Muslim Woman Competes in Weightlifting

[quote]doogie wrote:

[quote]zahmad wrote:
9/11 occured almost 10 years ago and people still have these questions. Let’s make it clear. The day after 9/11, multiple Muslim organizations made the statement - “American Muslims utterly condemn what are vicious and cowardly acts of terrorism against innocent civilians. We join with all Americans in calling for the swift apprehension and punishment of the perpetrators. No political cause could ever be assisted by such immoral acts.”

The people responsible for flying that plane into the twin towers are/were the aggressors. The people in the twin towers were not aggressors.

The fact that nearly 10 years AFTER the attacks have occurred, Muslims still have to make this point is kind of ridiculous.[/quote]

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]zahmad wrote:
I don’t know what translation of the Quran you looked at but here’s the 3 most popular ones for the ending of that verse:

“…, after having been humbled.”

“… and feel themselves subdued”

" being brought low"

None of these translations imply that the nonMuslims have to become Muslim or have Muslim rules forced upon them, …
[/quote]

Ha!

Wonderful.

Non-Muslims only need to “be humbled” or “brought low” or, yeah, made to “feel themselves subdued” by Muslims.

That’s supposed to make it all ok?

Are you out of your mind?

Tell me: How would you like to meet any of those fates because you are not a Christian? Should we do THAT to YOU?

Sheesh.[/quote]

I can only conclude that you are either deliberately obtuse or have the IQ of a doormat.

[quote]doogie wrote:

[quote]PonceDeLeon wrote:

[quote]doogie wrote:

Jesus. While I’m sure some people did celebrate the attacks, my question is this:

How do you KNOW the footage captured is of people SPECIFICALLY celebrating the 9/11 attacks? How do you know it’s not random footage of people cheering for something else? Are they speaking English? Or are you relying on the new anchor’s words of “you see people cheering an Osama Bin Laden victory…etc.”

How the fuck are you guys forfeiting your common sense in this case? Why aren’t you questioning the authenticity of the footage?

Come on. Stop being sheep. [/quote]

You’re right. I never saw the World Trade Centers before they were “supposedly” brought down, either. How do I know they existed? You’re probably right that the reports I linked from three different networks are all a bunch of lies. Damn, I feel stupid now.[/quote]

Could you make a dumber counter argument? (that’s rhetorical; please don’t attempt to answer)

The WTC’s existence has been verified by many Americans. It has appeared in movies and was “up” for many years and had many visitors. You can ask a New Yorker from here about it, for instance.

The video footage was of random Arabs dancing and smiling. Do any of us speak Arabic? Do we KNOW they were dancing because the WTC was brought down? Or can we point at any random group of Arabs dancing and smiling and say the same thing about them?

You are relying on journalists telling you that people dancing and smiling are dancing and smiling to celebrate an attack on the US. The fact that you buy it without questioning it is just absurd. Your comparison is asinine.

That’s like me filming any random person dancing and smiling and telling you that person was doing so at your expense; they were laughing at your misfortune. You would simply take my word for it? Come on. You aren’t that stupid, are you?

[quote]HeavyTriple wrote:

[quote]PonceDeLeon wrote:
And the very educated, upper class Muslims do a poor job of speaking on these subjects. They only seem to speak out against US foreign policy but never the cesspool of Islamic fundamentalism that ruins the images of their cultures. It makes Westerners think that even those educated Muslims are somehow ok with this kind of garbage existing in their countries. And you can’t say, “Believe me, they are not ok…” that’s not enough. They need to speak out against it and they need to clean up the garbage. Actions, not words.[/quote]

I wasn’t going to dive into the religious debate going on in here, but wow. This is word-for-word my primary criticism of Islam.[/quote]

The problem is that the educated ex-pats are mostly abroad and left their respective countries BECAUSE of the bullshit going on there; they want nothing to do with their home country’s politics.

Many Iranians, for instance, are secular and thus looked down upon by Arabs who are devout Muslims. Iranians ex pats look down upon those Arabs and Islam for bringing a theocratic system and a bloody revolution, ruining the lives of millions. Secular, educated ex pats tend to want to disassociate themselves with their home countries, minus the pride in culture (art, music, history) and the fact that most ex pats have relatives abroad.

