And I get bashed for saying the same things that others have said for years. I love how X tries to act like all I do is come in and derail threads when all I was doing was giving my opinions, which were related to the topic. Not to mention, I brought up Cedric McMillan, who happens to be black and is one of my preferred bodybuilders. So, lol at people trying to act like I was making it “all about race”. Jokers.
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
I think the real question is why anyone is focusing on me in a thread about Max Charles.[/quote]
No offence, but probably because you said that was your physique goal, and how you eventually wanted to look.[/quote]
…and?
So because I said I see him as an “ideal” physique, the whole thread is now about my goals?
Get serious. It is always the same guys
This thread is about the guy in the pic above.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
I think the real question is why anyone is focusing on me in a thread about Max Charles.[/quote]
No offence, but probably because you said that was your physique goal, and how you eventually wanted to look.[/quote]
…and?
So because I said I see him as an “ideal” physique, the whole thread is now about my goals?
Get serious. It is always the same guys
This thread is about the guy in the pic above.[/quote]
Oh sweet jeebus…I was just trying to be polite, quit your whining…if this is a thread about a bodybuilder, then it should be in the bodybuilding section.
[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
[quote]Mtag666 wrote:
Prof X I am by no means trying to make this a steroid debate. I am genuinely curious as if you plan on using to achieve a similar physique as you stated that is your goal? Or do you beleive that is attainable naturally?[/quote]
The real question is: if it is attainable naturally, why hasn’t X attained it? He’s trained (by his estimation) for over 15 years with a focus on size and (hammer) strength and has done so naturally. Maybe he’s not cut out for this… or maybe it’s fucking stupid to assume someone could reach that level of development without a boatload of drugs and the right genetics. [/quote]
lol’d hard at the (hammer) strength. I was trying to be nice and just ask a question I honestly had no ill intentions but obviously I won’t get an answer so fuck it. I think your question is the real question. haha
Yeah, nobody here is going to be looking like that without some serious assistance. Just the facts.
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
Yeah, nobody here is going to be looking like that without some serious assistance. Just the facts.[/quote]
How dare you put perfectly rational limits on people.
For shame.
Big AND lean. Quite a combo. I wonder if this Maxx guy counts macros?
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
Big AND lean. Quite a combo. I wonder if this Maxx guy counts macros?[/quote]
1 burger, 2 burger, 3 burger…
But on a serious note he could of came in a bit more shredded. Dieted a bit harder. That is one spot many competitors these days lack…suffering through their diet. Getting there glutes shredded. Off season I would doubt he counts his macros. Eye balls things. Contest prep fo show doe
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
Yeah, nobody here is going to be looking like that without some serious assistance. Just the facts.[/quote]
Substantiate this claim. Explain how you know this to be a FACT.
[quote]JBL5 wrote:
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
Yeah, nobody here is going to be looking like that without some serious assistance. Just the facts.[/quote]
Substantiate this claim. Explain how you know this to be a FACT.[/quote]
Trololol
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]JBL5 wrote:
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
Yeah, nobody here is going to be looking like that without some serious assistance. Just the facts.[/quote]
Substantiate this claim. Explain how you know this to be a FACT.[/quote]
Trololol[/quote]
I really hope so. Otherwise it’s essentially the flying spagetti monster arguement (ie just because you can’t prove something doesn’t exist means it does, which to any rational person is stupid)
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]JBL5 wrote:
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
Yeah, nobody here is going to be looking like that without some serious assistance. Just the facts.[/quote]
Substantiate this claim. Explain how you know this to be a FACT.[/quote]
Trololol[/quote]
Actually the “nobody here” part is most likely, almost definitely true. I am just curious as to why so many people on these forums are obsessed with steroids and the limitations of being a natural. Not all naturals are resigned to their fate of only being 190 and lean.
[quote]JBL5 wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]JBL5 wrote:
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
Yeah, nobody here is going to be looking like that without some serious assistance. Just the facts.[/quote]
Substantiate this claim. Explain how you know this to be a FACT.[/quote]
Trololol[/quote]
Actually the “nobody here” part is most likely, almost definitely true. I am just curious as to why so many people on these forums are obsessed with steroids and the limitations of being a natural. Not all naturals are resigned to their fate of only being 190 and lean. [/quote]
Good comparison. Max is certainly barely above 190 and contest ready. (Heavy sarcasm)
[quote]JBL5 wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]JBL5 wrote:
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
Yeah, nobody here is going to be looking like that without some serious assistance. Just the facts.[/quote]
Substantiate this claim. Explain how you know this to be a FACT.[/quote]
Trololol[/quote]
Actually the “nobody here” part is most likely, almost definitely true. I am just curious as to why so many people on these forums are obsessed with steroids and the limitations of being a natural. Not all naturals are resigned to their fate of only being 190 and lean. [/quote]
lol at “only” 190 and lean. For guys under 6 foot (hell even 6 foot) that is huge for a natty! If we’re talking true sub 10% as lean. That will take years of doing things right to achieve and shouldn’t be so easily dismissed as small
[quote]Mtag666 wrote:
[quote]JBL5 wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]JBL5 wrote:
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
Yeah, nobody here is going to be looking like that without some serious assistance. Just the facts.[/quote]
Substantiate this claim. Explain how you know this to be a FACT.[/quote]
Trololol[/quote]
Actually the “nobody here” part is most likely, almost definitely true. I am just curious as to why so many people on these forums are obsessed with steroids and the limitations of being a natural. Not all naturals are resigned to their fate of only being 190 and lean. [/quote]
lol at “only” 190 and lean. For guys under 6 foot (hell even 6 foot) that is huge for a natty! If we’re talking true sub 10% as lean. That will take years of doing things right to achieve and shouldn’t be so easily dismissed as small
[/quote]
190 is not huge. Don’t care how lean.
[quote]JBL5 wrote:
[quote]Mtag666 wrote:
[quote]JBL5 wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]JBL5 wrote:
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
Yeah, nobody here is going to be looking like that without some serious assistance. Just the facts.[/quote]
Substantiate this claim. Explain how you know this to be a FACT.[/quote]
Trololol[/quote]
Actually the “nobody here” part is most likely, almost definitely true. I am just curious as to why so many people on these forums are obsessed with steroids and the limitations of being a natural. Not all naturals are resigned to their fate of only being 190 and lean. [/quote]
lol at “only” 190 and lean. For guys under 6 foot (hell even 6 foot) that is huge for a natty! If we’re talking true sub 10% as lean. That will take years of doing things right to achieve and shouldn’t be so easily dismissed as small
[/quote]
190 is not huge. Don’t care how lean.
[/quote]
I think you’re delusional then. Layne Norton competes around 190-195 which for natty’s of average height is one of (if not the) highest stage weight for natural guys under 6 foot.