Mark Rippetoe Success Story

[quote]Captnoblivious wrote:

[quote]optheta wrote:
Chris Colucci hows that Kool Aid taste?

Notice a trend in all those pictures? The guys start with defined abs then they are gone and they just look a little bit chubbier.

Ohh and everybody and there mom can bench 300lbs like its nothing after doing starting strength.[/quote]

Shit, he just put up a motherfucking cool-aid grand stand.

Good point! Most of those pics could be manipulated through pumped/unpumped photos. [/quote]
If it’s so easy to manipulate the body for pictures, why do you not look like you lift in your avatar? Your T-Nation nickanme is definitely appropriate.

[quote]knotginuwhine wrote:
I disagree with point one because I feel the exact popularity of these programs, that you speak of, indicates that “most people” don’t want to train like body builders.
Many people want to train like athletes.
That is part of personal experience as far as why I began training utilizing a strength focused program.
[/quote]

This should be emphasized.

It is especially humorous that these guys will shit all over Rippetoe’s Starting Strength for “aesthetic purposes” (seriously, is there a gayer phrase in the English language than talking about how aesthetic you are?) yet are hanging on every sentence coming out of CT’s mouth (who has been advocating training for performance for bodybuilding purposes for a couple years now).

[quote]csulli wrote:

[quote]optheta wrote:
Notice a trend in all those pictures? The guys start with defined abs then they are gone and they just look a little bit chubbier.[/quote]

I thought the bodybuilding forum was better than this :confused:

So it’s all about skinny guys keeping their abs year round and not having any muscle?[/quote]

LOL you seriously thought it was better than that? Is this your first time in here? I regret opening up topics on here almost as much as the PWI forum (though not quite).

The real funny thing in here is how few of these guys with actual bodybuilders as their avatar actually look like they lift weights, or even have pictures of themselves to show their “progress”. You will be hard pressed to find photos of these know it alls with their impressive physiques anyhwere on this site.

[quote]aeyogi wrote:
I have read Starting Strength. Most of the book focuses on lifting technique; however, the programming is designed to provide a strength base for athletes.

If you use a strength program and want bodybuilding results, you have chosen the wrong tool for your goals. Blame your discrimination not the program, and quit shitting on an excellent strength coach.[/quote]

This is a good point.

I hate the fact that most people are on one end of the pole and just sit there and miss posts like this and do not debate it. Every program has a different purpose then the next and is tailored to the individual. Paulie did not like SS and found bodybuilding split to be his kind of workout and it obviously paid off. To say that SS does not give results is crazy. Everyone is looking at the body image of the guys that Chris posted but look at the lifting numbers. It’s awesome how much strength that these guys have gained from such a program. You are not going to be a strong power lifter if you do bodybuilder split and you are not going to be aesthetic if you work on a power lifting workout. edit: (with some exceptions of some individuals)

Yes, it probably is a bad place to talk about SS in a bodybuilding forum because it is not meant to make someone a bodybuilder.

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]knotginuwhine wrote:
I disagree with point one because I feel the exact popularity of these programs, that you speak of, indicates that “most people” don’t want to train like body builders.
Many people want to train like athletes.
That is part of personal experience as far as why I began training utilizing a strength focused program.[/quote]

Well, that’s exactly what I was talking about. Most beginners in my experience, hear ‘bodybuilder’ and they thing of huge veiny guys, and they say don’t want that. When they think of something like the “world’s strongest man”, all they see are fat guys. But when they think athletes, or, hell, Navy SEALs, they see something they want.

So, naturally, when they see something that says “train like an athlete” or “train like a special forces operator” (cough Pavel with his kettlebells cough), and that’s what they latch onto. Somewhere after that point, many get sucked into the whole “functional strength” rhetoric without realizing it.

Most people who’ve never lifted seem to be far more interested in looking like a guy out of Men’s Health than a guy out of M&F. [/quote] You either hang around some low esteem or low expectation guys. I never see this, and the only time I ever hear somebody say they want to look like (the old) Men’s Health models is when they think they can never be as big as the M&F guys.

SS strength and other programs are more popular because you are on this site, they market better, and many of the advanced coaches are too bored to do another beginner program. There are other beginner bodybuilding programs and you would find out they are remarkably similar. Notice I said Beginner.

I can’t agree with Sento and his comments on the pictures Chris posted. While those are not tv style “outstanding” progress pictures, but they are what I’ve seen for people that are in the process of growing. I would definitely like to see all the people everyone here has seen that looks so drastically different after 7 weeks or 2 months.

[quote]Captnoblivious wrote:
Rippetoe looks like an over sized coyote turd. His program is terrible. Read the book, burned it for firewood!

(edited for grammar)[/quote]

Actually I think Rippetoe (his face) looks like a much older version of Bud Bundy from the sitcom Married with Children.

[quote]Sentoguy wrote:
Honestly, in those first couple before and after pics you posted Chris, the guys just look a little shlubbier; neither looks any better from a bodybuilding perspective (which is the forum we are posting in). The third guy looked emaciated in the before picture and yes definitely looks more filled out in the after photos, and the fourth guy definitely gained some weight in his after photo (how much of it was muscle is tough to tell, but whatever).

But like you said, Starting Strength is a strength building program, not a bodybuilding program. If my son was undersized and wanted to get into football, I might have him start with SS or WS4SB (or some other strength oriented program). But if he wanted to look better and get more muscular, I would not pick either of those programs. The criticism of SS isn’t that it sucks as a strength building program, it’s that a poor choice for bodybuilding.

Finally, while I acknowledge that Rippetoe is a respected strength coach, has been coaching athletes for many years, and is still pretty strong for his age, none of those things really mean anything when discussing how he looks from a bodybuilding perspective. That would be like someone saying that Oprah would make a poor choice for a Victoria Secret Model and me coming back with “yeah, but she’s super rich and does tons of good things for charity”. One has nothing to do with the other and although perhaps good in their own right do not in any way counter the original statement.[/quote]

Actually, by American black female standards, Oprah is on the small side and could pull off the Victoria Secret Model gig.

[quote]Captnoblivious wrote:

[quote]Chris Colucci wrote:

[quote]Captnoblivious wrote:
Rippetoe looks like and over sized coyote turd.[/quote]
As a 56-year old who’s been coaching people since you and I were in diapers, has the respect of the overwhelming majority of his peers (professionals, not armchair trainers), and still has a 500 deadlift, I’m sure he’s heart-broken that you don’t find him aesthetic enough.

You’re saying this based on your experience as a coach, your experience trying the program for a few months, or your experience as mountain biker/rock climber with a few years of lifting under your belt?

Way to sound cool in front of the big guys. It probably worked.[/quote]

The starting strength debate has been rehashed over and over again. At this point, there is really nothing to debate. Defending SS in the body building forum is pointless. The only credit I would give rip is for staying strong and doing a good job selling his product.

I find it interesting that you feel the need to defend another coach with a sub par physique. Practicing what you preach goes along way to validate your product or service. I would much rather read an article by Nate Myaki or Clay Height than a has been powerlifter with a 50 inch waist.

As the saying goes- “Form dictates function.”

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:

[quote]knotginuwhine wrote:
I disagree with point one because I feel the exact popularity of these programs, that you speak of, indicates that “most people” don’t want to train like body builders.
Many people want to train like athletes.
That is part of personal experience as far as why I began training utilizing a strength focused program.
[/quote]

This should be emphasized.

It is especially humorous that these guys will shit all over Rippetoe’s Starting Strength for “aesthetic purposes” (seriously, is there a gayer phrase in the English language than talking about how aesthetic you are?) yet are hanging on every sentence coming out of CT’s mouth (who has been advocating training for performance for bodybuilding purposes for a couple years now).

[/quote]

That’s because CT is more AESTHETIC than Rippetoe and that’s what sells in this superficial world. I remember CT mentioning that people gave him less credit/value when he was training as an Olympic lifter (and looked the part) versus when he switched over to the bodybuilding arena.

[quote]In10s wrote:

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:

[quote]knotginuwhine wrote:
I disagree with point one because I feel the exact popularity of these programs, that you speak of, indicates that “most people” don’t want to train like body builders.
Many people want to train like athletes.
That is part of personal experience as far as why I began training utilizing a strength focused program.
[/quote]

This should be emphasized.

It is especially humorous that these guys will shit all over Rippetoe’s Starting Strength for “aesthetic purposes” (seriously, is there a gayer phrase in the English language than talking about how aesthetic you are?) yet are hanging on every sentence coming out of CT’s mouth (who has been advocating training for performance for bodybuilding purposes for a couple years now).

[/quote]

That’s because CT is more AESTHETIC than Rippetoe and that’s what sells in this superficial world. I remember CT mentioning that people gave him less credit/value when he was training as an Olympic lifter (and looked the part) versus when he switched over to the bodybuilding arena.[/quote]

I’m not denying that. But this thread and 99% of them like it are spent bashing STARTING STRENGTH (the program) not MARK RIPPETOE (the coach). CT could tell people to run Starting Strength to get aesthetic (again, I feel gay using that word) and they would trip over themselves running to the squat rack. Hell he basically has. Have you ever seen HP Mass? Hrmm…squatting 3x/week in the 3 rep range, with multiple sets? Hell it is nothing but a powerlifting program from the 80’s!

[quote]caveman101 wrote:

[quote]paulieserafini wrote:

[quote]caveman101 wrote:
Ripptoes 5x5 and similar is great if you’re trying to coach a bunch of newbs and bring them up to at least BW x10 squats. But GOMAD is the biggest bullshit ever.[/quote]

Dude, I sometimes wonder how many people’s lives he has ruined with GOMAD[/quote]

Drinking a ton of milk while being told to squat for a mere 75 reps a week (at sub 200lb sets certinley messed up my first year[/quote]

^^^This guy is bashing the program and doesn’t even know how to run it.

“Rippetoes 5x5”

“75 reps per week”

Unless things have changed in the SS world, the program is 3x5 squats three times per week. 5x5 is a different program. Seriously dude if you didn’t run the fucking program correctly, you don’t get to go on forums and complain about it.

[quote]optheta wrote:

[quote]MickyGee wrote:
I find it humorous that I was Googling “rippetoe success stories” to find the alleged article where he brags about getting some kid fat, and this is one of the first few links… lol[/quote]

Ohh and gotta love the way in which they throw around 300lb Bench and 400+ squat around that program too. Apparently every goober who starts that program after 2 years his benching 3x5 for 315lbs and 400lbs squatting.

Seems legit.
[/quote]

It only seems “non-legit” to someone that doesn’t have the talent or work ethic to make it happen.

You’ve already established that you’re not strong. Do you have any pictures that lends credence the notion that you aren’t focused on strength and rather about size (or ‘aesthetics’ LOL)? Or are you just another forum-hanger trying to break the 5,000 post barrier (mostly in off-topic threads)?

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:

[quote]In10s wrote:

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:

[quote]knotginuwhine wrote:
I disagree with point one because I feel the exact popularity of these programs, that you speak of, indicates that “most people” don’t want to train like body builders.
Many people want to train like athletes.
That is part of personal experience as far as why I began training utilizing a strength focused program.
[/quote]

This should be emphasized.

It is especially humorous that these guys will shit all over Rippetoe’s Starting Strength for “aesthetic purposes” (seriously, is there a gayer phrase in the English language than talking about how aesthetic you are?) yet are hanging on every sentence coming out of CT’s mouth (who has been advocating training for performance for bodybuilding purposes for a couple years now).

[/quote]

That’s because CT is more AESTHETIC than Rippetoe and that’s what sells in this superficial world. I remember CT mentioning that people gave him less credit/value when he was training as an Olympic lifter (and looked the part) versus when he switched over to the bodybuilding arena.[/quote]

I’m not denying that. But this thread and 99% of them like it are spent bashing STARTING STRENGTH (the program) not MARK RIPPETOE (the coach). CT could tell people to run Starting Strength to get aesthetic (again, I feel gay using that word) and they would trip over themselves running to the squat rack. Hell he basically has. Have you ever seen HP Mass? Hrmm…squatting 3x/week in the 3 rep range, with multiple sets? Hell it is nothing but a powerlifting program from the 80’s!

[/quote]

I still think Rippetoe looks like an older version of Bud Bundy (face wise).

People shouldn’t bash Starting Strength until they truly understand/accept the difference in lift-specific strength acquisition and the dramatic results in before and after physique transformation. They really are apples and oranges whose line of division has been blurred.


.


Toss Christina Appelgate’s salad for 5 x 5!!!

[quote]In10s wrote:
People shouldn’t bash Starting Strength until they truly understand/accept the difference in lift-specific strength acquisition and the dramatic results in before and after physique transformation. They really are apples and oranges whose line of division has been blurred.[/quote]

How dare you suggest people think for themselves and not follow the mob mentality of all the other faceless, pictureless, anonymous brotards out there?

[quote]In10s wrote:

[quote]Captnoblivious wrote:

[quote]Chris Colucci wrote:

[quote]Captnoblivious wrote:
Rippetoe looks like and over sized coyote turd.[/quote]
As a 56-year old who’s been coaching people since you and I were in diapers, has the respect of the overwhelming majority of his peers (professionals, not armchair trainers), and still has a 500 deadlift, I’m sure he’s heart-broken that you don’t find him aesthetic enough.

You’re saying this based on your experience as a coach, your experience trying the program for a few months, or your experience as mountain biker/rock climber with a few years of lifting under your belt?

Way to sound cool in front of the big guys. It probably worked.[/quote]

The starting strength debate has been rehashed over and over again. At this point, there is really nothing to debate. Defending SS in the body building forum is pointless. The only credit I would give rip is for staying strong and doing a good job selling his product.

I find it interesting that you feel the need to defend another coach with a sub par physique. Practicing what you preach goes along way to validate your product or service. I would much rather read an article by Nate Myaki or Clay Height than a has been powerlifter with a 50 inch waist.

As the saying goes- “Form dictates function.”
[/quote]

I think for 50 Rip looks pretty decent, and 500 @ 50 is still deadlifting.
See back not that long ago, in the year 2000 if not even more recently, it was a challenge to find NON-bodybuilding training facts.
Westside book of methods wasn’t out, and the Russian stuff wasn’t translated,and if it was no bookstores had it, and allow me to assure you I SCOURED for literature, I didn’t even know PL uSA existed let alone where I would get it.
But my bookstore, remember bookstores? Had VOLUMES of Weider; VOLUMES, all Arnolds books all that other swill from the magazines, that is ALL you could find, but they had a thousand books all that might has well been written by the same guy, and they all said we should lift like professional BB’s have determined most efficient, never mind they aren’t any different than you, and wouldn’t dream of drugs.
If you didn’t play on a football team a strength coach wasn’t going to help you.
ALL you could find was Weider principles, that’s it.
You’d ask your buddies how do you lift?
And they’d tell you 3-5 sets 8-12 reps body part or push pull maybe some drop sets or rest pause.
Weight lifting college classes 3-5 sets 8-12 reps body part or push pull drop sets or rest pause.
Now lets say you did that for years, and you attained your size and strength plateaus, and you’re a smart, studious, knowledgeable person who can just FEEL you aren’t doing something right, and you have no interest in banana hammocks and men staring at you in said hammock, and you’d like to put off the vitamin-T until you’re dick needs it, which hopefully will still be some years God willing.
The knowledge of you’re body that tells you that you can do more is correct, and when you learn that you are pissed you didn’t learn it sooner, you are pissed that you KNEW it and SEARCHED and couldn’t find it.
I could find a myriad of porn or any illegal drug or any weapon, a billion cat pictures, but real STRENGTH training literature was hard to find, and extremely dense if you did find it, or Russian.
There are a myriad of techniques to program past plateaus.
So if you were like me and I know this experience has been had by many, there is definitely some anger there, (I feel absolutely justified), at being propagandized for so long by the machine that I knew was lying to me and I could do nothing but take it.
But, it’s all better now all the info is a click away, shit even the Russian stuff is translated, condensed and free.
And I am much happier, though to be fair that may be the divorce.
BTW I’ve never done Starting Strength or read it but I know the principles and in my experience and opinion they are light years ahead of the Weider pap for non-cyclist beginners.

[quote]knotginuwhine wrote:
BTW I’ve never done Starting Strength or read it but I know the principles and in my experience and opinion they are light years ahead of the Weider pap for non-cyclist beginners.[/quote]

Why do you say that? Serious question.

What have you seen is particularly wrong with the Weider principles?

[quote]In10s wrote:

[quote]Chris Colucci wrote:

[quote]Captnoblivious wrote:
Rippetoe looks like and over sized coyote turd.[/quote]
As a 56-year old who’s been coaching people since you and I were in diapers, has the respect of the overwhelming majority of his peers (professionals, not armchair trainers), and still has a 500 deadlift, I’m sure he’s heart-broken that you don’t find him aesthetic enough.

You’re saying this based on your experience as a coach, your experience trying the program for a few months, or your experience as mountain biker/rock climber with a few years of lifting under your belt?

Way to sound cool in front of the big guys. It probably worked.[/quote]

The starting strength debate has been rehashed over and over again. At this point, there is really nothing to debate. Defending SS in the body building forum is pointless. The only credit I would give rip is for staying strong and doing a good job selling his product.

I find it interesting that you feel the need to defend another coach with a sub par physique. Practicing what you preach goes along way to validate your product or service. I would much rather read an article by Nate Myaki or Clay Height than a has been powerlifter with a 50 inch waist.

As the saying goes- “Form dictates function.”[/quote]

For goodness sakes if you want to quote the deadlift video post use this one. I have fixed the quotes for you all.

[quote]csulli wrote:

For goodness sakes if you want to quote the deadlift video post use this one. I have fixed the quotes for you all.[/quote]

That drives me nuts. I used to think people were morons and just fucked up the quote, but its actually because T-Nat’s top of the line, super duper awesome forum software doesn’t put a carriage return between the video link and the end quote brackets, so you end up with skewed garbage. I’m sure they will address it in a forthcoming software update by the year 2015.