Are coup d’etats passe or something? The next revolution that brews in a Muslim country should be funded by all Westerners abroad, via PayPal or Google Checkout or something.

Can we run a Groupon to fund rebel forces in Libya? Has it been done?

Instead of attacking those countries’ ideologies–no matter how right we are in attacking them–we should step off that angle (because it makes the other side defensive and communication breaks down) we should plant seeds into the minds of the most influential minorities in those countries, minorities who might have popular followings for opposing policies of incumbent leaders.

We need to fund them somehow and let them believe that they led the march and it was all their idea. The moment we act like we know what’s
best for them, all the fractured parties join forces and become anti-Western and anti-American. It’s counterintuitive but we should ignore some of the jingoist bullshit we hear and engage Muslims in dialogue using a different strategy, one that preaches to them a secular system whose benefit is the preservation of their fate, not its perversion for political gain (by incumbent leaders, for instance).

The second you say, “your way sucks and is ugly!” you have unlikely forces join (by virtue of sharing a common denominator, in this case Islam) to become allies.

This is similar to coaching. You can’t keep telling someone how much they suck or how ugly they are; they’ll either resent you and stop listening to you, or you’ll simply lose them and they’ll regress and continue with the behavior you want them to change.

Tell the educated, sensible folks: “Hey, Islam is beautiful and you should continue spreading the word in YOUR country to those who want to listen, but you should take it out of politics because fundamentalists are ruining the image of Islam by distorting messages. Westerners aren’t taking you seriously because of it.” And then, let the minorities flush out the garbage on their own. Let it be THEIR task, not the “'Merahkins! Fuck yeah!”

Present someone with something you think they’d really want (preserving Islam, gaining the respect of non-Muslims) and then present to them the threats/barriers to this goal. If you say, “your faith sucks and you’re all terrorists!” they’ll just sympathize with fundamentalists. (the influential minorities, in this case)

[quote]Chushin wrote:

Ha!

Wonderful.

Non-Muslims only need to “be humbled” or “brought low” or, yeah, made to “feel themselves subdued” by Muslims.

That’s supposed to make it all ok?

Are you out of your mind?

Tell me: How would you like to meet any of those fates because you are not a Christian? Should we do THAT to YOU?

Sheesh.[/quote]

When I look at my gross vs. net income I sure do feel humbled, brought low, and feel subdued.

[quote]PonceDeLeon wrote:

[quote]HeavyTriple wrote:

[quote]PonceDeLeon wrote:
And the very educated, upper class Muslims do a poor job of speaking on these subjects. They only seem to speak out against US foreign policy but never the cesspool of Islamic fundamentalism that ruins the images of their cultures. It makes Westerners think that even those educated Muslims are somehow ok with this kind of garbage existing in their countries. And you can’t say, “Believe me, they are not ok…” that’s not enough. They need to speak out against it and they need to clean up the garbage. Actions, not words.[/quote]

I wasn’t going to dive into the religious debate going on in here, but wow. This is word-for-word my primary criticism of Islam.[/quote]

The problem is that the educated ex-pats are mostly abroad and left their respective countries BECAUSE of the bullshit going on there; they want nothing to do with their home country’s politics.

Many Iranians, for instance, are secular and thus looked down upon by Arabs who are devout Muslims. Iranians ex pats look down upon those Arabs and Islam for bringing a theocratic system and a bloody revolution, ruining the lives of millions. Secular, educated ex pats tend to want to disassociate themselves with their home countries, minus the pride in culture (art, music, history) and the fact that most ex pats have relatives abroad.

Are coup d’etats passe or something? The next revolution that brews in a Muslim country should be funded by all Westerners abroad, via PayPal or Google Checkout or something.

Can we run a Groupon to fund rebel forces in Libya? Has it been done?

