Muscle Patheticness

Professor_X · February 14, 2014, 4:40pm

[quote]mbdix wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]mbdix wrote:
In that extra scene I wouldn’t call them dressed dooshy.[/quote]

Dude, being a douche is based on action…not specific style of dress. Their clothes weren’t that much different in that last scene…just no loud colors and sunglasses.[/quote]

Negative X. Clothes can have an impact on douchebagness. Loud colors are borderline territory. You can wear clothing that might be considered loud colors and still not register on the douchebag scale but it has to be done correctly. They are wearing tank tops that are literally skin tight, the sunglasses are being worn indoors. They are 2 adult males and chose to do this video in a MALL! [/quote]

I am still missing the problem here or what makes them a douche.

A douche is the guy who speeds up when you try to pass him on the freeway only to slow back down after he prevents you from doing so.

Wearing loud colors is just wearing loud colors.

Does it upset you that they get more attention?

browndisaster · February 14, 2014, 6:26pm

[quote]browndisaster wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]browndisaster wrote:

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
as me at 5’10", so be it.
[/quote]

I’m only throwing this in here because I recall getting a lot of static when I assumed (because it said so in his personal profile that he filled out himself) that PX was 5’10, and he went out of his way to stress how much taller he was.

S[/quote]
Yeah also 30 inch thighs, 18+ inch arms, 270 lbs, would need double the calories of Amit Sapir to prep, and “not-fat”

Inb4 it’s common to give your rough height in shoes in addition to your real height.

Oh and those dudes are douches. Cmon now guys
http://m.comedycentral.com/videos/video.rbml?id=5lepme&alt=http%3A%2F%2Fm.comedycentral.com%2Fvideos%2Findex.rbml
[/quote]

Of course they look like douches. PX defends anyone who has large amounts of muscle (e.g., Kai Greene banging a grapefruit).

If Hitler was jacked, PX would be defending the Holocaust.
[/quote]
Gee, I would ask him how he got really big muscles rather than bring up the mass murders. You all look like concentration camp victims, not ubermensch.

Why is that?[/quote]

Good post. I would further add that a skinny newb’s first 5 year plans should be to bulk. It only takes a few months to drop the fat. I did start cutting recently, but noticed I was still growing while getting leaner, so my next few 5 year plans will be focused on recomping still.

Just because I stick to hammer and sickle now doesn’t mean I’m" weak." Seems like some here are scared that communism will spread.

UtahLama · February 14, 2014, 6:36pm

[quote]browndisaster wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]browndisaster wrote:

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
as me at 5’10", so be it.
[/quote]

I’m only throwing this in here because I recall getting a lot of static when I assumed (because it said so in his personal profile that he filled out himself) that PX was 5’10, and he went out of his way to stress how much taller he was.

S[/quote]
Yeah also 30 inch thighs, 18+ inch arms, 270 lbs, would need double the calories of Amit Sapir to prep, and “not-fat”

Inb4 it’s common to give your rough height in shoes in addition to your real height.

Oh and those dudes are douches. Cmon now guys
http://m.comedycentral.com/videos/video.rbml?id=5lepme&alt=http%3A%2F%2Fm.comedycentral.com%2Fvideos%2Findex.rbml
[/quote]

Of course they look like douches. PX defends anyone who has large amounts of muscle (e.g., Kai Greene banging a grapefruit).

If Hitler was jacked, PX would be defending the Holocaust.
[/quote]
Gee, I would ask him how he got really big muscles rather than bring up the mass murders. You all look like concentration camp victims, not ubermensch.

Why is that?[/quote]

Good post. I would further add that a skinny newb’s first 5 year plans should be to bulk. It only takes a few months to drop the fat. I did start cutting recently, but noticed I was still growing while getting leaner, so my next few 5 year plans will be focused on recomping still.

Just because I stick to hammer and sickle now doesn’t mean I’m" weak." Seems like some here are scared that communism will spread.[/quote]

HA!

+1 ambiguous group reference

/it’s a good look on you

J_Prufrock · February 14, 2014, 10:27pm

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Just a heads up, guys, this level of e-hate just for posting anything makes some of you look either desperate or jealous. Logging in just to claim you carry more muscle than me is pretty lame when that seems to be the only motivation…and yet not one picture was shown of more.[/quote]

What you’re not getting is that most seem to agree that you aren’t carrying much more muscle than Utah. Also, you go on about how you are the biggest all the time. Well, you also are carrying probably the most body-fat out of all of the regular posters in here. Yeah, a lot to brag about.

mbdix · February 14, 2014, 11:40pm

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]mbdix wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]mbdix wrote:
In that extra scene I wouldn’t call them dressed dooshy.[/quote]

Dude, being a douche is based on action…not specific style of dress. Their clothes weren’t that much different in that last scene…just no loud colors and sunglasses.[/quote]

Negative X. Clothes can have an impact on douchebagness. Loud colors are borderline territory. You can wear clothing that might be considered loud colors and still not register on the douchebag scale but it has to be done correctly. They are wearing tank tops that are literally skin tight, the sunglasses are being worn indoors. They are 2 adult males and chose to do this video in a MALL! [/quote]

I am still missing the problem here or what makes them a douche.

