and met some top blokes). In fact, if I could go back and live there I would without a second thought. If you want to be reffered to as English thats fine by me.

Also, don’t be too sensitive about the ‘all talk’ comment. It’s difficult to prove if anyone is all talk or all go over an internet forum. I like to think I would give anyone on these forums the benefit of the doubt unless they were just downright talking shit. My all talk comment was just a light hearted comment and not meant to be taken too seriously. I apologise for any emotional stress that i’ve caused.

Now thats sorted… good prediction about France being a major contender for the world cup. I wouldn’t pull all this Allblacks ‘peaking early’ crap either. I could go on but only time will tell…

[quote]alstan90 wrote:
Rowings shit, their’s only one sport worse than it, that AMerican Football bollox. What’s al that about? They fkin restart everytime the ball touches the floor, and wear loads of padding, pussies. In the whole match their must be about 2 minutes of play.
[/quote]

haha, good stuff.

what’s also true is that our “football” showcases the pure athleticism of genetic freaks like tomlinson, vick, reggie bush, etc.

you don’t see talent like that in rugby.

[quote]chillain wrote:
alstan90 wrote:
Rowings shit, their’s only one sport worse than it, that AMerican Football bollox. What’s al that about? They fkin restart everytime the ball touches the floor, and wear loads of padding, pussies. In the whole match their must be about 2 minutes of play.

haha, good stuff.

what’s also true is that our “football” showcases the pure athleticism of genetic freaks like tomlinson, vick, reggie bush, etc.

you don’t see talent like that in rugby.
[/quote]
‘Genetic’ freaks like Oakland Raiders Bill Romanowski, Barret Robbins, Dana Stubblefield and Chris Cooper…is that what you mean? Oh yeah NFL is just full of ‘genetics’.

You obviously don’t watch rugby? What you may not undertand is that in Rugby we have a slightly different policy towards the use of ‘genetics’ in sport.

[quote]Gregatron wrote:
Supermick, i’m not anti english, british whatever you want to call it. I lived there for 3 years and loved it (played rugby there too and met some top blokes). In fact, if I could go back and live there I would without a second thought. If you want to be reffered to as English thats fine by me.

Also, don’t be too sensitive about the ‘all talk’ comment. It’s difficult to prove if anyone is all talk or all go over an internet forum. I like to think I would give anyone on these forums the benefit of the doubt unless they were just downright talking shit. My all talk comment was just a light hearted comment and not meant to be taken too seriously. I apologise for any emotional stress that i’ve caused.

Now thats sorted… good prediction about France being a major contender for the world cup. I wouldn’t pull all this Allblacks ‘peaking early’ crap either. I could go on but only time will tell…[/quote]

apology accepted. ;o)

[quote]Will Heffernan wrote:
supermick wrote:
Commonwealth games is when Britian is divided into each seperate country you divvy.
Im English first brit after but true to form instead of actually reading the posts above where a KIWI labelled English, brits u jumped in on an anti english parade yeah yeah we hate you blah blah see the chip on my shoulder and im not having it.
Bollocks mate.

Sorry my attempt at being a little high brow, a bit subtle with my humour was probably not pitched at the right level for my intended audience…I should of chucked some fart jokes in.
I do understand the Commonwealth Games concept…I’m an Aussie so I know all about cake and eating etc we lay claim to Crowded House and Russell Crowe…oh and don’t forget Sam Neil…ah what am I on about…anything good from NZ we’ll pretend it’s actually ours.
I can tell by your tone that maybe I struck a nerve with the whole British vs English thing?? Maybe a little bit…don’t you feel a little grubby inside when you find yourself cheering some Scot, Welsh or Nth Ireland athlete at the Olympics? You obviously know what I was getting at if you feel so agreived.
You really need to take a bit of a pill and have a little lay down…you obviously have a persecution complex? I can only speak for myself but I am definitely not anti English or British for that matter.[/quote]

u talk too much. bollocks

[quote]Will Heffernan wrote:
[/quote]

You are too serious! Now get off Spike or whatever stimulants you are having and have a beer or two!