Instead of attacking those countries’ ideologies–no matter how right we are in attacking them–we should step off that angle (because it makes the other side defensive and communication breaks down) we should plant seeds into the minds of the most influential minorities in those countries, minorities who might have popular followings for opposing policies of incumbent leaders.

We need to fund them somehow and let them believe that they led the march and it was all their idea. The moment we act like we know what’s
best for them, all the fractured parties join forces and become anti-Western and anti-American. It’s counterintuitive but we should ignore some of the jingoist bullshit we hear and engage Muslims in dialogue using a different strategy, one that preaches to them a secular system whose benefit is the preservation of their fate, not its perversion for political gain (by incumbent leaders, for instance).

The second you say, “your way sucks and is ugly!” you have unlikely forces join (by virtue of sharing a common denominator, in this case Islam) to become allies.

This is similar to coaching. You can’t keep telling someone how much they suck or how ugly they are; they’ll either resent you and stop listening to you, or you’ll simply lose them and they’ll regress and continue with the behavior you want them to change.

Tell the educated, sensible folks: “Hey, Islam is beautiful and you should continue spreading the word in YOUR country to those who want to listen, but you should take it out of politics because fundamentalists are ruining the image of Islam by distorting messages. Westerners aren’t taking you seriously because of it.” And then, let the minorities flush out the garbage on their own. Let it be THEIR task, not the “'Merahkins! Fuck yeah!”

Present someone with something you think they’d really want (preserving Islam, gaining the respect of non-Muslims) and then present to them the threats/barriers to this goal. If you say, “your faith sucks and you’re all terrorists!” they’ll just sympathize with fundamentalists. (the influential minorities, in this case)[/quote]

x2.

Ponce, you’re laying some serious wisdom on this site these days. I iz impressed.

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]PonceDeLeon wrote:

[quote]doogie wrote:

[quote]PonceDeLeon wrote:

[quote]doogie wrote:

Jesus. While I’m sure some people did celebrate the attacks, my question is this:

How do you KNOW the footage captured is of people SPECIFICALLY celebrating the 9/11 attacks? How do you know it’s not random footage of people cheering for something else? Are they speaking English? Or are you relying on the new anchor’s words of “you see people cheering an Osama Bin Laden victory…etc.”

How the fuck are you guys forfeiting your common sense in this case? Why aren’t you questioning the authenticity of the footage?

Come on. Stop being sheep. [/quote]

You’re right. I never saw the World Trade Centers before they were “supposedly” brought down, either. How do I know they existed? You’re probably right that the reports I linked from three different networks are all a bunch of lies. Damn, I feel stupid now.[/quote]

Could you make a dumber counter argument? (that’s rhetorical; please don’t attempt to answer)

The WTC’s existence has been verified by many Americans. It has appeared in movies and was “up” for many years and had many visitors. You can ask a New Yorker from here about it, for instance.

The video footage was of random Arabs dancing and smiling. Do any of us speak Arabic? Do we KNOW they were dancing because the WTC was brought down? Or can we point at any random group of Arabs dancing and smiling and say the same thing about them?

You are relying on journalists telling you that people dancing and smiling are dancing and smiling to celebrate an attack on the US. The fact that you buy it without questioning it is just absurd. Your comparison is asinine.

That’s like me filming any random person dancing and smiling and telling you that person was doing so at your expense; they were laughing at your misfortune. You would simply take my word for it? Come on. You aren’t that stupid, are you?[/quote]

As I recall, 2 Detroit residents here (Tirib and Sifu) witnessed those celebrations where they live.[/quote]

And you’re not seeing the point at all. The point was that you need to have a certain sense of critical thinking when reading/seeing/hearing something in the media.

And then to use this critical thinking combined with the information you can get other places to decide if what has been said is a reflection of the general mood amongst the worlds muslim populace (which is just as an diverse population as the christian).

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]zahmad wrote:

When I look at my gross vs. net income I sure do feel humbled, brought low, and feel subdued.

[/quote]
Ok, that’s it.

I’m not going to talk to anyone this blatantly stupid.

