Pull-Up Strength While Bulking

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
Carlitosway wrote:
Player wrote:
So guys, what do you think about free weight vs machines, TBT vs split, slow gaining vs bulking?

Player wrote:
So guys, what do you think about free weight vs machines, TBT vs split, slow gaining vs bulking?

Just beating a dead horse here player. It will turn into a flamefest faster then you typed that question. I think free weights are great, I think machines are great also. (ask me this question a year ago I’d probably just say freeweights only and TBT and I’d still probably be 155 today) I prefer a 2 way split (what im doing now), upper/lower split, or bodypart split and I prefer bulking long term and adjusting diet when necessary for less fat gain, better then doing one of them yoyo bulks (bulk then cut bulk then cut shit).

I look at the big picture which is gaining mass at a good pace for my long term goal of achieving an appreciable amount of muscle for my frame. I could care less what joe schmoe is doing over there.

I mean c’mon man this is a bodybuilding thread on what is mostly a bodybuilding site. If you’re a bodybuilder just doing free weights, avoiding machines and only do TBT you might be cutting yourself short.

He was being sarcastic :slight_smile:

[/quote]

Yeah, right.

Add weight

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
Of course they look like a pussy version. Who gives a fuck?
Yet they build latwidth so much better for most people (when performed correctly).

Great stretch, no cheating…

[/quote]

Interesting… I’d like to try these as I do pullups only these days since don’t have access to a pulldown machine. I have wached some of the videos. I see the basics… elevate the feet, add weight to your lap etc. What else is there to know regarding the form and range of motion etc? Basically, would you mind expanding on this “(when performed correctly)”? Thanks!

[quote]DJS wrote:
Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

Of course they look like a pussy version. Who gives a fuck?
Yet they build latwidth so much better for most people (when performed correctly).

Great stretch, no cheating…

Interesting… I’d like to try these as I do pullups only these days since don’t have access to a pulldown machine. I have wached some of the videos. I see the basics… elevate the feet, add weight to your lap etc. What else is there to know regarding the form and range of motion etc? Basically, would you mind expanding on this “(when performed correctly)”? Thanks![/quote]

Well, for one avoid turning this into too much of a row…
There might be a good, detailed explanation floating around intensemuscle, you could run a search there.
Make sure you emphasize the stretch-part of the ROM and really control the negative here, no dropping down or bouncing out of the bottom.
Higher reps (10-12 or so or 10-14… Latwidth, not “general upper body strength” :slight_smile: Maybe tribunal can add some detail, but you should be able to figure it out anyway) imo and avoid too much bicep involvement…

If you’ve watched Jason Wojo do them, that should give you a good idea of how to perform them correctly.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
Carlitosway wrote:
Player wrote:
So guys, what do you think about free weight vs machines, TBT vs split, slow gaining vs bulking?

Player wrote:
So guys, what do you think about free weight vs machines, TBT vs split, slow gaining vs bulking?

Just beating a dead horse here player. It will turn into a flamefest faster then you typed that question. I think free weights are great, I think machines are great also. (ask me this question a year ago I’d probably just say freeweights only and TBT and I’d still probably be 155 today) I prefer a 2 way split (what im doing now), upper/lower split, or bodypart split and I prefer bulking long term and adjusting diet when necessary for less fat gain, better then doing one of them yoyo bulks (bulk then cut bulk then cut shit).

I look at the big picture which is gaining mass at a good pace for my long term goal of achieving an appreciable amount of muscle for my frame. I could care less what joe schmoe is doing over there.

I mean c’mon man this is a bodybuilding thread on what is mostly a bodybuilding site. If you’re a bodybuilder just doing free weights, avoiding machines and only do TBT you might be cutting yourself short.

He was being sarcastic :slight_smile:

[/quote]

Sometimes I can’t tell sarcasm, aw fuck this site really. Damn that bastard.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
DJS wrote:
Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

Of course they look like a pussy version. Who gives a fuck?
Yet they build latwidth so much better for most people (when performed correctly).

