[quote]cromwell2007 wrote:
[quote]HeavyTriple wrote:
[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
What does the chest have to do with it? If you put up in the high 500’s, you better don’t do it as a chest lift…
But yes, way too many in the high 500’s… And I call bs on most of the 600 and 600+, with very few exceptions (kaz etc).
There are excessively few people benching 600+ raw.
For comparison, many super-heavyweight bodybuilders and quite a bunch of heavyweights (IFBB) are good for about 495 for 3-12 (chest bench/crappy setup… Depends also on height/weight obviously… The 8-12 reppers are the guys with better setup and more gifted leverages ala the guy who competed against JJ in the strongest BB contest, he got 505 for 9 or 12 or something like that full ROM and is one of very few to achieve something like that… The low 500’s are the slightly lighter guys like McGrath back before his tricep tear, JJ, etc, pretty common actually among heavies and superheavies who love to lift heavy) and low to mid 500’s PL style… Some even in the high 500’s and you might find a couple of potential 600 lb benchers there but not many (Zack Khan is in the high 500’s I think, The Rhino obviously, and a few others).
You’ll find more such numbers among powerlifters obviously, but there are still not many who bench 600+ raw, and with only a mere handful exceptions (hoornstra, he’s also a bodybuilder I forgot to mention above, competes in the 242’s in PL and has done 615 in comp and 675 or so in the gym, maybe stronger now… Crazy! Probably one of the top 3 guys in terms of genetic gift for benching) they are usually very heavy.
Most pro-wrestlers don’t look like they could hold a candle to any of these guys… With very few exceptions.
Those pro-wrestlers looking like yesteryear’s pro bodybuilders are/were probably good for 405x10-12, perhaps a couple of reps at 495 for the really heavy guys, but rarely the numbers quoted in the OP unless they did their share of powerlifting/strongman etc.
[/quote]
Hey man, I hear you on the chest argument. But show me a guy who benches 600 raw and I will show you a guy who has better chest development than Steiner. Plus, as I alluded to before, the guy was pretty small before steroids, so I just don’t see 600 as even a remote possibility.
As for whether or not these lifts are geared, I think some of them are. There was a thread below this list and it seemed that some of the powerlifters’ numbers were geared. That could explain Henry’s 620 if he never did more than 500 raw.
I’m not saying I believe these numbers past the guys I mentioned. I would say at least 75% of that list is greatly exaggerated. But I’m too young to know who a lot of them are, so I thought maybe some people who were older than me could give some insight.[/quote]
Steiner suffered a horrendous throat injury in puerto rico and required emergency surgery, during said surgery they had to cut though his chest and rib cage. This was several years ago , He is missing some pertoral muscle tissue as a result. This is the reason for his “unimpressive chest development” Also he has huge triceps and shoulders which is what really powers a heavy bench I can believe 500 a few years ago quite readily[/quote]
Again, I understand the dynamics of a powerlifting bench or just a heavy bench, but I’m not talking about a few years ago. I’m talking about 10 years ago when I actually watched wrestling, I think a 600 bench is laughable from Steiner. 500 back then, maybe.