Hey all, Ive got a bone to pick…I havent been on the forum lately b/c Ive been working on some things that you all will appreciate when done, but I gotta say something about this low carb dieting fad that’s running rampant. I keep getting emails about and keep reading posts on this and other forums about the anabolic diet, the cyclic ketogenic diet, Poliquin and Serrano’s diets. All of these diets share the same principles (essentially). And when I say this, Im not referring to the fact that they all make you hungry all the time, the fact that they all make you pissed off all the time, the fact that they make you feel like shit all the time, or the fact that they essentially ensure that you probably will lose muscle and the fact that you certainly dont gain muscle while on them. Oh wait a minute…yes I am referring to all that!
Now let me clarify before you take out your rocks and stone me for heresy. These diets are fine for a month or so. Maybe even two months after you've gotten fatter than you should have and then need to lean out. But guys are following them indefinately. And they are trying to make them a lifestyle. I have BIG issues with that.
First, although these diets are offered up by “experts”, I can assure you that there is little to no scientific data to support them for use in the long term. There is especially no data to support claims of anticatabolism and anabolism, etc. In addition, taking 50-100 g of glutamine per day is also completely theoretical and downright physiologically scary. Please dont make me out to be too conservative here b/c Im anything but that. There is nothing conservative about trying to help guys see that these diets are too extreme and might not help put on any muscle at all. My goal is to show people that muscle gain is contingent on adequate carbs, plenty of protein, and lots of good fats.
What I am contending is that these low carb diets may be counterproductive but at the very least, may not offer any advantage over a more sane approach like 40%p, 30%c, and 30%f. Now, in my book, if they offer no benefit over a diet that does have carbs in it, they are a huge failure because of the suffering that low carb dieting entails.
My point is that readers of t-mag and other pubs seem to be brainwashed that low carb dieting is the only way to get big, or is it ripped, or is it both? See what I mean? People think these diets can get them big or ripped or both. Which is it? I contend that they wont get you big. And I contend that although they may help you lose fat in the short run (1 month or so), they are counterproductive if followed long term. So basically why not trying an eating program that is effective over the long haul? This way you dont have to low carb diet away the fat…go nuts while doing this…rebound afterwards and pig out on carbs…get fat again…and repeat the cycle. Im talking about a lifestyle diet that is gradually shifted during mass phases and diet phases, but universally follows sound eating principles.
Or you could just keep feeling like shit, low carb dieting, feeling guilty cause you cant stick to it for months on end, etc.
God, I feel like the "Stop the Insanity" chick! But I do think people are being misled with the low carb diets and need a better approach.