Great stretch, no cheating…

Interesting… I’d like to try these as I do pullups only these days since don’t have access to a pulldown machine. I have wached some of the videos. I see the basics… elevate the feet, add weight to your lap etc. What else is there to know regarding the form and range of motion etc? Basically, would you mind expanding on this “(when performed correctly)”? Thanks!

Well, for one avoid turning this into too much of a row…
There might be a good, detailed explanation floating around intensemuscle, you could run a search there.
Make sure you emphasize the stretch-part of the ROM and really control the negative here, no dropping down or bouncing out of the bottom.
Higher reps (10-12 or so or 10-14… Latwidth, not “general upper body strength” :slight_smile: Maybe tribunal can add some detail, but you should be able to figure it out anyway) imo and avoid too much bicep involvement…

If you’ve watched Jason Wojo do them, that should give you a good idea of how to perform them correctly.
[/quote]

Thanks!

Looks like I can’t search over there without a login. I’ll see if i can find it somewhere online. Thanks.

[quote]DJS wrote:
Thanks!

Looks like I can’t search over there without a login. I’ll see if i can find it somewhere online. Thanks.
[/quote]

Just make an account man, it’s no big deal and you can search for all the old threads/posts by In-Human, MassiveG and Doggcrapp… Lots of good info to be found.

And you’ll need one to view all the pretty pictures of Dante.
Not that you can see much in those, as he’s trying to flex real hard while at the same time attempting to hold the camera still.

For some reason he also has to flex hard while he’s photographing other people, so whenever he takes a pic it looks like a parkinson-victim was holding the camera or that there was an earth-quake going on or so :wink:

[quote]Mad Titan wrote:
Add weight[/quote]

A Mad Titan sighting! Quick, someone pass me the camera!

:slight_smile:

[quote]Mad Titan wrote:
Add weight[/quote]

Woah mad titan is back, hoo rah!

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
DJS wrote:
Thanks!

Looks like I can’t search over there without a login. I’ll see if i can find it somewhere online. Thanks.

Just make an account man, it’s no big deal and you can search for all the old threads/posts by In-Human, MassiveG and Doggcrapp… Lots of good info to be found.

And you’ll need one to view all the pretty pictures of Dante.
Not that you can see much in those, as he’s trying to flex real hard while at the same time attempting to hold the camera still.

For some reason he also has to flex hard while he’s photographing other people, so whenever he takes a pic it looks like a parkinson-victim was holding the camera or that there was an earth-quake going on or so :wink:

[/quote]

Will do! thanks.

[quote]waylanderxx wrote:
Mad Titan wrote:
Add weight

Woah mad titan is back, hoo rah![/quote]

I checked the date on this thread to make sure it was current! haha

[quote]Carlitosway wrote:
Player wrote:
So guys, what do you think about free weight vs machines, TBT vs split, slow gaining vs bulking?

Player wrote:
So guys, what do you think about free weight vs machines, TBT vs split, slow gaining vs bulking?

Just beating a dead horse here player. It will turn into a flamefest faster then you typed that question. I think free weights are great, I think machines are great also. (ask me this question a year ago I’d probably just say freeweights only and TBT and I’d still probably be 155 today) I prefer a 2 way split (what im doing now), upper/lower split, or bodypart split and I prefer bulking long term and adjusting diet when necessary for less fat gain, better then doing one of them yoyo bulks (bulk then cut bulk then cut shit).

I look at the big picture which is gaining mass at a good pace for my long term goal of achieving an appreciable amount of muscle for my frame. I could care less what joe schmoe is doing over there.

I mean c’mon man this is a bodybuilding thread on what is mostly a bodybuilding site. If you’re a bodybuilder just doing free weights, avoiding machines and only do TBT you might be cutting yourself short.
[/quote]

One silly post and you pour your heart man… Get a grip :wink:

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
rudilerm wrote:
Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
Wasn’t this the bodybuilding forum once?

For lat width:
properly performed Rack Chins > Limited (bottom half) ROM Pullups/Pulldowns > Full Rom Pullups/Pulldowns.

So from your flow chart, you’re saying Rack chins are better than the others right? I’m just making sure I’m reading it correctly.
Better in the context of building latwidth for most people.
Also, after continuously hearing the term “Rack Chins” and not knowing wtf it was, I just checked it out on youtube. I know I can’t pass judgment because I have never performed them but, they just look like a pussy version of a pull up or chin. Why are they superior?