Sheesh x 100

Edit: That is actually FUNNY, when I think about it. Thanks for the chuckle. Please keep making that argument. Even other Muslims will run from you.[/quote]

That was supposed to be a joke. What do you think happens when one group loses a war against another group? If you think Christians have never subdued anyone go read some history instead of name calling. Like I said before, Christians/Jews/Others that lost a war to Muslims or live in Muslim land still have the right to practice their own religion.

Now you or one of your posse members will post some links pointing out actions that are contrary to what I said.

[quote]PonceDeLeon wrote:

[quote]doogie wrote:

[quote]PonceDeLeon wrote:

[quote]doogie wrote:

Jesus. While I’m sure some people did celebrate the attacks, my question is this:

How do you KNOW the footage captured is of people SPECIFICALLY celebrating the 9/11 attacks? How do you know it’s not random footage of people cheering for something else? Are they speaking English? Or are you relying on the new anchor’s words of “you see people cheering an Osama Bin Laden victory…etc.”

How the fuck are you guys forfeiting your common sense in this case? Why aren’t you questioning the authenticity of the footage?

Come on. Stop being sheep. [/quote]

You’re right. I never saw the World Trade Centers before they were “supposedly” brought down, either. How do I know they existed? You’re probably right that the reports I linked from three different networks are all a bunch of lies. Damn, I feel stupid now.[/quote]

Could you make a dumber counter argument? (that’s rhetorical; please don’t attempt to answer)

The WTC’s existence has been verified by many Americans. It has appeared in movies and was “up” for many years and had many visitors. You can ask a New Yorker from here about it, for instance.

The video footage was of random Arabs dancing and smiling. Do any of us speak Arabic? Do we KNOW they were dancing because the WTC was brought down? Or can we point at any random group of Arabs dancing and smiling and say the same thing about them?

You are relying on journalists telling you that people dancing and smiling are dancing and smiling to celebrate an attack on the US. The fact that you buy it without questioning it is just absurd. Your comparison is asinine.

That’s like me filming any random person dancing and smiling and telling you that person was doing so at your expense; they were laughing at your misfortune. You would simply take my word for it? Come on. You aren’t that stupid, are you?[/quote]

You really are that blind? You’d rather believe that CNN, Fox, MSNBC, AP, and Reuters all faked footage of Muslims celebrating 9/11 rather than accept the truth that it occurred?

What about your world view is so threatened by the fact that it Muslims celebrated 9/11? Are you really one of those head-in-the-sand types who believe Islam is a religion of peace?

http://www.city-journal.org/html/eon_9_11_02fd.html

[quote]zahmad wrote:

[quote]Chushin wrote:

Ha!

Wonderful.

Non-Muslims only need to “be humbled” or “brought low” or, yeah, made to “feel themselves subdued” by Muslims.

That’s supposed to make it all ok?

Are you out of your mind?

Tell me: How would you like to meet any of those fates because you are not a Christian? Should we do THAT to YOU?

Sheesh.[/quote]

When I look at my gross vs. net income I sure do feel humbled, brought low, and feel subdued.

[/quote]

Really?

I feel anally raped.

They might as well weave a ribbon in my hair and call me Cindy.

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:
The Quran is very much against offensive wars.
[/quote]

Which works quite well when you claim a need to defend against everything that you disagree with or don’t like.

“Hey, it was just self-defense when we flew those planes into those buildings!”

Everywhere Muslims go, they seem to find things that they need to “defend” themselves against, huh?

Hell, they even have to defend against other Muslims, it seems, given how often they kill each other (not to mention oppress each other) on religous grounds.[/quote]

Yeah well, that is of course something that only Muslims do.

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]PonceDeLeon wrote:

[quote]doogie wrote:

[quote]PonceDeLeon wrote:

[quote]doogie wrote:

Jesus. While I’m sure some people did celebrate the attacks, my question is this:

How do you KNOW the footage captured is of people SPECIFICALLY celebrating the 9/11 attacks? How do you know it’s not random footage of people cheering for something else? Are they speaking English? Or are you relying on the new anchor’s words of “you see people cheering an Osama Bin Laden victory…etc.”

How the fuck are you guys forfeiting your common sense in this case? Why aren’t you questioning the authenticity of the footage?

