I’d been hoping for a Sarah Palin vice-presidency for ages, almost for as long as I became aware of her existence.
The fact that she’s committed to preserving the Second Amendment is obviously a big plus.
The fact that she has more balls than both “men” on the opposite ticket combined is another plus.
And naturally, the fact that she’s way hotter than either Michelle Obama or Jill Biden is a nice bonus.
Never thought I’d say it, but John McCain has earned my vote.
I don’t see her as inexperienced. She has run a business a city and a state.
If it must be a question, woul you rather have an inexperienced President or an inexperienced Vice president?
On the job training is never good from the front.
50x
[quote]50x wrote:
I don’t see her as inexperienced. She has run a business a city and a state.
If it must be a question, woul you rather have an inexperienced President or an inexperienced Vice president?
On the job training is never good from the front.
50x [/quote]
McCain is a cancer survivor, yesterday he was 72 years old, look at him he is in a daze. He is losing weight which may be good it could also be assign of stress.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
50x wrote:
I don’t see her as inexperienced. She has run a business a city and a state.
If it must be a question, woul you rather have an inexperienced President or an inexperienced Vice president?
On the job training is never good from the front.
50x
McCain is a cancer survivor, yesterday he was 72 years old, look at him he is in a daze. He is losing weight which may be good it could also be assign of stress.
[/quote]
Obama is a Chicago politics survivor, if there is such a thing. The other day he was 47. Look at him, he’s drunk on his own celebrity. If he loses any more weight he’ll disappear which would be good, but would only be a sign of some other socialist to follow.
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
50x wrote:
I don’t see her as inexperienced. She has run a business a city and a state.
If it must be a question, woul you rather have an inexperienced President or an inexperienced Vice president?
On the job training is never good from the front.
50x
McCain is a cancer survivor, yesterday he was 72 years old, look at him he is in a daze. He is losing weight which may be good it could also be assign of stress.
Obama is a Chicago politics survivor, if there is such a thing. The other day he was 47. Look at him, he’s drunk on his own celebrity. If he loses any more weight he’ll disappear which would be good, but would only be a sign of some other socialist to follow.[/quote]
My comments were not meant to inflame, they were only stating the obvious. I do not understand how Obama is drunk on his celebrity, could you give me some examples Thanks
Biden is 65 andhas had surgury for 2 brain aneurysms.
50x
[quote]Mikeyali wrote:
GDollars37 wrote:
Agree with just about everything you said, but you’ll still be voting for McCain. Might suck if you get called off IRR to go attack some crappy country on the other end of the world that is no threat to America.
If that’s what it takes to set our country up for a Palin presidency…
Look, Obama is just as likely to get us into a nonsensical war as McCain. Belligerent countries will be more reckless with him in office. Obama will also be more willing to commit troops so as not to be seen as weak on national defense. He’s not anti-war right now because he believes it; he’s against the war because that’s what’s popular.
America likes getting into wars, we just don’t like staying in them. Let the polls leading up to the midterms say that the democrats are unpopular for not standing up to Iran/Russia or more likely and the big green machine will be at war faster than the news wires can get the word out.
mike[/quote]
exactly. i believe that if Obama were elected, the war situation would be a lot worse during his term. he would either just keep sending troops without much of a strategy or he’ll pull us out of Iraq and Afganistan right away, make himself look like a hero, but a year later end up kissing Russias ass if they decide to push our buttons. you are right about Obama riding the coat tails of what the fad attitude at the moment is.
typical politicians Obama and Biden are, will tell everyone exactly what they want to hear, and the mass is stupid enough to buy into that shit every four years. at least everyone knows where McCain comes from, and where his stance his, while Obama came from no where and is shrouded in mystery.
i remember during the Clinton years, everybody wanted to go to war, didnt matter if it was Iraq, Cuba, China, everyone wanted our president to send the troops to go kick someones ass. especially Iraq. for years after the gulf war, everyone bitched and moaned that we should have killed Saddam and we were weak for not doing so. When Bush took office, he did exactly what everyone wanted. invade Iraq, kill off Saddam and make the world just like us.
at the start of the war, everyone was suddenly “patriotic” “proud to be American” fuck the french cause they disagree with us and lets change the name of French fries to fucking freedom fries. but as soon as we got some blood on our hands and bodies coming back suddenly people who wanted war, are suddenly screaming the opposite. and now george w. bush, the united states is evil cause our wish was granted but then reality struck.
i dont know about any of you, but im personally glad Bush was president during all this cause can you imagine what Gore would have done? he would have dropped to his knees begging for mercy, and whined about how war is bad for the environment as bombs would be going off in our cities. then of course, if i memory serves, didnt he start on his global warming crap just as soon as it became the latest American and apparantly global craze?
Gore had been on the environmental kick for some time – had for example written in his book prior to the 2000 election that it would be better if gasoline prices were $5/gallon and they should be made this high because this supposedly would help the environment – but it was not he figured out how he could personally enrich himself with carbon trading schemes (from which he has obtained I believe it is over $100 million dollars for himself now, or if not yet over then approaching it) that he really went big-time with it.
