Muscle Patheticness

Off Topic
201

[quote]mbdix wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]mbdix wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]flipcollar wrote:

[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Just a heads up, guys, this level of e-hate just for posting anything makes some of you look either desperate or jealous. Logging in just to claim you carry more muscle than me is pretty lame when that seems to be the only motivation…and yet not one picture was shown of more.[/quote]

What you’re not getting is that most seem to agree that you aren’t carrying much more muscle than Utah. Also, you go on about how you are the biggest all the time. Well, you also are carrying probably the most body-fat out of all of the regular posters in here. Yeah, a lot to brag about. [/quote]

Speak for yourself. Just because the loudest people in these threads agree, doesn’t mean that most agree. There are like 5 or 6 guys that jump in these threads and say Utah carries more muscle.

The only thing that’s clear is that X carries more fat than Utah. I’m pretty sure no one’s going to argue with that. To say that Utah’s carrying more muscle than X is splitting hairs at best. They’re both carrying a very respectable amount of muscle. Without X getting to Utah’s level of leanness, though, this question will never be definitively answered.

Fortunately, it doesn’t need to be answered. There’s no reason for every thread that exceeds 100 posts on this site to become a pissing match. When X started getting called out on these boards, most claimed that they were doing it to protect they young/new trainers from getting bad information. That was the excuse in the chest pre-fatiguing thread, for example. What’s happening now is serving absolutely no purpose. How is arguing about which big guy is bigger going to help anyone? If you could actually prove that Utah has, say, 5 lbs more muscle than X, what’s the prize? A cookie? A pat on the back?[/quote]

Dude, this is the internet. There is a continuum from dead wrong to absolute authority.

Take me for example- I’m sitting at an unimpressive 165-170 right now. I could provide an answer to something right out of any mass monsters playbook and it would be dead wrong. Why? Because I’m a twerp.

Now take someone who is hanging in there at 250+. He could tell you to do something utterly ridiculous and be way more right than anybody else based solely on the fact that he’s huge.

So that five lbs. makes a big difference once you get into that thinner strip on the far right side of that continuum.

It’s like being in the bottom end of Mensa. You might be in the top 2% of the rest of the world, but if you’re just sneaking by with a 141 or 142, you’re pretty much at the bottom of their barrel.
[/quote]

I understand what you are saying, but even the top tier members of Mensa are smart enough to recognize when that guy just making into the club is correct
[/quote]

How much do you weigh?
[/quote]

Haha ~205 But, I’m a little over 6’2" so I already know my opinion doesn’t mean shit. Still trying to get bigger, stronger, and leaner though[/quote]

Ha, I love when one little post of mine creates so much debate. Look, I don’t take this stuff too seriously. I just find it a bit ridiculous that X can claim he has more muscle than Utah and it’s fine. However, if I bring up that I think he doesn’t, I’m causing trouble. It’s just a bullshit situation. Also, Flip, I know you seem to be a fan of X and are all about that whole, “Rah, rah, I take this all really seriously and feel the need to defend someone I don’t even know” thing but really, it’s a forum.

People are going to have different opinions. People are going to express those opinions. There isn’t much you can do about it. Just like none of us can stop X from drooling over himself. I’m out for another day or so.

202

[quote]mbdix wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]mbdix wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]flipcollar wrote:

[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Just a heads up, guys, this level of e-hate just for posting anything makes some of you look either desperate or jealous. Logging in just to claim you carry more muscle than me is pretty lame when that seems to be the only motivation…and yet not one picture was shown of more.[/quote]

What you’re not getting is that most seem to agree that you aren’t carrying much more muscle than Utah. Also, you go on about how you are the biggest all the time. Well, you also are carrying probably the most body-fat out of all of the regular posters in here. Yeah, a lot to brag about. [/quote]

Speak for yourself. Just because the loudest people in these threads agree, doesn’t mean that most agree. There are like 5 or 6 guys that jump in these threads and say Utah carries more muscle.