[quote]alstan90 wrote:
Rowings shit, their’s only one sport worse than it, that AMerican Football bollox. [/quote]

God, you’re an idiot.

[quote]
What’s al that about? They fkin restart everytime the ball touches the floor, and wear loads of padding, pussies.[/quote]

I actually played American Football (in high school), Rugby (in college), and rowed crew (still do).

Fact: You get hit way, way harder in American Football. They don’t wear pads because they are pussies. American Football players are as tough, if not tougher than rugby players. They are also, bigger, faster, and stronger. I wonder how a rugby player would fare at the NFL combine?

They wear pads so they don’t get killed or crippled. Americans used to play football without pads back in the early days until Congress threatened to ban the game because of the numbers of kids being killed or crippled playing the game.

but seeing as you’re a fucking Anglo-centric lout who is talking shit without having a clue as to what he is talking about, please understand that the dynamics of the game are completely different. I don’t recall in rugby that you have 10-20 yards to build up a head of steam to really crush someone. Kinda funny how the forward pass changes things.

Oh yeah, as to American football players being ‘pussies’ for wearing protection. Rugby players are starting to wear shoulder pads and head gear, so doesn’t that make them pussies as well?

[quote]
In the whole match their must be about 2 minutes of play. [/quote]

No it’s more like 3.5 hours. Rugby matches last less than 2 hours with halftime included.

[quote]
Seriously though, the whole world plays Rugby, not so many row.[/quote]

this is not true.

[quote]
England world champions WHOOOO![/quote]

Only because the USA doesn’t give a fuck about rugby.

[quote]
Stay on the right side of the river![/quote]

stay out of discussions on topics you know nothing about.

[quote]supermick wrote:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8313747460191556109&q=haka

forget rowing mate.[/quote]

If seeing the haka doesn’t make the hair stand up on your arms, you may be dead.

[quote]supermick wrote:
u talk too much. bollocks
[/quote]
Bullseye.

[quote]RIT Jared wrote:
I really fail to see the draw from Rugby to crew. Many good Rugby players for some reason have been caught up in the ludacris faggotry that is otherwise known as competitive rowing.

Maybe crew would be the right choice if you’re looking to become a cashmere sweater wearing sissy or a schoolboy bitch.[/quote]

Another idiot.

what are you talking about?

What is this small-dicked macho bullshit?

You have obviously never raced a rowing event. You obviously are another idiot who is talking out of his ass.

The 2000m is about as painful as you can get. Rowing in a boat with seven other guys is extremely technically demanding. Seriously, get in a boat with seven other novices and give it a go. Get in a single and try to row three strokes without tipping over. Dumbass.

Here’s an idea- go out on the track and run as fast as you can for 6.5 minutes.(oh yeah, if you don’t quit first). You see, the difference in rowing is that even though it feels like your heart is going to jump out of your body through your mouth, YOU CANNOT QUIT. One, because probably the seven other guys in the boat haven’t quit and if so, then your oar catches in the water, and with the momentum it would crane into your ribcage and rip you out of the boat.

Two, your teammates will kick your ass.

After you’re done puking your guts out come talk to me about ‘faggotry’.

Better yet - try surviving three-four months of winter training - doing 12-15 sessions a week of long, painful, boring rowing machine and rowing tank training and weight lifting and then talk to me about ‘faggotry’. Rowing is a very cerebral, internalized sport - it’s all about who can withstand the most pain while maintaining a high level of coordination, technical proficiency and balance.

In short, rowing isn’t something you watch, it’s something you do.

Look, I could care less if you like rowing or not, but RESPECT THE FUCKING SPORT. Don’t come out and make a blanket statement that all rowers are ‘faggots’
and not expect to get lit up for it.

What I find funny is that you call rowing gay, and then glorify as macho a sport where it is common practice to get naked with a bunch of other men post-game and then get drunk or to stick your head in between the asses of a bunch of other guys and give them the reach-around to get into ‘scrum formation’. (Ask a lock forward and he’ll tell you.)

