Powerful Videos from a Powerful Individual

Off Topic
101

[quote]angry chicken wrote:
LOL at all of the people who think that there is something wrong with men learning more about EFFECTIVE ways of attracting women. Or about being exposed to different ideas and ways of thinking. Or even hearing about OLD ideas with a different style or spin of communication or presentation.

“Just be yourself” is the WORST advice I have ever heard! As if the “self” is a static entity that never evolves… LOL

Our “prime directive” as human beings is to survive long enough to mate with the BEST possible partner so that the BEST possible set of genetics can be passed on to our offspring, thus giving them the BEST chance of survival and subsequent replication. Wash, rinse, repeat. Everything else on this sad little planet is just window dressing.

I’d even go as far as to say that as MEN, it is in our instincts and our biological make up to mate with AS MANY good genetic matches that we can! Obviously, that model doesn’t jive with “modern civilization” unless you have the means to support all of the resulting offspring. But that’s a PART of what we are as men, like it or not.

As for people knocking the fact that PUA gurus make MONEY (god forbid) by teaching a specific SKILL SET to someone who obviously lacks it (or else they wouldn’t BUY it), then those people must be communists or something, because that’s the DEFINITION of capitalism: find a market, develop a product, PROFIT!

What’s wrong with that? There is NO difference whatsoever between what Arash or any of the other PUA guys are selling and what MILLIONS of women buy at the magazine stand at the check out line of EVERY supermarket in the US. Cosmo’s headlines this month are: Be a man magnet: 13 moves to make you irresistible to him; Stretch your wardrobe, not your wallet; 8 secret guy insecurities; Your hottest legs ever; Make his friends worship you. Here’s the link if you don’t believe me: http://www.cosmopolitan.com/

So we have 13 “secret moves” that women will PAY for, some fashion advice, 8 ways to MANIPULATE a man with his insecurities, some regurgitated information on leg training and some advice to MANIPULATE a man’s FRIENDS to her advantage… But it’s the PUA guys that are the douchebags, right? Give me a fucking break. The next time you are in the grocery store and there is woman in front of you browsing a Cosmo, why don’t you call her a manipulative bitch and tell her to “just be herself” and she’ll find a man!

And that’s just Cosmo, I could give the same shit with Marie Clair, Glamour, Self, Woman’s Day, Shape, etc… ad infinitum… So WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE? Why is OK for WOMEN to learn essentially the SAME kind of information that PUA’s teach men - and that’s OK, but when a MAN want’s to figure out “13 secrets to attract a women” or whatever, he’s then labeled as a douchebag, a wannabe, a PUA, “creepy”, disingenuous, manipulative, etc…

It’s ONLY information. Do some men abuse it and lie to women to get laid? Sure they do. Do some women use lipstick and a bra to hold up their tits so that they appear to be more attractive than they “really” are? Sure they do! Is every woman that wears lipstick a bad person? Of course not! There’s no logical reason for hating on someone for wanting become more socially intelligent with the opposite sex, for business, or for whatever reason THAT PERSON wants to!

As for, “he gives off a gay vibe”, SO WHAT? Maybe he’s bisexual? Maybe he IS a fag and got into being a PUA to cover it up and WAAAAY overcompensated… It’s pretty obvious that he’s got skills and gets RESULTS for the people that PAY him… Good for him! As long as he’s not trying to put his wiener near MY butt, I really don’t care if he wakes up dreaming about a nice set of hairy balls across his chin! It’s irrelevant to what he’s communicating.

As for the face tats and the hats and the shirts that are too tight, again, WHO GIVES A SHIT? This is 2012. Not everyone has to wear a nice polo shirt to look presentable! He’s obviously going for his interpretation of a “fuck the establishment” look. By the way, LOTS of chicks think that look is hot, otherwise he wouldn’t get laid, now WOULD HE? Just because YOU can’t pull off a certain look in YOUR social circle, doesn’t mean HE can’t pull off that same look in HIS social circle…

I actually liked some his points. Yes, most of it is NOT new (and he specifically THANKS the people who wrote the books about the stuff he is regurgitating, so he is not CLAIMING it is HIS ideas), but he presents the ideas in an energetic and well thought out way.

If he has found a way to be successful and can get people to pay him money to regurgitate the ideas of others, and have fun while he’s at it, who is ANYONE to hate on that? Just because you’re not happy at your JOB working for someone else? Then grow a set and start your own business, cuz that’s all this guy is doing. Although I don’t personally feel the need to purchase any of his products, I wish him the best of luck and applaud his growing success in this economy.[/quote]

FINALLY, someone who actually GETS IT.