The only thing that’s clear is that X carries more fat than Utah. I’m pretty sure no one’s going to argue with that. To say that Utah’s carrying more muscle than X is splitting hairs at best. They’re both carrying a very respectable amount of muscle. Without X getting to Utah’s level of leanness, though, this question will never be definitively answered.

Fortunately, it doesn’t need to be answered. There’s no reason for every thread that exceeds 100 posts on this site to become a pissing match. When X started getting called out on these boards, most claimed that they were doing it to protect they young/new trainers from getting bad information. That was the excuse in the chest pre-fatiguing thread, for example. What’s happening now is serving absolutely no purpose. How is arguing about which big guy is bigger going to help anyone? If you could actually prove that Utah has, say, 5 lbs more muscle than X, what’s the prize? A cookie? A pat on the back?[/quote]

Dude, this is the internet. There is a continuum from dead wrong to absolute authority.

Take me for example- I’m sitting at an unimpressive 165-170 right now. I could provide an answer to something right out of any mass monsters playbook and it would be dead wrong. Why? Because I’m a twerp.

Now take someone who is hanging in there at 250+. He could tell you to do something utterly ridiculous and be way more right than anybody else based solely on the fact that he’s huge.

So that five lbs. makes a big difference once you get into that thinner strip on the far right side of that continuum.

It’s like being in the bottom end of Mensa. You might be in the top 2% of the rest of the world, but if you’re just sneaking by with a 141 or 142, you’re pretty much at the bottom of their barrel.
[/quote]

I understand what you are saying, but even the top tier members of Mensa are smart enough to recognize when that guy just making into the club is correct
[/quote]

How much do you weigh?
[/quote]

Haha ~205 But, I’m a little over 6’2" so I already know my opinion doesn’t mean shit. Still trying to get bigger, stronger, and leaner though[/quote]

Well you got me by about 30 lbs. so you are this much [-------] righter.

(the bracket spaces are arbitrary and scale-able if that helps.)

203

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]flipcollar wrote:

[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Just a heads up, guys, this level of e-hate just for posting anything makes some of you look either desperate or jealous. Logging in just to claim you carry more muscle than me is pretty lame when that seems to be the only motivation…and yet not one picture was shown of more.[/quote]

What you’re not getting is that most seem to agree that you aren’t carrying much more muscle than Utah. Also, you go on about how you are the biggest all the time. Well, you also are carrying probably the most body-fat out of all of the regular posters in here. Yeah, a lot to brag about. [/quote]

Speak for yourself. Just because the loudest people in these threads agree, doesn’t mean that most agree. There are like 5 or 6 guys that jump in these threads and say Utah carries more muscle.

The only thing that’s clear is that X carries more fat than Utah. I’m pretty sure no one’s going to argue with that. To say that Utah’s carrying more muscle than X is splitting hairs at best. They’re both carrying a very respectable amount of muscle. Without X getting to Utah’s level of leanness, though, this question will never be definitively answered.

Fortunately, it doesn’t need to be answered. There’s no reason for every thread that exceeds 100 posts on this site to become a pissing match. When X started getting called out on these boards, most claimed that they were doing it to protect they young/new trainers from getting bad information. That was the excuse in the chest pre-fatiguing thread, for example. What’s happening now is serving absolutely no purpose. How is arguing about which big guy is bigger going to help anyone? If you could actually prove that Utah has, say, 5 lbs more muscle than X, what’s the prize? A cookie? A pat on the back?[/quote]

Dude, this is the internet. There is a continuum from dead wrong to absolute authority.

Take me for example- I’m sitting at an unimpressive 165-170 right now. I could provide an answer to something right out of any mass monsters playbook and it would be dead wrong. Why? Because I’m a twerp.

Now take someone who is hanging in there at 250+. He could tell you to do something utterly ridiculous and be way more right than anybody else based solely on the fact that he’s huge.

So that five lbs. makes a big difference once you get into that thinner strip on the far right side of that continuum.