[quote]rugby86 wrote:
After reading through various posts around this site for a while, I’ve noticed that quite a few of you guys are rugby players. I enjoy the sport as it truly is a kick ass game, however I’m contemplating a possible stint with the crew team to try something new.

Considering that I will still be active within the gym in addition to conditioning and practices, which sport do you all think would be better for overall gains to go along with my workouts?[/quote]

Listen, forget all this stupidity regarding crew you’ve been reading.

There are gay people in every sport - rowing is no different from any other. But not everyone who rows is gay, as the idiots posting on the subject are leading you to believe. I’m sure it’s the same proportion as in other sport.

You can be pretty sure there are some seriously closeted fags playing rugby with all the homo-erotic shit that goes on in that sport. (LOL)

Anyway, rowing is a very self-selecting sport - you’ll either get hooked right away or you won’t. The only to find out is to give it a go.

However, given your question - you have to figure out what you want to look like. Rowers are by nature rather tall and muscular - not bodybuilder or rugby player muscular - but more like swimmer or power-forward in basketball muscular. Why? Excess muscle mass is just dead weight.

Elite level oarsmen (at Elite University, National Team, and Olympic level ) average about 6’4" and weigh anywhere from 200-230 lbs. with single digit bodyfat.

If you want to be much bigger than that then maybe rowing may not be for you - too much cardio to make you much bigger.
But I think it’s safe to say that once you are hooked - it becomes a lifelong obsession, because that’s how long you’ll spend trying to perfect your technique and balance.

good luck

[quote]OARSMAN wrote:
alstan90 wrote:
Rowings shit, their’s only one sport worse than it, that AMerican Football bollox.

God, you’re an idiot.

What’s al that about? They fkin restart everytime the ball touches the floor, and wear loads of padding, pussies.

I actually played American Football (in high school), Rugby (in college), and rowed crew (still do).

Fact: You get hit way, way harder in American Football. They don’t wear pads because they are pussies. American Football players are as tough, if not tougher than rugby players. They are also, bigger, faster, and stronger. I wonder how a rugby player would fare at the NFL combine?

They wear pads so they don’t get killed or crippled. Americans used to play football without pads back in the early days until Congress threatened to ban the game because of the numbers of kids being killed or crippled playing the game.

but seeing as you’re a fucking Anglo-centric lout who is talking shit without having a clue as to what he is talking about, please understand that the dynamics of the game are completely different. I don’t recall in rugby that you have 10-20 yards to build up a head of steam to really crush someone. Kinda funny how the forward pass changes things.

Oh yeah, as to American football players being ‘pussies’ for wearing protection. Rugby players are starting to wear shoulder pads and head gear, so doesn’t that make them pussies as well?

In the whole match their must be about 2 minutes of play.

No it’s more like 3.5 hours. Rugby matches last less than 2 hours with halftime included.

Seriously though, the whole world plays Rugby, not so many row.

this is not true.

England world champions WHOOOO!

Only because the USA doesn’t give a fuck about rugby.

Stay on the right side of the river!

stay out of discussions on topics you know nothing about.

[/quote]

i think this has riled u a little as someone has insulted rowing. I actually played union here in England and used a C2 rower as my primary cardio - intervals, aerobic power workouts the lot. I picked up tips along the way from the uni rowing team members who were a very dedicated lot.

Concerning your rant there are reasons for the lack of massiveness in Rugby. Your men at the line of scrimmage only need to be active for a short amount of time. Although powerful and strong this hardly defines them as athletes due to their lack of aerobic conditioning. prop forward needs to be explosive (Line out, taking short balls etc), perform exhausting isometric style exercise (Scrummaging) and have the gas (Vo2 max) to go about and suppport a break or whatever. Its the latter component that really seperates the two sports people as generally, a rugby player needs way more aerobically than your football guys do.

However, im certian your running backs (I dont know that many names here) have the athletic-ness to excell should they be allowed to try out.