If you’re ever in the Bay Area, hit me up brother. You would enjoy the free meetup lectures we have, along side like-minded individuals.

102
103

I live near a big persian community, this guy just strikes me as a typical Iranian
-they’re all huge bullshitters, strangely good with women and often pretty threatening towards them, and in all other areas really fucking ghey

104

maybe the guy seph86 is a lil tough to watch, im not really into the pua stuff but i watched this video because i liked the title but this guy rsd tyler has a lot of other good videos.

105

[quote]seph89 wrote:

[quote]angry chicken wrote:
LOL at all of the people who think that there is something wrong with men learning more about EFFECTIVE ways of attracting women. Or about being exposed to different ideas and ways of thinking. Or even hearing about OLD ideas with a different style or spin of communication or presentation.

“Just be yourself” is the WORST advice I have ever heard! As if the “self” is a static entity that never evolves… LOL

Our “prime directive” as human beings is to survive long enough to mate with the BEST possible partner so that the BEST possible set of genetics can be passed on to our offspring, thus giving them the BEST chance of survival and subsequent replication. Wash, rinse, repeat. Everything else on this sad little planet is just window dressing.

I’d even go as far as to say that as MEN, it is in our instincts and our biological make up to mate with AS MANY good genetic matches that we can! Obviously, that model doesn’t jive with “modern civilization” unless you have the means to support all of the resulting offspring. But that’s a PART of what we are as men, like it or not.

As for people knocking the fact that PUA gurus make MONEY (god forbid) by teaching a specific SKILL SET to someone who obviously lacks it (or else they wouldn’t BUY it), then those people must be communists or something, because that’s the DEFINITION of capitalism: find a market, develop a product, PROFIT!

What’s wrong with that? There is NO difference whatsoever between what Arash or any of the other PUA guys are selling and what MILLIONS of women buy at the magazine stand at the check out line of EVERY supermarket in the US. Cosmo’s headlines this month are: Be a man magnet: 13 moves to make you irresistible to him; Stretch your wardrobe, not your wallet; 8 secret guy insecurities; Your hottest legs ever; Make his friends worship you. Here’s the link if you don’t believe me: http://www.cosmopolitan.com/

So we have 13 “secret moves” that women will PAY for, some fashion advice, 8 ways to MANIPULATE a man with his insecurities, some regurgitated information on leg training and some advice to MANIPULATE a man’s FRIENDS to her advantage… But it’s the PUA guys that are the douchebags, right? Give me a fucking break. The next time you are in the grocery store and there is woman in front of you browsing a Cosmo, why don’t you call her a manipulative bitch and tell her to “just be herself” and she’ll find a man!

And that’s just Cosmo, I could give the same shit with Marie Clair, Glamour, Self, Woman’s Day, Shape, etc… ad infinitum… So WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE? Why is OK for WOMEN to learn essentially the SAME kind of information that PUA’s teach men - and that’s OK, but when a MAN want’s to figure out “13 secrets to attract a women” or whatever, he’s then labeled as a douchebag, a wannabe, a PUA, “creepy”, disingenuous, manipulative, etc…

It’s ONLY information. Do some men abuse it and lie to women to get laid? Sure they do. Do some women use lipstick and a bra to hold up their tits so that they appear to be more attractive than they “really” are? Sure they do! Is every woman that wears lipstick a bad person? Of course not! There’s no logical reason for hating on someone for wanting become more socially intelligent with the opposite sex, for business, or for whatever reason THAT PERSON wants to!

As for, “he gives off a gay vibe”, SO WHAT? Maybe he’s bisexual? Maybe he IS a fag and got into being a PUA to cover it up and WAAAAY overcompensated… It’s pretty obvious that he’s got skills and gets RESULTS for the people that PAY him… Good for him! As long as he’s not trying to put his wiener near MY butt, I really don’t care if he wakes up dreaming about a nice set of hairy balls across his chin! It’s irrelevant to what he’s communicating.

As for the face tats and the hats and the shirts that are too tight, again, WHO GIVES A SHIT? This is 2012. Not everyone has to wear a nice polo shirt to look presentable! He’s obviously going for his interpretation of a “fuck the establishment” look. By the way, LOTS of chicks think that look is hot, otherwise he wouldn’t get laid, now WOULD HE? Just because YOU can’t pull off a certain look in YOUR social circle, doesn’t mean HE can’t pull off that same look in HIS social circle…

I actually liked some his points. Yes, most of it is NOT new (and he specifically THANKS the people who wrote the books about the stuff he is regurgitating, so he is not CLAIMING it is HIS ideas), but he presents the ideas in an energetic and well thought out way.

If he has found a way to be successful and can get people to pay him money to regurgitate the ideas of others, and have fun while he’s at it, who is ANYONE to hate on that? Just because you’re not happy at your JOB working for someone else? Then grow a set and start your own business, cuz that’s all this guy is doing. Although I don’t personally feel the need to purchase any of his products, I wish him the best of luck and applaud his growing success in this economy.[/quote]

FINALLY, someone who actually GETS IT.

If you’re ever in the Bay Area, hit me up brother. You would enjoy the free meetup lectures we have, along side like-minded individuals.
[/quote]

Did we read the same post? AC didn’t really come off as agreeing with you, as much as he was speaking out against the negativity shown towards the PUA community in general, and those who profit off of it. He even said in his reply that this guy is nothing new, nothing revolutionary, just a different face to the same game; a game he believes nobody has any right to hate on.

106

Wtf is going on in here?

I bet its stupid

107

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
Wtf is going on in here?

I bet its stupid[/quote]
yep, perfect summary

108

IT’S NOT STUPID!!! You’re just a big pee-pee head!!!

109

[quote]postholedigger wrote:
IT’S NOT STUPID!!! You’re just a big pee-pee head!!![/quote]

Kick his ass Seabass!

110

[quote]red04 wrote:

[quote]seph89 wrote:

[quote]angry chicken wrote:
LOL at all of the people who think that there is something wrong with men learning more about EFFECTIVE ways of attracting women. Or about being exposed to different ideas and ways of thinking. Or even hearing about OLD ideas with a different style or spin of communication or presentation.

“Just be yourself” is the WORST advice I have ever heard! As if the “self” is a static entity that never evolves… LOL

Our “prime directive” as human beings is to survive long enough to mate with the BEST possible partner so that the BEST possible set of genetics can be passed on to our offspring, thus giving them the BEST chance of survival and subsequent replication. Wash, rinse, repeat. Everything else on this sad little planet is just window dressing.

I’d even go as far as to say that as MEN, it is in our instincts and our biological make up to mate with AS MANY good genetic matches that we can! Obviously, that model doesn’t jive with “modern civilization” unless you have the means to support all of the resulting offspring. But that’s a PART of what we are as men, like it or not.

As for people knocking the fact that PUA gurus make MONEY (god forbid) by teaching a specific SKILL SET to someone who obviously lacks it (or else they wouldn’t BUY it), then those people must be communists or something, because that’s the DEFINITION of capitalism: find a market, develop a product, PROFIT!

What’s wrong with that? There is NO difference whatsoever between what Arash or any of the other PUA guys are selling and what MILLIONS of women buy at the magazine stand at the check out line of EVERY supermarket in the US. Cosmo’s headlines this month are: Be a man magnet: 13 moves to make you irresistible to him; Stretch your wardrobe, not your wallet; 8 secret guy insecurities; Your hottest legs ever; Make his friends worship you. Here’s the link if you don’t believe me: http://www.cosmopolitan.com/

So we have 13 “secret moves” that women will PAY for, some fashion advice, 8 ways to MANIPULATE a man with his insecurities, some regurgitated information on leg training and some advice to MANIPULATE a man’s FRIENDS to her advantage… But it’s the PUA guys that are the douchebags, right? Give me a fucking break. The next time you are in the grocery store and there is woman in front of you browsing a Cosmo, why don’t you call her a manipulative bitch and tell her to “just be herself” and she’ll find a man!

And that’s just Cosmo, I could give the same shit with Marie Clair, Glamour, Self, Woman’s Day, Shape, etc… ad infinitum… So WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE? Why is OK for WOMEN to learn essentially the SAME kind of information that PUA’s teach men - and that’s OK, but when a MAN want’s to figure out “13 secrets to attract a women” or whatever, he’s then labeled as a douchebag, a wannabe, a PUA, “creepy”, disingenuous, manipulative, etc…

It’s ONLY information. Do some men abuse it and lie to women to get laid? Sure they do. Do some women use lipstick and a bra to hold up their tits so that they appear to be more attractive than they “really” are? Sure they do! Is every woman that wears lipstick a bad person? Of course not! There’s no logical reason for hating on someone for wanting become more socially intelligent with the opposite sex, for business, or for whatever reason THAT PERSON wants to!

As for, “he gives off a gay vibe”, SO WHAT? Maybe he’s bisexual? Maybe he IS a fag and got into being a PUA to cover it up and WAAAAY overcompensated… It’s pretty obvious that he’s got skills and gets RESULTS for the people that PAY him… Good for him! As long as he’s not trying to put his wiener near MY butt, I really don’t care if he wakes up dreaming about a nice set of hairy balls across his chin! It’s irrelevant to what he’s communicating.

As for the face tats and the hats and the shirts that are too tight, again, WHO GIVES A SHIT? This is 2012. Not everyone has to wear a nice polo shirt to look presentable! He’s obviously going for his interpretation of a “fuck the establishment” look. By the way, LOTS of chicks think that look is hot, otherwise he wouldn’t get laid, now WOULD HE? Just because YOU can’t pull off a certain look in YOUR social circle, doesn’t mean HE can’t pull off that same look in HIS social circle…

I actually liked some his points. Yes, most of it is NOT new (and he specifically THANKS the people who wrote the books about the stuff he is regurgitating, so he is not CLAIMING it is HIS ideas), but he presents the ideas in an energetic and well thought out way.

If he has found a way to be successful and can get people to pay him money to regurgitate the ideas of others, and have fun while he’s at it, who is ANYONE to hate on that? Just because you’re not happy at your JOB working for someone else? Then grow a set and start your own business, cuz that’s all this guy is doing. Although I don’t personally feel the need to purchase any of his products, I wish him the best of luck and applaud his growing success in this economy.[/quote]

FINALLY, someone who actually GETS IT.

If you’re ever in the Bay Area, hit me up brother. You would enjoy the free meetup lectures we have, along side like-minded individuals.
[/quote]

Did we read the same post? AC didn’t really come off as agreeing with you, as much as he was speaking out against the negativity shown towards the PUA community in general, and those who profit off of it. He even said in his reply that this guy is nothing new, nothing revolutionary, just a different face to the same game; a game he believes nobody has any right to hate on.
[/quote]

Reading comprehension my friend…

111

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
Wtf is going on in here?

I bet its stupid[/quote]

I’m just providing some awesome video content IMHO. Everything else, yep, mostly stupid.

112

[quote]seph89 wrote:

Most of modern history you have predominantly two groups of people, the current pop culture, and the group that is anti the current pop culture and does the opposite to separate and try to make them self an individual but ends up becoming just another conformed group.

These guys crack me the fuck up, how about people just live and decide your life for yourself and be confident in your self, instead of hopelessly jumping on some groups band wagon.

All this guy is doing is selling the same “join my group and adjust your life to my standards” bull shit that every one else is.

You know what is more sexy to a woman than the popular guy or the guy that is totally nonconformist and cant see that he is just conforming to the opposite of the social norm? The guy that is just his fucking self and is comfortable and confidant in that.

Another thing that’s great about being your self, is you don’t have to pay some dumb fuck “Guru” or “Mentor” to teach you or to go to his class.

Don’t be a weak minded person and jump on some one else bandwagon for fucks sake, drive your own.

113

[quote]seph89 wrote:

I like it when it’s sunny.

114

[quote]pgtips wrote:

[quote]seph89 wrote:
[/quote]

I like it when it’s sunny. [/quote]

Most people do, except for try hard ass hats.

Oh, and albinos… it gives them wicked sunburn.

115

For men that have trouble approaching women this PUA stuff is kinda like ‘training wheels’ when one is learning to ride a bike, or perhaps like learning addition and subtraction before moving on to algebra. The serious men I have known grow bored with the ‘entry level’ stuff within a couple of years are are ready to move on to more substantial things. I’m not knocking the ‘self-help’ industry, I’m all about what works, but there is something to be said for the confidence that comes from knowing you figured it out on your own!

116

  1. Satisfied with sex life, doesn’t give a shit about the PUA community.
  2. Unsatisfied with sex life, gives a seriously stinky, tar-black, multi-wipe, soft serve shit about the PUA community.

Pick one and call me after a long night of honest reflection.

From what I’ve seen, there is some weird shit in the PUA community. I read The Game, which then prompted me to read The Mystery Method to see wtf that guy preaches. While I was pleasantly surprised at how insightful he is as far as the subtleties of social interactions go, I was dumbfounded at the way he almost sociopathically dissects the minutiae of every single encounter with nearly everyone he meets on a night out.

If you want to find material to be better with chicks – that’s cool. Where I think the line gets crossed is when the entire process gets warped into a robotic assembly line of social check points. The line gets crossed when material or gurus start preaching the virtues of manipulating others as “pawns” and turning what SHOULD be an enjoyable, EMOTIONAL experience (getting to know another person in a social setting) into a plastic, soulless series of subtle manipulations.

