[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
And let’s not forget that many genetically gifted people CAN’T make it in the entertainment, modeling, fashion, and sports industries because:
- there’s a limited amount of spots
- they didn’t get lucky or “discovered”
- they lack the proper resources or backing
- or–get this–they’re stupid or stinking lazy (like many bodybuilders). [/quote]
So what are you saying?
[/quote]
Because of your incoherency and poor communication skills, I don’t know how else to communicate with you. So I give up. Happy?[/quote]
Poor communication? You stated facts as if they self evidently prove something without explaining a conclusion.
Kinda like just publishing a scientific paper by sending in a load of results and a letter saying “Speaks for itself”
[/quote]
Conclusion: No naturals with 80 to 100 pounds of training induced muscle!
Conclusion: No natural, 225+#, 6% bodyfat holding, 5’7" man.
Conclusion: NO ONE with an advanced or elite-level bodybuilder’s (keyword: ADVANCED and ELITE) physique just from genetics and doing soe manual labor.
[/quote]
So whats the limit then? Where is the point where you draw the line? Put a number to it.
As in, maximum bodyfat, weight and LBM for a sub 5 10 natural lifter.
The tension mounts…
Duck the post or answer? Choices choices…
[/quote]
You don’t give a rat’s ass about anything I have to say, and although I thought you were an OK guy who I simply disagreed with, I know longer think that. Again, if you think I’m wrong on evertyhing and get off on trying to insulting me, go on with yourself. Very respectful thing to do to denigrate my degree and profession.
Thanks!