Concerning pads etc - complete bollocks really. The helmets basically cut down scrapes, cuts and the like but studies prove that your still likely to get concussed with or without one.
Shoulder pads make it easier on the tackle but less ability to “dig” the shoulder in imo.

I like rowing, steve redrave and Mat pinsent are hero’s here and rightly so!

[quote]Will Heffernan wrote:
rugby86 wrote:
haha That’s all the information i needed my friends. For the non-americans, yes crew is rowing in long boats. It was just something I was considering to see which would be better for me. But at the risk of turning into a faggoty sister dike, I’ll most assuredly get that notion out of my head and resume some rugby.

If it’s water you want…try water polo…it’s just rugby in a pool.

[/quote]

PETA is protesting water polo because so many horses drown.

[quote]supermick wrote:

i think this has riled u a little as someone has insulted rowing. I actually played union here in England and used a C2 rower as my primary cardio - intervals, aerobic power workouts the lot. I picked up tips along the way from the uni rowing team members who were a very dedicated lot.[/quote]

What really pissed me off was that I read on this site, which is supposedly one of the more enlightened training sites on the web.

For members to post such stupid,uninformed intolerant bullshit is ridiculous, and very, very disappointing.

[quote]
Concerning your rant there are reasons for the lack of massiveness in Rugby. Your men at the line of scrimmage only need to be active for a short amount of time. [/quote]

yes of course, the amount of running at all positions in rugby accounts for the relative lack of size compared to american footballers. American football has become highly specialized and is infinitely more complex than Rugby.

I just hate it when uneducated foreigners (to the nuances of the sport) dismiss American football as ‘pussy’ or not rigorous because of ‘play stoppage’ when they don’t have a friggin’ idea of what they are talking about.

I am in the unique position in that I’ve participated in all three. I can say categorically:

  1. you get hit a lot harder in American football than you do in Rugby.

Why?

a. In rugby, the first thing you learn to do is tackle properly, since you don’t wear as much protection - you can’t throw your body around like you can in American football without suffering the consequences.

b. the forward pass changes the whole dynamic of the game. In rugby it’s more like a moving pile of people across the field - the only time you really have the opportunity to crush someone is when you punt the ball away and the fullback will be there to field it - if your backs and flankers have the speed maybe they can get a good lick in. In American football - it’s pretty much geared toward a fast acceleration and a brutal hit - pretty much on every play

c. in American football - the guys are just much bigger - so just on basic physics alone the hits are going to be more ‘ballistic’ as they say.

  1. Other than X-country skiing - rowing is the most CV demanding sport there is. You can make the argument about say Tour de France level cycling - but I would rebut by saying that oarsmen outweigh cyclists and skiiers by a good 60-80 lbs. Their V02 Max relative to body weight is off the charts.

  2. Rowing is also perhaps the most training intensive sport (relative to duration of event) in the world. Consider that world-class oarsman will log over 200K a week on the water or rowing machine + 3-4 weight training sessions for a 6 minute event gives you an idea at the physiological demands of maintaining AT level cardio output/with corresponding high power for that amount of time

I disagree completely one point. To suggest that American footballers are not athletes is ludicrous. Granted many specific position players may not have the CV fitness of a rugger, but usually those guys will blow them out of the water in terms of sheer strength and in some cases agility. Line play in American football is incredibly difficult, not just any big man can play - not only do you have to be as strong as a horse (many NFL level linemen can bench well over 500lbs) but incredibly nimble and agile as well. That’s like saying Oly Lifters are not athletes because they aren’t aerobically fit.

Anyway, but not for any physiological differences, it’s just the natural adaptation to the nature of the sport. I personally think the NFL (American Football league) has gotten ridiculous with its emphasis on sheer massiveness. That can’t be healthy.

[quote]
However, im certian your running backs (I dont know that many names here) have the athletic-ness to excell should they be allowed to try out.[/quote]

More than definite. I’m convinced if the USA channeled it’s sporting energy to Rugby instead of American Football it would dominate the game. It wouldn’t even be close. We just have a ridiculous pool of talent to choose from on this side of the pond.