If people start there and then progress to the more “natural” material out there (I’m sure it exists), then that’s fine. It’s a stepping stone and a learning experience and I can’t fault anyone for wanting to improve their ability to relate to the opposite sex. But relying on shit like ^^ is honestly doing someone way more harm than good in the long run… breaking down every social interaction and studying the nuts and bolts under a microscope must be exhausting. Dismantling every meeting, every conversation, every interaction into a sequence of minor power struggles, status displays, etc., rather than learning to enjoy the ride is just a sad way to go through life.

117

I think THIS is worth a ten thousand word essay on the problem people have with the mainstream perception of the PUA community.

Plus, you know, the stereotype that they dress like homosexual clowns at a San Franciscan gay pride parade.

118

As a side note, doesn’t he also detail ways to “freeze out” a woman who pumps the brakes on the physical escalation in order to make her feel awkward enough to want to continue? Or doing subtle shit to subconsciously program her into believing that being intimate with you is more “comfortable” than the alternative?

not talking about rape or whatever… just ways to dbag yourself into carving another notch into your bedpost.

Always reminded me of “The Implication”… which IS the type of stuff people should feel free to shit on.

119

[quote]anonym wrote:

  1. Satisfied with sex life, doesn’t give a shit about the PUA community.
  2. Unsatisfied with sex life, gives a seriously stinky, tar-black, multi-wipe, soft serve shit about the PUA community.

Pick one and call me after a long night of honest reflection.

From what I’ve seen, there is some weird shit in the PUA community. I read The Game, which then prompted me to read The Mystery Method to see wtf that guy preaches. While I was pleasantly surprised at how insightful he is as far as the subtleties of social interactions go, I was dumbfounded at the way he almost sociopathically dissects the minutiae of every single encounter with nearly everyone he meets on a night out.

If you want to find material to be better with chicks – that’s cool. Where I think the line gets crossed is when the entire process gets warped into a robotic assembly line of social check points. The line gets crossed when material or gurus start preaching the virtues of manipulating others as “pawns” and turning what SHOULD be an enjoyable, EMOTIONAL experience (getting to know another person in a social setting) into a plastic, soulless series of subtle manipulations.

If people start there and then progress to the more “natural” material out there (I’m sure it exists), then that’s fine. It’s a stepping stone and a learning experience and I can’t fault anyone for wanting to improve their ability to relate to the opposite sex. But relying on shit like ^^ is honestly doing someone way more harm than good in the long run… breaking down every social interaction and studying the nuts and bolts under a microscope must be exhausting. Dismantling every meeting, every conversation, every interaction into a sequence of minor power struggles, status displays, etc., rather than learning to enjoy the ride is just a sad way to go through life.[/quote]

Well said. It’s important to know that the Mystery Method, for example, is just that…a METHOD. It details a blueprint for an interaction with a female and maps out the escalation from the approach to building comfort to seduction (I prefer “sex” here because seduction is a very broad term. You can argue that you are seduced when watching a movie or listening to your favorite song. Robert Greene explains it well in his book Art of Seduction)

Anyways the BIG PICTURE in all of this is learning to become more SOCIALLY INTELLIGENT. This means being able to understand other human beings and read them well enough to know how to properly act and behave when interacting with other individuals. On the same token you first have to be OKAY WITH YOU. This is confidence or the Inner Game, as Arash and others refer to it. If you are constantly at war with yourself, your interactions with other females will reflect that and at the same time cloud your judgement and perception of the social situation. So in my eyes and Arash’s, a Great Pickup Artist is also a SOCIAL GENIUS.

That is where these other so-called PUA’s are giving the community a bad name. They look at interacts with women as a mechanical process. They may have the right “moves” but outside of the realm of pickup or “sarging”, they are complete social retards. These are the same idiots who scam guys out of their money and give them the illusion of having game and being good with women. I think that’s bullshit…

It’s no different making a 60-year-old woman smile than it is to make a smoking hot 25-year-old model smile. You have to KNOW AND UNDERSTAND human nature and BE OKAY with you. That’s it and if you listen to Arash’s lecture they are all geared towards those two fundamental points and really supercharging your Inner Game.

I have spoken…

120

[quote]seph89 wrote:

[quote]anonym wrote:
So in my eyes and Arash’s, a Great Pickup Artist is also a SOCIAL GENIUS.
[/quote]

Putting forward basic ideas to socially inept people qualifies some one to be a genius?

In one video he says that thinking about the current moment IS living in the moment, and then touts that as being some kind of zen philosophy and that it may be over some peoples heads, he then goes on to say that changing your train of thought is as easy as…changing your train of fucking thought.

If this man is a genius we are all truly as the human race utterly fucked.