Ramp Sets Not So Good?

Training Bodybuilding
21

[quote]bicepmannn wrote:
trextacy wrote:
Oh, and if your English sucks how do you know you have comprehended the posts by Prof X (or anyone else, for that matter) who do write in English and discuss ramping?

I translate the entire Babelfish of usage of page web. [/quote]

If it translates to your language as well as it’s translating to english, I doubt you understand the concept enough to take issue with it.

But, basically, your sets warm you up for a top/heaviest all out set for reps, and you try to add more weight/reps to that last set each session, thus allowing progression to occur more quickly than if you had to add weight and complete 3-4 straight sets with the “new” weight.

If you are currently benching 200 lbs for 8 reps, what would get you bigger/stronger faster- over the course of a year, going to 3 sets of 6-8 at 225 lbs, or being able to work up to a top set of 275 lbs for 8 reps? Most peopl would say the guy doing 275 for 8 reps would be bigger/stronger, so that approach is superior for most people.

/thread

22

Dude, no way we truly haha! at yours about the upright sets against the ramping. But honestly, how can any we can comprehend these revolving post you type?

Eh, then again–who Fuck Who cause think this ourselves us?

We stoopid.

23

[quote]bicepmannn wrote:
The greetings of everyone. I have thinks sat in my car today of education, and I have concluded these ramps sets when expoused through the magnet of Prof X and such is not completely just as effective to construct muscle as much of on this raw advice.

They see, is that can be seen reading by the works by far such authors, whom I believe this volume, this step intensity, is the key to the growth, and actually this is seen in training by much bodybuilder. While using of the ramp rule in contrast to the upright series you waste the time in the gymnasium, that could be issued otherwise to register more volume through bodypart.

Also through the same nature of the series of ramp, you must a long time rest between the series that when Chad Waterbury said, are poorly for the body formation. I try only to show people on this advice, that only because people is large as a Prof X, mean NOT that they have cause to right. [/quote]

To you the salutories were to have been tremendous! When not to for but to have thoughts concerning things to where such information is concerned. Through that which some might have thought advice but when to have been plainly.

With such having been seen in volume, intensity, but with growth abound there was never in a box but frankly thoughts to not have been, when plainly the transform, notwithstanding for all!

Also, with concerns to the ramp, but not so much in the universe as a being, but they said how such things might pass for doing.

So is not as much complicating as when things are clearly to have been shown but not obtuse.

Hoping where my translation is to not have been so incomprehensible but vagina.

24

[quote]Itchy wrote:
Dude, no way we truly haha! at yours about the upright sets against the ramping. But honestly, how can any we can comprehend these revolving post you type?

Eh, then again–who Fuck Who cause think this ourselves us?

We stoopid.[/quote]

Dude, nous avons vraiment rien haha! à la verticale sur votre fixe contre la rampe. Mais honnêtement, comment peut-on tout comprendre ces renouvelable après vous tapez? Eh, puis de nouveau - qui Fuck Qui pense que cela nous cause de nous? Nous stoopid.

25

Tal vez sus creadores, hasta el punto. Quizás el extranjero nos ha mostrado la luz, y estamos entrando en una nueva era donde la gente no se incrementan. … Tal vez, sólo tal vez, de Waterbury más cerca de la perfección y ligera que el resto de nosotros.

26

Chang_lee - I’m telling you.

“Muscular lumps”

27

I seriously laughed at this thread!

Honestly, I thought it was a joke! I guess not.

OP, I don’t know where you’re from, but for a second I thought you had Disorganized-type Schizophrenia.

The largest reason your getting bad remarks is because you didn’t even pose a question. You just came in here and (tried) to just tell everybody that what they do sucks!

ALL training methods work! Whats needed is progression, consistency and effort.

Let me ask you something. Do you understand this: Your highness, may I have some food for my engine, for his lowness?

I didn’t think so.

If you want to use an online translator, use Google Translate. I use it to speak with my grandfather online, who is Russian. It works like a charm.

28

[quote]SteelyD wrote:
bicepmannn wrote:
The greetings of everyone. I have thinks sat in my car today of education, and I have concluded these ramps sets when expoused through the magnet of Prof X and such is not completely just as effective to construct muscle as much of on this raw advice.

They see, is that can be seen reading by the works by far such authors, whom I believe this volume, this step intensity, is the key to the growth, and actually this is seen in training by much bodybuilder. While using of the ramp rule in contrast to the upright series you waste the time in the gymnasium, that could be issued otherwise to register more volume through bodypart.

Also through the same nature of the series of ramp, you must a long time rest between the series that when Chad Waterbury said, are poorly for the body formation. I try only to show people on this advice, that only because people is large as a Prof X, mean NOT that they have cause to right.

To you the salutories were to have been tremendous! When not to for but to have thoughts concerning things to where such information is concerned. Through that which some might have thought advice but when to have been plainly.

With such having been seen in volume, intensity, but with growth abound there was never in a box but frankly thoughts to not have been, when plainly the transform, notwithstanding for all!

Also, with concerns to the ramp, but not so much in the universe as a being, but they said how such things might pass for doing.

So is not as much complicating as when things are clearly to have been shown but not obtuse.

Hoping where my translation is to not have been so incomprehensible but vagina.[/quote]

FUCKING FUNNY!!!

29

hey, he saw that we did there?

30

[quote]forbes wrote:
SteelyD wrote:
bicepmannn wrote:
The greetings of everyone. I have thinks sat in my car today of education, and I have concluded these ramps sets when expoused through the magnet of Prof X and such is not completely just as effective to construct muscle as much of on this raw advice.