[quote]
Concerning pads etc - complete bollocks really. The helmets basically cut down scrapes, cuts and the like but studies prove that your still likely to get concussed with or without one.[/quote]

Really? Players in the NFL get concussions all the time. Just yesterday, D’shea Townsend from the Pittsburgh Steelers left the game against the Chicago Bears with a concussion after nailing a wide receiver. That goes to show you the ferocity of the hits that even with those helmets they are still getting concussions.

[quote]
Shoulder pads make it easier on the tackle but less ability to “dig” the shoulder in imo.[/quote]

Whatever the reason, man, the point is that the ruggers slag American footballers for wearing shoulder pads and helmets, but now they are wearing them too, a bit of a double standard, you think?

What is going on is that they are realizing that ruggers are getting bigger, stronger, and faster and dudes are starting to get really fucked up. It’s not ‘pussy’ to wear padding. It’s smart. That lets you play the game longer. Which is supposed to the be the whole point isn’t it? If you’re just into getting pummelled then go join the Pride circuit or something like that. Your odds of getting paid are a lot higher.

I wish people would drop this macho bullshit attitude, it really is retarded.

[quote]
I like rowing, steve redrave and Mat pinsent are hero’s here and rightly so![/quote]

Obviously, I like rowing too. Steve Redgrave is a stud. So is Pinsent - a very big dude.

cheers,

[quote]OARSMAN wrote:
supermick wrote:

i think this has riled u a little as someone has insulted rowing. I actually played union here in England and used a C2 rower as my primary cardio - intervals, aerobic power workouts the lot. I picked up tips along the way from the uni rowing team members who were a very dedicated lot.

What really pissed me off was that I read on this site, which is supposedly one of the more enlightened training sites on the web.

For members to post such stupid,uninformed intolerant bullshit is ridiculous, and very, very disappointing.

Concerning your rant there are reasons for the lack of massiveness in Rugby. Your men at the line of scrimmage only need to be active for a short amount of time.

yes of course, the amount of running at all positions in rugby accounts for the relative lack of size compared to american footballers. American football has become highly specialized and is infinitely more complex than Rugby.

I just hate it when uneducated foreigners (to the nuances of the sport) dismiss American football as ‘pussy’ or not rigorous because of ‘play stoppage’ when they don’t have a friggin’ idea of what they are talking about.

I am in the unique position in that I’ve participated in all three. I can say categorically:

  1. you get hit a lot harder in American football than you do in Rugby.

Why?

a. In rugby, the first thing you learn to do is tackle properly, since you don’t wear as much protection - you can’t throw your body around like you can in American football without suffering the consequences.

b. the forward pass changes the whole dynamic of the game. In rugby it’s more like a moving pile of people across the field - the only time you really have the opportunity to crush someone is when you punt the ball away and the fullback will be there to field it - if your backs and flankers have the speed maybe they can get a good lick in. In American football - it’s pretty much geared toward a fast acceleration and a brutal hit - pretty much on every play

c. in American football - the guys are just much bigger - so just on basic physics alone the hits are going to be more ‘ballistic’ as they say.

  1. Other than X-country skiing - rowing is the most CV demanding sport there is. You can make the argument about say Tour de France level cycling - but I would rebut by saying that oarsmen outweigh cyclists and skiiers by a good 60-80 lbs. Their V02 Max relative to body weight is off the charts.

  2. Rowing is also perhaps the most training intensive sport (relative to duration of event) in the world. Consider that world-class oarsman will log over 200K a week on the water or rowing machine + 3-4 weight training sessions for a 6 minute event gives you an idea at the physiological demands of maintaining AT level cardio output/with corresponding high power for that amount of time

Although powerful and strong this hardly defines them as athletes due to their lack of aerobic conditioning. prop forward needs to be explosive (Line out, taking short balls etc), perform exhausting isometric style exercise (Scrummaging) and have the gas (Vo2 max) to go about and suppport a break or whatever. Its the latter component that really seperates the two sports people as generally, a rugby player needs way more aerobically than your football guys do.