The lack of any actual warming in the last 10 years – or for that matter that the peak of “global warming” was no warmer than the 1950’s were and not as warm as say roughly the 10th to 14th Centuries when Greenland was green – has been no impediment to Gore, thanks to the media being in the tank for alleged global warming. It has only been necessary to change the name to “climate change,” so that either hot or cold, more rain or less, more snow or less, no matter what happens everything is to be taken as proof that Gore is right and that carbon trading schemes putting money into his pocket are necessary to “save the planet.”
[quote]Bill Roberts wrote:
Gore had been on the environmental kick for some time – had for example written in his book prior to the 2000 election that it would be better if gasoline prices were $5/gallon and they should be made this high because this supposedly would help the environment – but it was not he figured out how he could personally enrich himself with carbon trading schemes (from which he has obtained I believe it is over $100 million dollars for himself now, or if not yet over then approaching it) that he really went big-time with it.
The lack of any actual warming in the last 10 years – or for that matter that the peak of “global warming” was no warmer than the 1950’s were and not as warm as say roughly the 10th to 14th Centuries when Greenland was green – has been no impediment to Gore, thanks to the media being in the tank for alleged global warming. It has only been necessary to change the name to “climate change,” so that either hot or cold, more rain or less, more snow or less, no matter what happens everything is to be taken as proof that Gore is right and that carbon trading schemes putting money into his pocket are necessary to “save the planet.” [/quote]
Outstanding Doc.
It’s also no accident that everybody decrying alleged man made global warming/climate change as an apocalyptic threat is very quick to add that a bunch of measures that will just happen to burden the United States the most are the instantly necessary solutions.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
<<< My comments were not meant to inflame, they were only stating the obvious. I do not understand how Obama is drunk on his celebrity, could you give me some examples Thanks
[/quote]
Honestly no. You gave me a very civil response and I mean no sarcasm by that, but I am not going to look for examples of something that even many of his supporters have warned that he needs to get a handle on.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Tiribulus wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
50x wrote:
I don’t see her as inexperienced. She has run a business a city and a state.
If it must be a question, woul you rather have an inexperienced President or an inexperienced Vice president?
On the job training is never good from the front.
50x
McCain is a cancer survivor, yesterday he was 72 years old, look at him he is in a daze. He is losing weight which may be good it could also be assign of stress.
Obama is a Chicago politics survivor, if there is such a thing. The other day he was 47. Look at him, he’s drunk on his own celebrity. If he loses any more weight he’ll disappear which would be good, but would only be a sign of some other socialist to follow.
My comments were not meant to inflame, they were only stating the obvious. I do not understand how Obama is drunk on his celebrity, could you give me some examples Thanks
[/quote]
“we are the ones the world has been waiting for”
what more do you need?
[quote]bald eagle wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
Tiribulus wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
50x wrote:
I don’t see her as inexperienced. She has run a business a city and a state.
If it must be a question, woul you rather have an inexperienced President or an inexperienced Vice president?
On the job training is never good from the front.
50x
McCain is a cancer survivor, yesterday he was 72 years old, look at him he is in a daze. He is losing weight which may be good it could also be assign of stress.
Obama is a Chicago politics survivor, if there is such a thing. The other day he was 47. Look at him, he’s drunk on his own celebrity. If he loses any more weight he’ll disappear which would be good, but would only be a sign of some other socialist to follow.
My comments were not meant to inflame, they were only stating the obvious. I do not understand how Obama is drunk on his celebrity, could you give me some examples Thanks
“we are the ones the world has been waiting for”
what more do you need?
[/quote]
correction - it was the following -
“we are the ones we have have been waiting for”
[quote]Bill Roberts wrote:
Gore had been on the environmental kick for some time – had for example written in his book prior to the 2000 election that it would be better if gasoline prices were $5/gallon and they should be made this high because this supposedly would help the environment – but it was not he figured out how he could personally enrich himself with carbon trading schemes (from which he has obtained I believe it is over $100 million dollars for himself now, or if not yet over then approaching it) that he really went big-time with it.
The lack of any actual warming in the last 10 years – or for that matter that the peak of “global warming” was no warmer than the 1950’s were and not as warm as say roughly the 10th to 14th Centuries when Greenland was green – has been no impediment to Gore, thanks to the media being in the tank for alleged global warming. It has only been necessary to change the name to “climate change,” so that either hot or cold, more rain or less, more snow or less, no matter what happens everything is to be taken as proof that Gore is right and that carbon trading schemes putting money into his pocket are necessary to “save the planet.” [/quote]
the facts do not matter with these people - it is an anticapitalism agenda at the roots and a religion.
but you are right - more hurricanes = global warming / climate change
fewer hurricanes = global warming / climate change
It is irritating to listen to.
