Personally I think there’s a lot to be said for following through with a program right down to the detail - it was always a challenge for me to go through programs exactly according to the way they were set up, but I came out better for it.
I tried Quattro Dynamo and a couple other Waterbury programs that don’t come to mind at the moment, in addition to HSS-100 a little later on before I could figure out for myself what worked for me.
I did follow them as laid out and doing that gave me a degree of discipline, I believe. But following these programs down to the wire kept me 1) accountable to a set template and 2) made sure that I didn’t try to slack off by replacing exercises that I didn’t really want to do with ones that I found more likeable (read: easier).
So where I’m going with this is that I’d say follow a program down to the very tee for the discipline it engenders, that definitely helped me out - and given that the guys that write the programs are pretty damn good, you’re probably going to be challenged - especially if you’re just starting out.
Much as i believed at the time I could tinker with the programs I mentioned above, doing so would have hindered the gains I made significantly, and I’m glad I didn’t.
Over time, I have made the transition to taking bits and pieces out of the training philosophies I’ve read here and elsewhere. Perhaps it’s less professional, but I feel that I learn more about my own body this way.
Much as I think that the programs here are great, it can’t be overlooked that they’re written for public view, and cannot possibly be written with all of the readers in mind. I think it’s best that someone get an idea about what works for them by following a set template initially, and then using the concepts it illustrates to cater to their own bodies.
As theuofh said above, it’s about knowing how it works, not just that it does. Although i’d add a third part, following these programs also lets you know WHAT works.
Just my 2c, hope I didn’t ramble, haha.