I disagree completely one point. To suggest that American footballers are not athletes is ludicrous. Granted many specific position players may not have the CV fitness of a rugger, but usually those guys will blow them out of the water in terms of sheer strength and in some cases agility. Line play in American football is incredibly difficult, not just any big man can play - not only do you have to be as strong as a horse (many NFL level linemen can bench well over 500lbs) but incredibly nimble and agile as well. That’s like saying Oly Lifters are not athletes because they aren’t aerobically fit.

Anyway, but not for any physiological differences, it’s just the natural adaptation to the nature of the sport. I personally think the NFL (American Football league) has gotten ridiculous with its emphasis on sheer massiveness. That can’t be healthy.

However, im certian your running backs (I dont know that many names here) have the athletic-ness to excell should they be allowed to try out.

More than definite. I’m convinced if the USA channeled it’s sporting energy to Rugby instead of American Football it would dominate the game. It wouldn’t even be close. We just have a ridiculous pool of talent to choose from on this side of the pond.

Concerning pads etc - complete bollocks really. The helmets basically cut down scrapes, cuts and the like but studies prove that your still likely to get concussed with or without one.

Really? Players in the NFL get concussions all the time. Just yesterday, D’shea Townsend from the Pittsburgh Steelers left the game against the Chicago Bears with a concussion after nailing a wide receiver. That goes to show you the ferocity of the hits that even with those helmets they are still getting concussions.

Shoulder pads make it easier on the tackle but less ability to “dig” the shoulder in imo.

Whatever the reason, man, the point is that the ruggers slag American footballers for wearing shoulder pads and helmets, but now they are wearing them too, a bit of a double standard, you think?

What is going on is that they are realizing that ruggers are getting bigger, stronger, and faster and dudes are starting to get really fucked up. It’s not ‘pussy’ to wear padding. It’s smart. That lets you play the game longer. Which is supposed to the be the whole point isn’t it? If you’re just into getting pummelled then go join the Pride circuit or something like that. Your odds of getting paid are a lot higher.

I wish people would drop this macho bullshit attitude, it really is retarded.

I like rowing, steve redrave and Mat pinsent are hero’s here and rightly so!

Obviously, I like rowing too. Steve Redgrave is a stud. So is Pinsent - a very big dude.

cheers,

[/quote]

couple of points -
Its hard to state conclusively that your football is infinately more complex. Its all relative to whatever level you have played at. Im sure international rugby teams have just as many calls (plays) as NFL teams in certain elements of their game.

Dorian west, the ex england hooker had to know 70+ calls just for line outs. In addition he played “man out” on Englands defensibe line. A position where you’d take a lot of contact and have the responsability of calling the defensive line to rush in an attempt to cut doen opposition time on the ball. All this in addition to his role in the scrum and ability to heel a channel 1 or 2 ball at will, to call an 8 man drive, react to a set piece back row move - knowing how to “block” and support at restarts (of which there are infinate varieties - all very complex imo. Your football is too.

Regarding hits…please look…

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1456417717068146447&q=rugby+hits

i dont want to turn this into a your sport isnt as hard as ours as its all relative but being hit by a samoan is no joke.
Regarding your point of people moving across the pitch - id argue this is only relevant in unskilled games where kids “watch the ball” - when people know their rols its much more dynamic and lines are straighter/hit harder.

I agree about the VO2 max statements. We had several documentaries on rowing following the fab 4 as they were known on their training pre sydney 2000. Pinsent, cracknell etc - rowing till they collapsed. Impressive and dedicated. Im a fan as i say and id never dismiss this as a gay pasttime.