It’s like being in the bottom end of Mensa. You might be in the top 2% of the rest of the world, but if you’re just sneaking by with a 141 or 142, you’re pretty much at the bottom of their barrel.
[/quote]

I read these threads solely because I’m a people watcher hobbiest (well, more like people gawker in this case). But, I have to say that this post is absolutely brilliant -well done, sir. Obviously, being older has indeed made you wiser. :wink:

204

And so the fuck what?

[quote]You sound like a retard, Der_SW. Believing that eating 8000 calories a day while spending practically all your time training simply to build more muscle than is practical somehow makes the world beautiful is a special kind of narcissistic. If you believe a guy walking around with tons of mass increases the happiness in the world, then you are a special breed.

Blue steel![/quote]

If I still smoked, I’d take a long pull on my cigar and then tell you to go fuck yourself. As it is, I’m just going to tell you to go fuck yourself. Now go fuck yourself.

1 Like
205

[quote]browndisaster wrote:

[quote]browndisaster wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]browndisaster wrote:

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
as me at 5’10", so be it.
[/quote]

I’m only throwing this in here because I recall getting a lot of static when I assumed (because it said so in his personal profile that he filled out himself) that PX was 5’10, and he went out of his way to stress how much taller he was.

S[/quote]
Yeah also 30 inch thighs, 18+ inch arms, 270 lbs, would need double the calories of Amit Sapir to prep, and “not-fat”

Inb4 it’s common to give your rough height in shoes in addition to your real height.

Oh and those dudes are douches. Cmon now guys
http://m.comedycentral.com/videos/video.rbml?id=5lepme&alt=http%3A%2F%2Fm.comedycentral.com%2Fvideos%2Findex.rbml
[/quote]

Of course they look like douches. PX defends anyone who has large amounts of muscle (e.g., Kai Greene banging a grapefruit).

If Hitler was jacked, PX would be defending the Holocaust.
[/quote]
Gee, I would ask him how he got really big muscles rather than bring up the mass murders. You all look like concentration camp victims, not ubermensch.

Why is that?[/quote]

Good post. I would further add that a skinny newb’s first 5 year plans should be to bulk. It only takes a few months to drop the fat. I did start cutting recently, but noticed I was still growing while getting leaner, so my next few 5 year plans will be focused on recomping still.

Just because I stick to hammer and sickle now doesn’t mean I’m" weak." Seems like some here are scared that communism will spread.[/quote]
Shitler do you realize that you can’t reach your own ideal of blonde hair and blue eyes naturally? It’s even common knowledge that your elite soldiers are given anabolics.

Of course, me pointing out your logical flaws just makes me part of the “posse.” These are your opinions and the majority of us don’t agree with them…but you have to shout them and silence out others to be heard. Your toxic attitude on these forums doesn’t foster healthy discussion; before I know it I’m in a boxcar on the way to a camp in Serbia.

inb4 it all boils down to GENETICS. That’s getting tired man

206

Do you guys know what this thread needs?

207

That’s right. Izzy the stick chick.

208

And Jumpin’ Jesse

209

Man,just look at the raw power Miss Ennis generates in those slomos.

210

[quote]Der_Steppenwolfe wrote:

And so the fuck what?

[quote]You sound like a retard, Der_SW. Believing that eating 8000 calories a day while spending practically all your time training simply to build more muscle than is practical somehow makes the world beautiful is a special kind of narcissistic. If you believe a guy walking around with tons of mass increases the happiness in the world, then you are a special breed.

Blue steel![/quote]
If I still smoked, I’d take a long pull on my cigar and then tell you to go fuck yourself. As it is, I’m just going to tell you to go fuck yourself. Now go fuck yourself.[/quote]

Doesn’t change the validity of what I said. Truth hurts sometimes, doesn’t it?