Of course they look like a pussy version. Who gives a fuck?
Yet they build latwidth so much better for most people (when performed correctly).

Great stretch, no cheating…

(There were some pics of Justin Harris’ before and after lat-spread in the DoggCrapp thread… He practically had no lats before despite being big…)

Bodybuilding isn’t about doing exercises just for the sake of doing those exercises.
So if something looks awkward, but is worth the trouble… Why complain?

Btw, when referring to limited ROM pull-ups/chins I meant:
(lo and behold, he isn’t even a bodybuilder and still thinks like that… Judging from his back, he may be doing something right)

http://asp.elitefts.com/qa/training-logs.asp?qid=89100&tid=126

[/quote]

Not to take away from rack chins, because clearly there’s something to them, but doesn’t JH attribute more of his lat width gains to the DC stretching+bent over rope handle pulldowns? He’s mentioned those many times to people asking for advice on EFS, and has commented on how much more he feels the stretch in that movement than typical pulldowns.

[quote]Player wrote:
Carlitosway wrote:
Player wrote:
So guys, what do you think about free weight vs machines, TBT vs split, slow gaining vs bulking?

Player wrote:
So guys, what do you think about free weight vs machines, TBT vs split, slow gaining vs bulking?

Just beating a dead horse here player. It will turn into a flamefest faster then you typed that question. I think free weights are great, I think machines are great also. (ask me this question a year ago I’d probably just say freeweights only and TBT and I’d still probably be 155 today) I prefer a 2 way split (what im doing now), upper/lower split, or bodypart split and I prefer bulking long term and adjusting diet when necessary for less fat gain, better then doing one of them yoyo bulks (bulk then cut bulk then cut shit).

I look at the big picture which is gaining mass at a good pace for my long term goal of achieving an appreciable amount of muscle for my frame. I could care less what joe schmoe is doing over there.

I mean c’mon man this is a bodybuilding thread on what is mostly a bodybuilding site. If you’re a bodybuilder just doing free weights, avoiding machines and only do TBT you might be cutting yourself short.

One silly post and you pour your heart man… Get a grip ;)[/quote]

lol hate bastards like you, coming out of now where and shit, you caught me in a bad mood to. Hope you got a good laugh fucker

[quote]cdh3087 wrote:
Do pullups, pulldowns are for the pussies who don’t like lifting their body weight but would rather sit down and pull a bar down. I’m not saying pulldowns suck but pullups are better. So sure yeah do your pulldowns but make sure you’re doing your pullups too.[/quote]

Good logic there.

[quote]red04 wrote:
Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
rudilerm wrote:
Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
Wasn’t this the bodybuilding forum once?

For lat width:
properly performed Rack Chins > Limited (bottom half) ROM Pullups/Pulldowns > Full Rom Pullups/Pulldowns.

So from your flow chart, you’re saying Rack chins are better than the others right? I’m just making sure I’m reading it correctly.
Better in the context of building latwidth for most people.
Also, after continuously hearing the term “Rack Chins” and not knowing wtf it was, I just checked it out on youtube. I know I can’t pass judgment because I have never performed them but, they just look like a pussy version of a pull up or chin. Why are they superior?

Of course they look like a pussy version. Who gives a fuck?
Yet they build latwidth so much better for most people (when performed correctly).

Great stretch, no cheating…

(There were some pics of Justin Harris’ before and after lat-spread in the DoggCrapp thread… He practically had no lats before despite being big…)

Bodybuilding isn’t about doing exercises just for the sake of doing those exercises.
So if something looks awkward, but is worth the trouble… Why complain?

