[quote]dankid wrote:
[quote]maraudermeat wrote:
all i know is that i would NEVER do my seated presses like the one of the fat fuck the OP used as an example of a seated overhead press. look at him… he’s a fat fuck, that isn’t even straight up and down. it’s an incline press. he’s not even using his sholderzzzzz. don’t get me started on the fact that he held his breath through most of that set. and what’s up with those things on his elbows?? that’s just cheating.
my vote is for standing overhead press. anything else is just cheating. [/quote]
I didn’t see that video before. It was a lot of weight, but not really a shoulder press. More of a hybrid incline/shoulder press. Its kinda silly for me to criticize the video, because he’s way stronger than me, but if he was a bodybuilder (which im assuming not) then he should also be coming down all the way.
The other problem about seated presses, is even with a 100% vertical bench, almost everyone will turn them into an incline bench. People are saying that they had to switch to seated because their back was arching too much on standing, but I’d bet a lot of money that these same people are arching their back a ton on seated presses. So it wasn’t that they NEEDED to switch to seated, but instead of getting stronger, they switched to convince themselves that more weight meant more strength.
And the biomechanics of a true vertical seated press are all screwed up, unless you use DB’s or a HS machine. On a standing pressyour head and torso are able to pivot out of the path of the bar, but with a seated press (unless you use a low backed bench) you are forced to change the bar path completely. For me, so far seated press has been most useful for lockouts starting above my head, but anything with more ROM and i’d prefer to do them standing.[/quote]
Fail.