A douche is the guy who speeds up when you try to pass him on the freeway only to slow back down after he prevents you from doing so.

Wearing loud colors is just wearing loud colors.

Does it upset you that they get more attention?[/quote]

It’s cool if you don’t see it.

You call those guys dooshes, I call them assholes

I am not upset at all by them acting like dooshes. I am not the biggest guy in my gym, and I don’t think all the guys bigger than me are douchebags. I am an equal opportunity douchebag classifier. Skinny guys can be dooshes, fat guys, bodybuilders.

There is a method to how one ends up in the douchebag category. You can use this video to demonstrate to someone some things to avoid doing if you don’t want to look like a douchebag.

StevenF · February 15, 2014, 5:02am

too much douchebaggery going on in here.

“hey what’d you do today honey?”

“i got on the internet and told this guy he’s fat.”

Der_Steppenwolfe · February 15, 2014, 6:40am

The world would be a less beautiful place without people using muscle shots of themselves in games like the OP described. Bodybuilding, I’ve come to believe, is not narcissistic. It’s a selfless attempt to make the world more beautiful by improving one’s own physique. I believe it’s the thinking man’s duty to increase the amount of happiness in the world. What’s pathetic about that?

legendaryblaze · February 15, 2014, 9:01am

You sound like a retard, Der_SW. Believing that eating 8000 calories a day while spending practically all your time training simply to build more muscle than is practical somehow makes the world beautiful is a special kind of narcissistic. If you believe a guy walking around with tons of mass increases the happiness in the world, then you are a special breed.

Blue steel!

flipcollar · February 15, 2014, 3:05pm

[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Just a heads up, guys, this level of e-hate just for posting anything makes some of you look either desperate or jealous. Logging in just to claim you carry more muscle than me is pretty lame when that seems to be the only motivation…and yet not one picture was shown of more.[/quote]

What you’re not getting is that most seem to agree that you aren’t carrying much more muscle than Utah. Also, you go on about how you are the biggest all the time. Well, you also are carrying probably the most body-fat out of all of the regular posters in here. Yeah, a lot to brag about. [/quote]

Speak for yourself. Just because the loudest people in these threads agree, doesn’t mean that most agree. There are like 5 or 6 guys that jump in these threads and say Utah carries more muscle.

The only thing that’s clear is that X carries more fat than Utah. I’m pretty sure no one’s going to argue with that. To say that Utah’s carrying more muscle than X is splitting hairs at best. They’re both carrying a very respectable amount of muscle. Without X getting to Utah’s level of leanness, though, this question will never be definitively answered.

Fortunately, it doesn’t need to be answered. There’s no reason for every thread that exceeds 100 posts on this site to become a pissing match. When X started getting called out on these boards, most claimed that they were doing it to protect they young/new trainers from getting bad information. That was the excuse in the chest pre-fatiguing thread, for example. What’s happening now is serving absolutely no purpose. How is arguing about which big guy is bigger going to help anyone? If you could actually prove that Utah has, say, 5 lbs more muscle than X, what’s the prize? A cookie? A pat on the back?

Professor_X · February 15, 2014, 4:08pm

[quote]mbdix wrote:

It’s cool if you don’t see it.

You call those guys dooshes, I call them assholes[/quote]

It’s the same thing…and means you are using a style of dress alone to determine someone’s personality and character. That is just illogical. It doesn’t matter if most people do it, it still doesn’t make sense because it means your perception of people is based on stereotypes…which means bias and bigotry.

If you don’t want to BE a douchebag, don’t act like one. There is no way to DRESS like one and become one instantly because of the clothing.

Also, Flipcollar, good post. It would seem that “most people” would rather the same group stop ruining every thread because of group bias.

Gnarly · February 15, 2014, 5:23pm

[quote]Der_Steppenwolfe wrote:
The world would be a less beautiful place without people using muscle shots of themselves in games like the OP described. Bodybuilding, I’ve come to believe, is not narcissistic. It’s a selfless attempt to make the world more beautiful by improving one’s own physique. I believe it’s the thinking man’s duty to increase the amount of happiness in the world. What’s pathetic about that?[/quote]

Dude I’m kind of drunk but you just made my day man. I fuckin love this shit n beautiful bodies are beautiful

LankyMofo · February 15, 2014, 5:36pm

[quote]Der_Steppenwolfe wrote:
The world would be a less beautiful place without people using muscle shots of themselves in games like the OP described. Bodybuilding, I’ve come to believe, is not narcissistic. It’s a selfless attempt to make the world more beautiful by improving one’s own physique. I believe it’s the thinking man’s duty to increase the amount of happiness in the world. What’s pathetic about that?[/quote]

Quite possibly the most skewed perspective of reality I’ve ever read.