[quote]bald eagle wrote:
the facts do not matter with these people - it is an anticapitalism agenda at the roots and a religion.
but you are right - more hurricanes = global warming / climate change
fewer hurricanes = global warming / climate change
It is irritating to listen to.
[/quote]
And you know it’s comin. Any second we should be hearing about the poetic justice of Gustav making landfall right when the RNC starts. You can set your clock by it.
I recently heard Walter Mondale state he remembered the moment he knew he was going to lose.
It was during the 2nd debate (I think) when President Reagan said “…I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit for political purposes my opponent’s youth and inexperience.”
Obama’s moment was Friday at 1100 when Sarah Palin was introduced.
I just hope getting the Republican base in the polling booths for McCain/Palin will shift legislative seats more to the right.
[quote]pwilliams wrote:
I recently heard Walter Mondale state he remembered the moment he knew he was going to lose.
It was during the 2nd debate (I think) when President Reagan said “…I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit for political purposes my opponent’s youth and inexperience.”
Obama’s moment was Friday at 1100 when Sarah Palin was introduced.
I just hope getting the Republican base in the polling booths for McCain/Palin will shift legislative seats more to the right.[/quote]
Reagan was the consummate master. He could debate somebody bloody with passion and finality in that calm soft spoken manner he had. I still have those Mondale debates on VHS somewhere.
I believe you’re thinking somewhat wishfully about the congressional races. I expect the Dems to pick up seats in the house and the senate which is all the more reason Che cannot be allowed the executive branch. This CANNOT happen. If it weren’t for the court I’d be tempted to say just let them take the wheel for a few years so we can be taught this lesson.
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
pwilliams wrote:
I recently heard Walter Mondale state he remembered the moment he knew he was going to lose.
It was during the 2nd debate (I think) when President Reagan said “…I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit for political purposes my opponent’s youth and inexperience.”
Obama’s moment was Friday at 1100 when Sarah Palin was introduced.
I just hope getting the Republican base in the polling booths for McCain/Palin will shift legislative seats more to the right.
Reagan was the consummate master. He could debate somebody bloody with passion and finality in that calm soft spoken manner he had. I still have those Mondale debates on VHS somewhere.
I believe you’re thinking somewhat wishfully about the congressional races. I expect the Dems to pick up seats in the house and the senate which is all the more reason Che cannot be allowed the executive branch. This CANNOT happen. If it weren’t for the court I’d be tempted to say just let them take the wheel for a few years so we can be taught this lesson.
[/quote]
You are quite right - THE COURTS! - we can untangle a whole lot of mess but those liberal whack jobs who legislate from the bench - because they can’t win in the legislature - are there for life.
[quote]bald eagle wrote:
Bill Roberts wrote:
Gore had been on the environmental kick for some time – had for example written in his book prior to the 2000 election that it would be better if gasoline prices were $5/gallon and they should be made this high because this supposedly would help the environment – but it was not he figured out how he could personally enrich himself with carbon trading schemes (from which he has obtained I believe it is over $100 million dollars for himself now, or if not yet over then approaching it) that he really went big-time with it.
The lack of any actual warming in the last 10 years – or for that matter that the peak of “global warming” was no warmer than the 1950’s were and not as warm as say roughly the 10th to 14th Centuries when Greenland was green – has been no impediment to Gore, thanks to the media being in the tank for alleged global warming. It has only been necessary to change the name to “climate change,” so that either hot or cold, more rain or less, more snow or less, no matter what happens everything is to be taken as proof that Gore is right and that carbon trading schemes putting money into his pocket are necessary to “save the planet.”
the facts do not matter with these people - it is an anticapitalism agenda at the roots and a religion.
but you are right - more hurricanes = global warming / climate change
fewer hurricanes = global warming / climate change
It is irritating to listen to.
[/quote]
I know what you mean! But those damn whiners in the Maldives keep complaining, bastards.
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
50x wrote:
I don’t see her as inexperienced. She has run a business a city and a state.
If it must be a question, woul you rather have an inexperienced President or an inexperienced Vice president?
On the job training is never good from the front.
50x
McCain is a cancer survivor, yesterday he was 72 years old, look at him he is in a daze. He is losing weight which may be good it could also be assign of stress.
Obama is a Chicago politics survivor, if there is such a thing. The other day he was 47. Look at him, he’s drunk on his own celebrity. If he loses any more weight he’ll disappear which would be good, but would only be a sign of some other socialist to follow.[/quote]
He also thinks he’s Jesus or something.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
Mick28 wrote:
McCain needed a woman for his VP, as I stated about 30 days ago. Is this the right woman? It could be, but heaven help McCain if she comes off as being even a bit weak in the brian department. They will then characterize her as a “Barbie Doll” and it will be all over. If she can stand with the big dogs then she’s a great pick.
She already has stood with the big dogs. She turned back the Bridge to Nowhere, sued the Federal Gov’t, and sold the Governor’s GS5 on Ebay.
There is not a single report of her bending, or waffling on any issue, or running from any fight.
[/quote]
Yep.