Im gonna stick with my point o conditioning. Id agree that in terms of strength most NFL guys would blow most rugby guys out the water as your game involves this component much more than rugby. However, They are not necessarily more agile (jason robinson, christian cullen etc) and in my opinion to be considered an athlete a variety of physical attributed are needed - the conditioning of the aerobic system is one and i very much doubt the guys in the line of scrimmage have this - this is reflected in the fact that most would be described as obese in a variety of body composition tests (Calipers, under water testing, BMI -yeah i know its crap).

Your spot on concerning the NFL’s obsession with massiveness. Sadly though due to money top sport revolves around winning as a priority (and rightly so) not the athletes health, unfortunately. I feel this reflects the blatant gear use (AAS) in your sport compared to rugby (although granted - it happens. Whether thats right or wrong is another matter.
Also agree on your talent pool statement. Probably got better facilites all round too.

cheers

[quote]supermick wrote:
… generally, a rugby player needs way more aerobically than your football guys do.

However, im certian your running backs (I dont know that many names here) have the athletic-ness to excell should they be allowed to try out.
[/quote]

LOL!

OARSMAN, nice series of posts.

I was taking the piss in my previous posts but I have to deal with this one seriously as OARSMAN has no grip on reality. I have read this response a couple of times combing it with my irony and sarcasm detector but I have to make just a few observations.

[quote]OARSMAN wrote:
supermick wrote:

i think this has riled u a little as someone has insulted rowing. I actually played union here in England and used a C2 rower as my primary cardio - intervals, aerobic power workouts the lot. I picked up tips along the way from the uni rowing team members who were a very dedicated lot.

What really pissed me off was that I read on this site, which is supposedly one of the more enlightened training sites on the web.
[/quote]
Probably the only correct comment in this entire response.

Somewhat like your entire post that follows.

That is just rubbish. If you have been involved in rugby at any significant level you’d know that you were comparing apples and oranges and to say that American Football is ‘infinitely more complex’ only demonstrates your complete ignorance.

Do you mean similar to exactly what you have done above with regard to rugby? Oh yeah…I hate that too.

The only unique position you’ve been in is having the ability to talk out your own arse.

Wrong…I’d be happy to explain this in detail if you want to PM me?

Here I was thinking that American Football was an infinitely more complex game than rugby??? I didn’t realise that those guys were just running around throwing themselves about aimlessly?

You say you’ve played rugby but this whole statement let’s me know without doubt you have no idea what you are talking about. I’d be happy to send you some match analysis footage and I dare you to tell me that it is in anyway possible to be hit any harder? I posted a link on here previously regarding rugby league…have a look at some of those hits and get back to me.

I’d say from what I’ve seen of NFL…now I can’t claim to be uniquely qualified like yourself but I do watch a lot of NFL…I’d say from looking at the stats on the TV that goes along with the players that the guys delivering the biggest hits in NFL are actually about the same size as many of the forwards in International Rugby.

500lbs…what just like many Prop Forwards in international rugby? Do you have any idea what Andy Sheridan or Os Du Rant bench? No…I hear you say.

By that reasoning you should dominate all sport? I didn’t realise you did? I thought on a per capita bases the US actually performed quite poorly at International events like say…the Olympics? I must be wrong? Do you not think that perhaps the Pacific Islanders, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, England, Scotalnd…and on and on we go decided to play NFL there might be a chance we’d give you some food for thought. Just a stupid comment that once again demonstrates you have no idea what you are talking about.

You just reiterated exactly what supermick said in his original post?

You mean the rubbish that you’ve been going on about? I agree.

At last…something I can agree with you on.

I have to thank Will Heffernan and Supermick for replying to OARSMAN’s posts. You guys are legends.

I was literally too stunned to type a word after reading that shit.

Do people in america actually know how to play rugby? because it sure doesn’t sound like any rugby i’ve ever played (and i’ve played for 22 years).
There is just too much crap to sift through in OARSMAN’s posts so I can’t be stuffed even trying to reply.

Just one thing though. A 500lb+ bench means you’re strong but doesn’t necessarily equate to an explosively violent tackle. Watch some international rugby and see the distance that most players cover to make a ‘big hit’. Now thats power my friend.