Btw, when referring to limited ROM pull-ups/chins I meant:
(lo and behold, he isn’t even a bodybuilder and still thinks like that… Judging from his back, he may be doing something right)

http://asp.elitefts.com/qa/training-logs.asp?qid=89100&tid=126

Not to take away from rack chins, because clearly there’s something to them, but doesn’t JH attribute more of his lat width gains to the DC stretching+bent over rope handle pulldowns? He’s mentioned those many times to people asking for advice on EFS, and has commented on how much more he feels the stretch in that movement than typical pulldowns.[/quote]

Yeah, but those are only one of the exercises he did (I’m guessing he used them as a widowmaker? in that case he probably used them every workout, after his main move out of a rotation of 3)
Other than that, you get Wojo and a ton of other people loving the exercise (me included). I’m thinking that might be more than just coincidence.

I think it’s also very important to know proper form while performing pull ups. Barely touching the top of your head to the bar and swinging your ass up there is not considered a complete pullup.

I hear too many peeps claiming that they can do 15-20 pullups, but when u watch them perform pull ups, they are swinging all over the place and barely move towards the bar. If your going to do proper pullups at least get your chin to the bar.

Try touching your chest to the bar as u would when doing pull downs and see how many u can perform before failure…probably not too many. It takes practice like any other exercise, but the results will be much better for sure.

As I was searching the net for pull ups, I came across someone doing them with improper form - YouTube and someone doing them the proper way - YouTube

[quote]AzCats wrote:

As I was searching the net for pull ups, I came across someone doing them with improper form YouTube?
v=BAUUTwoimpI&eurl=How to Do Pullups with Proper Form: Full Guide | StrongLifts and someone doing them the proper way - YouTube [/quote]

Umm…I think you got those links mixed up.

Yes I did…Edit thank you

Back width is largely a function of your clavicle width UNLESS you use the special method I described on a different thread of “dislocating” your scapulae - its very painful initially and possibly dangerous if you do it incorrectly- but OVERNIGHT adds several inches to your lat spread. Dante uses this trick quite well as do most older Bbers and I assume he taught you IM chumps the trick lol. The hanging lat stretch and palumbo’s idea with the vertical support make a big structural difference as do pullovers up to a certain age.

Rack chins are great if you arch back and keep chest up and stretch with a pause at the bottom, just like lat pulldowns - as you said.

For an excellent back finisher give this movement a try - kneel between two cable stacks such that the cables are roughly along the direction of your forearms (the more closely you satisfy this condition, the less your arms will be recruited in the movement), begin the movement with a full stretch and squeeze scapulae together with a pause at finish.
\end{hijack}

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
red04 wrote:
Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
rudilerm wrote:
Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
Wasn’t this the bodybuilding forum once?

For lat width:
properly performed Rack Chins > Limited (bottom half) ROM Pullups/Pulldowns > Full Rom Pullups/Pulldowns.

So from your flow chart, you’re saying Rack chins are better than the others right? I’m just making sure I’m reading it correctly.
Better in the context of building latwidth for most people.
Also, after continuously hearing the term “Rack Chins” and not knowing wtf it was, I just checked it out on youtube. I know I can’t pass judgment because I have never performed them but, they just look like a pussy version of a pull up or chin. Why are they superior?

Of course they look like a pussy version. Who gives a fuck?
Yet they build latwidth so much better for most people (when performed correctly).

Great stretch, no cheating…

(There were some pics of Justin Harris’ before and after lat-spread in the DoggCrapp thread… He practically had no lats before despite being big…)

Bodybuilding isn’t about doing exercises just for the sake of doing those exercises.
So if something looks awkward, but is worth the trouble… Why complain?

Btw, when referring to limited ROM pull-ups/chins I meant:
(lo and behold, he isn’t even a bodybuilder and still thinks like that… Judging from his back, he may be doing something right)

http://asp.elitefts.com/qa/training-logs.asp?qid=89100&tid=126

Not to take away from rack chins, because clearly there’s something to them, but doesn’t JH attribute more of his lat width gains to the DC stretching+bent over rope handle pulldowns? He’s mentioned those many times to people asking for advice on EFS, and has commented on how much more he feels the stretch in that movement than typical pulldowns.

Yeah, but those are only one of the exercises he did (I’m guessing he used them as a widowmaker? in that case he probably used them every workout, after his main move out of a rotation of 3)
Other than that, you get Wojo and a ton of other people loving the exercise (me included). I’m thinking that might be more than just coincidence.

[/quote]