211

[quote]on edge wrote:
Man,just look at the raw power Miss Ennis generates in those slomos.[/quote]

Now those 2 videos add real beauty to this world, Sir

212

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]mbdix wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]mbdix wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]flipcollar wrote:

[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Just a heads up, guys, this level of e-hate just for posting anything makes some of you look either desperate or jealous. Logging in just to claim you carry more muscle than me is pretty lame when that seems to be the only motivation…and yet not one picture was shown of more.[/quote]

What you’re not getting is that most seem to agree that you aren’t carrying much more muscle than Utah. Also, you go on about how you are the biggest all the time. Well, you also are carrying probably the most body-fat out of all of the regular posters in here. Yeah, a lot to brag about. [/quote]

Speak for yourself. Just because the loudest people in these threads agree, doesn’t mean that most agree. There are like 5 or 6 guys that jump in these threads and say Utah carries more muscle.

The only thing that’s clear is that X carries more fat than Utah. I’m pretty sure no one’s going to argue with that. To say that Utah’s carrying more muscle than X is splitting hairs at best. They’re both carrying a very respectable amount of muscle. Without X getting to Utah’s level of leanness, though, this question will never be definitively answered.

Fortunately, it doesn’t need to be answered. There’s no reason for every thread that exceeds 100 posts on this site to become a pissing match. When X started getting called out on these boards, most claimed that they were doing it to protect they young/new trainers from getting bad information. That was the excuse in the chest pre-fatiguing thread, for example. What’s happening now is serving absolutely no purpose. How is arguing about which big guy is bigger going to help anyone? If you could actually prove that Utah has, say, 5 lbs more muscle than X, what’s the prize? A cookie? A pat on the back?[/quote]

Dude, this is the internet. There is a continuum from dead wrong to absolute authority.

Take me for example- I’m sitting at an unimpressive 165-170 right now. I could provide an answer to something right out of any mass monsters playbook and it would be dead wrong. Why? Because I’m a twerp.

Now take someone who is hanging in there at 250+. He could tell you to do something utterly ridiculous and be way more right than anybody else based solely on the fact that he’s huge.

So that five lbs. makes a big difference once you get into that thinner strip on the far right side of that continuum.

It’s like being in the bottom end of Mensa. You might be in the top 2% of the rest of the world, but if you’re just sneaking by with a 141 or 142, you’re pretty much at the bottom of their barrel.
[/quote]

I understand what you are saying, but even the top tier members of Mensa are smart enough to recognize when that guy just making into the club is correct
[/quote]

How much do you weigh?
[/quote]

Haha ~205 But, I’m a little over 6’2" so I already know my opinion doesn’t mean shit. Still trying to get bigger, stronger, and leaner though[/quote]

Well you got me by about 30 lbs. so you are this much [-------] righter.

(the bracket spaces are arbitrary and scale-able if that helps.)
[/quote]

Well, at least I have that going for me. Glad your back to moving Iron in the gym btw. I know you took some time off

213

[quote]on edge wrote:
That’s right. Izzy the stick chick.

BEST POST

214

[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:

People are going to have different opinions. People are going to express those opinions. There isn’t much you can do about it. Just like none of us can stop X from drooling over himself. I’m out for another day or so.
[/quote]

Right.

Which is why I expressed my opinion. I’m very much aware of how a forum works.

215

Well…that really escalated quickly!

216

Yup- it’s still at zero, sweetheart.

217

Height makes ALL the difference; as an example SavagedNation in this forum clocked in at 285 in 12 week out condition (as estimated by zraw in the same thread though i’d say its more like 14 weeks out), at 6’4".

Compare that with Utah’s 230 at 6’1" in (lets assume) 12 week out condition? Does that mean SN is that much more advanced than either X or Utah or that he’s just 3 inches taller?

You can’t compare LBMs when there’s a 3 inch height difference.