They see, is that can be seen reading by the works by far such authors, whom I believe this volume, this step intensity, is the key to the growth, and actually this is seen in training by much bodybuilder. While using of the ramp rule in contrast to the upright series you waste the time in the gymnasium, that could be issued otherwise to register more volume through bodypart.

Also through the same nature of the series of ramp, you must a long time rest between the series that when Chad Waterbury said, are poorly for the body formation. I try only to show people on this advice, that only because people is large as a Prof X, mean NOT that they have cause to right.

To you the salutories were to have been tremendous! When not to for but to have thoughts concerning things to where such information is concerned. Through that which some might have thought advice but when to have been plainly.

With such having been seen in volume, intensity, but with growth abound there was never in a box but frankly thoughts to not have been, when plainly the transform, notwithstanding for all!

Also, with concerns to the ramp, but not so much in the universe as a being, but they said how such things might pass for doing.

So is not as much complicating as when things are clearly to have been shown but not obtuse.

Hoping where my translation is to not have been so incomprehensible but vagina.

FUCKING FUNNY!!!
[/quote]

LOL. Ending with “vagina” is what made this.

31

[quote]forbes wrote:
I seriously laughed at this thread!

Honestly, I thought it was a joke! I guess not.

OP, I don’t know where you’re from, but for a second I thought you had Disorganized-type Schizophrenia.

The largest reason your getting bad remarks is because you didn’t even pose a question. You just came in here and (tried) to just tell everybody that what they do sucks!

ALL training methods work! Whats needed is progression, consistency and effort.

Let me ask you something. Do you understand this: Your highness, may I have some food for my engine, for his lowness?

I didn’t think so.

If you want to use an online translator, use Google Translate. I use it to speak with my grandfather online, who is Russian. It works like a charm.[/quote]

I do not say every that they make, are incorrect, show I simply on that that the majority of the bodybuilder -Arnold, Zane used upright series, and that perhaps series of the ramp is not the better manner proposed is, to construct the muscle after all, as is suggested a lot time on these counsels.

And the fact why has importance if I understand this quotation or I do not think that the people majority understands that I try to say, they choose just of not to listen.

32

This guys English reminds me of juanromero. That guy still around?

33

420×913 219 KB

[quote]bicepmannn wrote:
Despite all laughs and cries of troll your person of refuted you my complaints since nevertheless. Thus, I left to conclude that I have the reason here unless someone explains me in fact why the series of ramp are as much better than upright series. [/quote]

This is why.

34

419×622 52.1 KB

And this.

35


And this.

36

420×630 69.9 KB

Oh, and let’s not forget this.

37

420×630 28.6 KB

Hmmm, I’m starting to see a pattern…

38


One more for good measure.

39

[quote]SteelyD wrote:
bicepmannn wrote:
The greetings of everyone. I have thinks sat in my car today of education, and I have concluded these ramps sets when expoused through the magnet of Prof X and such is not completely just as effective to construct muscle as much of on this raw advice.

They see, is that can be seen reading by the works by far such authors, whom I believe this volume, this step intensity, is the key to the growth, and actually this is seen in training by much bodybuilder. While using of the ramp rule in contrast to the upright series you waste the time in the gymnasium, that could be issued otherwise to register more volume through bodypart.

Also through the same nature of the series of ramp, you must a long time rest between the series that when Chad Waterbury said, are poorly for the body formation. I try only to show people on this advice, that only because people is large as a Prof X, mean NOT that they have cause to right.

To you the salutories were to have been tremendous! When not to for but to have thoughts concerning things to where such information is concerned. Through that which some might have thought advice but when to have been plainly.

With such having been seen in volume, intensity, but with growth abound there was never in a box but frankly thoughts to not have been, when plainly the transform, notwithstanding for all!

Also, with concerns to the ramp, but not so much in the universe as a being, but they said how such things might pass for doing.

So is not as much complicating as when things are clearly to have been shown but not obtuse.

Hoping where my translation is to not have been so incomprehensible but vagina.[/quote]

LMAO!

Best. Post.

40

[quote]SteelyD wrote:
bicepmannn wrote:
The greetings of everyone. I have thinks sat in my car today of education, and I have concluded these ramps sets when expoused through the magnet of Prof X and such is not completely just as effective to construct muscle as much of on this raw advice.

They see, is that can be seen reading by the works by far such authors, whom I believe this volume, this step intensity, is the key to the growth, and actually this is seen in training by much bodybuilder. While using of the ramp rule in contrast to the upright series you waste the time in the gymnasium, that could be issued otherwise to register more volume through bodypart.

Also through the same nature of the series of ramp, you must a long time rest between the series that when Chad Waterbury said, are poorly for the body formation. I try only to show people on this advice, that only because people is large as a Prof X, mean NOT that they have cause to right.

To you the salutories were to have been tremendous! When not to for but to have thoughts concerning things to where such information is concerned. Through that which some might have thought advice but when to have been plainly.

With such having been seen in volume, intensity, but with growth abound there was never in a box but frankly thoughts to not have been, when plainly the transform, notwithstanding for all!

Also, with concerns to the ramp, but not so much in the universe as a being, but they said how such things might pass for doing.

So is not as much complicating as when things are clearly to have been shown but not obtuse.

Hoping where my translation is to not have been so incomprehensible but vagina.[/quote]

LOL! I don’t find a lot of written stuff funny, but this was brilliant.