Come on. Stop being sheep. [/quote]

You’re right. I never saw the World Trade Centers before they were “supposedly” brought down, either. How do I know they existed? You’re probably right that the reports I linked from three different networks are all a bunch of lies. Damn, I feel stupid now.[/quote]

Could you make a dumber counter argument? (that’s rhetorical; please don’t attempt to answer)

The WTC’s existence has been verified by many Americans. It has appeared in movies and was “up” for many years and had many visitors. You can ask a New Yorker from here about it, for instance.

The video footage was of random Arabs dancing and smiling. Do any of us speak Arabic? Do we KNOW they were dancing because the WTC was brought down? Or can we point at any random group of Arabs dancing and smiling and say the same thing about them?

You are relying on journalists telling you that people dancing and smiling are dancing and smiling to celebrate an attack on the US. The fact that you buy it without questioning it is just absurd. Your comparison is asinine.

That’s like me filming any random person dancing and smiling and telling you that person was doing so at your expense; they were laughing at your misfortune. You would simply take my word for it? Come on. You aren’t that stupid, are you?[/quote]

As I recall, 2 Detroit residents here (Tirib and Sifu) witnessed those celebrations where they live.[/quote]

Pretty sure this is not true, at least I don’t recall any celebration here. Michigan has a very large redneck contingent, there would have been a riot. Despite Dearborn being the largest population of Middle-Easterners in the country, they are still massively outnumbered. Also, Islamic leaders here were quick to condemn the attacks, if for no other reason in concern for there own safety.

This has turned into quite a hate fest. Every religion has it’s radicals, unfortunately the majority moderate Muslims are being shouted down.

[quote]doogie wrote:

[quote]PonceDeLeon wrote:

[quote]doogie wrote:

Jesus. While I’m sure some people did celebrate the attacks, my question is this:

How do you KNOW the footage captured is of people SPECIFICALLY celebrating the 9/11 attacks? How do you know it’s not random footage of people cheering for something else? Are they speaking English? Or are you relying on the new anchor’s words of “you see people cheering an Osama Bin Laden victory…etc.”

How the fuck are you guys forfeiting your common sense in this case? Why aren’t you questioning the authenticity of the footage?

Come on. Stop being sheep. [/quote]

You’re right. I never saw the World Trade Centers before they were “supposedly” brought down, either. How do I know they existed? You’re probably right that the reports I linked from three different networks are all a bunch of lies. Damn, I feel stupid now.[/quote]

I usually just like to watch train-wreck threads like this from afar, but this post reminded me of this video I saw before:

FTR I think all terrorists should burn in hell, but to call out a whole belief system or group of people for a bunch of crazies is dangerous for everyone involved.

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]zahmad wrote:

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]zahmad wrote:

When I look at my gross vs. net income I sure do feel humbled, brought low, and feel subdued.

[/quote]
Ok, that’s it.

I’m not going to talk to anyone this blatantly stupid.

Sheesh x 100

Edit: That is actually FUNNY, when I think about it. Thanks for the chuckle. Please keep making that argument. Even other Muslims will run from you.[/quote]

That was supposed to be a joke. What do you think happens when one group loses a war against another group? If you think Christians have never subdued anyone go read some history instead of name calling. Now you or one of your posse members will post some links pointing out actions that are contrary to what I said.
[/quote]

You’re missing the point.

By about a million miles.

This is not some situational directive. It’s Allah’s word to Muslims. If the passage said “this time” or “under ceertain conditions” or “for the next 100 years” your point would have merit.

As it is, this is simply another of God’s directive to Muslims.

Because the Koran IS God’s word, right?

Or are you going to claim that present-day Muslims know that they should ignore this part of the Koran (but not others)?
[/quote]

What about “wage no aggressive wars” do you not get?

And yes, apparently Allah is no pacifist, but since he is supposed to be the same as Jehova that is hardly surprising.

So to sum it up for you:

Wage no aggressive wars, seek peace whenever you can, but fight if you must and if you do, fuck them up.

There, better now?