[quote]mbdix wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]mbdix wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]flipcollar wrote:

[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Just a heads up, guys, this level of e-hate just for posting anything makes some of you look either desperate or jealous. Logging in just to claim you carry more muscle than me is pretty lame when that seems to be the only motivation…and yet not one picture was shown of more.[/quote]

What you’re not getting is that most seem to agree that you aren’t carrying much more muscle than Utah. Also, you go on about how you are the biggest all the time. Well, you also are carrying probably the most body-fat out of all of the regular posters in here. Yeah, a lot to brag about. [/quote]

Speak for yourself. Just because the loudest people in these threads agree, doesn’t mean that most agree. There are like 5 or 6 guys that jump in these threads and say Utah carries more muscle.

The only thing that’s clear is that X carries more fat than Utah. I’m pretty sure no one’s going to argue with that. To say that Utah’s carrying more muscle than X is splitting hairs at best. They’re both carrying a very respectable amount of muscle. Without X getting to Utah’s level of leanness, though, this question will never be definitively answered.

Fortunately, it doesn’t need to be answered. There’s no reason for every thread that exceeds 100 posts on this site to become a pissing match. When X started getting called out on these boards, most claimed that they were doing it to protect they young/new trainers from getting bad information. That was the excuse in the chest pre-fatiguing thread, for example. What’s happening now is serving absolutely no purpose. How is arguing about which big guy is bigger going to help anyone? If you could actually prove that Utah has, say, 5 lbs more muscle than X, what’s the prize? A cookie? A pat on the back?[/quote]

Dude, this is the internet. There is a continuum from dead wrong to absolute authority.

Take me for example- I’m sitting at an unimpressive 165-170 right now. I could provide an answer to something right out of any mass monsters playbook and it would be dead wrong. Why? Because I’m a twerp.

Now take someone who is hanging in there at 250+. He could tell you to do something utterly ridiculous and be way more right than anybody else based solely on the fact that he’s huge.

So that five lbs. makes a big difference once you get into that thinner strip on the far right side of that continuum.

It’s like being in the bottom end of Mensa. You might be in the top 2% of the rest of the world, but if you’re just sneaking by with a 141 or 142, you’re pretty much at the bottom of their barrel.
[/quote]

I understand what you are saying, but even the top tier members of Mensa are smart enough to recognize when that guy just making into the club is correct
[/quote]

How much do you weigh?
[/quote]

Haha ~205 But, I’m a little over 6’2" so I already know my opinion doesn’t mean shit. Still trying to get bigger, stronger, and leaner though[/quote]

218

[quote]Depression Boy wrote:
Height makes ALL the difference; as an example SavagedNation in this forum clocked in at 285 in 12 week out condition (as estimated by zraw in the same thread though i’d say its more like 14 weeks out), at 6’4".

Compare that with Utah’s 230 at 6’1" in (lets assume) 12 week out condition? Does that mean SN is that much more advanced than either X or Utah or that he’s just 3 inches taller?

You can’t compare LBMs when there’s a 3 inch height difference.
[/quote]

To clarify in case there is any misunderstanding- I was just riffing on the recent theme of “If someone is bigger your an idiot if you don’t listen to them” theme that has been going on for a decade or so.

It wasn’t intended to be a serious comparison of anybody to anyone else. I’ve lifted with a guy who was pulling 625 at 6’1 and 190 lbs., who by most recent standards would not even look like he lifts (haha), and knew another guy who had a growth disorder that put him at 6’7" and 300 lbs.- also kind of lanky looking. So yeah, height, limb length, lean mass muscle bellies and a whoe ton of other factors go into how someone looks at a given weight.

For the guy who is 6’7" to look like a body builder he would probably have to weigh 375-400 lbs.

219

[quote]BigDawg6593 wrote:

[quote]jasmincar wrote:
I see tons of people take steroids and get steroid-buff. You don’t even have to train that hard.
[/quote]

Really? Don’t have to train that hard? So the only thing I have to be to become a freak is just take roids and chill? gtfo with that[/quote]

Yep, that’s what most guidos do :slight_smile:

220

I’m of the mind that a man shouldn’t wear really tight clothes.

The guys in that video could surely find shirts that are 2XL or 3XL or whatever they needed to still let people know they’re big without going too tight, which I believe where most all of the douchieness comes from.