Gnarly · February 15, 2014, 5:41pm

Hahaha it’s hilarious

SkyzykS · February 15, 2014, 5:59pm

[quote]flipcollar wrote:

[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Just a heads up, guys, this level of e-hate just for posting anything makes some of you look either desperate or jealous. Logging in just to claim you carry more muscle than me is pretty lame when that seems to be the only motivation…and yet not one picture was shown of more.[/quote]

What you’re not getting is that most seem to agree that you aren’t carrying much more muscle than Utah. Also, you go on about how you are the biggest all the time. Well, you also are carrying probably the most body-fat out of all of the regular posters in here. Yeah, a lot to brag about. [/quote]

Speak for yourself. Just because the loudest people in these threads agree, doesn’t mean that most agree. There are like 5 or 6 guys that jump in these threads and say Utah carries more muscle.

The only thing that’s clear is that X carries more fat than Utah. I’m pretty sure no one’s going to argue with that. To say that Utah’s carrying more muscle than X is splitting hairs at best. They’re both carrying a very respectable amount of muscle. Without X getting to Utah’s level of leanness, though, this question will never be definitively answered.

Fortunately, it doesn’t need to be answered. There’s no reason for every thread that exceeds 100 posts on this site to become a pissing match. When X started getting called out on these boards, most claimed that they were doing it to protect they young/new trainers from getting bad information. That was the excuse in the chest pre-fatiguing thread, for example. What’s happening now is serving absolutely no purpose. How is arguing about which big guy is bigger going to help anyone? If you could actually prove that Utah has, say, 5 lbs more muscle than X, what’s the prize? A cookie? A pat on the back?[/quote]

Dude, this is the internet. There is a continuum from dead wrong to absolute authority.

Take me for example- I’m sitting at an unimpressive 165-170 right now. I could provide an answer to something right out of any mass monsters playbook and it would be dead wrong. Why? Because I’m a twerp.

Now take someone who is hanging in there at 250+. He could tell you to do something utterly ridiculous and be way more right than anybody else based solely on the fact that he’s huge.

So that five lbs. makes a big difference once you get into that thinner strip on the far right side of that continuum.

It’s like being in the bottom end of Mensa. You might be in the top 2% of the rest of the world, but if you’re just sneaking by with a 141 or 142, you’re pretty much at the bottom of their barrel.

Depression_Boy · February 15, 2014, 6:38pm

Agreed. Its little more than a guessing game, but if Utah is indeed 3 inches taller (which i personally doubt especially after having seen the videos with Thibz and X together), he is LIKELY to have some more LBM than X even if X looks “hyooger”, but again, it is irrelevant.

But anything to do with X or Bauber, their bodyfat levels, measurements and the exact amount of muscle theyre both carrying is VERY important to HIM, and I PERSONALLY respect that.

[quote]flipcollar wrote:

[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Just a heads up, guys, this level of e-hate just for posting anything makes some of you look either desperate or jealous. Logging in just to claim you carry more muscle than me is pretty lame when that seems to be the only motivation…and yet not one picture was shown of more.[/quote]

What you’re not getting is that most seem to agree that you aren’t carrying much more muscle than Utah. Also, you go on about how you are the biggest all the time. Well, you also are carrying probably the most body-fat out of all of the regular posters in here. Yeah, a lot to brag about. [/quote]

Speak for yourself. Just because the loudest people in these threads agree, doesn’t mean that most agree. There are like 5 or 6 guys that jump in these threads and say Utah carries more muscle.

The only thing that’s clear is that X carries more fat than Utah. I’m pretty sure no one’s going to argue with that. To say that Utah’s carrying more muscle than X is splitting hairs at best. They’re both carrying a very respectable amount of muscle. Without X getting to Utah’s level of leanness, though, this question will never be definitively answered.

Fortunately, it doesn’t need to be answered. There’s no reason for every thread that exceeds 100 posts on this site to become a pissing match. When X started getting called out on these boards, most claimed that they were doing it to protect they young/new trainers from getting bad information. That was the excuse in the chest pre-fatiguing thread, for example. What’s happening now is serving absolutely no purpose. How is arguing about which big guy is bigger going to help anyone? If you could actually prove that Utah has, say, 5 lbs more muscle than X, what’s the prize? A cookie? A pat on the back?[/quote]

Depression_Boy · February 15, 2014, 6:39pm

Just be grateful Oleena is posting again and this time she isnt trolling.

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:

[quote]Der_Steppenwolfe wrote:
The world would be a less beautiful place without people using muscle shots of themselves in games like the OP described. Bodybuilding, I’ve come to believe, is not narcissistic. It’s a selfless attempt to make the world more beautiful by improving one’s own physique. I believe it’s the thinking man’s duty to increase the amount of happiness in the world. What’s pathetic about that?[/quote]

Quite possibly the most skewed perspective of reality I’ve ever read. [/quote]

mbdix · February 15, 2014, 6:40pm

[quote]SkyzykS wrote: